Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-nqrmd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-20T16:36:59.140Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Melting, runoff and the formation of frozen lakes in a mixed snow and blue-ice field in Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Jan-Gunnar Winther
Affiliation:
Norwegian Polar Institute, Middelthunsgate 29. Box 5072 Majorstua, N-0301 Oslo, Norway
Hallgeir Elvehøy
Affiliation:
Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Administration, Middelthunsgate 29, Box 5091 Majorstua, N-0301 Oslo, Norway
Carl Egede Bøggild
Affiliation:
The Geological Survey of Greenland, Øster Voldgade 10, DK-1350 Copenhagen, Denmark
Knut Sand
Affiliation:
SINTEF Norwegien Hydrotechnical Laboratory, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
Glen Liston
Affiliation:
Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, U. S. A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Large-scale melting phenomena such as meltwater drainage channels and meltwater accumulation basins of frozen lakes were surveyed on the land ice mass in Jutulgryta, Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica, during the Norwegian Antarctic Research Expedition in 1989–90 (NARE 1989–90). The largest frozen lake that was observed was close to 1 km in width. These melting features were also detected in a Landsat Thematic Mapper image recorded on 12 February 1990. Then, during NARE 1993–94, a 5year glaciological programme was started in this area. In spite of negative air temperatures and the presence of a frozen ice surface, sub-surface melting and runoff were found within the uppermost metre in blue-ice fields. The sub-surface melting is a consequence of solar radiative penetration and absorption within the ice, i.e. the “solid-state-greenhouse effect”. Temperatures in blue ice were about 6°C higher than for snow. Internal melt and meltwater transport were observed throughout the 1 month of measurements. The conditions for active melting in Jutulgryta are probably marginal. A slight increase of air temperatures can result in more “classical” surface melting, whereas a cooling may disable sub-surface melting. Studies of how the extent and characteristics of the melting features change with time can be particularly valuable as indicators of climate change. This ongoing programme clearly identifies the importance of analyzing how these melting features originate, of mapping their present areal distribution, of determining how sensitive they are to climate change and of Studying changes in the past and possible changes in the future.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1996
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Location and surface topography of the NARE 1993-94 study area in Futulgryta, Dronning Maud Land. Temperature profiles and stratigraphy from typical locations in blue ice and snow are shown. While some surface melting takes place in this area, the main melt activity seems to take place sub-surface in blue-ice fields due to the “solid-state-greenhouse effect”. Typically, the upper 5–10cm of the blue-ice fields remain frozen while the sub-surface melt layer is about 0.5 m thick. The frozen lake shown (lake Jutulsjøen) is fed by meltwater that flows into an unfrozen layer that lies between the underlying main ice body of the frozen lake and the top ice cover. This means that the “solid-state-greenhouse effect” is present at the frozen lake as well. The top ice cover of lake Jutulsjøen was typically 10–20 cm thick, whereas the underlying layer of waler had a thickness varying between 40 and 83cm.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. The dry meltwater-drainage channel surveyed on 13 February 1990. The channel was about 5 m wide and 0.5 m deep, indicating that a significant water discharge must have been drained through this channel. It is unknown whether this flow was produced by “classical” surface melting or by an outburst of meltwater from an upstream frozen lake. The frozen lake and its island of snow located in the middle is seen in the background (from Winther, 1993).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Colour composite histogram-equalised image of Landsat TM band 5 (red). TM band 4 (green) and TM band 2 (blue) from 12 February 1990. Note the frozen lakes and drainage channels emphasised in the lower right by TM band 5 (red) (from Winther, 1993).

Figure 3

Fig. 4. The Jutulgryta area with its mixed snow and blue-ice fields. The mountains closest to Jutulgryta are located on the other side of the Jutulstraumen ice stream about 80km to the west, and can be seen in the background.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Albedo variations along a 7.1 m long transect that crosses a partly drained melt pool (∆), and at four locations on Lake Jutulsjøen (*). The figure visualises the large span in surface albedo that occurs in this area. Albedo values are integrated numbers obtained from 182 discrete measurements in the wavelength region from 372 to 899 nm. Each measurement represents a bandwidth of approximately 3nm. Measurements were acquired using the portable SE590 spectroradiometer. The field of view of the sensor is 6° and the surface area covered by the sensor represents about 14 cm2 for the measurements presented here (from Bøggild and others. 1995).

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Measured sub-surface temperature profiles in snowpacks and blue-ice fields in Jutulgryta. The significantly higher ice temperatures (about 6°C) at stakes 50 and 53 refer to registrations in exposed blue ice (from Bøggild and others, 1995).

Figure 6

Fig. 7. The photo shows a typical profile in a blue-ice field where sub-surface melting and runoff take place. Note that the surface remains frozen while the runoff layer or aquifer consists of meltwater that drains through a complicated ice matrix. The sub-surface melt layer is normally about 0.5 m deep and was continuously present during 4 weeks of fieldwork in the 1993–94 austral summer season.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Model simulations of temperatures in a blue-ice field when the radiative “protecting” snow cover is removed. The simulations indicate that a sudden exposure of blue ice will increase ice temperatures by several degrees Celsius. Combined with the measured temperature differences between snow and blue ice seen in Figure 6. this implies that these blue-ice fields have been exposed for many years.