Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-7262s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-17T19:18:57.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The mineralogy of suspended matter, fresh and Cenozoic sediments in the fluvio-deltaic Rhine–Meuse–Scheldt–Ems area, the Netherlands: An overview and review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2016

J. Griffioen*
Affiliation:
TNO Geological Survey of the Netherlands, P.O. Box 80 015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands and Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, P.O. Box 80 115, 3508 TC Utrecht, the Netherlands
G. Klaver
Affiliation:
Formerly BRGM, Laboratories Division, 3 av. C. Guillemin, BP36009, 45060 Orleans, France; Le Studium, CNRS, Orleans, France; TNO Geological Survey of the Netherlands, P.O. Box 80 015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands
W.E. Westerhoff
Affiliation:
TNO Geological Survey of the Netherlands, P.O. Box 80 015, 3508 TA Utrecht, the Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author. Email: jasper.griffioen@tno.nl

Abstract

Minerals are the building blocks of clastic sediments and play an important role with respect to the physico-chemical properties of the sediment and the lithostratigraphy of sediments. This paper aims to provide an overview of the mineralogy (including solid organic matter) of sediments as well as suspended matter as found in the Netherlands (and some parts of Belgium). The work is based on a review of the scientific literature published over more than 100 years. Cenozoic sediments are addressed together with suspended matter and recent sediments of the surface water systems because they form a geoscientific continuum from material subject to transport via recently settled to aged material. Most attention is paid to heavy minerals, clay minerals, feldspars, Ca carbonates, reactive Fe minerals (oxides, siderite, sulphides, glauconite) and solid organic matter because they represent the dominant minerals and their properties form a main issue in subsurface and water management. When possible and relevant, the amounts, provenance, relationship with grain size distribution, early diagenesis and palaeohydrological evolution are described. Tables with statistical data about the mineral contents and isotopic composition of carbonates and organic matter are presented as overviews. The review on the mineralogy of Dutch fluvial and marine environments is more extensive than that for the other sedimentary environments because the first two have been studied much more intensively than the others and they also form the larger part of the Dutch deposits. The focus is on the natural background mineralogy of Dutch sediments, but this is hard for recent sediments, largely because the massive hydraulic infrastructure present in the Netherlands has probably also affected the mineralogy and geochemistry of sediments deposited in recent centuries. Many findings are summarised, several of which lead to more general insights for the Dutch situation. Ca carbonates in sediments often have several provenances and thus must be considered as mixtures. Dolomite is commonly present in addition to calcite. The importance of biotite as weatherable mica is unclear. Weathering of heavy minerals plays some role but it is unclear in which way it affects the heavy mineral associations. Clays are usually dominated by illite, smectite and their interstratified variant, while kaolinite is usually below 20% and chlorite below 5%. Vermiculite is a minor constituent in fluvial clays and its illitisation presumably happens during early diagenesis in the marine environment. Opaque Fe hydroxides can be present in addition to Fe oxyhydroxide coatings and both will play a role in redox chemistry as reactive Fe minerals. Feldspars in marine sediments must be present but they have not been properly studied. The genesis of rattle stones and carbonate concretions has not been completely elucidated. The fraction of terrigeneous organic matter in estuarine and coastal marine sediments is substantial. The available data and information are spread irregularly over the country and the reviewed information discussed in this paper is derived from relatively small-scale studies dealing with a limited amount of analysed samples. Much information is available from the Scheldt estuaries in the southwestern part of the Netherlands partly due to the severe contamination of the Western Scheldt in recent decades.

Information

Type
Review
Copyright
Copyright © Netherlands Journal of Geosciences Foundation 2016 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The Netherlands, showing the topography and the locations of the geographical names referred to in this paper.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Geological settings of the Netherlands during the Quaternary (upper left) and its main, shallow tectonic structures.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Surface geology of the Netherlands.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Lithostratigraphy of Cenozoic deposits in the Netherlands.

Figure 4

Table 1. Overview of the lithostratigraphical members mentioned in the subsequent sections of this manuscript, arranged according to the formations to which they belong, and some main lithological characteristics.

Figure 5

Table 2. Description of organic geochemical compounds and types of plankton as mentioned in this manuscript (basically derived from http://www.thefreedictionary.com/ and checked against Engel & Macko (1993)).

Figure 6

Table 3. Standard heavy mineral composition (in counts of 100) determined in the original six heavy mineral assemblages distinguished by Edelman (1933).

Figure 7

Table 4. Heavy mineral and feldspar assemblages determined in the Dutch Quaternary fluvial deposits. Data for the heavy minerals are taken from Zonneveld (1958), Doppert et al. (1975) and Westerhoff (2009). Feldspar data are from Van Baren (1934).

Figure 8

Table 5. Stability of some common heavy minerals under chemical weathering (Friis, 1974).

Figure 9

Table 6. Mineralogical composition (in wt%) of the <2 µm fraction of some fluvial clays and marine clays in the Netherlands and muds from the North Sea surface (derived from Breeuwsma (1985), unless stated otherwise). Analyses were performed on samples after removal of organic matter, carbonates and sulphides.

Figure 10

Table 7. Clay mineralogy (in wt%) of Rhine-Meuse-Scheldt Holocene and Pleistocene fluvial clays (derived from Adriaens (2014)).

Figure 11

Table 8. Regional characteristics (as percentiles) of the pyrite, reactive Fe, organic matter and Ca carbonate contents in several Dutch fluvial geological formations.

Figure 12

Table 9. General characterisation of the CaCO3 state of Dutch Quaternary geological formations (derived from Klein & Griffioen (2010)).

Figure 13

Table 10. Median values of pyrite, organic matter and Ca carbonate contents (in wt%) in different facies of the Holocene confining layer in the Bommelerwaard polder (derived from Van Helvoort et al. (2007)).

Figure 14

Table 11. Results of isotope analysis on carbonates in several Dutch geological sediments and the Belgian Boom Clay.

Figure 15

Table 12. Overview of the original and present-day carbonate contents of soils derived from different fluvial sediment types of the Rhine and Meuse river systems in the eastern Netherlands (derived from Pons (1957)).

Figure 16

Table 13. Contents of extractable Fe oxyhydroxides and total Fe (as range or average with standard deviation) in recent sediments of fluviatile water systems.

Figure 17

Table 14. Sulphur contents (as range or average with standard deviation) in different kinds of recent sediments in fluvial systems or small pools and lake.

Figure 18

Fig. 5. Example of pyrite framboids adhered to a sand grain (above) and the micromorphology of a single framboid (below).

Figure 19

Fig. 6. Whitish siderite-rich layer in clay of the Waalre Formation in the Maalbeek quarry (near Venlo, Limburg).

Figure 20

Table 15. Organic carbon contents (as range or average with or without standard deviation) in recent sediments in fluvial systems or related floodplains.

Figure 21

Table 16. Observed ranges or averages with standard deviations in organic matter content and its δ13C and 14C values for suspended matter and recent sediments in fluvial, estuarine and marine systems.

Figure 22

Fig. 7. Map of the southern North Sea with the locations of the geographical names referred to in this paper.

Figure 23

Table 17. Standard heavy mineral counts (in counts of 100) of the five HMAs distinguished by Baak (1936) in the bottom sands of the southern North Sea.

Figure 24

Fig. 8. Distribution of the heavy mineral assemblages across the southern North Sea (redrawn from Schüttenhelm & Laban, 2005).

Figure 25

Fig. 9. So-called ‘silver sand’ in the Beaujean quarry in southern Limburg.

Figure 26

Table 18. Average heavy mineral contents (in counts of 100) of the beach and dune sands deposited along the Dutch coast from Den Helder to Hoek van Holland. Data for the 200–250 µm fraction from Eisma (1968) and for the >30 µm fraction from Edelman (1933).

Figure 27

Table 19. Heavy mineral content (in %) of individual size fractions of beach and dune sands collected between Scheveningen (km pole 91) and Den Helder (km pole 2) (derived from Eisma (1968)).

