Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-92wsb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-15T12:07:27.703Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identifying barriers and facilitators for health risk behaviours among people with severe mental illness in Bangladesh and Pakistan: a qualitative study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 May 2025

Badur Un Nisa
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, Rawalpindi Medical University , Rawalpindi, Pakistan Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shifa Tameer-e-Millat University, Islamabad, Pakistan
Imogen Featherstone
Affiliation:
Department of Health Sciences, University of York , York, UK
Gerardo A. Zavala*
Affiliation:
Department of Health Sciences, University of York , York, UK
Humaira Bibi
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, Rawalpindi Medical University , Rawalpindi, Pakistan
Md Badruddin Saify
Affiliation:
ARK Foundation , Dhaka, Bangladesh
Mahmudul Hasan
Affiliation:
ARK Foundation , Dhaka, Bangladesh
Faiza Aslam
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, Rawalpindi Medical University , Rawalpindi, Pakistan
Asad Tamizuddin Nizami
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, Rawalpindi Medical University , Rawalpindi, Pakistan
Rumana Haque
Affiliation:
ARK Foundation , Dhaka, Bangladesh
Najma Siddiqi
Affiliation:
Department of Health Sciences, University of York , York, UK Hull York Medical School, University of York , York, UK
Richard I.G. Holt
Affiliation:
Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK Southampton National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
Hannah Maria Jennings
Affiliation:
Department of Health Sciences, University of York , York, UK Hull York Medical School, University of York , York, UK
*
Corresponding author: Gerardo A. Zavala; Email: g.zavala@york.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

People with severe mental illness (SMI) are at greater risk of obesity, cardiovascular disease and diabetes than the general population, due to a higher prevalence of health risk behaviours. Research is needed to inform tailored interventions to improve the health behaviours (diet, physical activity and sleep) of people with SMI in South Asia as these behaviours are closely linked to obesity. The study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators to healthy diet, physical activity and good sleep among individuals with SMI. A qualitative design was employed using photovoice, semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions. Participants included 16 people with SMI, 16 caregivers and 17 health professionals in Bangladesh and Pakistan. Data were analysed thematically, informed by the socio-ecological framework. A complex interplay of individual, familial and societal factors influenced these health behaviours. Individual factors include knowledge, beliefs and mental health limitations. Caregivers play a crucial role in influencing behaviour. At the societal level, gender expectations, financial constraints and religious influences significantly impact these behaviours. The insights from this research can inform tailored interventions for this vulnerable group and highlight the need for integrated services, financial support and improved urban planning.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Participant characteristics

Supplementary material: File

Nisa et al. supplementary material 1

Nisa et al. supplementary material
Download Nisa et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 81.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Nisa et al. supplementary material 2

Nisa et al. supplementary material
Download Nisa et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 458.2 KB

Author comment: Identifying barriers and facilitators for health risk behaviours among people with severe mental illness in Bangladesh and Pakistan: a qualitative study — R0/PR1

Comments

Dr. Gerardo A. Zavala Gomez

University of York, UK

g.zavala@york.ac.uk

February 24, 2025

Editors-in-Chief

Professor Judy Bass, Johns Hopkins University, USA

Professor Dixon Chibanda, Friendship Bench, Zimbabwe

Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health

Dear Editors,

I am pleased to submit our manuscript, “Identifying Barriers and Facilitators for Health Risk Behaviours in People with Severe Mental Illness (SMI) in Bangladesh and Pakistan: A Qualitative Study,” for consideration in Cambridge Prisms: Global Mental Health. Our study explores the socio-ecological factors influencing diet, physical activity, and sleep among individuals with SMI in Pakistan and Bangladesh, aligning with the journal’s focus on global mental health and the intersection of mental and physical health.

Using a qualitative approach, including photovoice, semi-structured interviews, and focus groups, we identify key barriers and facilitators at individual, familial, and societal levels. Our findings emphasize the need for culturally tailored interventions, integrated healthcare services, and policy changes to improve health outcomes in this vulnerable population.

This manuscript is original, has not been published or submitted elsewhere, and has received ethical approval from relevant institutional review boards. We appreciate your time and consideration and look forward to your feedback.

Sincerely,

Dr. Gerardo A. Zavala Gomez

University of York, UK

g.zavala@york.ac.uk

Review: Identifying barriers and facilitators for health risk behaviours among people with severe mental illness in Bangladesh and Pakistan: a qualitative study — R0/PR2

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

This qualitative study in two psychiatric state hospitals in Bangladesh and Pakistan examines barriers and facilitators to health behaviors amongst persons with severe mental illness (SMI). Photo-voice supported interviews with persons with SMI and focus group discussions with caregivers and mental health providers are used, along with a socioecological framework to interpret results and make recommendations at institution and policy levels. Given the scarcity of data from LMIC and South Asian context on the topic, this is a useful and important piece of research.

