Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-kcxw8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-13T00:36:04.187Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Piercing associated perichondritis of the pinna: are we treating it correctly?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2013

Z W Liu*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Colchester General Hospital, UK
P Chokkalingam
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Colchester General Hospital, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Z W Liu, Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Essex County Hospital, Lexden Rd, Colchester CO3 3NB, UK E-mail: zwl20cam@gmail.com

Abstract

Objective:

This paper reports a series of patients with sporadic pinna perichondritis who presented to a district general hospital over a period of 10 years. The data examined included the causative organism, risk factors and pattern of antibiotic use.

Method:

A retrospective analysis of diagnosed cases of pinna perichondritis from 2001 to 2012 was performed. A literature review of pinna perichondritis was carried out using Pubmed with the key words ‘pinna perichondritis’, ‘pinna abscess’, ‘pinna infection’ and ‘piercing’.

Results:

Pinna perichondritis was more likely to result from chondral than lobe piercings. The majority of cases were caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Conclusion:

Most patients were not prescribed anti-pseudomonal antibiotics on presentation. This may result in persistent infection and long-term cosmetic defects.

Information

Type
Clinical Records
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable