Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-jhrpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-16T18:32:37.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subvocal phonological decoding: A key component in diagnosing reading disabilities

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 October 2015

John K. Munro
John K. Munro*
Affiliation:
University of Melbourne
*
Department of Learning and Educational Development, Faculty of Education, University of Melbourne, Victoria 3010, Australia, Fax: 61 3 8344 0975, E-mail: j.munro@unimelb.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

A key aspect of the work of many educational and developmental psychologists is the diagnosis of literacy learning disability. One component of this disability is learning to read words automatically. This difficulty is attributed to the gradual development of phonological decoding and the related acquisition of orthographic knowledge. Unfamiliar letter strings can be decoding either overtly, by saying aloud systematically parts of a written word and then blending the parts, or subvocally. Subvocal decoding is assumed to be more mature develapmentally and to be a key acquisition. The present study examines aspects of the acquisition of subvocal decoding by monitoring the reading of pseudowords by average and low achieving third to fifth graders. Subvocal phonological decoding ability was correlated with the accuracy, comprehension, and rate components of prose reading for both categories of reading ability and was higher for the average readers. Its accuracy was influenced by the number of letters in a pseudoword and its sound structure. Low achieving reoders showed a greater sensitivity to subvocal phonological decoding than average reoders. The implications for the diagnosis of reading disabilities by educational and developmental psychologists are discussed.

Keywords

Automatic ReadingDecodingLearning DisabilitiesOrthographic KnowledgeReading DisabilitiesSubvocal Phonological

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
The Educational and Developmental Psychologist , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , 2004 , pp. 109 - 123
Copyright
Copyright © Australian Psychological Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aaron, P.G., Joshi, M., & Williams, K.A. (1999). Not all reading disabilities are alike. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(2), 120–137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adams, M. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Beminger, V., & Abbott, R. (1994). Multiple orthographic and phonological codes in literacy acquisition: An evolving research program. In Beminger, V. (Ed.), The varieties of orthographic knowledge I: Theoretical and developmental issues (pp. 277–317). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1993). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children. A one-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 104–111.Google Scholar
Castles, A., & Coltheart, M. (1993). Varieties of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 47, 149–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ehri, L.C. (1987). Learning to spell and read words. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 19, 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehri, L.C., & Robbins, C. (1992). Beginners need some decoding skill to read words by analogy. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 12–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elbro, C., Borstrom, I., & Petersen, D.K. (1998). Predicting dyslexia from kindergarten: The importance of distinctness of phonological representations of lexical items. Reading Research Quarterly, 33(1), 36–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher, J.M., Shaywitz, S.E., Shankweiler, D., Katz, L., Liberman, I., Stuebing, K., Francis, D.J., Fowler, A., & Shaywitz, B.A. (1994). Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 6–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., Schatschneider, C, & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goswami, U. (1994). Reading by analogy: Theoretical and practical constraints. In Hulme, C. & Snowling, M. (Eds.), Reading development and dyslexia (pp. 18–30). Whurr: London.Google Scholar
Iversen, S., & Tunmer, W.E. (1993). Phonological processing skills and the reading recovery program. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 112–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 437–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamhi, A.G., & Catts, H.W. (1999). Language and reading disabilities. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Kaufman, A.S., & Kaufman, N.L. (1990). Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test IK-BIT). Circle Pines, MN: AGS Publishing.Google Scholar
Kintsch, W. (1988). The use of knowledge in discourse processing: A construction-integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laxon, V., Gallagher, A., & Masterson, J. (2002). The effects of familiarity, orthographic neighbourhood density, letter-length, and graphemic complexity on children’s reading accuracy. British Journal of Psychology, 93(2) 269–288.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laxon, V., Masterson, J., & Moran, R. (1994). Are children’s representations distributed? Effects of orthographic neighbourhood size, consistency and regularity of naming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manis, F.R., Seidenberg, M.S., Doi, L.M., McBride-Chang, C., & Peterson, A. (1996). On the bases of two subtypes of developmental dyslexia. Cognition, 58, 157–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, V.A., & Liberman, I.Y. (1984). Phonological awareness and verbal short-term memory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17(10), 592–599.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marshall, C.M., Snowling, M.J., & Bailey, P.J. (2001). Rapid auditory processing and phonological ability in normal readers and readers with dyslexia. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44(4), 925–941.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munro, j. (2000). Phoneme awareness span: A neglected dimension of phonemic awareness. Australian Developmental and Educational Psychologist, 17(10), 76–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muter, V., & Snowling, M. (1998). Concurrent and longitudinal predictors of reading: The role of metalinguistic and short-term memory skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 33(3), 320–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, K., & Snowling, M.J. (1998). Semantic processing and the development of word recognition skills: Evidence from children with reading comprehension difficulties. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nation, K., Clarke, P., & Snowling, M.J. (2002). General cognitive ability in children with reading comprehension difficulties. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(4), 549–561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neale, M.D. (1999). Neale Analysis of Reading Ability (3rd ed.). Hawthorn, Victoria: ACER Press.Google Scholar
Perfetti, C.A., Beck, I., Bell, L.C. & Hughes, C. (1987). Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 53(3), 283–319.Google Scholar
Rack, J.P., Snowling, M.J., & Olson, R.K. (1992). The nonword reading deficit in developmental dyslexia: Review. Reading Research Quarterly, 27(1), 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seymour, P.H.K. (1986). Cognitive analysis of dyslexia. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Share, D.L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spear-Swerling, L., & Sternberg, R.J. (1998). Curing our “epidemic” of learning disabilities. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(5), 397–402.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K.E. (1999). The sociopsychometrics of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 32(4), 350–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Cognitive processes and the reading problems of learning disabled children: Evaluating the assumption of specificity. In Torgesen, J. & Wong, B. (Eds.), Psychological and educational perspectives on learning disabilities (pp. 87–131). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stanovich, K.E., & Siegel, L.S. (1994). Phenotypic performance profile of children with reading disabilities: A regression-based test of the phonological-core variable-difference model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 36(1), 24–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stanovich, K.E., Siegel, L.S., & Gottardo, A. (1997). Converging evidence for phonological and surface subtypes of reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 114–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunmer, W.E., & Nesdale, A.R. (1985). Phonemic segmentation skill and beginning reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 4, 417–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandervelden, M.C., & Siegel, L.S. (1995). Phonological recoding and phoneme awareness in early literacy: A developmental approach. Reading Research Quarterly, 30(A), 854–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, R.K., Torgesen, J.K., Laughon, P., Simmons, K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1993). Development of young readers phonological processing abilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Sipay, E.R., & Small, S.G. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(4), 601–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vellutino, F.R. (1991). Introduction to three studies on reading acquisition: Convergent findings on theoretical foundations of code-oriented versus whole-language approaches to reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(A), 437–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webster, P.E., Plante, A.S., & Couvillion, M. (1997). Phonologic impairment and prereading: Update on a longitudinal study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(4), 365–376.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed