Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-j4x9h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T02:56:42.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The end-Cretaceous plant extinction: Heterogeneity, ecosystem transformation, and insights for the future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2023

Peter Wilf*
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences and Earth and Environmental Systems Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA
Mónica R. Carvalho
Affiliation:
Museum of Paleontology and Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Elena Stiles
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
*
Corresponding author: Peter Wilf; Email: pwilf@psu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg) mass extinction was geologically instantaneous, causing the most drastic extinction rates in Earth’s History. The rapid species losses and environmental destruction from the Chicxulub impact at 66.02 Ma made the K–Pg the most comparable past event to today’s projected “sixth” mass extinction. The extinction famously eliminated major clades of animals and plankton. However, for land plants, losses primarily occurred among species observed in regional studies but left no global trace at the family or major-clade level, leading to questions about whether there was a significant K–Pg plant extinction. We review emerging paleobotanical data from the Americas and argue that the evidence strongly favors profound (generally >50%), geographically heterogeneous species losses and recovery consistent with mass extinction. The heterogeneity appears to reflect several factors, including distance from the impact site and marine and latitudinal buffering of the impact winter. The ensuing transformations have affected all land life, including true angiosperm dominance in the world’s forests, the birth of the hyperdiverse Neotropical rainforest biome, and evolutionary radiations leading to many crown angiosperm clades. Although the worst outcomes are still preventable, the sixth mass extinction could mirror the K–Pg event by eliminating comparable numbers of plant species in a geologic instant, impoverishing and eventually transforming terrestrial ecosystems while having little effect on global plant-family diversity.

Information

Type
Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Modeled surface air temperatures (A) before and (B) during the coldest impact-winter year, 3 years after the Chicxulub impact; pickaxe icons indicate the principal fossil floras discussed in the text from (north to south) the northern Great Plains, southern Rockies, Colombia, and southern Argentina. Drafted by J. Brugger, using model output from Brugger et al. (2021), with permission.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Plant extinction in the Williston Basin, North Dakota. (A) Ranges in the composite section of 141 macrofossil species occurring in more than one stratigraphic bin, with 99% confidence intervals on last appearances, relative to the K/Pg event horizon recognized from multiple indicators. The conservative estimate of 57% species extinction is based on this analysis, using only the last appearances in the uppermost 5 m of Cretaceous strata (Wilf and Johnson, 2004). The observed extinction increases if the window is shifted down, as demonstrated in (B), showing simulated extinctions and species richness from the same dataset (singletons included) when based on discrete 10-m bin windows (Stiles et al., 2020). Modified from (A) Wilf and Johnson (2004) and (B) Stiles et al. (2020).

Figure 2

Figure 3. The post-KPgE rise of extant angiosperm families, seen in Colombian macrofossils and a molecular-phylogenetic reconstruction of stem- vs. crown-group age distributions. In (A), bars show proportions of species (with standard deviations) in a family in a compilation of 72 Neotropical vegetation plots; darker bars indicate the top-10 families that account for half of total stems. Red diamonds mark families present in a latest Cretaceous flora; blue circles show families recognized in two Paleocene floras. Modified from Carvalho et al. (2021). (B) Frequency distributions and 95% kernel density curves of reconstructed mean stem (red) and crown (blue) angiosperm family ages, from an analysis calibrated using 238 well-constrained fossils. Subscript “m” indicates age estimates derived from molecular analyses rather than direct geological dating. Modified from Ramírez-Barahona et al. (2020), with permission.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Early Danian reproductive fossils from the Salamanca Formation, Chubut, Argentina. (A) Agathis immortalis (Araucariaceae) branch with leaves and axillary pollen cones (see Escapa et al., 2018). (B) Notiantha grandensis (Rhamnaceae) flowers side-by-side in transverse and longitudinal views (see Jud et al., 2017). (C) Stephania psittaca (Menispermaceae) endocarp (see Jud et al., 2018b). Lacinipetalum spectabilum (Cunoniaceae) flower, detail of ovary surface covered in trichomes and entrapped pollen grains, glowing under epifluorescence (see Jud et al., 2018a). All the specimens are housed at Museo Paleontolόgico Egidio Feruglio, Trelew, Chubut. Credits: A, C, D: P. Wilf; B, N. Jud, used with permission.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Changes in K/Pg leaf diversity and leaf morphospace in Patagonia, modified from Stiles et al. (2020). (A) Rarefied richness (with 95% confidence intervals) for leaf assemblages from the latest Maastrichtian Lefipán, early Danian Salamanca (P Loros 1 and P Loros 2), and late Danian Las Flores formations from Patagonia, compared with three sampling levels from the Williston Basin in North Dakota denoted by their stratigraphic positions relative to the K/Pg event bed (also see Figure 2A). Note the sharp drop in richness in both areas and the higher richness in both time periods for the Patagonian floras. (B) Morphospace plots for Maastrichtian and Danian leaf species in Patagonia, using principal coordinates analysis (PCoA). The Danian leaves have higher morphological diversity, despite lower species richness. Icons and gray lines indicate lobed Danian outlier species and their plot locations.

