Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-lfk5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-27T15:17:46.229Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Trash, Art, and the Comics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2024

John Dyck Open the ORCID record for John Dyck [Opens in a new window]
John Dyck*
Affiliation:
Department of Philosophy, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
*
Email: john.dyck@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many comics are aesthetically trashy: They are immediately grasped and easily available. Historically, this trashiness is lobbed as an aesthetic defect of many comics, a defect for both their production and their appreciation. To defend these comics, some point to non-aesthetic values, like sociality. I argue that there is aesthetic value to these comics, and that it lies precisely in their trashy characteristics: their immediacy and availability. Many comics have these characteristics because many comics are cartooned. The immediacy of cartooning is precisely what makes so many ordinary comics beautiful in an ordinary way.

Keywords

comicsevaluationaesthetic valueartistic valuetrashbad art

Information

Type
Article
Information
Canadian Journal of Philosophy , Volume 53 , Issue 7-8: Themed Issue: Philosophy of Comics , October 2023 , pp. 688 - 696
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baudelaire, C. (1995). The painter of modern life and other essays. Trans. Mayne, J. (Ed.). Phaidon Press.Google Scholar
Beck, C. C. (2000). The Seven Deadly Sins of Comics Creators. https://www.twomorrows.com/alterego/articles/06sins.html Google Scholar
Beerbohm, M. (1928). The spirit of caricature. In Beerbohm, a variety of things (pp. 119–130). Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Bergengren, R. (1906). The humor of the colored supplement. Atlantic Monthly, 98, 269–73.Google Scholar
Carroll, N. (1994). The paradox of junk fiction. Philosophy and Literature, 18, 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, N. (1998). A philosophy of mass art. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chute, H. (2017). Why comics? HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
Cohen, T. (1993). High and low thinking about high and low art. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 51, 151–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costello, M. J. (2009). Secret identity crisis: Comic books and the unmasking of cold war America. Continuum.Google Scholar
Cowling, S., & Cray, W. D. (2022). Philosophy of comics: An introduction. Bloomsbury.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, I. (2020). Comic strips. In Hatfield, C. & Beaty, B. (Eds.), Comics studies: A guidebook (pp 13–24). Rutgers University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, C. (1945). Steig’s Cartoons: Review of All Embarrassed by William Steig. The Nation, March 3, 1945.Google Scholar
Hajdu, D. (2008). The ten-cent plague: The great comic-book scare and how it changed America. Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Harold, J. (2010). The value of fictional worlds (or why ‘the Lord of the rings’ is worth reading). Contemporary Aesthetics, 8.Google Scholar
Kael, P. (1969). Trash, art, and the movies. In Harper’s Monthly (pp. 87–129). Reprinted in Kael, Going Steady: Film Writings 1968–1969 (1970: Little, Brown & Company.Google Scholar
Meskin, A. (2007). Defining comics? Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 65, 369–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A. (2018). In defense of the medium. In Chute, H. (Ed.), Review of why comics?. Los Angeles Review of Books. https://lareviewofbooks.org/article/in-defense-of-the-medium/ Google Scholar
Molotiu, A. (2020). Cartooning. Hatfield, C., & Beatyeds, B. (Eds.), Comics studies: A guidebook (pp. 153–171). Rutgers University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, C. (2023). Cheap art and creative activism. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 81, 269–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parker, D. 1943/2004. A mash note to Crockett Johnson. In Heer, J., & Worcester, K. (Eds.), Arguing comics (pp. 35–36). University Press of Mississippi. Originally in the October 3 1943 edition of PM.Google Scholar
Railton, P. (1998). Aesthetic value, moral value, and the ambitions of naturalism. In Levinson, J (Ed.), Aesthetics and ethics: Essays at the intersection. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, T. J. (1990). An aesthetics of junk fiction. University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, J. E. (2021). Wastepaper modernism. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seldes, G. 1924/1957. The 7 lively arts. Sagamore Press.Google Scholar
Stecker, R. (1996). What is literature? Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 50, 681–694.Google Scholar
Strohl, M. (2021). Why it’s okay to love bad movies. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabachnick, S. E. (2017). From comics to the graphic novel. In Tabachnick, S. E. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to the graphic novel. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warshow, R. (1970). The immediate experience. Atheneum Press.Google Scholar
Watterson, B. (1990). A few thoughts on Krazy Kat . In Marschall, R (Ed.), The Komplete Kolor Krazy Kat. Remco Worldservice Books.Google Scholar