Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-v2srd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T03:34:43.200Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comparisons of right ventricular strain between repaired tetralogy of fallot and isolated pulmonary regurgitation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2025

George Slim*
Affiliation:
Stollery Children’s Hospital, Divisions of Pediatric Cardiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Joseph Pagano
Affiliation:
Stollery Children’s Hospital, Divisions of Pediatric Cardiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Kumaradevan Punithakumar
Affiliation:
Servier Virtual Cardiac Centre, Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute and Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Michelle Noga
Affiliation:
Servier Virtual Cardiac Centre, Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute and Department of Radiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
Edythe Tham
Affiliation:
Stollery Children’s Hospital, Divisions of Pediatric Cardiology and Diagnostic Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
*
Corresponding author: George Slim; Email: gslim@ualberta.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Pulmonary regurgitation leading to right ventricular enlargement may occur after repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) or balloon dilation for pulmonary valve stenosis. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) guidelines to identify the timing of valve replacement in rTOF are not necessarily applicable to isolated pulmonary regurgitation. This study aims to compare deformation parameters of isolated pulmonary regurgitation and rTOF at comparable right ventricular volume loads.

Methods:

Adopting a quantitative retrospective analytic framework, CMR was performed in 44 patients (0–30 years), 22 in each of the isolated pulmonary regurgitation and rTOF study arms, matched for age (±12 months), and Right ventricular end-diastolic volume z-score (±1). Right ventricular longitudinal strain/strain rate and circumferential strain/strain rate were measured. Comparisons between groups were analysed using two-tailed T-tests and one-way ANOVA.

Results:

Both groups showed predominance of longitudinal over circumferential strain. Circumferential strain was significantly greater in rTOF compared to isolated pulmonary regurgitation (–26.5% versus –22.3%, p < 0.05). Longitudinal strain did not differ between groups. The longitudinal:circumferential strain ratio was significantly lower in rTOF compared to isolated pulmonary regurgitation (1.24 versus 1.53, p = 0.05). Circumferential and longitudinal strain rates did not differ between groups.

Conclusions:

The right ventricles in rTOF demonstrate greater reliance on circumferential strain in response to increased volumes. The decrease in longitudinal:circumferential strain ratio suggests rTOF right ventricles display a greater adaptive response to the volume load than isolated pulmonary regurgitation, highlighting the importance of the relative contributions of both circumferential and longitudinal strain in order to understand the mechanisms of right ventricular dysfunction in pulmonary regurgitation.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that no alterations are made and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use and/or adaptation of the article.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Group comparisons of clinical, volumetric, functional, and ventricular deformation

Figure 1

Figure 1. Longitudinal strain vs Circumferential Strain at comparable volumes.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Global longitudinal strain / global circumferential strain—ratio.

Figure 3

Table 2. Prior group comparisons of volumetric, functional, and ventricular deformation10 (Goot, et al)

Figure 4

Figure 3. (a) Right Ventricular Global Longitudinal Strain measurement (b) Right ventricular global longitudinal strain rate analysis.

Figure 5

Figure 4. (a) Right ventricular global circumferential Strain measurement (b) Right ventricular global circumferential strain rate analysis.