Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c78cf97d-hf2s2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-24T17:22:20.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Short-pulse LIBS: fundamentals and applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2009

R. E. Russo
Affiliation:
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, USA
Andrzej W. Miziolek
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Research Laboratory, USA
Vincenzo Palleschi
Affiliation:
Istituto per I Processi Chimico-Fisici, Italy
Israel Schechter
Affiliation:
Technion - Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The basis of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is well established – real time, simultaneous multielement chemical analysis without sample preparation. Although the advantages are well recognized, understanding the fundamental laser ablation processes underlying this technology remains a quest. The heart of LIBS is the luminous plasma; its initiation and history are critical to applications. The plasmas' properties depend on experimental parameters, including the laser pulse (energy, duration, repetition rate, and wavelength), the sample (physical and optical), and ambient atmosphere (gas, pressure). Except for a few research papers in the analytical literature, most LIBS applications are based on nanosecond pulsed lasers. There are two compelling reasons to delve into the short-pulse regime for LIBS – expected differences in the laser–material and the laser–plasma interactions. Stated differently, there is reason to believe that improved analytical accuracy, precision, and sensitivity can be achieved by the use of short-pulsed lasers for LIBS applications.

In the LIBS plasma, spectral emission intensity of elemental lines is based on the amount of mass ablated as well as on the concentration of that mass in the sample (ignoring plasma temperature and electron number density for the moment). For accurate chemical analysis, the chemistry of the ablated mass must be representative of the sample (no fractionation). Ideally, there also would be matrix independence; the same amount of mass would be ablated independent of sample properties. These two goals can be realized by better understanding and controlling the laser–material interaction. Finally, the plasma itself can influence the ablation process.

Information

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×