Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-8wtlm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-10T20:59:22.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can a Penalty for Environmental Violations Promote Corporate Environmental Governance? An Analysis of the Deterrence Effect from the Perspective of Peer Influence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 November 2025

Shan Xu*
Affiliation:
South China University of Technology, China
Wei Xie
Affiliation:
South China University of Technology, China
*
Corresponding author: Shan Xu (bmshanxu@scut.edu.cn)

Abstract

Previous studies have primarily advocated enhancing the deterrent effects of sanctions against offending firms to prevent organizational environmental violations. However, despite stricter regulatory environments, violations that cross the ‘red line’ remain pervasive. Limited research has delved into the factors that influence an organization’s ability to learn from environmental sanctions imposed on others. To address this gap, inspired by social learning theory, we examine whether environmental sanctions imposed on violating firms deter environmental governance among their industry and regional peers using a sample of Chinese-listed firms from 2008 to 2021. Our findings indicate that increasing the frequency and severity of penalties for offending firms – particularly those leading firms and state-owned-enterprises or those with close ties – can affect the environmental governance practices of their peers, both in terms of process and outcome, underscoring the critical role of peer influence in enforcing environmental regulations. Additionally, the current article also concludes that the general deterrence effect on peers is more pronounced in competitive industries and regions with underdeveloped legal frameworks.

摘要

摘要

既有研究普遍主张通过强化对违规企业制裁的威慑力来遏制环境违法行为,然而在监管趋严的背景下,触碰环保‘红线’的现象依然频发。探讨企业如何从其他受罚主体的环境处罚中汲取经验的研究十分有限。为了弥补这一不足,本研究基于社会学习理论,以2008–2021年中国A股上市公司为样本,实证检验对违规企业的环境处罚能否有效改善其行业与地域同伴的环境治理行为。研究表明,提高对违规企业的处罚频次与力度(尤其是当受罚主体为行业龙头、国有企业或与之存在密切关联的企业时),能够从治理过程与实施效果双重维度震慑同伴企业的环境治理实践,揭示了同伴影响在环境规制执行中的传导机制。进一步研究表明,在行业竞争程度较高、地区法治化水平较低的场域中,环境处罚对同伴企业的一般威慑效应更为明显。

