Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-rbxfs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T08:26:42.722Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Lactobacillus reuteri and its combination with gluco-oligosaccharides on improving growth performance and intestinal health of broilers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2025

Runzi Tang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in East China, Ministry of Agriculture and Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition (Zhejiang University) Ministry of Education, Institute of Feed Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Jiaqi Chen
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in East China, Ministry of Agriculture and Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition (Zhejiang University) Ministry of Education, Institute of Feed Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Shuang Liang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in East China, Ministry of Agriculture and Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition (Zhejiang University) Ministry of Education, Institute of Feed Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Jiayue Zhao
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in East China, Ministry of Agriculture and Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition (Zhejiang University) Ministry of Education, Institute of Feed Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Binke Chen
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in East China, Ministry of Agriculture and Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition (Zhejiang University) Ministry of Education, Institute of Feed Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Yibin Xu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in East China, Ministry of Agriculture and Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition (Zhejiang University) Ministry of Education, Institute of Feed Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Xiaoqing Ding
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in East China, Ministry of Agriculture and Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition (Zhejiang University) Ministry of Education, Institute of Feed Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Aikun Fu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in East China, Ministry of Agriculture and Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition (Zhejiang University) Ministry of Education, Institute of Feed Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
Xiuan Zhan*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition and Feed Science in East China, Ministry of Agriculture and Key Laboratory of Molecular Animal Nutrition (Zhejiang University) Ministry of Education, Institute of Feed Science, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
*
Corresponding author: Xiuan Zhan; Email: xazan@zju.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ban on antibiotics as feed additives requires modern intensive farming with more comprehensive diseases control approaches. Currently, synbiotics serve as promising alternatives to enhance growth performance and improve health in the poultry industry. In this research, we investigated beneficial effects of Lactobacillus reuteri (LR) with its combination of gluco-oligosaccharides (GlcOS) supplementation on growth performance and intestinal health of broilers. A total of 900 1-day-old male Lingnan yellow-feather broilers were randomly allocated into the control group (CON group, and two experimental groups feeding basal diet supplementing LR (LR group) and its combination with GlcOS (RG group), respectively. The findings indicated beneficial effects of growth performance in experimental groups (LR and RG groups), as evidenced by decreasing the feed-to-gain ratio (F/G) in both experimental groups (P < 0.05) and increasing the average daily gain (ADG) in the RG group (P < 0.05). Simultaneously, both experimental groups increased the villus height/crypt depth ratio (VH:CD) (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the RG group showed increased activity of digestive enzymes (P < 0.05) and upregulated mRNA expression of tight junction protein and transportation protein (P < 0.05), while decreased the serum levels of d-lactic acid and diamine oxidase (P < 0.05), suggesting the improvement of the nutrient digestion and absorption, as well as the mucosal barrier integrity. Moreover, increased abundance of beneficial bacteria, including Bacteroides, Muribaculaceae and Prevotellaceae_UCG-001 (P < 0.05), leading to a finely altered gut microbiome and metabolome. Collectively, the findings of this research revealed that dietary supplemented LR and its combination with GlcOS could enhance the intestinal morphology, digestion, absorption and barrier function, and improve the cecal microbiota structure and metabolic function finally achieving the effect of improving growth performance of broilers. Overall, the effect of the combination of LR and GlcOS was synergistic, providing a future alternative to antibiotics as growth promoter.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0), which permits re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that no alterations are made and the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Zhejiang University and Zhejiang University Press.
Figure 0

Table 1. Composition and nutrient levels of the basal diets

Figure 1

Table 2. Primer sequences for RT-qPCR

Figure 2

Table 3. Effects of LR and its combination with GlcOS on growth performance of broilers

Figure 3

Figure 1. The effects of LR and its combination with GlcOS on intestinal morphology and barrier function of intestine. VH (A), CD (B), VH: CD (C), morphological microstructure (D) of duodenum, jejunum and ileum (40×). (E) Jejunum microvillus microstructure under transmission electron microscope (TEM). (F) PAS staining of jejunum (100×). (G) The number of goblet cells in the jejunum. Serum level of DAO (H) and d-lactic acid (I). (J) mRNA expression of jejunal tight junction genes. Data were presented as mean with SD (n = 6). Significance was shown as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.

