The search for Sir John Franklin

After the failure of the Franklin Expedition to return to England several years after its last sighting in Lancaster Sound in July 1845, Franklin’s wife, Lady Jane Franklin (1791–1875), and others, pressed the British Admiralty to launch a search for the missing expedition. Beginning in 1847, with a substantive finder’s reward on offer, a series of expeditions joined the hunt. Some were funded by the Admiralty. Some were privately funded. At one point, in 1850, eleven British and two American ships were looking for the lost expedition at the same time [Fig. 1]. In all, more than thirty different expeditions participated in the search (Berton, Reference Berton1988, 151; Ross, W.G., Reference Ross2002, 57–69). As the public’s interest in the subject grew, the Admiralty found itself under increasing pressure to either find the missing explorers or provide an explanation for their disappearance.

Figure 1.

“The Arctic Discovery Ships – Midnight” Melville Bay, August 12, 1850, by William Parker Snow (1817-1895), Watercolor on paper, 6 x 8 inches. Private collection.

Over time, various relics from the missing expedition were found, and the sad story of the Franklin Expedition’s fate began to unfold [Fig. 2]. Even if willing to concede the loss of Franklin’s two ships, HMS Erebus and HMS Terror, it took decades before the world would believe that all hands had been lost with them. Throughout the 1850s, the search for the missing heroes continued. To cover such a vast area, the search teams employed a wide range of techniques to reach out to the hoped-for survivors.

Figure 2.

Relics from the lost Franklin expedition, Illustrated London News, November 4, 1854. Private collection.

Among the first and least personal ways of spreading information to the missing seamen was by releasing hot air balloons that carried messages telling anyone lucky enough to find them that there were search parties looking for them and where they could find help (Aukland & Moore, Reference Auckland and Moore1998, 5–6; Schoendorf, Reference Schoendorf1982, 21–27; Wordie, Reference Wordie1998, 75–79) [Fig. 3]. Hundreds of balloons were sent up from the rescue ships and many thousands of printed dispatches were scattered over the Arctic (Hoag, Reference Hoag2000). Other attempts to communicate with the lost expedition members involved the use of rockets, kites, flashing lights, gunshots, horns, and drums. At least two efforts to communicate were more tangible and lasting. These involved the use of special buttons and collars made for Arctic foxes.

Figure 3.

Sample message form for distribution by balloon in hope of communicating with Sir John Franklin’s lost expedition. Private collection.

Native encounters

Not surprisingly, the seamen who were looking for Franklin and his men had many encounters with native people. They hoped these experienced, well-traveled people might be able to help in the rescue effort. Unfortunately, the English-speaking searchers rarely had the language skills needed to communicate with the Inuit in any substantive way. Sometimes they gave them printed messages intended for their lost compatriots, but since these were fragile, ephemeral, and of no interest to the Inuit, the chances of them being retained, or finding their way to their hoped-for recipients were slim. For this reason, the search teams came up with another idea: something more desirable and permanent with which to convey the same information.

What they created were special buttons called “postal buttons” or “rescue buttons” on which they embossed information describing the locations of rescue vessels and caches of food [Fig. 4]. They gave these to the Inuit hunters they met in the hope that the buttons would be used by their recipients and eventually spotted by the lost seamen who would find the information they contained helpful in leading them to safety. “Rescue buttons” were used by Commander Robert McClure (1807–1873) from the HMS Investigator and from its companion ship HMS Enterprise from 1850 to 1854, and by Capt. Edward Belcher (1799–1877) and his fellow captains during their multi-ship squadron’s search for Franklin between 1852 and 1854.

Figure 4.

“Rescue Button” 1852. Private collection.

The idea was a good one, for the buttons were highly valued by the Inuit. They were put to many uses by them, including, in one case, serving as the bowl for a pipe. This was found a decade later, hundreds of miles from where the button had been given away [Fig. 5a and b]. It was collected by Roderick Macfarlane, the director of the Hudson Bay Company’s trading post at Fort Anderson, Northwest Territories, when he was acquiring ethnographic objects from the local people for the Natural History Museum of the Smithsonian Institution. It resides in their Arctic Collection (#NMNH-E002156) in Washington, today.

Figure 5.

(a & b). “Rescue Button” used in Inuit pipe. Courtesy Smithsonian Institution.

