Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-6mz5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-20T09:48:43.033Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Permanent fast flow versus cyclic surge behaviour: numerical simulations of the Austfonna ice cap, Svalbard

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

Thorben Dunse
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, PO Box 1047, Blindern, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway E-mail: thorben.dunse@geo.uio.no
Ralf Greve
Affiliation:
Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0819, Japan
Thomas Vikhamar Schuler
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, PO Box 1047, Blindern, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway E-mail: thorben.dunse@geo.uio.no
Jon Ove Hagen
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, PO Box 1047, Blindern, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway E-mail: thorben.dunse@geo.uio.no
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A large part of the ice flux within ice caps occurs through spatially limited fast-flowing units. Some of them permanently maintain fast flow, whereas others operate in an oscillatory mode, characterized by short-lived active phases followed by long quiescent phases. This surge-type behaviour results from intrinsic rather than external factors, thus complicating estimates of glacier response to climate change. Here we present numerical model results from Austfonna, an ice cap on Svalbard that comprises several surge-type basins. Previous studies have suggested a thermally controlled soft-bed surge mechanism for Svalbard. We systematically change the parameters that govern the nature of basal motion and thereby control the transition between permanent and oscillatory fast flow. Surge-type behaviour is realized by a relatively abrupt onset of basal sliding when basal temperatures approach the pressure-melting point and enhanced sliding of marine grounded ice. Irrespective of the dynamic regime, the absence of considerable volumes of temperate ice, both in the observed and simulated ice cap, indicates that fast flow is accomplished by basal motion over a temperate bed. Given an idealized present-day climate, the equilibrium ice-cap size varies significantly, depending on the chosen parameters.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2011
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of the Austfonna ice cap and its location within the Svalbard archipelago (inset). Contours show surface elevations (m a.s.l.), blue solid lines indicate drainage basins (Hagen and others, 1993) and the red solid line the main ice divide. Basins of interest are marked with bold letters: the three known surge-type basins Etonbreen (ET), terminating into Wahlenbergfjorden (WBF), and Bråsvellbreen (BR) and Basin-3 (B3), terminating into the Barents Sea. Other basins of interest are Duvebreen (DU), Leighbreen (LE) and Basin-5 (B5).

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Maps of (a) the bedrock topography and (b) modern observed ice thickness. The white solid line in (a) indicates the modern observed glacier outline. Contours are spaced at 50 m.

Figure 2

Table 1. Physical parameters used in all model experiments

Figure 3

Table 2. Sliding-law parameter combinations of the five model experiments. The sliding-law coefficient, Cb(Cr for hard rock and Cs for soft sediments as specified in Table 1), and the exponents p and q are first given for ice areas resting on land, then for the ice areas grounded below sea level. Nb is either the full (Pf) or reduced basal pressure (Pr). Note that in the case of a linear sliding law (marine grounded ice in experiment 5) basal sliding is independent of the basal pressure (exponent q = 0)

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Comparison of the five model experiments with varied submelt sliding parameter, γ. Mean values of (a) total volume, (b) total glacierized area and (c) percentage of temperate basal area relative to the total area for the time period 25–30 ka and their associated twofold standard deviation normalized with respect to the mean (d, e, f). The grey dashed lines envelope model results within 10% of the modern observed values (a, b) marked by a solid grey line. The modern basal area at the pmp (dashed line in c) follows from theoretical considerations using ice-cap geometry and geothermal heat flux.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Time series of total glacierized area for a quasi-steady-state time period of model years 25–30 ka for all model experiments. Model runs with (a) γ set to 1°C and (b) γ set to 0.2°C.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. (a) Steady-state basal velocity and (b) basal temperature relative to pmp for experiment 1 with γ set to 1°C. The modelled glacier outline is indicated by the grey solid curve.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Snapshots of the basal velocity (left panels) and basal temperature relative to pmp (right panels) at indicated model years for experiment 5 with γ set to 0.2°C.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Mean ice-thickness evolution at specific points fixed in space on individual basins during experiment 5 with γ set to 0.2°C. The dashed green lines indicate the times represented in Figure 6.

Figure 9

Fig. 8. (a) Ice thickness evolution, (b) basal temperature relative to pmp, and (c) relative contribution of basal motion to the overall ice flow, i.e. the surface motion, at one specific location on Etonbreen. Time-series data are given for the period 25–30 ka for all five experiments using γ = 0.2°C.