Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-2r2wp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-10T09:19:23.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biopsychosocial stressors and perinatal mental health: The mediating role of social support in a Pakistani cohort

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2026

Abid Malik*
Affiliation:
Health Services Academy, Pakistan
Rakhshanda Liaqat
Affiliation:
Health Services Academy, Pakistan Human Development Research Foundation, Pakistan
Nadia Suleman
Affiliation:
Health Services Academy, Pakistan
Semra Etyemez
Affiliation:
Weill Cornell Medicine, USA
Bilal Ahmed
Affiliation:
Health Services Academy, Pakistan
Raima Asif
Affiliation:
Health Services Academy, Pakistan
Shahzad Ali Khan
Affiliation:
Health Services Academy, Pakistan
Pamela J. Surkan
Affiliation:
Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, USA
Lauren M. Osborne
Affiliation:
Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Department of Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medical College, USA
*
Corresponding author: Abid Malik; Email: abid.malik@hsa.edu.pk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Perinatal depression and anxiety are major contributors to maternal morbidity, with a disproportionate burden in low- and middle-income countries. In Pakistan, common and modifiable biological risks, including anemia and vitamin D deficiency, may interact with psychosocial factors to influence perinatal mental health. This cohort study enrolled 152 pregnant women from a public hospital in Islamabad; 147 completed baseline assessments (12–32 weeks gestation) and 100 were followed at 6–8 weeks postpartum. Validated Urdu versions of the EPDS, GAD-7, and MSPSS were used alongside hemoglobin and vitamin D assessments at both time points. Longitudinal analyses were conducted using generalized linear mixed models, supplemented by cross-sectional and mediation analyses.Depression was prevalent antenatally (41.5%) and increased postpartum (57.0%), while anxiety declined from 25.2% to 12.0%. Higher hemoglobin was protective against antenatal depression (OR = 0.66) and anxiety (OR = 0.65), but not in longitudinal models. Vitamin D deficiency predicted postnatal depression (OR = 3.15), while sufficiency was associated with remission. Social support showed a strong protective effect (OR = 0.24) and mediated 40% of the hemoglobin–depression association. Baseline symptom severity was the strongest predictor of postpartum outcomes. These findings highlight a substantial burden and point to modifiable nutritional and psychosocial targets for intervention.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Participant flow.

Figure 1

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of study participants (N = 149)

Figure 2

Table 2. Attrition analysis: comparison of baseline characteristics between participants retained and lost to follow-up

Figure 3

Table 3. Vitamin D status and statistical associations with perinatal mental health trajectories (N = 100)

Figure 4

Table 4. Cross-sectional associations between biomarkers, social support and mental health at baseline (T1; N = 147)

Figure 5

Table 5. Cross-sectional associations between biomarkers, social support and mental health at follow-up (T2; N = 100)

Figure 6

Table 6. Factors associated with perinatal depression and anxiety in longitudinal analysis

Figure 7

Table 7. Mediation analysis of hemoglobin → social support → depression

Figure 8

Figure 2. Mediation path diagram.

Author comment: Biopsychosocial stressors and perinatal mental health: The mediating role of social support in a Pakistani cohort — R0/PR1

Comments

Dear Editors,

Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health

Cambridge University Press

I am pleased to submit our manuscript, “Biopsychosocial Stressors and Perinatal Mental Health: The Mediating Role of Social Support in a Pakistani Cohort,” for consideration in Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health. This study directly aligns with the journal’s mission to advance evidence-based, interdisciplinary global mental health research that addresses inequities and supports scalable solutions in low- and middle-income countries.

Our manuscript presents rare longitudinal data from Pakistan that integrates nutritional biomarkers, psychosocial resources, and mental health trajectories across pregnancy and the postpartum period. Very few studies in South Asia have evaluated perinatal depression and anxiety through a combined biological and psychosocial lens, and to our knowledge, none have simultaneously examined hemoglobin, vitamin D, perceived social support, and mental health outcomes in a longitudinal design. The findings offer timely and policy-relevant insights into perinatal mental health in LMICs, a population disproportionately exposed to both biological vulnerabilities and structural adversity.