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Association for Chinese Management Research.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adhikari, B. K., & Agrawal, A. 2018. Peer influence on payout policies. Journal of Corporate Finance, 48: 615637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adut, A. 2005. A theory of scandal: Victorians, homosexuality, and the fall of Oscar Wiled. American Journal of Sociology, 111(1): 213248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aghamolla, C., & Thakor, R. T. 2022. IPO peer effects. Journal of Financial Economics, 144(1): 206226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agranov, M., & Buyalskaya, A. 2022. Deterrence effects of enforcement schemes: An experimental study. Management Science, 68(5): 35733589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albino, V., Balice, A., & Dangelico, R. M. 2009. Environmental strategies and green product development: An overview on sustainability‐driven companies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 18(2): 8396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asiaei, K., Bontis, N., Alizadeh, R., & Yaghoubi, M. 2022. Green intellectual capital and environmental governance accounting: Natural resource orchestration in favor of environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(1): 7693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. 1968. A social learning interpretation of psychological dysfunctions. In London, P., and Rosenham, D. (Eds.), Foundations of abnormal psychology: 293344. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. 1977. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Banerjee, R., Gupta, N. D., & Villeval, M. C. 2018. The spillover effects of affirmative action on competitiveness and unethical behavior. European Economic Review, 101: 567604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beccaria, C. 2016. On crimes and punishment. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Becker, G. S. 1968. Crime and punishment: An economic approach. Journal of Political Economy, 76(2): 1368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bird, A., Edwards, A., & Ruchti, T. G. 2018. Taxes and peer effects. The Accounting Review, 93(5): 97117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blundell, W., Gowrisankaran, G., & Langer, A. 2020. Escalation of scrutiny: The gains from dynamic enforcement of environmental regulations. American Economic Review, 110(8): 25582585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bu, C., & Shi, D. 2021. The emission reduction effect of daily penalty policy on firms. Journal of Environmental Governance, 294: 112922.Google ScholarPubMed
Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G., & Vasvari, F. 2008. Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organization and Society, 33(4): 303327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. 2003. Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance: The role of human resource practices in creating organizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6): 740751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, G. B., Løken, K. V., & Mogstad, M. 2014. Peer effects in program participation. American Economic Review, 104(7): 20492074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deng, Y. L., You, D. M., & Wang, J. J. 2022. Research on the nonlinear mechanism underlying the effect of tax competition on green technology innovation: An analysis based on the dynamic spatial Durbin model and the threshold panel model. Research Policy, 76: 102545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational field. American Sociological Review, 48(2): 147160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. 1988. Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4): 549560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earnhart, D., & Friesen, L. 2013. Can punishment generate specific deterrence without updating? Analysis of a stated choice scenario. Environmental Resource Economics, 56: 379397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, C., & Nagin, D. 2015. Who is afraid of the stick? Experimentally testing the deterrent effect of sanction certainty. Review of Behavioral Economics, 2(4): 405434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Florackis, C., Fu, X., & Wang, J. J. 2023. Political connections, environmental violations and punishment: Evidence from heavily polluting firms. International Review of Financial Analysis, 88: 102698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foroughi, R. Y., Marcus, A. J., Nguyen, V., & Tehranian, H. 2022. Peer effects in corporate governance practices: Evidence from universal demand laws. The Review of Financial Studies, 35(1): 132167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, D., & Olsen, L. 2009. Environmental uncertainty and managers’ use of discretionary accruals. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(2): 188205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasan, S., & Koning, R. 2019. Prior ties and the limits of peer effects on startup team performance. Strategic Management Journal, 40(9): 13941416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoberg, G., & Phillips, G. 2016. Text-based network industries and endogenous product differentiation. Journal of Political Economy, 124(5): 14231465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, K., & Robinson, D. T. 2006. Industry concentration and average stock returns. The Journal of Finance, 61(4): 19271956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, Y. C., & Kim, T. Y. 2019. Between legitimacy and efficiency: An institutional theory of corporate giving. Academy of Management Journal, 62(5): 15831608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, L., Lin, C., & Lin, P. 2014. The determinants of pollution levels: Firm-level evidence from Chinese manufacturing. Journal of Comparative Economics, 42(1): 118142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, M. S. 2020. Regulation by shaming: Deterrence effects of publicizing violations of workplace safety and health laws. American Economic Review, 110(6): 18661904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonsson, S., Greve, H. R., & Fujiwara-Greve, T. 2009. Undeserved loss: The spread of legitimacy loss to innocent organizations in response to reported corporate deviance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 54(2): 195228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamiya, S., Kang, J. K., Kim, J., Milidonis, A., & Stulz, R. M. 2021. Risk management, firm reputation, and the impact of successful cyberattacks on target firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 139(3): 719749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karpoff, J. M., JrLott, J. R., & Wehrly, E. W. 2005. The reputational penalties for environmental violations: Empirical evidence. The Journal of Law and Economics, 48(2): 653675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasper, M., & Alm, J. 2022. Audits, audit effectiveness, and post-audit tax compliance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 195: 87102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kedia, S., Koh, K., & Rajgopal, S. 2015. Evidence on contagion in earnings management. The Accounting Review, 90(6): 23372373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, J., Li, Y., & Zhang, L. 2011. Corporate tax avoidance and stock price crash risk: Firm-level analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(3): 639662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krippendorff, K. 2004. Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3): 411433.Google Scholar