Author comment: The end-Cretaceous plant extinction: Heterogeneity, ecosystem transformation, and insights for the future — R0/PR1

Comments

Dear John, Barry, and the team,

Thank you very much for inviting this submission and checking an early draft for suitability. Fortunately, we have been able to complete the submission much earlier than anticipated. We hope you find it really interesting and suitable for the series! Please note that I will be out of the country March 12-30 with little or no email access. Best, Peter

Review: The end-Cretaceous plant extinction: Heterogeneity, ecosystem transformation, and insights for the future — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Comments to Author: The manuscript by Wilf et al. provides an interesting overview of published paleobotantical records across the K-Pg boundary in North and South America .The results highlight heterogeneity among records, potentially reflecting a heterogenous response the the K-Pg boundary perturbations.

Overall, the manuscript is well-written, albeit with a somewhat unconventional structure. An example is the unexpected side-discussion on geological records versus molecular clock data (lines 180-192) that is placed a bit awkwardly.

Perhaps the main take-home message is that the paleobotantical records across the K-Pg boundary are actually still rather centered around the Americas, making it difficult to truly assess a global record across the K-Pg boundary. This point could be stressed a bit more in the conclusions.

A few other comments and suggestions:

Lines 75-76:

While the KPME was in all likelihood indeed more rapid than any other geological mass extinction, I would be cautious to use the term ‘severity’ in this sentence, as other mass extinctions (e.g. PT boundary) appear to have resulted in higher overall extinction rates.

Lines 105-106:

I would refrain from using such terminology as “any KPME for plants” and “the plant KPME”, since a mass extinction event is per definition an extinction event across many different biological groups. Hence, one should not say “a mass extinction among plants”, but rather “an extinction event among plants”, of, if you will, “a massive extinction among plants…across the KPg boundary”

Please be careful with this terminology throughout the manuscript.

Line 143:

“70,000 years” gives the suggestion of a level of accuracy that is not really there. Even when adding the “ca.” to this number, it is better to use something like “ca. 70 kyrs”. The alternative option would be to add quantitative uncertainties on this number, but I don’t believe those are available either.

Lines 332-334:

There are a few other interesting sites in Europe, for example the mid-Seelandinian floras of the Gelinden Marls in Belgium, already described in the 19th century by De Saporta et al. and others, where there recently also have been studies on the plant-insect interactions (Zambon et al, 2023).

Lines 374-375: see earlier comments on the terminology around mass extinctions. Please refrain from using terminology such as “a mass extinction for…” followed by a specific biological group.

All in all, these minor points leads me to suggest this manuscript to be accepted for publication with minor revisions.

