Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-7fx5l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-22T03:15:11.634Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Flow Laws For Glacier Ice: Comparison Of Numerical Predictions And Field Measurements

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

C.J. Van Der Veen
Affiliation:
Byrd Polar Research Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210–1308, U.S.A.
I.M. Whillans
Affiliation:
Byrd Polar Research Center, and Department of Geology and Mineralogy, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210–1308, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Ice flow along the 20 km long strain network up-stream of the Dye 3 bore hole in Greenland is studied in detail. By solving the force-balance equations and using selected flow laws, stresses and strain-rates are calculated throughout the section of the ice sheet. The validity of the results is evaluated by comparison with the velocity profile derived from bore-hole-tilting measurements, and with observed surface strain-rates. A number of constitutive relations are tried and most predict a velocity profile at the bore-hole site that is in good agreement with that observed, if appropriate enhancement factors are used. However, there are major discrepancies between modelled and measured surface strain-rates. Use of Nye’s generalization of Glen’s flow law, or an anisotropic constitutive relation, requires unrealistically large along-flow variations in the enhancement factor. Inclusion of normal stress effects can lead to much better agreement, but it is possible that other processes, such as dynamic recrystallization or primary creep, should be included in the constitutive relation of polar ice.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1990
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of Greenland showing the location of Dye 3 strain net, and detailed map of the Dye 3 area (after Dahl-Jensen (1985), based on data from Overgaard and Gundestrup (1985)). The three straight lines represent the three grid lines and the dashed line the estimated flow line leading to the Dye 3 bore hole (cf. Whillans and others, 1987). Cross-lines indicate stations along the central line of the strain grid used in this study. Open circles denote satellite-tracking stations (Whillans and others, 1984).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Measured surface elevations relative to the elevation at the bore hole (from Whillans and others, 1984) and basal topography (from Jezek and others, 1985a; Overgaard and Gundestrup, 1985) along the center line of the strain grid.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Temperature measured in the Dye 3 bore hole (from Gundestrup and Hansen, 1984) and enhancement factors at depth calculated by Dahl-Jensen (1985) for the Dye 3 bore hole. The vertical scale gives the dimensionless depth, s = (h - z)/H, in which h represents surface elevation, H ice thickness, and z elevation.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Driving stress for the full thickness and calculated basal drag along the Dye 3 flow line, using Glen’s flow law (n = 3, A0 = 4.0 × 105 kPa−3 year−1, Q = 60 kJ mol−1) including the enhancement factors shown in Figure 3, and using the anisotropy law of Johnson (1977).

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Calculated velocity profile at the bore-hole site. The curve labelled “Enh” corresponds to the calculation based on Glen’s law including enhancement factors, and that labelled “An” to the calculation based on Johnson’s anisotropic law. Velocities derived from bore-hole-tilting measurements (from Gundestrup and Hansen, 1984) are indicated by crosses. Velocities have been non-dimensionalized as fu(s) [u(s) - u(0)]/u(0).

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Surface stretching and surface velocities along the Dye 3 flow line. The heavy curves are the results of force-balance calculations, while the thin curves are data from Whillans and others (1984).

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Results of a downward force-balance calculation using enhancement factors, with the depth of the Wisconsin ice layer fixed at 15% of the ice thickness along the entire flow line, and prescribed zero basal velocities. The upper panel shows calculated basal drag, the middle panel enhancement factors required to satisfy force balance, and the lower panel the basal elevation with the linear trend subtracted (n = 3, A0 = 4.0 × 105 kPa−3 year−1, Q = kJ mol−1).

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Basal drag and shear parameter γ required to satisfy force balance, when zero velocities are prescribed, and the depth of the Wisconsin layer is fixed at 15% of the ice thickness, along the entire flow line. All three curves are the result of a downward calculation based on Johnson’s anisotropy law. The longitudinal stretching parameter a was assigned the isotropic value 1 (curves labelled 1), or increased linearly from a minimum value at the surface (0.05 for curves 2, and 0.005 for curves 3), to the isotropic value at the top of the Wisconsin layer (and constant below). The value of the rate factor used in all three calculations is A0 = 4 × 105 kPa−3 year−1.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Enhancement factors required to satisfy force balance, when zero basal velocities are prescribed, and the depth of the Wisconsin layer is fixed at 15% of the ice thickness, along the entire flow line. The upper curve applies to a downward calculation based on Nye’s generalization of Glen’s flow law (n = 3, A0 = 4.0 × 105 kPa−3 year−1, Q = 60 kJ mol−1), the middle curve to that using flow law I of Man and Sun (1987) (A1 = 100), and the lower curve pertains to the calculation based on flow law II of Man and Sun (1987) (A1 = 1.15).

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Driving stress. Values are obtained by gridding measured surface elevations to a regular grid with a spacing of 0.455 km, using cubic-spline interpolation. These values are assigned to four numerical grids with increasing spacing (0.455, 0.91, 1.82, and 2.73 km, respectively, from top to bottom), by omitting in-between values. These resulting surface elevations are used to calculate the driving stress. Tick marks on the horizontal bars under each curve indicate positions of the numerical grid points.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Second derivative of the surface velocity (). Values are obtained similarly as for Figure 10.

Figure 11

Fig. 12. Calculated patterns of basal drag from four calculations differing only in the horizontal grid spacing used. Value of the rate factor used is A0 = 2 × 105 kPa−3 year−1, n = 3, and an Arrhenius-type temperature-dependence with the temperature as shown in Figure 3. The conventional generalized flow law is used and the enhancement factor equals 1 at all depths.

Figure 12

Fig. 13. Effect of Gaussian smoothing on the pattern of basal drag calculated using the smallest horizontal grid spacing (0.455 km). Panel a shows the unsmoothed pattern, as in the upper panel of Figure 12; panel b that was obtained after Gaussian smoothing with a band width of twice the grid spacing, and panel c after smoothing with a band width of four times the grid spacing. Panel d shows the calculated basal drag from the calculation using a horizontal grid spacing of 1.82 km, as in the third panel of Figure 12.