The work makes several important contributions to the global mental health literature. It advances mechanistic understanding by demonstrating how nutritional deficiencies and social support interact to shape perinatal depression and anxiety, showing that social support significantly mediates the relationship between hemoglobin and depressive symptoms. It also highlights the stage-specific role of vitamin D insufficiency in predicting postpartum depression and the persistence or remission of antenatal symptoms. Together, these findings offer a pragmatic biopsychosocial model that can inform integrated, low-cost maternal mental health strategies within existing antenatal care systems. Because the biomarkers we assessed are routinely measured in maternal health services, our results point toward immediately actionable and scalable strategies for early detection and intervention.

The manuscript has been approved by all authors and is not under consideration elsewhere. There are no conflicts of interest. Ethical approval was obtained from the National Bioethics Committee of Pakistan and the Institutional Review Board of the Health Services Academy. Data collection was supported by the International Brain Research Organization (IBRO) through the Neuroscience Capacity Accelerator for Mental Health.

We believe this manuscript will be of strong interest to Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health readers, given its empirical depth, methodological rigor, and direct relevance for global maternal mental health policy and implementation science. We would be grateful for the opportunity to contribute to your journal.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Dr. Abid Malik

Principal Investigator

Public Mental Health Department, Health Services Academy, Islamabad

Email: abid.malik@hsa.edu.pk

Review: Biopsychosocial stressors and perinatal mental health: The mediating role of social support in a Pakistani cohort — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

I appreciated the opportunity to review this manuscript. The study addresses a critical public health issue in a context where high-quality longitudinal data are scarce. The attempt to integrate nutritional biomarkers with psychosocial resources is both timely and conceptually sound. The manuscript is well-written and clearly structured. However, several points require careful revision to enhance methodological rigor, interpretive accuracy, and alignment between results and conclusions.

Major Revisions

1. Although the initial sample size calculation is clearly described, the substantial loss to follow-up (approximately 32%) raises important concerns that are not adequately addressed. The manuscript states that attrition was largely unrelated to symptom severity; however, no empirical comparison between retained and lost participants is reported. A formal attrition analysis comparing baseline demographic, clinical, biomarker, and mental health variables between completers and non-completers should be included. Without this analysis, the validity of the longitudinal GLMM findings remains uncertain. Additionally, the reduced sample size at follow-up substantially limits the power of trajectory and mediation analyses, and this limitation should be explicitly acknowledged.

2. The cross-sectional logistic regression models appear to be largely unadjusted, yet the results are sometimes interpreted as independent effects. The rationale for selecting covariates should be clarified, and key potential confounders, such as socioeconomic status, parity, education, BMI, and family structure, should be considered or explicitly justified if excluded. Similarly, the longitudinal models are only adjusted for baseline symptom severity, gestational age, and biomarkers. Clearer justifications are needed for excluding psychosocial variables, such as social support, from the primary GLMMs, given their central theoretical role in the study.

3. The mediation analysis that examines social support as a mediator of the hemoglobin–depression association is interesting from a conceptual standpoint, but it is methodologically fragile. Since all variables used in the mediation model were measured at baseline, it is not possible to establish temporal precedence among exposure, mediator, and outcome. Therefore, the use of causal mediation terminology should be substantially toned down throughout the manuscript. The authors should clearly frame this analysis as exploratory and associative and explicitly discuss the strong assumptions required for causal interpretation, including the absence of unmeasured confounding factors.

4. The trajectory groups, particularly those for anxiety, include very small cell sizes, which limits interpretability and statistical reliability. Although Fisher’s exact tests are appropriate, the manuscript should more clearly communicate the exploratory nature of these analyses and avoid drawing strong conclusions from subgroup comparisons with very small sample sizes. This is especially important when linking vitamin D status to remission or persistence patterns.