Figure 28

Table 20. Heavy mineral assemblages and glauconite presence of the Quaternary and Neogene marine formations. Data are from Westerhoff (2009), Doppert et al. (1975) and Baak (1936). No systematic data could be found on the quantities of feldspars in the marine geological formations.

Figure 29

Table 21. Mineralogical composition (in wt%) of the fractions <0.5, 0.5–2 and 2–10 µm of mud deposited along the Dutch and German coast (derived from Favejee (1951)).

Figure 30

Table 22. Clay mineralogy (as ranges in wt%) from mudflats on Belgian Coastal Shelf, Scheldt river and estuary, and marine recent and older deposits from the North Sea and the Netherlands (derived from Zeelmaekers (2011) and Adriaens (2014)).

Figure 31

Fig. 10. Maps of the fractions of different clay minerals in the clay fraction of seabed sediments in the North Sea (redrawn from Irion & Zöllmer, 1999).

Figure 32

Table 23. Clay mineralogy (in wt%) of Palaeogene and Neogene marine sediments studied in the Netherlands or Belgium. All results are based on the <2 μm fraction of the samples except Decleer et al. (1983), which are based on whole sediment.

Figure 33

Table 24. Mineral counts of feldspars and micas (out of 100 grains of light minerals) in sediments and/or suspended matter in the Wadden Sea, the North Sea and the Rhine river (calcite and aragonite were removed prior to counting; derived from Crommelin (1943)).

Figure 34

Table 25. Amounts of diatoms in different kinds of Dutch geological sediments.

Figure 35

Table 26. Regional characteristics (as percentiles) of the pyrite, reactive Fe, organic matter and Ca carbonate contents in several Dutch marine geological formations. Geotop refers to the first tens of metres below surface and 5a2 and 5b2 are two of these areas (see Van Gaans et al. (2011) and Griffioen et al. (2013)). Note that 82.5 percentile is given in regular or 90 percentile in italic script.

Figure 36

Fig. 11. Major sources and fluxes of Ca-carbonates in the Rhine-Meuse-Scheldt delta area and related southern North Sea.

Figure 37

Fig. 12. Sediment cores from drilling B19C0473 at Bakkum (North-Holland) showing in the central core tidal stream deposits with shell fragments on top of a peat layer that features the bioturbation burrows of a mussel.

Figure 38

Fig. 13. Example of a septarian carbonate concretion in the Boom Clay as observed in a quarry near Leuven (Belgium).

Figure 39

Fig. 14. Example of glauconite-rich sand illustrating the typical occurrence of this mica or clay mineral as sand-sized granules.

Figure 40

Table 27. Characteristics of the recent estuaries related to the Netherlands (derived from Abril et al. (2002)).

Figure 41

Table 28. Regional characteristics (as percentiles) of the pyrite, reactive Fe, organic matter and Ca carbonate contents (in wt%) in the two Dutch glacial formations on the Central Drenthe Plateau (derived from Klein & Griffioen (2012)).

Figure 42

Table 29. Typical heavy mineral assemblages (in counts of 100) of the aeolian loess deposits (derived from Mucher (1973)).

Figure 43

Fig. 15. SEM backscatter image of a polished thin section showing pyritised plant remains as observed in a buried peat layer of the Boxtel Formation at the Peel Horst (derived from RGD, 1989).

Figure 44

Table 30. Regional characteristics (as percentiles) of the Ca carbonate, clay, organic matter and pyrite contents (in wt%) of peat in different combinations of region and geological unit. The data largely refer to peat deeper than 1 m below surface.

Figure 45

Fig. 16. Bog ore with blue-discoloured, oxidised vivianite as found during construction of the entry of the high-speed traintunnel near Leiden, South-Holland.

Figure 46

Fig. 17. Local, horizontal enrichments of Fe-oxyhydroxides as well as Mn-oxyhydroxides in sand of the Sterksel Formation as found in the Maalbeek quarry (Limburg). It is yet unknown how and when these oxyhydroxides were formed diagenetically.