Arctic foxes

Perhaps the most ingenious means of communication with the missing explorers was that involving Arctic foxes [Fig. 6]. This small canine species, widespread in its distribution, is known to travel long distances in search of food. During the winter months, when birds, lemmings, and other sources of nourishment are in short supply, the foxes often gather near human settlements in hope of scavenging discarded food [Fig. 7]. Crewmen aboard ice-bound vessels frequently noticed and commented on the ubiquity and tameness of foxes around them. An account offered by a crewmember on HMS Investigator in 1848, is typical: “… the foxes of Leopold Harbour [where the ship was wintering]… soon discovered the warmth thrown out by the squadron under [the command of] Sir James Ross, and wisely burrowed and bred in the snow embankments thrown up around the ship.” For those sailors who had dogs at home (and to the officers who had dogs aboard), it was not hard to think of a way of harnessing the foxes to help them spread the word of rescue.

Figure 6.

Arctic fox (Vulpes lagopus) by John James Audubon from The Viviparous Quadrupeds of North America (1846-1854), Courtesy of the Library, Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University.

Figure 7.

Arctic foxes and dogs linger near Inuit encampment, from a plate in: Journal of A Second Voyage for the Discovery of a North-west Passage from the Atlantic to the Pacific Performed in the Years 1821-22-23 in His Majesty’s Ships Fury and Hecla, under the orders of Captain William Edward Parry. London: John Murray, 1824. 498. Courtesy of the Library, Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University.

The plan was to have the blacksmiths aboard the rescue ships emboss on metal collars the location of food caches and points of rendezvous where the missing seamen might seek refuge. The foxes would be baited with food, captured, collared, and released. This way, even if the animals did not travel away from the area immediately, as spring arrived and the ice melted, they would inevitably spread out over the Arctic carrying information to anyone who might see, trap, or shoot them in the ensuing months or years. The foxes, which generally live for from three to six years, cover a home range of nine square kilometers, but they are known to travel much farther in search of food. In 2019, an Arctic fox from Bylot Island, in Nunavut, northern Canada, was traced traveling an astounding 6400 kilometers in just 299 days (Dzombak, Reference Dzombak2023).

Captain James Clark Ross (1800–1862), who led one of the earliest Franklin Search expeditions in 1848–1849, reported to the Admiralty his use of foxes as a means of contacting the lost mariners:

James D. Gilpin, a clerk on one of Ross’s ships, HMS Investigator, wrote a short article in the Nautical Magazine in 1850 in which he reported:

Fortunately, we have a detailed accounting of the fox collaring in the diary of William Gibson, carpenter’s mate on HMS Investigator. A few of his daily entries give a good idea of what was going on:

November [1848]

16^th Weather fair no wind, but very cold, the glass fell to 36dg below zero, which made it too cold for men to work outside, hands employed on board; at half past 7AM, they started [released] a fox, with a collar round his neck, with the ships names stamped on it, and the Lat[itude] and Long[itude] that we were in, this was done in the hopes that it might be the good fortune for some of Sir John Franklin’s party to fall in with it.

17^th Weather fine, but very cold, the Glass 34dg below zero, the hands went outside to work though freezing so hard, it froze their water boots so hard that they could scarcely walk in them. The fox that we started [released] yesterday was caught again in the Enterprise’s trap, today, and they started him again, but he did not care about going away for he hung round the ship some time, the glass rose up to 15dg below zero, and kept so all night.

23^rd Weather fine, hands employed on the Ice about the walk, we sent another Dispatch [information stamped on a collar] away by Mr. Fox, the glass 24dg below zero.

28^th Weather moderate, hands employed outside, on the ice rising on the wall where it was so low; we caught another Fox, and started [released] him with another Dispatch [stamped collar], the glass during the day was from 22dg to 34dg below zero, very cold.

December [1848]

1^st Weather fair, hands employed about the wall, we caught a fox, that had been started from the other ship, it was very tame and we started him again, the glass 39dg below zero.

5^th Weather fair, hands employed on the Ice, at 4AM the glass 40dg below zero, caught another fox, put a collar round his neck and started him.

21^st At 4AM glass 50dg below zero, hands out on the Ice Skylarking, we caught a fox and set him adrift with a collar round his neck, at 8PM glass 49dg below zero.