Leary, M. T., & Roberts, M. R. 2014. Do peer firms affect corporate financial policy? The Journal Finance, 69(1): 139178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, G., & Xiao, X. 2020. Voluntary engagement in environmental projects: Evidence from environmental violators. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(2): 325348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, R. 2005. Law, endowments and property rights. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(3): 6188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughran, T. A., Piquero, A. R., Fagan, J., & Mulvey, E. P. 2012. Differential deterrence: Studying heterogeneity and changes in perceptual deterrence among serious youthful offenders. Crime Delinquency, 58(1): 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, H., Liu, X., Wu, A., & Zhong, X. 2021. Is it possible to escape? Local protectionism and outward foreign direct investment by Chinese privately-owned enterprises. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38(4): 14991524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, R., Ji, Q., Zhai, P., & Yang, R. 2022. Environmental violations, refinancing risk, and the corporate bond cost in China. Journal of International Financial Management & Accounting 33(3): 480504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marquis, C., & Tilcsik, A. 2016. Institutional equivalence: How industry and community peers influence corporate philanthropy. Organization Science, 27(5): 13251341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, S. R., Lee, J. J., & Parmar, B. L. 2021. Social distance, trust and getting “hooked”: A phishing expedition. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 166: 3948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mike, K., & Kiss, G. 2019. Combining formal and informal contract enforcement in a developed legal system: A latent class approach. Journal of Institutional Economics, 15(3): 521537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Misani, N., & Pogutz, S. 2015. Unraveling the effects of environmental outcomes and processes on financial performance: A non-linear approach. Ecological Economics, 109(1): 150160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishina, Y., Dykes, B. J., Block, E. S., & Pollock, T. G. 2010. Why “good” firms do bad things: The effects of high aspirations, high expectations, and prominence on the incidence of corporate illegality. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4): 701722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, A. P., & Raghuram, G. R. 1994. The benefits of leading relationships: Evidence from small data. The Journal of Finance, 49(1): 337.Google Scholar
Moody, G. D., Siponen, M., & Pahnila, S. 2018. Toward a unified model of information security policy compliance. MIS Quarterly, 42(1): 285A222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pache, A. C., & Santos, F. 2013. Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to conflicting institutional logics. Academy Management Journal, 56(4): 9721091.Google Scholar
Pan, L., Han, W., Li, Y., & Wu, H. 2022. Legitimacy or efficiency? Carbon emissions transfers under the pressure of environmental law enforcement. Journal of Cleaner Production, 365: 132766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paternoster, R. 2010. How much do we really know about criminal deterrence? Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 100(3): 765823.Google Scholar
Przemystaw, G. H., & Kacprzak, A. 2021. Curbing cyberloafing: Studying general and specific deterrence effects with field evidence. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(2): 219235.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. L., & O’Leary-Kelly, A. M. 1998. Monkey see, monkey do: The influence of work groups on the antisocial behavior of employees. Academy of Management Journal, 41(6): 658672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadiq, R., Haji, S. A., Cool, G., & Rodriguez, M. J. 2010. Using penalty functions to evaluate aggregation models for environmental indices. Journal of Environmental Governance, 91(3): 706716.Google ScholarPubMed
Sarel, R. 2022. Crime and punishment in times of pandemics. European Journal of Law and Economics, 54(2): 155186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seo, H. 2021. Peer effects in corporate disclosure decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 71(1): 101364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharkey, A. J., & Bromley, P. 2015. Can ratings have indirect effects? Evidence from the organizational response to peers’ environmental ratings. American Sociological Review, 80(1): 6391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, H. T., & Zhou, Y. K. 2017. Environmental enforcement supervision and enterprise environmental performance: Quasi natural experimental evidence from environmental protection interviews. Nankai Business Review, 6: 7382.Google Scholar
Shevchenko, A. 2021. Do financial penalties for environmental violations facilitate improvements in corporate environmental performance? An empirical investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(4): 17231734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, M. M., Ugrin, J., Li, M., Wu, J. N., Guo, S. S., & Zhang, W. P. 2021. Do deterrence mechanisms reduce cyberloafing when it is an observed workplace norm? A moderated mediation model. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health, 18(13): 6751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suchman, M. C. 1995. Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3): 571610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, X., Yan, Y., & Dong, Y. 2022. Peer effect in green credit induced green innovation: An empirical study from China’s Green Credit Guidelines. Resources Policy, 76: 102619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taschini, L., Chesney, M., & Wang, M. 2014. Experimental comparison between markets on dynamic permit trading and investment in irreversible abatement with and without non-regulated companies. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 46(1): 2350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trevino, L. K. 1992. The social effects of punishment in organizations: A justice perspective. Academy of Management Review, 17(4): 647676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trumpp, C., Endrikat, J., Zopf, C., & Guenther, E. 2015. Definition, conceptualization, and measurement of corporate environmental performance: A critical examination of a multidimensional construct. Journal of Business Ethics, 126: 185204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truong, P. 2023. Peer effects and disclosure timing: Evidence from earnings announcements. The Accounting Review, 98(3): 427458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tumasjan, A., Strobel, M., & Welpe, I. 2011. Ethical leadership evaluations after moral transgression: Social distance makes the difference. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(4): 609622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C., Rodan, S., Fruin, M., & Xu, X. 2014. Knowledge networks, collaboration networks, and exploratory innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2): 484514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L. F., Yuan, T., & Xie, R. 2023. Environmental violations and the cost of debt financing. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 26(4): 193208.Google Scholar
Wang, R., Wijen, F., & Heugens, P. P. 2018. Government’s green grip: Multifaceted state influence on corporate environmental actions in China. Strategic Management Journal, 39(2): 403428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y., Li, Y., Ma, Z., & Song, J. 2019. The deterrence effect of a penalty for environmental violation. Sustainability, 11(15): 4226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Z. W., Yao, S. Y., Sensoy, A., Goodell, J. W., & Cheng, F. Y. 2022. Learning from failures: Director interlocks and corporate misconduct. International Review of Financial Analysis, 84: 102406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wen, Z. L., Zhang, L., Hou, J. T., & Liu, H. Y. 2004. Testing and application of the mediating effects. Acta Psychological Sinica, 5: 614620.Google Scholar
Xiao, Z. X., Dong, M. C., & Zhu, X. X. 2019. Learn to be good or bad? Revisited observer effects of punishment: Curvilinear relationship and network contingencies. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 34(4): 754766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, S., & Liu, D. C. 2020. Political connections and corporate social responsibility: Political incentives in China. Business Ethics: A European Review, 29(4), 664693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, S., & Ma, P. Y. 2022. CEOs’ poverty experience and corporate social responsibility: Are CEOs who have experienced poverty more generous? Journal of Business Ethics, 180(2): 747776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, D. W., Xu, Y. H., & Wan, W. P. 2014. The deterrence effects of vicarious punishments on corporate financial fraud. Organization Science, 25(5): 15491571.Google Scholar
Zhang, G. Q., Chen, X. Y., & Xiao, H. 2020. Process and outcome dimensions of environmental governance and corporate financial performance. Business Management Journal, 5: 120139.Google Scholar