Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-pn7tm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-23T23:38:30.746Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

TB infection prevention and control at public health facilities in //Karas region, Namibia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2025

Nicolett Muzuki Nyambe
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, Natural Resources and Applied Sciences, Namibia University of Science and Technology (NUST), Windhoek, Namibia Department of Environmental and Public Health, Ministry of Health and Social Services, Keetmanshoop, Namibia
Carolie Cloete
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, Natural Resources and Applied Sciences, Namibia University of Science and Technology (NUST), Windhoek, Namibia
Andrit Lourens*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, Natural Resources and Applied Sciences, Namibia University of Science and Technology (NUST), Windhoek, Namibia Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Family, Community and Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town (UCT) , Cape Town, South Africa
*
Corresponding author: Andrit Lourens; Email: andrit.lourens@uct.ac.za

Abstract

Objectives:

To evaluate healthcare workers’ (HCWs) providing tuberculosis (TB) services knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) regarding infection prevention and control (IPC), assess barriers and facilitators to TB IPC implementation and adherence, and evaluate existing TB IPC policies at public health facilities in Namibia’s //Karas region.

Design:

Concurrent mixed-methods design.

Setting:

Public healthcare facilities in Namibia’s //Karas region.

Methods:

Quantitative data were collected using an online questionnaire distributed via email and social media platforms to HCWs providing TB services. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize respondent characteristics and KAP scores, followed by bivariate analysis using the Pearson χ2 test (P < .05) to assess associations between knowledge scores and respondent characteristics. Focus group discussions (FGDs) were conducted with TB focal persons from District Coordinating Committees, transcribed, and analyzed thematically using a 6-phased approach. Data collection spanned 8 months (April 17–November 10, 2023).

Results:

HCWs demonstrated good knowledge (91.2%) and positive attitudes (85.3%) toward TB IPC, with practice scores less optimal (61.8%). Knowledge was associated with district (P = .001), department (P = .036), and education level (P = .010). Staff shortages were the most cited barrier, and training emerged as a key facilitator. FGDs confirmed the implementation of TB IPC policies at institutional level and revealed barriers, including inadequate infrastructure, limited resources, stigmatization, and lack of managerial support. Facilitators included effective communication, health education, and personal protective equipment availability.

Conclusion:

Strengthening TB IPC requires investment in infrastructure, training, consistent monitoring, and policy enforcement. Targeted IPC interventions can address key barriers and improve adherence across public health facilities.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America
Figure 0

Table 1. Respondent characteristics

Figure 1

Table 2. Barriers and facilitators to TB IPC adherence

Figure 2

Table 3. Characteristics of participants (n = 18)

Figure 3

Table 4. Quotations supporting Themes 1 and 2

Figure 4

Table 5. Quotations supporting Themes 3 and 4

Supplementary material: File

Nyambe et al. supplementary material 1

Nyambe et al. supplementary material
Download Nyambe et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 34.2 KB
Supplementary material: File

Nyambe et al. supplementary material 2

Nyambe et al. supplementary material
Download Nyambe et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 17.3 KB
Supplementary material: File

Nyambe et al. supplementary material 3

Nyambe et al. supplementary material
Download Nyambe et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 29 KB