January [1849]

25^th At 4AM, glass at 48dg below zero, hands employed fetching gravel, caught another fox and set the other [captured on Jan. 24] adrift with a collar round his neck with the Ships names on it and where we was [sic] laying, glass from 48dg to 47dg during.

February [1849]

8^th Blowing fresh with plenty of drift, one of Quartermasters caught a fox by hand in the night, he came on board to pay a visit to our Toby, the fox that we had chained up, he had a collar round his neck, it was one that had been started from our ship about a month ago, glass 47dg below zero.

March [1849]

9^th Weather fine at 8AM glass 22dg below zero hands out on the Ice all day, glass at 8PM 34dg below zero, we caught a fox with a collar on that we set adrift on the 3^rd of October 1848. [not mentioned in the entry of Oct. 3^rd though that entry is abridged and combined with the 4^th]

April [1849]

1^st Sunday weather very rough all day a strong breeze from the N.E. went to church and divisions, caught a very large fox, glass from 5dg to 13dg below zero.

2^nd Weather moderated, on the Starboard side of the ship the drift snow was 7 feet thick, the hands was [sic] employed in removing it away, we put a collar round the fox’s neck with the ships name and where we was [sic] laying, and set him adrift.

By the end of April, Gibson noted that “The foxes have now all entirely disappeared.”Footnote ¹ His ship had overwintered in the vicinity of what today is known as the Prince Leopold Island Migratory Bird Sanctuary. The area is well known for its abundance of nesting sea birds, and, for that reason, has become a favorite stopping place for modern Arctic cruise ships traveling through the Northwest Passage. It also explains why sailors wintering-over nearby encountered so many Arctic foxes. The animals were attracted to the ships during the winter months when wild food was hard to come by, then dispersed in the spring, when birds, eggs, and other wild food sources once again became available.

So central were the Arctic foxes to Ross’s search efforts, that they were featured in a life-sized panorama that was painted by Robert Burford (1791–1861) and exhibited in London in the years following Ross’s return to England [Fig. 8]. In this way, the fox-collaring effort was brought to the attention of the tens of thousands of people who saw it depicted in the display and read about it in the accompanying pamphlet/catalog (Burford, Reference Burford1850).

Figure 8.

Royal panorama “View of the Polar Regions” by Robert Burford Broadside-brochure printed for viewers. It shows the collaring of Arctic foxes and other activities during Capt. James Clark Ross’s expedition in search of the lost Franklin expedition (1848-49) Private collection.

While several subsequent search expeditions followed Ross’s example in creating fox collars, not all were as committed to the process or took it as seriously. Sherard Osborn (1822–1875), captain of the steam tender HMS Pioneer, one of four ships in a Franklin search effort overseen by Captain Horatio Austin (1800–1865) in 1850, reported on his crew’s interaction with Arctic foxes in his book, Stray Leaves from an Arctic Journal (1852):

Osborn’s reference to “enclosing information in a collar,” as opposed to embossing information on a collar, suggests that the process undertaken by the members of Austin’s expedition may have been somewhat different from that employed by Ross.

Captain Richard Collinson (1811–1883), commanding HMS Enterprise from 1850–1855, was another naval officer who attempted to communicate with Franklin’s expedition with fox collars. In his report, Collinson states that a first fox was captured and tagged on October 25, 1851, and that three were tagged in December 1851, one of which was recaptured in March 1852. Others were tagged on May 25, 1852, and November 2, 1852 (Collinson, Reference Collinson and Collinson1889, 170, 174, 178, 187, 247). Collinson left England in January 1850, two months after Ross’s return. He may have learned of Ross’s attempts prior to his departure.

Lieutenant Joseph-René Bellot (1826–1853) was another searcher who discussed his attempts to capture and tag foxes during the Franklin search, three years after Ross pioneered the technique (Bellot, Reference Bellot1854). Bellot served on the Prince Albert, the ship used for a private search expedition sponsored by Lady Jane Franklin commanded by William Kennedy (1814–1890) in 1851–1852. On its search, the Prince Albert stopped at Port Leopold on Somerset Island, where Ross had wintered-over, but ultimately it moved on to winter some 120 km south of Port Leopold, at Batty Bay, on the east shore of Somerset Island. Bellot was fully aware of Ross’s experience in tagging foxes and referenced them in his own narrative, noting that the crew of the Prince Albert did the same. Unlike Ross, however, their efforts were thwarted by the ship’s dogs that repeatedly attacked the fox traps and destroyed them. He reported only two foxes being captured. Both were found dead, though whether they were killed by dogs or surreptitiously by seamen hoping to take home their pelts he does not say (Bellot, Reference Bellot1855. Vol. 2, 113, 258).