Some minor clarifications and changes are recommended. Could there be light shed on current systemic support or infrastructure or health behaviours for the persons with SMI in these two countries/hospitals? I would have assumed there to be no such services, and that is what is highlighted in the discussion, but I do see nutritionist listed as a healthcare provider interviewed, which appears contradictory to these statements. This information on current provisions could be shared in the introduction, along with setting. Thus when suggesting interventions and policy recommendations in the discussion, the gap that needs to be filled can be better understood.

Minor language clarifications -

Suggest participants numbers currently in “results” be moved to methods as numbers reference would be helpful when justifying sample size (line 79-88).

Line 18-20: People with SMI are 2.5 times more likely to have obesity 19 than the general population, with the global prevalence estimated to be 25.9% (Afzal et al. 20 2021). -> please edit the sentence, global prevalence estimate of what is 25.9%? It is unclear

suppression is chained in a free country - the quote by person with SMI, line 331- clarify as currently sentence not comprehensible

Review: Identifying barriers and facilitators for health risk behaviours among people with severe mental illness in Bangladesh and Pakistan: a qualitative study — R0/PR3

Conflict of interest statement

No conflict of interests to be declared

Comments

1- Rationale for Multiple Study Sites

The rationale for including two study sites is unclear. Given the likely contextual and demographic differences between the two settings, one would expect significant variability in participant experiences and responses. It would be important to justify this decision and explain how potential inter-site differences were accounted for in the study design and analysis.

2- Data Collection Sequence and Translation Concerns

Could you clarify the sequence of data processing—does it follow the order: recording → translation → verbatim transcription? If so, there may be implications for the fidelity of the data. Analyzing translated texts can result in loss or distortion of meaning, particularly for culturally nuanced language. Please elaborate on how this issue was addressed or mitigated during analysis.

3- Definition and Details of Physical Activity

The description of physical activity from the perspective of participants with severe mental illness (SMI) would benefit from greater detail. For example, how frequently did participants engage in physical activity (e.g., number of days per week, duration)? Was the activity structured or informal? Providing this context would enhance the interpretation of the findings.

4- Participant Capacity and Informed Consent

One participant reportedly expressed paranoia toward the interviewer and made the statement that she had “eaten the truth.” This raises important ethical concerns regarding her capacity to provide informed consent. Was her mental state assessed to ensure she was stable enough to participate in the study? A brief explanation of how capacity to consent was evaluated would be helpful.

5- Inclusion of Non-Communicable Diseases (NCDs)

Did the sample include individuals diagnosed with non-communicable diseases (NCDs)? If so, were any specific insights or patterns observed in this subgroup? Clarifying this aspect could add further depth to the findings.

6- Consideration of Personal and Contextual Factors

The interpretation of findings could be strengthened by exploring associations with relevant personal factors, such as age, duration of illness, changes in pre-morbid functioning, level of education, and income. Including such variables would help contextualize the results and identify any meaningful sub-group differences.

Recommendation: Identifying barriers and facilitators for health risk behaviours among people with severe mental illness in Bangladesh and Pakistan: a qualitative study — R0/PR4

Comments

Dear authors,

Below you will find the reviewers' comments. Overall, the reviewers found your paper compelling and informative. However, additional clarifications are required, as noted below. Please revise the manuscript thoroughly and prepare a point-by-point response letter.

I look forward to receiving a revised version.

Decision: Identifying barriers and facilitators for health risk behaviours among people with severe mental illness in Bangladesh and Pakistan: a qualitative study — R0/PR5

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Author comment: Identifying barriers and facilitators for health risk behaviours among people with severe mental illness in Bangladesh and Pakistan: a qualitative study — R1/PR6

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Review: Identifying barriers and facilitators for health risk behaviours among people with severe mental illness in Bangladesh and Pakistan: a qualitative study — R1/PR7

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Thanks, this looks good. Please fix punctuation end of line 354 - change comma into colon or otherwise alter grammatical structure as preferred.

Review: Identifying barriers and facilitators for health risk behaviours among people with severe mental illness in Bangladesh and Pakistan: a qualitative study — R1/PR8

Conflict of interest statement

No conflicts of interests to be declared

Comments

NA

Recommendation: Identifying barriers and facilitators for health risk behaviours among people with severe mental illness in Bangladesh and Pakistan: a qualitative study — R1/PR9

Comments

No accompanying comment.

Decision: Identifying barriers and facilitators for health risk behaviours among people with severe mental illness in Bangladesh and Pakistan: a qualitative study — R1/PR10

Comments

No accompanying comment.