Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-nf276 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-20T02:02:39.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Some comments on climatic reconstructions from ice cores drilled in areas of high melt

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Roy M. Koerner*
Affiliation:
Terrain Sciences Division, Geological Survey of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A OE8, Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Poor consideration has been given in many Arctic circum-polar ice-core studies to the effect of summer snow melt on chemistry, stable-isotope concentrations and time-scales. Many of these corps are drilled close to the firn line where melt is intense. Some come from below the firn line where accumulation is solely in the form of super-imposed ice. In all cases, seasonal signals are reduced or removed and, in some, time gaps develop during periods of excessive melting which situate the drill site in the ablation zone. Consequently, cross correlations of assumed synchronous events among the cores are invalid, so that time-scales along the same cores differ between authors by factors of over 2. Many so-called climatic signals are imaginary rather than real. By reference to published analyses of cores from the superimposed ice zone on Devon Ice Cap (Koerner, 1970) and Meighen Ice Cap (Koerner and Paterson, 1974), it is shown how melt affects all the normally well-established ice-core proxies and leads to their misinterpretation. Despite these limitations, the cores can give valuable low-resolution records for all or part of the Holocene. They show that the thermal maximum in the circum-polar Arctic occurred in the early Holocene. This maximum, effected negative balances on all the ice caps and removed the smaller ones. Cooler conditions in the second half of the Holocene have caused the regrowth of these same ice caps.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1997
Figure 0

Table 1. Melt (in parentheses, column 5) is the product of melt per cent and annual accumulation, not balance. However, annual accumulation equals balance above the firn line. The melt values are only directly comparable between the sites if the sites the above the saturation line. Below this, run-off occurs, i.e. melt may exceed 100% if melting extends into underlying annual layers. The two values for balance on Hoghetta include the value for the last 20 years and (in parentheses) the value for the 1959 – 63 period. The latter is the one used to date the core; Fujii and others (1990) identified recurrent layers of this thickness at depth and considered them annual layers.* Stièvenard and others (1996) believed the isotopic signature of a 37 – 60 cm layer of ice sandwiched between frozen sediments underlying a more recent Vavilov core represents Pleistocene ice. Somewhat contentious, it must at best represent ice that may have survived the early Holocene by its burial under protective debris. The “trend” column refers to whether the trend in either δ18O or melt between 7 and 0.5 ka is significant

Figure 1

Fig. 1. Drill sites referred to in text. 1. GRIP and CISP 2; 2. Devon Ice Cap; 3. Agassiz Ice Cap; 4. Meighen Ice Cup; 5. Academii Nauk; 6. Vavilov Ice Cap; 7. Høghetta, Grønford, Lomonosov; 8. Austfonna, Vestfonna; 9. Penny ice Cap; 10. Franz Josef.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Stable isotopes on a depth scale: Meighen Ice Cap (Koerner and Paterson, 1974). Lomonosov (Gordienko and others, 1981) and Gronfjord/Fridtjof (Punning and others, 1980) ice cores.Values from the Soviet ice cores are from digitization of the published records. Meighen and Grønfjord data surface to bedrock, Lomonosov surface to 20 in above the bed.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Stable isotopes, Academii Nauk, Vavilov (Kotlyakov and others, 1991) and Agassiz (Fisher and others, 1983) Ice Caps. Values for Academii Nauk and Vavilov are from digitization of the published diagrams. Run-off On Vavilov (Barkov and others. 1992) has probably affected this record.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Melt record for Academii Nauk (Kotlyakov and others, 1991) Austfonna (Tarussov, 1992) and Agassiz Ice Caps (Koerner and Fisher, 1990). Melt expressed as g cm−2 a−1 based on accumulation rates and melt percentages published by the authors and, in the ease of Academii Nauk, and Austfonna, digitized from the published diagram. Time-scales are those of the authors. In the case of Austfonna. both a theoretical and stratigraphic time-scale are given (Zagorodnov and Arkhipov, 1989). I use the theoretical that gives the bed an age of 6000 – 7000 years. The stratigraphic gives a basal ice age of 3000 – 4000 years.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Annual mass balance at the drill site on Meighen Ice Cap and at a stake situated close to the equilibrium line on the northwest side of Devon Ice Cap.