5. The role of hemoglobin and vitamin D is interpreted inconsistently across cross-sectional, longitudinal, and trajectory analyses. For instance, hemoglobin is considered a meaningful protective factor; however, it loses significance in adjusted longitudinal models. These findings should be more clearly reconciled in the discussion, emphasizing that baseline symptom severity overwhelmingly explains postnatal outcomes and that the effects of biomarkers appear context-specific and weaker once prior mental health is accounted for.

6. Although the policy and clinical implications are appealing, some of the recommendations currently exceed what the data can robustly support. Statements suggesting that biomarkers can be used for mental health risk stratification should emphasize that the findings are preliminary and hypothesis-generating, not practice-changing.

7. To strengthen the discussion on the interaction between psychosocial resources, stress, and perinatal mental health trajectories, it would be helpful to incorporate literature examining how contextual stressors influence perinatal psychological adjustment over time, especially during periods of increased stress. Studies on perinatal mental health under adverse contextual conditions could situate the present findings within a broader developmental and psychosocial framework (e.g., 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1588433; 10.1007/s12144-024-06603-3.

Minor Revisions

1. Please ensure consistent use of terms such as perinatal, antenatal, and postnatal throughout the manuscript, particularly in the Results and Discussion sections.

2. It would be helpful to specify if biomarker assays were repeated for quality control purposes, as well as how missing data was handled beyond the mention of a complete-case approach.

3. Although several limitations are acknowledged, this section should explicitly include issues related to attrition bias, residual confounding, and constraints of baseline-only mediation analyses.

4. The overall language quality is good, but there are occasional instances of overly strong causal phrasing that should be softened. Further improving readability would require minor grammatical edits and sentence streamlining.

Review: Biopsychosocial stressors and perinatal mental health: The mediating role of social support in a Pakistani cohort — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Dear Author,

I found the study clear and engaging, and results are potentially valuable to the field. I have few suggestions to strengthen the manuscript.

Abstract: the abstract is clear however a brief clarification of the rationale for focusing on Hb and Vit D may help the readers who are not familiar with regional nutritional context.

Multiple approaches are mentioned, please add short indication of primary analytical emphasis (e.g longitudinal vs cross sectional) to improve clarity.

Introduction:

Minor streamlining of background content could improve flow and reduce repetition for readers familiar with this field.

Methodology:

To address the possibility of attrition-related bias, it would be beneficial to briefly mention whether there were differences in baseline characteristics between the retained (follow-up) and lost (follow-up) participants.

Results:

some numerical results are repeated across the text and tables, minor consolidation can improve readability of content.

Conclusion

Well supported by findings.

Good Luck...!!

Regards

Dr. Ayesha Sana

Sr. Lecturer

Pharmacy Dept

Iqra University, H-9 campus Islamabad

Review: Biopsychosocial stressors and perinatal mental health: The mediating role of social support in a Pakistani cohort — R0/PR4

Conflict of interest statement

NIl

Comments

Thank you for the opportunity to review this manuscript. It presents a longitudinal investigation of biopsychosocial stressors and their influence on perinatal mental health outcomes, an important contribution to the literature from a low‑ and middle‑income country perspective. The manuscript is generally well written and thoughtfully structured. However, some minor issues require attention to improve clarity and coherence. The following suggestions are offered to support further improvement

Introduction

• Page 5, line 25: The referent for “they” is unclear and should be specified.

• The rationale for studying is strong. The inclusion of biological markers and a longitudinal design appropriately strengthens the justification.

Methods

• Indicate the period during which data were collected, especially since the discussion references post COVID recovery and contextual stressors in the study setting.

Results

• Page 12, line 38: Capitalize the first letter of the sentence.

• Page 14, line 33: Capitalize the first letter of the sentence.

