Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-2tv5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T02:02:14.297Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The sociolinguistic gender pattern in French: a comparison of two linguistic levels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 October 2008

Nigel Armstrong
Nigel Armstrong
Affiliation:
Department of French, School of Modern Languages, University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, e-mail: n.r.armstrong@ncl.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article I examine different rates of development, at the linguistic levels of variable pronunciation and discourse, of a sample of French girls aged 11–12. These girls, in contrast to their older counterparts, show variable linguistic behaviour on the phonological level that aligns with the well attested pattern of the avoidance by female speakers of vernacular forms: the ‘sociolinguistic gender pattern’. At the same time, in discourse one female speaker shows a manipulation of conversational tone, as evidenced by her behaviour across speech styles, that is comparable to adult competence. I argue that the disjunction between the girls's communicative competence on these two levels is due to the different social functions that variation fulfils on each level: while variable phonology may serve to express a speaker's location in a social-regional nexus that younger speakers have yet to engage with fully, the discourse level expresses more central aspects of a speaker's identity that can plausibly be assumed to develop earlier.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of French Language Studies , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , September 1998 , pp. 139 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Aniansson, E. (1981) Barns språkliga formåga: Redogörelse för ett par test. FUMS Rapport, No 84, Uppsala (cited in S. Romaine, 1984).Google Scholar
Armstrong, N. (1993) A Study of Phonological Variation in French Secondary School Pupils. Ph.D. thesis, University of Newcastle upon Tyne.Google Scholar
Armstrong, N. (1996a) Deletion of French /l/: linguistic, social and stylistic factors. Journal of French Language Studies, 6: 1–21.Google Scholar
Armstrong, N. (1996b) The phonology of style shift in English and French. Newcastle and Durham Working Papers in Linguistics, 4: 1–12.Google Scholar
Armstrong, N. (1998) La variation sociolinguistique dans le lexique français. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie, 114/3: 462–95.Google Scholar
Ashby, W. (1981) French liaison as a sociolinguistic phenomenon. In: Cressey, W. W. and Napoli, D. J. (eds.), Linguistic symposium on the Romance languages (9th). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 46–57.Google Scholar
Ashby, W. (1988) François du Canada/français de France: divergence et convergence. French Review, 6/5. 693–702.Google Scholar
Bell, A. (1984) Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13/2: 145–204.Google Scholar
Brown, G. (1982) The spoken language. In: Carter, R. (ed.), Linguistics and Teacher. London: Roudedge & Kegan Paul, 75–87.Google Scholar
Coates, J. (1986) Women, Men and Language. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Cheshire, J. (1978) Present tense verbs in Reading English. In: Trudgill, P. (ed.), Sociolinguistic Patterns in British English. London: Arnold, 52–68.Google Scholar
Cheshire, J. (1982). Variation in an English Dialect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. (1989) The whole woman: sex and gender differences in variation. Language Variation and Change, 1: 245–67.Google Scholar
Fasold, R. (1990) The Sociolinguistics of Language. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fishman, P. (1980) Conversational insecurity. In: Giles, H., Robinson, W. P. and Smith, P. (eds.), Language: Social Psychological Perspectives. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 127–32.Google Scholar
Gauchat, L. (1905/1980) L'unité phonétique dans le patois d'une commune. In Aus Romanischen Sprachen und Literaturen. Festschrift Heinrich Morf. Geneva: Slatkine Reprints, 175–232.Google Scholar
Giles, H. and St Clair, R. N. (eds.) (1979) Language and Social Psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hall, K. and Bucholtz, M. (1995) Gender Articulated. London: Roudedge.Google Scholar
Holmes, J. Women, language and identity. MS: forthcoming in Journal of Sociolinguistics.Google Scholar
Hudson, R. (1980) Sociolinguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, E. (1988) The realisation of /R/ in Canadian and standard European French. In Ferrara, K. et al. (eds.), Linguistic Change and Contact: Proceedings of the 16th Annual Conference on New Ways of Analysing Variation. Austin: University of Texas, 143–51.Google Scholar
James, D. and Clarke, S. (1993) Interruptions, gender and power: a critical review of the literature. In: Tannen, D. (ed.), Gender and Conversational Interaction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 231–80.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1966) The Social Stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972) Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Laks, B. (1977) Contribution empirique à l'analyse socio-différentielle de la chute de /r/ dans les groupes consonantiques finales. Langue Française, 34: 109–25.Google Scholar
Milroy, J., Milroy, L., Hartley, S., Walshaw, D. (1994) Glottal stops and Tyneside glottalisation: competing patterns of variation and change in British English. Language Variation and Change, 6: 327–57.Google Scholar
Milroy, J. Gender difference as a factor in language change. Paper presented in the Department of Speech, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, November 1996.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1979) The language of Edinburgh schoolchildren: the acquisition of sociolinguistic competence. Scottish Literary Journal (language supplement), 9: 55–61.Google Scholar
Romaine, S. (1984) The Language of Children and Adolescents. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trudgill, P. (1974) The Social Differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
West, C. and Zimmerman, D. (1983) Small insults: a study of interruptions in cross-sex dyadic conversations between unacquainted persons. In: Thorne, B., Kramarae, C. and Henley, N. (eds.), Language, Gender and Society. Rowley, MA: Newbury, 103–18.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D. and West, C. (1975) Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation. In: Thorne, B. and Henley, N. (eds.), Language and Sex: Difference and Dominance. Rowley, MA: Newbury, 105–29.Google Scholar