Review: The end-Cretaceous plant extinction: Heterogeneity, ecosystem transformation, and insights for the future — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

No competing Interests

Comments

Comments to Author: This is an interesting and useful overview of the vegetation change and mass extinction related to the end-Cretaceous event 66 million years ago. The text is very well written, easy to follow and keeps the reader interested. It has the North American record in the focus but provides a good global overview supported by figures and diagrams, also including climate effects and the future aspect on the 6th mass extinction. I suggest publication with minor revision.

1. I find the usage of the abbreviation KPME completely unacceptable. P stands for the Permian and should definitely not be used for the Paleogene. If the authors find the need to abbreviate the Cretaceous-Paleogene mass extinction then I suggest K-PgME.

In some places, the authors have used KTME, mainly in the Fig. captions. That is less bad but probably not correct either – please search through the manuscript for these inconsistencies.

2. I lack a short paragraph on holdover taxa in refugia in general. There is data from e.g. Tasmania with plant groups surviving the K-PgME until the Eocene.

3. In the section concerning the impact winter, carbon particles are mentioned as nucleus for aerosols. Importantly also nano-particles of Fe (material dispersed from the asteroid) has shown to play a major role for the following darkness and cooling. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2014.05.009.

I look forward to see this interesting paper published.

Sincerely

Vivi Vajda

Recommendation: The end-Cretaceous plant extinction: Heterogeneity, ecosystem transformation, and insights for the future — R0/PR4

Comments

Comments to Author: Dear Dr. Wilf,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript (ID: EXT-22-0048) to Cambridge Prisms: Extinction. I have now received reports from two reviewers. Collectively, both Reviewers think this paper is well written and significant and should be published. However, as you will see from the reports, the reviewers raised some minor issues that need to be revised or reconsidered, e.g., the abbreviation KPME. Reviewer 1 suggested to raise aspects that need further interpretation, such as the fact that the paleobotanical record across the K-PG boundary is still actually more centered on the Americas, making it difficult to truly assess the global record across the K-Pg boundary. Considering these comments, my decision is a minor revision.

Please make sure all points raised by the reviewers are addressed and provide a point-by-point response to these comments along with your revision.

Thank you for your understanding and I look forward to receiving the revised manuscript.

Sincerely,

Haijun

Prof. Haijun Song

Handling Editor, Cambridge Prisms: Extinction

Email: haijunsong@cug.edu.cn

Decision: The end-Cretaceous plant extinction: Heterogeneity, ecosystem transformation, and insights for the future — R0/PR5

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: The end-Cretaceous plant extinction: Heterogeneity, ecosystem transformation, and insights for the future — R1/PR6

Comments

Please see the response letter uploaded at Step 1 as the cover letter.

→NOTES ON FIGURE UPLOADS: I re-uploaded all five figure files here because they were not showing in the generated proof. In addition, I converted Fig4 from tif to jpeg (minimum compression) because the system kept corrupting the tif file. Fig. 4A shows as too blue in the system previews but has correct color temperature in the uploaded file. The figure files are otherwise unchanged from the initial submission.

Review: The end-Cretaceous plant extinction: Heterogeneity, ecosystem transformation, and insights for the future — R1/PR7

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Comments to Author: Thank you for addressing all the issues. I look forward to see the paper in print.

Regards

Vivi Vajda

Recommendation: The end-Cretaceous plant extinction: Heterogeneity, ecosystem transformation, and insights for the future — R1/PR8

Comments

Comments to Author: Dear Dr. Wilf,

Thank you again for submitting your manuscript (ID: EXT-22-0048.R1) to Cambridge Prisms: Extinction. Your revisions adequately address the concerns raised in the review and I am pleased to confirm that your paper “The end-Cretaceous plant extinction: heterogeneity, ecosystem transformation, and insights for the future” has been accepted for publication in Cambridge Prisms: Extinction.

Yours sincerely,

Haijun

Sincerely,

Haijun

Prof. Haijun Song

Handling Editor, Cambridge Prisms: Extinction

Email: haijunsong@cug.edu.cn

Decision: The end-Cretaceous plant extinction: Heterogeneity, ecosystem transformation, and insights for the future — R1/PR9

Comments

No accompanying comment.