Discussion

• Expand the comparison of findings to include evidence from other LMICs beyond Pakistan.

Implications

• Page 18, line 51: Replace “lady” with “lay.”

• The statement “Future studies should distinguish between depression and anxiety” needs clearer elaboration.

• Given the mean gestational age of participants, the findings underscore the importance of early screening in pregnancy, as baseline symptoms strongly influence later outcomes.

General Comments

• The manuscript contains some typographical errors that require correction.

Recommendation: Biopsychosocial stressors and perinatal mental health: The mediating role of social support in a Pakistani cohort — R0/PR5

Comments

Dear Authors,

I am happy to share with you that we have independent reviews for your manuscript, which are positive. However, there are some suggestions and observations as well, which I believe can enhance the scope of your study. Therefore, I request you address them and submit at the earliest possible.

With thanks and best wishes,

Thomas

Decision: Biopsychosocial stressors and perinatal mental health: The mediating role of social support in a Pakistani cohort — R0/PR6

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Biopsychosocial stressors and perinatal mental health: The mediating role of social support in a Pakistani cohort — R1/PR7

Comments

Dear Editor,

We are pleased to submit the revised version of our manuscript entitled “Biopsychosocial Stressors and Perinatal Mental Health: The Mediating Role of Social Support in a Pakistani Cohort” for reconsideration in Global Mental Health.

We sincerely thank you and the reviewers for the thoughtful and constructive feedback on our initial submission. We have carefully addressed all comments raised by Reviewers 1, 2, and 3, and the manuscript has undergone substantial revision to enhance methodological transparency, analytical clarity, and interpretive rigor. These revisions include the addition of a formal attrition analysis comparing baseline characteristics of participants who were retained versus those lost to follow-up, with results reported in the Methods and Results sections and limitations explicitly acknowledged. We also provide a clearer justification of our analytical approach by explicitly distinguishing between cross-sectional, longitudinal, and exploratory analyses, alongside a more restrained interpretation of cross-sectional findings.

In response to reviewer feedback, the mediation and trajectory analyses have been reframed to clearly reflect their exploratory and non-causal nature. The Discussion has been strengthened to emphasize the dominant role of baseline symptom severity and to situate the findings within broader psychosocial and low- and middle-income country contexts. Throughout the manuscript, we have improved clarity and consistency of terminology, corrected typographical errors, and aligned the stated implications more closely with the strength of the evidence.

A detailed, point-by-point response to all reviewer comments is included with the revised submission, indicating precisely where changes have been made in the manuscript. We believe these revisions have substantially strengthened the paper and improved its suitability for publication in Global Mental Health. We appreciate your time and consideration and would be grateful for the opportunity to proceed to the next stage of review.

Sincerely,

Prof. Abid Malik

Corresponding Author

Department of Psychology

Health Services Academy, Islamabad

On behalf of all authors

Review: Biopsychosocial stressors and perinatal mental health: The mediating role of social support in a Pakistani cohort — R1/PR8

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

The manuscript has clearly benefited from the revision process. The structure is clearer, the results are well presented, and the discussion appropriately reflects the findings. The study is now suitable for publication. I recommend acceptance in its present form.

Review: Biopsychosocial stressors and perinatal mental health: The mediating role of social support in a Pakistani cohort — R1/PR9

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

The author has revised the manuscript in accordance with the previous feedback.

Recommendation: Biopsychosocial stressors and perinatal mental health: The mediating role of social support in a Pakistani cohort — R1/PR10

Comments

Dear Authors,

I am happy to share with you that your manuscript has been accepted. I greatly appreciate you for revising the manuscript satisfactorily in time. I also thank you for considering the ‘Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health’ to present your work.

I look forward to your contributions to the journal in future.

Sincerely,

Thomas

Decision: Biopsychosocial stressors and perinatal mental health: The mediating role of social support in a Pakistani cohort — R1/PR11

Comments

No accompanying comment.