Figure 4

Figure 2. The effects of LR and its combination with GlcOS on intestinal digestion and absorption function. AMY (A), LPS (B) and TPS activity (C) of duodenum, jejunum and ileum. (D) mRNA expression of jejunal transporter genes. Data were mean with SD (n = 6). Significance was shown as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.

Figure 5

Figure 3. The effects of LR and its combination with GlcOS on structure of the cecum microbiota. (A) Venn diagram of otus. (B) Alpha-diversity analysis based on indices of the Chao, Shannon, Simpson and observed species indices. (C) Beta-diversity analysis based on PCoA. (D) Beta-diversity analysis based on ANOISM. Data were mean with SD (n = 6). Significance was shown as *P < 0.05.

Figure 6

Figure 4. The effects of LR and its combination with GlcOS on composition of the cecum microbiota at the phylum level. (A) Relative abundance of microbiota at the phylum level. (B) The relative abundances of Desulfobacterota in all groups. Significance was shown as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.

Figure 7

Figure 5. The effects of LR and its combination with GlcOS on composition of the cecum microbiota at the family level. (A) Aabundance of the microbial composition at the family level. The relative abundances of Barnesiellaceae (B), Bacteroidaceae (C), Lachnospiraceae (D), Prevotellaceae (E), Norank_o_clostridia_ugg-014 (F) and Desulfovibrionaceae (G) in all groups. Significance was shown as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.

Figure 8

Figure 6. The effects of LR and its combination with GlcOS on composition of the cecum microbiota at the genus level. (A) Abundance of the microbial composition at the genus level. The relative abundances of bacteroides (B), Alistipes (C), Barnesiella (D), Prevotellaceae_ucg-001 (E), Norank_f_norank_o_clostridia_ucg-014 (F) and Ruminococcus_torques_group (G) in all groups. Significance was shown as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.

Figure 9

Figure 7. LEfSe multilevel species discriminant analysis of cecum microbiota. Bacterial taxa with LDA score >4 are selected as biomarker taxa.

Figure 10

Figure 8. (A) OPLS-DA score plot and permutation test of broiler cecum metabolites. OPLS-DA plot and permutation test of the CON and LR groups in positive ion mode (A1) and in negative ion mode (A2). OPLS-DA plot and permutation test of the CON and RG groups in positive ion mode (A3) and in negative ion mode (A4). OPLS-DA plot and permutation test of the LR and RG groups in positive ion mode (A5) and in negative ion mode (A6). PCA score plot of broiler cecum metabolites in positive ion mode (B1) and in negative ion mode (B2).

Figure 11

Figure 9. Volcano plot and classification of different metabolites between groups. Differential volcano plot between the CON and LR groups (A) and between the CON and RG groups (B). Classification of differential metabolites between the CON and LR groups (C) and between the CON and RG groups (D).

Figure 12

Figure 10. Top 30 most enrichment pathways based on metabolites difference between the CON and LR groups (A) and between the CON and RG groups (B). The size of the bubbles in the figure represents the number of the pathway enriched, and the color of the bubbles indicate the magnitude of enrichment significance based on P-values.

Figure 13

Figure 11. (A) Hierachical clustering analysis of the differential metabolite in the LR and CON groups. (B) Hierachical clustering analysis of the differential metabolite in the RG and CON groups.

Figure 14

Figure 12. Correlations between significantly altered cecal microbiota and metabolite between the CON and LR groups (A), and between the CON and RG groups (B). Significance was shown as *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 and ***P < 0.001.