Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-pn7tm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-13T14:59:36.048Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relationship between generic and occupation-specific job demands and resources, negative work−home interference and burnout among GPs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2021

N.C. Verhoef*
Affiliation:
Open University, Heerlen, the Netherlands
M. De Ruiter
Affiliation:
Nyenrode Business University, Breukelen, The Netherlands
R.J. Blomme
Affiliation:
Open University, Heerlen, the Netherlands Nyenrode Business University, Breukelen, The Netherlands
E.C. Curfs
Affiliation:
Open University, Heerlen, the Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author. E-mail: nico.phoenix@planet.nl
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Scholars often examine the effect of generic job demands and resources on burnout, yet to increase ecological validity, it is important to examine the effects of occupation-specific characteristics. An extended version of the job demands-resources model with work−home interference as a mediator is examined among a cross-sectional sample of 178 general practitioners (GPs). Interviews with GPs were used to develop questions on occupation-specific work characteristics. Hypotheses were tested in MEDIATE. Both generic and occupation-specific job demands positively affected emotional exhaustion, while only occupation-specific job demands affected depersonalization. Only strain-based work−family interference mediated the relationship between generic and occupation-specific job demands, emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. This study offers an important extension of the job demands-resources model by including occupation-specific job characteristics. This broader perspective can aid in more targeted job design to reduce burnout among GPs.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management 2021
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Conceptual model.Note: In Figure 1, the occupation-specific job demands and job resources that are examined in this study are indicated. These variables have not specifically been introduced in the theoretical framework, as the identification of these variables was part of the results of a pre-study in which interviews with GPs were conducted.

Figure 1

Table 1. Exploratory factor analyses occupation-specific demands and resources

Figure 2

Table 2. Fit indices measurement models

Figure 3

Table 3. Mean, standard deviation, Pearson's correlation and Cronbachs α (diagonally in boldface)

Figure 4

Table 4. Summary of mediation analysis mediation model dependent variable EE

Figure 5

Table 5. Summary of mediation analysis mediation model dependent variable DP

Figure 6

Table A. Common method variance analysis

Figure 7

Table B. Linear regression analysis generic job demands vs occupation-specific job demands