Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-t6st2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-19T19:31:21.536Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Short History of the Norwegian Oil Industry: From Protected National Champions to Internationally Competitive Multinationals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2015

Helge Ryggvik
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.

This study explores how Norway, as a latecomer to oil production, was able to develop both effective oil companies and an internationally competitive oil service industry. The article focuses on two rather distinct phases: the protectionist phase, in which a strong focus on local content fostered skilled Norwegian oil companies as well as a national oil service industry, and the phase of liberalization or financialization, where new forms of contact and openness to foreign ownership laid the basis for internationally oriented Norwegian oil companies and oil supply and service firms.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Business History Review , Volume 89 , Issue 1 , Spring 2015 , pp. 3 - 41
Copyright
Copyright © The President and Fellows of Harvard College 2015 

References

1 Johann D. Sundberg, “Statoil kjøper seg inn i mulig brasiliansk oljefunn” [Statoil buys into possible Brazilian oil finds], E24, 27 Dec. 2012, http://e24.no/boers-og-finans/statoil-asa/statoil-satser-i-brasil/20316635.

2 National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling, Deep Water: The Gulf Oil Disaster and the Future of Offshore Drilling (Washington, D.C., 2011), 67Google Scholar.

3 Richard Milne, “Investment: Norway's Nest Egg,” Financial Times, 19 Aug. 2012; Aditya Chakrabortty, “Dude, Where's My North Sea Oil Money?” Guardian, 13 Jan. 2014.

4 Humphreys, Macartan, Sachs, Jeffrey D., and Stiglitz, Joseph E., eds., Escaping the Resource Curse (New York, 2007)Google Scholar.

5 Maddison, Angus, Phases of Capitalist Development (Oxford, 1989), 177Google Scholar. Given the Norwegian oil sector's importance, there is a broad spectrum of written material describing different parts of Norwegian oil history. However, there are very few studies where economic historians have had full access to government and company archives. The main exception is the project Norsk Oljehistorie [Norwegian oil history]. The first volume—Hanisch, Tore Jørgen and Nerheim, Gunnar, Fra vantro til overmot? [From disbelief to arrogance?] (Oslo, 1992)Google Scholar—was written with full access to all relevant government archives and several company archives, and covers the period up to 1978. No one has since had full access to the Ministry of Oil and Energy's archives. The second volume—Nerheim, Gunnar, En gassnasjon blir til [A gas nation comes into being] (Oslo 1996)Google Scholar—was written with good access to the archive of the state oil company Statoil. I was coauthor with Smith-Solbakken, Marie on volume 3, Blod, svette og olje [Blood, sweat, and oil] (Oslo, 1997)Google Scholar. This volume, covering industrial relations and environmental and safety issues, was written with access to relevant archives. Later, in the early 2000s, a three-volume history of the industrial conglomerate and second largest Norwegian oil company Norsk Hydro was written by historians with good access. The last two volumes take up oil-related themes: Johannessen, Finn Erhard, Rønning, Asle, and Sandvik, Pål Thonstad, Nasjonal kontroll og intdustriell fornyelse: Hydro, 1945–1977 [National control and industrial renewal: Hydro, 1945–1977] (Oslo, 2005)Google Scholar; Lie, Einar, Oljerikdommer og internajonal ekpansjon: Hydro, 1977–2005 [Oil wealth and international expansion: Hydro, 1977–2005] (Oslo, 2005)Google Scholar. There are several relevant academic works in the form of MA and PhD theses as well as several popular presentations of company history made by journalists; some of these will be referenced in this article. There are several older studies of the early Norwegian oil history made by political scientists, most notably, Andersen, Svein, The Struggle over North Sea Oil and Gas: Government Strategies in Denmark, Britain and Norway (Oxford, 1993)Google Scholar and Noreng, Øystein, The Oil Industry and Government Strategy in the North Sea (London, 1980)Google Scholar.

6 Reve, Torgeir, Lensberg, Terje, and Grønhaug, Kjell, Et konkurransedyktig Norge [A competitive Norway] (Oslo, 1992), 188Google Scholar.

7 Carson, W. G., The Other Price of Britain's Oil (Oxford, 1982), 139Google Scholar; Andersen, North Sea Oil and Gas.

8 Om skattlegging av undersjøiske petroleumsforekomster [About taxation of subsea petroleum resources], Besl. O. [Law] no. 129 (1964–65).

9 Helge Ryggvik, “Norsk oljevirksomhet mellom det nasjonale og det internasjonale: En studie av selskapsstruktur og internasjonalisering” [Norwegian oil industry between the national and the international: A study of business structure and internationalization] (PhD diss., University of Oslo, 2000), 76.

10 The best known of these were Johan B. Holte and Torvild Aakvaag, director and future director of Norsk Hydro, respectively, and the shipowner Frederick Olsen.

11 Norwegian Oil Directorate, Facts 2010 (Oslo, 2010), 90Google ScholarPubMed. All reserve estimates in brackets are from this publication. One Sm3 of oil is equal to 6.29 barrels.

