Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-n8gtw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T07:17:53.945Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dynamics of a lipid vesicle across a microfluidic constriction: how do its membrane properties and microenvironment matter?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2024

Tanoy Kahali
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal 721302, India
Devi Prasad Panigrahi
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University College London, London WC1H 0AY, UK
Suman Chakraborty*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal 721302, India
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: suman@mech.iitkgp.ac.in

Abstract

Constriction in the flow passage of the physiological circulatory system is central to the occurrence of several diseased conditions such as thrombosis and is also pivotal towards the understanding of several regulatory processes in the human microvasculature. It is, therefore, imperative to advance a mechanistic insight into the dynamics of lipid vesicles, cell mimicking, fluid-filled compartments, through a physiologically relevant microconfinement, with particular focus on deciphering the role of its mechanophysical properties. Here we bring out the role of membrane bending rigidity and the initial deflation (deviation in shape from sphericity) on the transient shape evolution of a lipid vesicle as it migrates through a microfluidic constriction, a paradigm that is unexplored thus far. Based on our experimental observations as well as theoretical insights, we construct a regime map to elucidate the range of the key dimensionless parameters orchestrating this dynamical transition. Furthermore, our observations on the vesicle's stretching dynamics emerging from selective mapping with viscosity contrast between the encapsulated and the suspending fluid medium offer potential physiologically relevant cues on the impact of cell aging on its deformability across a constricted path. Such mechanistic insights may help in establishing quantitative correlations between the dynamical transition of a lipid vesicle and its membrane mechanics, which may in turn have decisive implications in health and disease while circulating across microvascular fluidic pathways.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Schematic illustration of the flow domain depicting an initially elliptic vesicle, placed at an off-centre position, migrating through a constricted channel in plane Poiseuille flow at the inlet (Si).

Figure 1

Figure 2. The physical system. (a,b) Experimental set-up having flow inlet (1), outlet (3) and the test section (2). The transport phenomena are observed under an inverted, transmission-type microscope operated in phase-contrast mode. The direction of flow is shown using arrows. (c1) A schematic of the flow domain. Wd and Wc denote the width of the diverging section (AB) and constricted section (CD), respectively. Region BC denotes the tapered region. (c2) The experimental viewgraph with scale bar. (d) Top view and (e) front view of the experimental set-up under consideration. The coordinate axis is located at the channel centreline. The normalized distance of the observed cell centroid from the channel centreline is denoted by eccentricity e. Angle $\theta $ denotes the initial inclination angle.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Three different vesicle dynamics observed prior to the constriction. (a) Stretching dynamics demarcated by stretch ratio (λ) as a function of normalized axial displacement $(\nu = 0.99;{\tau _{2D}} = 0.99)$. The insets represent the contours (from both experiment and 2-D simulation) at different axial locations. The inset at bottom right depicts the evolution of orientation angle with axial position for stretching. Evolution of the vesicle orientation angle as a function of normalized axial displacement obtained for (b) rolling and (c) tumbling $(\nu = 0.97;{\tau _{2D}} = 0.96)$ motions. Open symbols denote the experimental results while lines represent the simulations. (d) Schematic representation of the three different motions (tumbling (T), stretching (S), rolling (R)) at the converging section prior to the constricted channel. The scale bars are mentioned on each experimental viewgraph. See supplementary movies S1–S6 for more details.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Transition of motion features as a function of reduced area (volume) and normalized membrane bending modulus. The S (stretching), R (rolling) and T (tumbling) regimes map quantitatively with the membrane rigidity. All the data points representing the regime map are obtained from 2-D simulations and validated against experiments.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Variation in the maximum stretch ratio (λmax) as a function of viscosity contrast (ηr) between inner and outer fluids of the vesicles for reduced volume ~0.95 (experiment) and reduced area (2-D numerical) ~0.94. Open symbols demarcate experimental results, while blue solid lines represent numerical simulation results. The inset shows the variation in the stretching ratio (λ) as a function of axial position for viscosity contrasts: ηr = 1 and 8.

Supplementary material: File

Kahali et al. supplementary material 1

Kahali et al. supplementary material
Download Kahali et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 7.4 MB
Supplementary material: File

Kahali et al. supplementary material 2

Kahali et al. supplementary material
Download Kahali et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 2.9 MB
Supplementary material: File

Kahali et al. supplementary material 3

Kahali et al. supplementary material
Download Kahali et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 1.4 MB