The copper collars created for the foxes at Port Leopold by Gilpin, Gibson, Ross and the crew of the Enterprise and the Investigator in 1848–1849 [Fig. 9], and by Osborn, Austin and the others over-wintering near Griffith Island in Barrow Strait in 1850–1851 were not as refined and elegant as some of the collars made for dogs at home [Figs. 10 and 11], but they did not need to be. Their purpose was purely utilitarian. Nor were they the only way the foxes served as messengers, or “two-penny postmen” as the sailors called them (Burford, Reference Burford1850, 13). On later rescue expeditions, when marking copper collars was not possible or considered too much trouble, similar information was conveyed with vellum tags, attached to plainer, home-made fox collars of leather or metal. Only one such tag is known to survive [Fig. 12]. It was created in 1850 for use by Horatio Austin, captain of HMS Resolute, and Erasmus Ommanney, captain of the teak-built barque Assistance. That tag reads as follows: “In Search of Sir John Franklin; H.M.S. Resolute H.T. Austin R.N. ‘’ Assistance Capt. E. Ommanney; ? Steam Tender; Longitude__Lat__; ___Day of __1850____.”

Figure 9.

Copper fox collar, 1848. Courtesy Scott Polar Research Institute.

Figure 10.

Silver dog collars, Great Britain, 19th century. Courtesy National Sporting Library and Museum, Middleburg, Virginia.

Figure 11.

Brass and copper dog collars, Great Britain 1844. Courtesy National Sporting Library and Museum, Middleburg, Virginia.

Figure 12.

Vellum tag for communicating with the members of the lost Franklin expedition by Arctic fox, 1850. Private collection.

In 1852, William Herschel de Griesback, a retired serviceman, suggested that the survivors of the lost expedition may also have tried to use animals as a means of communication to their would-be rescuers. In a letter to the Admiralty, he reported that a number of reindeer skins that had recently been harvested in Spitsbergen had “cuts (slits) in their ears, although the reindeer of Spitzbergen live in a perfect wild state.” His explanation for such distinctive, man-made markings was that:

“Again,” he concluded, “who shall say that Sir John Franklin, or one of his party, may not actually have caught or shot one of the foxes before alluded to, and thus have arrived at the very idea of making the animal creation a means of notice of their existence within to the world without?”

Of course Mr. de Griesback was quite wrong about the reindeer of Spitzbergen (part of Svalbard, a Norwegian archipelago in the Arctic Ocean) living “in a perfect wild state” or that their ear markings were something that had been invented and employed by Franklin’s lost crewmembers after seeing one of the annotated fox tags. Both the Sami and the Komi cultures had been using ear-cutting as a way to mark the reindeer in their captive herds for countless generations. In any case, based on the year of their harvest in Spitzbergen, and the location from which the animals were taken, the reindeer ear cuttings that caught de Griesback’s attention were certainly not generated by the survivors of the Franklin Expedition.

Only a few of the fox collars created to communicate with the Franklin party have survived. One is at the Royal Geographical Society, and one at the Scott Polar Research Institute [Fig. 9]. While some of the message-carrying collars were undoubtedly recovered by Inuit hunters and their copper used for other purposes, it is unlikely that any of the collars was ever found by the missing seamen from Franklin’s party, for many, if not all, of the lost explorers had probably succumbed to cold and starvation before the foxes were given the potentially life-saving messages to convey.

Except for the employment of carrier pigeons, which were dispatched by Capt. Sir John Ross from his winter quarters aboard the “Felix” in 1850 (one of which actually reached its home, near Ayr in Scotland in five days), to my knowledge, this is the only use of wild animals as a means of communication in maritime history (Osborn, Reference Osborn1852, 176). The effort was unsuccessful, but the concept was a good one. Who knows what success there might have been had the effort begun just a few years before.