12 Innstilling fra den forsterkede industrikomite om undersøkelser etter og utvinning av undersjøiske petroleumforekomster på den norske kontinentalsokkel [Recommendations from the amplified industry committee on exploration for and exploitation of petroleum resources on the Norwegian Continental Shelf], Innst- S. [Recommendation to the parliament] no. 294 (1970–71). The committee's recommendations were later to be named Norwegian oil policy's “ten commandments.”

13 Ibid.

14 Njølstad, Olav, Jens Chr. Hauge—Fullt og helt [Jens Chr. Hauge—without reservations] (Oslo, 2008)Google Scholar.

15 Johnsen, Arve, Statoil-år: Utfordringen [The Statoil years: The challenge] (Oslo, 1988), 36Google Scholar.

16 Hanisch and Nerheim, Fra vantro til overmot, 184.

17 Ibid., 233.

18 Official Statistics of Norway, Historisk Statistikk [Historical statistics] (Oslo, 1994), 401Google Scholar.

19 Hanisch and Nerheim, Fra vantro til overmot, 203.

20 Janicke, Carl-Axel, Oljeboring til havs: Historien om en ny norsk næring [Offshore oil drilling: The story of a new Norwegian industry] (Oslo, 1984), 39Google Scholar.

21 Petroleumsundersøkelser nord for 62. Breddegrad [Petroleum exploration north of 62nd latitude], white paper no. 57 (1978–1979).

22 Hallwood, C. Paul, Transaction Cost and Trade between Multinational Corporations: A Study of Offshore Oil Production (Boston, 1990), 73Google Scholar.

23 Royal decree of 8 Dec. 1972, §54.

24 Petroleumslov med forskrifter [Petroleum law and regulations], NOU [Official Norwegian report] no. 43 (1979).

25 Om virksomheten på den norske kontinentalsokkel [About activities on the Norwegian Continental Shelf], white paper no. 53 (1979–1980).

26 Ibid.

27 Sveinung Engeland, “Ingeniørfabrikk på norsk: Oppbygginga av norsk petroleumsrelatert engineeringkompetanse” [The Norwegian engineering factory: The development of petroleum-related engineering skills in Norway] (PhD diss., University of Oslo, 1995).

28 Nerheim, En gassnasjon blir til.

29 Nerheim, Gunnar, Jøssang, Lars Gaute, and Utne, Bjørn S., I vekst og forandring, Rosenberg Verft 100 år, 1896–1996 [In growth and change: One hundred years of Rosenberg shipyard, 1896–1996] (Stavanger, 1995), 393Google Scholar; Groven, Knut and Heiret, Jan, I stål og olje: Historia om jern- og metallarbeidarene på Stord [In steel and oil: The story of the iron and metal workers at Stord] (Stord, 1996)Google Scholar.

30 Larvik, Håkon, Statfjord: Nordsjøens største oljefelt [Statfjord: The North Sea's largest oil field] (Stavanger, 1997)Google Scholar.

31 Chandler, Alfred D. Jr., Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise (Cambridge, Mass., 1962)Google Scholar, The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business (Cambridge, Mass., 1977), and Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism (Cambridge, Mass., 1990).

32 Williamson, Oliver E., Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (New York, 1975)Google Scholar; Hallwood, Transaction Cost and Trade.

33 Arve Johnsen, interview by the author, 6 Feb. 2008.

34 Willoch, Kåre, Statsminister [Prime Minister] (Oslo, 1990), 287Google Scholar.

35 The white paper covering this was presented on April 27, 1984 (no. 73 [1983–1984]).

36 Endring I lov av 13. juli 1975 nr. 35 om skattlegging av undersjøiske petroleumsforekomster M. v. [Changes in law of 13 July 1975 nr. 35 on taxation of petroleum resources] Ot. prp. [Bill] no. 3 (1986–1987), 79.

37 Enkelte spørsmål I petroleumsbeskatningen [Some questions about taxation of petroleum], white paper no. 41 (1986–1987).

38 Endringer i energilovgivningen som følge av EØS-avtalen [Changes in energy related laws as a consequence of the EEA agreement], Bill no. 82 (1991–1992).

39 Hanisch and Nerheim, Fra vantro til overmot, 235.

40 Gjerde, Kristin Øye and Ryggvik, Helge, On the Edge, under Water: Offshore Diving in Norway. Translated by Gooderham, Rolf E.. Stavanger, 2014Google Scholar. Originally published as Nordsjødykkerne (Stavanger, 2009).

41 Ibid.

42 Ibid., 182. The advanced industrial saturation diving then being performed on the Norwegian continental shelf relied on strong efforts to promote Norwegian research in diving and subsea activities; the Norwegian Underwater Technology Centre (NUTEC) and the several state-sponsored research programs were important. When Norwegian companies tried to compete with French, American, and to some degree British diving firms in the 1970s, these companies' exclusive access to military-sponsored research was a substantial advantage. During the 1980s, the U.S. marine diving tables had become common knowledge in the entire industry. The problem for divers was that when diving companies made their own versions of these tables they tended to shorten the decompression time, thereby increasing the possibility of “the bends,” or diving sickness.

43 “Noble Intentions Evolve into Bid Scandal!” European Offshore Petroleum Newsletter 15, no. 2 (1990)Google Scholar.

44 Reich, Robert, The Work of Nations: Preparing Ourselves for Twenty-First Century Capitalism (New York, 1991)Google Scholar; Ohmae, Kenichi, The Borderless World (New York, 1990)Google ScholarPubMed.

45 Christensen, Sverre A. and Rinde, Harald, Nasjonale Utlendinger: ABB i Norge, 1880–2010 [National foreigners: ABB in Norway, 1880–2010] (Oslo, 2010)Google Scholar.

46 Kongsberg Offshore a.s., Årsberetning [Annual report] (1993), 4.

47 Lerpold, Lin, Reputation by Association: Exploring Alliance Formation and Organizational Identity Adaptation (Stockholm, 2003)Google Scholar.

48 For example, there was the French regulation school (Alain Lipietz, Robert Boyer), transaction cost theory (Oliver Williamson), and various approaches that focused on the preconditions for innovation (Chris Freeman, Benkt Åke Lundvall, Giovanni Dosi, et al.).

49 Porter, Michael, The Competitive Advantage of Nations (New York, 1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50 Reve, , Lensberg, , and Grønhaug, , Et konkurransedyktig NorgeGoogle Scholar.

51 Reich, The Work of Nations, 3.

52 Ryggvik and Smith-Solbakken, Blod, svette og olje, 289.

53 Woolfson, Charles, Foster, John, and Beck, Matthias, Paying for the Piper: Capital and Labour in Britain's Offshore Oil Industry (London, 1997), 526Google Scholar.

54 The section on NORSOK is partly based on my doctoral dissertation, “Norsk oljevirksomhet mellom det nasjonale og det internasjonale.” See also Engen, Ole Andreas, Rhetoric and Realities: The NORSOK Programme and Technical and Organisational Change in the Norwegian Petroleum Complex (Bergen, 2002)Google Scholar.

55 “Samarbeid operatører og leverandører” [Cooperation between operators and suppliers], NORSOK report 3 (1995).

56 Petter Nore, “Norsk Hydro's Takeover of Saga Petroleum in 1999: A Case Study,” Maktog demokratiutredningens rapportserie 73 (Aug. 2003).

57 Eierskap i Statoil og fremtidig forvaltning av SDØE [Statoil's ownership and the future administration of SDFI], Parliamentary proposal no. 36 (2000–2001).

58 Musacchio, Aldo and Lazzarini, Sergio G., Reinventing State Capitalism: Leviathan in Business, Brazil and Beyond (Cambridge, Mass., 2014), 183CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

59 “Statoil-aksjen” [Statoil shares], Statoil website, http://www.statoil.com/en/investorcentre/share/pages/sharemonitor.aspx.

60 BP, Statistical Review of World Energy, June 2011 (London, 2011), 8Google Scholar.

61 Oljeskattekontoret [Yearly press briefing from the Norwegian oil tax office], Dec. 2011.

62 Ministry of Oil and Energy, Økt utvinning på norsk kontinentalsokkel: En rapport fra utvinningsutvalget [Increased extraction on the Norwegian continental shelf: A report from the committee on extraction] (Oslo, 2010), 33Google Scholar.

63 Energy, Rystad, Internasjonal omsetning fra norske oljeserviceselskaper: Rapport til Olje- og Energidepartmenentet [The international turnover from Norwegian oil service companies: A report to the Ministry of Petroleum and Energy] (Oslo, 21 Aug. 2012), 14Google Scholar, http://www.regjeringen.no/upload/OED/Rapporter/Rapport_Rystad-Energy_Internasjonal-omsetning-fra-norske-oljeserviceselskapert.pdf. The figures for the whole period are somewhat higher than the total oil investments. This is due both to the proportion of exports and because a part of turnover is made up of sales between different contractor companies. Hence the same economic activity may be counted several times.

64 INTSOK, Global Procurement Processes: Phase 1 (Oslo, 2014), 32Google Scholar.

65 Statistics Norway, External trade in goods, 2012, Final figures (Oslo, 24 June 2013), http://www.ssb.no/en/utenriksokonomi/statistikker/muh/aar-endelige/2013-06-24.

66 Olje- og gass står for mer enn 86 prosent av norsk eksport [Oil and gas constitute more than 86 percent of Norwegian exports], Petro. no. 19. (Aug. 2013), http://www.petro.no/nyheter/bedrifter-og-okonomi/olje--og-gass-star-for-86-prosent-av-norges-eksport/c0efa691-49bb-4bf0-b80f-37f0dfab566a.

67 Statoil, Annual Report 2012 , 13, http://www.statoil.com/AnnualReport2012/en/.