Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-r8qmj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-16T20:00:40.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Does a business-like letter written for a general practitioner meet the standards for patients?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Julian Mason  and
Daphne Rice
Julian Mason
Affiliation:
West Oxfordshire Community Mental Health Team for Older Adults, Welch Way, Witney, Oxfordshire OX28 6JQ, email: jdtmason@msn.com
Daphne Rice
Affiliation:
Newbury Community Mental Health Team for Older Adults, Beechcroft, Berkshire
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
Aims and Method

To gauge the acceptability of copying a business-like clinic letter for general practitioners, written by a doctor working in the Newbury Community Mental Health Team for Older Adults. Between August 2004 and March 2006 every letter written by each doctor was stored electronically. The letters contained a clear statement of the diagnosis, the active problems and a bullet-point care plan. Any concerns or reactions to the letters were documented as they were received. Between September and October 2006, 50 service user or carer recipients of the letters were sent a questionnaire, checking whether the letter met standards of clarity, helpfulness and content.

Results

Over 20 months 427 service users and carers received a total of 731 letters. One carer asked for the letter not to be sent in future; four carers asked for details of the letter to be modified; in only one was the content of the letter to the general practitioner modified before it was sent to the service user. The questionnaire about the suitability of the clinic letter had a 90% reply rate and all respondents said the letters were clear, understandable and that their content was of no surprise to them.

Clinical Implications

This report of a successful use of a frank business-like letter copied to service users or carers should be understood in the context of the following factors: the doctor who wrote them was familiar with and confident about the clinical work and comfortable with the style of the letter; he had a good rapport with a generally well-educated population and positive support from his colleagues. With these factors in place, the direct style of the letter was well received by patients and carers.

Information

Type
Original papers
Information
Psychiatric Bulletin , Volume 32 , Issue 7 , July 2008 , pp. 259 - 262
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2008

References

Boaden, R. & Harris, C. (2005) Copying letters to patients – will it happen? Family Practice, 22, 141–143.Google Scholar
Cape, J., Harvey, K., Johnson, S., et al (2005) Patients' views of letters their psychiatrists and psychologists send to referrers. Journal of Mental Health, 14, 369–382.Google Scholar
Combe, G., Short, C. & Stephens, H. (2006) Copying letters to families: attitudes and experiences of child and adolescent psychiatrists. Psychiatric Bulletin, 30, 413–415.Google Scholar
Department of Health (2003) Copying Letters to Patients. Good Practice Guidelines. Department of Health.Google Scholar
Huline-Dickens, S. (2004) Evaluation of copying letters to patients. Psychiatric Bulletin, 28, 304–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kalbe, E., Kessler, T., Calabrese, P., et al (2004) Dem Tect: a new sensitive cognitive screening test to support the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment and early dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 19, 136–143.Google Scholar
Lask, B. (2004) Copying letters to patients. Psychiatric Bulletin, 28, 426.Google Scholar
Lloyd, G. (2004) Medical records: copying letters to patients. Psychiatric Bulletin, 28, 57–59.Google Scholar
Marzanski, M., Padmapriya, M. & Coupe, T. (2005) Copying letters to patients: a study of patients' views. Psychiatric Bulletin, 29, 56–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nandhra, H., Murray, G., Hymas, N., et al (2004) Medical records: doctors' and patients' experiences of copying letters to patients. Psychiatric Bulletin, 28, 40–42.Google Scholar
Okolo, D. (2004) Copying letters to patients. Psychiatric Bulletin, 28, 343.Google Scholar
Royal College of Psychiatrists (2004) Copying Clinical Letters to Patients. Guidelines for Old Age Psychiatrists. Royal College of Psychiatrists Faculty for the Psychiatry of Old Age.Google Scholar
Sawhey, I., Tajer, A. & Morgan, J. (2007) Copying clinical letters to patients – views of people with learning disabilities and their carers. British Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 53, 17–23.Google Scholar
Spiessl, H., Rothbauer, J. & Cording, C. (2006) Discharge letters addressed to patients – confidence enhancement and psychoeducation (Entlassungsbriefe an Patienten – Vertrauensbildende Maßnahme und Psychoedukation). Psychiatrische-Praxis, 33, 296–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sturge, C. (2004) Sharing information/disclosure. Psychiatric Bulletin, 28, 304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subotsky, F. (2005) Copying letters to patients: issues for child and adolescent mental health services. Psychiatric Bulletin, 29, 201–203.Google Scholar
Thair, T., Bisson, J. & Wilcox, J. (2005) Copying clinic letters to psychiatric patients. Psychiatric Bulletin, 29, 327–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treloar, A. & Adamis, D. (2005) Sharing letters with patients and their carers: problems and outcomes in elderly and dementia care. Psychiatric Bulletin, 29, 330–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uher, R. & Timehin, C. (2006) Managing patient's information in a community mental health team. Psychiatric Bulletin, 30, 172–174 Google Scholar
Wald, C., Fahy, M., Walker, Z., et al (2003) What to tell dementia caregivers – the rule of threes. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18, 313–317.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Mason and Rice supplementary material

Supplementary Material

Download Mason and Rice supplementary material(File)
File 478 Bytes
Supplementary material: PDF

Mason and Rice supplementary material

Supplementary Material

Download Mason and Rice supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 20.2 KB

A correction has been issued for this article:

Correction

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.