Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-lfk5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-27T19:44:03.550Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The validity of diagnostic systems for common mental disorders: a comparison between the ID-CATEGO and the DSM-III systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

David Grayson ,
Keith Bridges ,
Diane Cook  and
David Goldberg
David Grayson
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Manchester and the NH & MRC Social Psychiatry Research Unit, Canberra, Australia
Keith Bridges
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Manchester and the NH & MRC Social Psychiatry Research Unit, Canberra, Australia
Diane Cook
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Manchester and the NH & MRC Social Psychiatry Research Unit, Canberra, Australia
David Goldberg*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Manchester and the NH & MRC Social Psychiatry Research Unit, Canberra, Australia
*
1Address for correspondence: Professor D. Goldberg, University of Manchester, Department of Psychiatry, Withington Hospital West Didsbury, Manchester M20 8LR.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

It is argued that latent trait analysis provides a way of examining the construct validity of diagnostic concepts which are used to categorize common mental illnesses. The present study adds two additional aspects of validity using multiple discriminant analysis applied to two widely used taxonomic systems. Scales of anxiety and depression derived from previous latent trait analyses are applied to individuals reaching criteria for ‘caseness’ on the ID-CATEGO system and the DSM-III system, both at initial diagnosis and six months later. The first multiple discriminant analysis is carried out on the initial scale scores, and the results are interpreted in terms of concurrent validity. The second analysis uses improvement scores on the two scales and relates to predictive validity. It is argued that the ID-CATEGO system provides a better classification for common mental illnesses than the DSM-III system, since it allows a better discrimination to be made between anxiety and depressive disorders.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , February 1990 , pp. 209 - 218
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd edn.American Psychiatric Association: Washington.Google Scholar
Burke, J. D. & Regier, D. A. (1988). Implications of an operational approach to psychiatric diagnosis. (Unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
Dean, C., Surtees, P. G. & Sashidharan, S. P. (1983). Comparison of research diagnostic systems in an Edinburgh community sample. British Journal of Psychiatry 142, 247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan-Jones, P., Grayson, D. & Moran, P. (1986). The utility of latent trait models in psychiatry epidemiology. Psychological Medicine 16, 391–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleiss, J. L., Gurland, B. J. & Cooper, J. E. (1971). Some contributions to the measurement of psychopathology. British Journal of Psychiatry 119, 647–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, D. P., Bridges, K., Duncan-Jones, P. & Grayson, D. (1987). Dimensions of neuroses seen in primary care settings; Psychological Medicine 17, 461–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grayson, D., Bridges, K., Duncan-Jones, P. & Goldberg, D. P. (1987). The relationship between symptoms and diagnosis of minor psychiatric disorder in general practice. Psychological Medicine 17, 933–942.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollyman, J. A., Freeling, P., Paykel, E. S., Bhat, A. & Sedgewick, P. (1988). Antidepressant treatment in general practice: a placebo controlled trial of amitriptyline. Journal of the Royal College of General Practice 38, 393–397.Google ScholarPubMed
Robins, L. N. (1985). Epidemiology: reflections on testing the validity of psychiatric interviews. Archives of General Psychiatry 42, 918–924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wing, J. K. & Sturt, E. (1978). The PSE-ID-Catego System Supplementary Manual. MRC Social Psychiatry Unit, London.Google Scholar