Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-jnbmb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-26T06:36:34.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

High frequency hearing loss in the elderly: effect of age and noise exposure in an Italian group

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

A Ciorba ,
A Benatti ,
C Bianchini ,
C Aimoni ,
S Volpato ,
R Bovo  and
A Martini
A Ciorba*
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, University Hospital of Ferrara, Italy
A Benatti
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, University Hospital of Ferrara, Italy
C Bianchini
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, University Hospital of Ferrara, Italy
C Aimoni
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, University Hospital of Ferrara, Italy
S Volpato
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Internal Medicine, Gerontology and Geriatrics, University Hospital of Ferrara, Italy
R Bovo
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, University Hospital of Ferrara, Italy
A Martini
Affiliation:
Department of Audiology, University Hospital of Ferrara, Italy
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Andrea Ciorba, Audiology Department, University Hospital of Ferrara, C so Giovecca 203, 44100 Ferrara, Italy Fax: +39 0532 236887 E-mail: andrea.ciorba@unife.it
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To describe the effect of age and noise on high frequency hearing thresholds in an Italian population aged 70 years and older, in order to investigate the interaction between presbycusis and noise exposure.

Methods:

We compared 460 subjects: 367 affected by presbycusis alone (204 women and 163 men) and 93 affected by presbycusis and noise exposure (eight women and 85 men). Pure tone average hearing thresholds, for each ear, were compared between groups, and between sexes and ages within groups.

Results:

A slight threshold difference was found between the two groups at 4 kHz. After adjusting for age and gender, this difference was found to be related only to differing patient age. Men's and women's thresholds differed significantly in both groups, especially at high frequencies, at which threshold deterioration was worse in men than women.

Conclusion:

The threshold differences between patients with presbycusis with and without noise exposure were limited. Larger studies are needed to assess the relative effects of ageing and noise exposure on hearing thresholds.

Keywords

Sensorineural Hearing LossPresbycusisHearing Loss, Noise Induced

Information

Type
Main Articles
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 125 , Issue 8 , August 2011 , pp. 776 - 780
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1Wilson, DH, Walsh, PG, Sanchez, L, Davis, AC, Taylor, AW, Tucker, G et al. The epidemiology of hearing impairment in an Australian adult population. Int J Epidemiol 1999;28:247–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Cruickshanks, KJ, Wiley, TL, Tweed, TS, Klein, BE, Klein, R, Mares-Perlman, JA et al. Prevalence of hearing loss in older adults in Beaver Dam, Wisconsin. The Epidemiology of Hearing Loss Study. Am J Epidemiol 1998;148:879–86CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Davis, A. Hearing in Adults. The Prevalence and Distribution of Hearing Impairment and Reported Hearing Disability in the MRC Institute of Hearing Research's National Study of Hearing. MRC Institute Of Hearing Research. London: Whurr, 1995;50–431Google Scholar
4Quaranta, A, Assennato, GE, Sallustio, V. Epidemiology of hearing problems among adults in Italy. Scand Audiol 1996;25:7–11Google Scholar
5Stucky, SR, Wolf, KE, Kuo, T. The economic effect of age-related hearing loss: national, state, and local estimates, 2002 and 2030. J Am Geriatr Soc 2010;58:618–19CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Natalizia, A, Casale, M, Guglielmelli, E, Rinaldi, V, Bressi, F, Salvinelli, F. An overview of hearing impairment in older adults: perspectives for rehabilitation with hearing aids. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 2010;14:223–9Google ScholarPubMed
7Mulrow, CD, Aguilar, C, Endicott, JE, Velez, R, Tuley, MR, Charlip, WS et al. Association between hearing impairment and the quality of life of elderly individuals. J Am Geriatr Soc 1990;38:45–50CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Dalton, DS, Cruickshanks, KJ, Klein, BE, Klein, R, Wiley, TL, Nondahl, DM. The impact of hearing loss on quality of life in older adults. Gerontologist 2003;43:661–8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Dobie, RA. Burdens of age-related and occupational noise-induced hearing loss in the United States. Ear Hear 2008;29:565–7CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Albera, R, Lacilla, M, Piumetto, E, Canale, A. Noise-induced hearing loss evolution: influence of age and exposure to noise. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010;267:665–71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Gratton, MA, Vazquez, AE. Age-related hearing loss: current research. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;11:367–71CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Blanchet, C, Pommie, C, Mondain, M, Berr, C, Hillaire, D, Puel, JL. Pure-tone threshold description of an elderly French screened population. Otol Neurotol 2008;29:432–40CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Noise and Hearing Protection. In: http://www.entnet.org/HealthInformation/hearingProtection.cfm [22nd April 2011]Google Scholar
14Nelson, EG, Hinojosa, R. Presbycusis: a human temporal bone study of individuals with downward sloping audiometric patterns of hearing loss and review of the literature. Laryngoscope 2006;116:1–12CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15WISE EARS® At Work. In: http://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/wise/wiseears_atwork.asp [23rd May 2011]Google Scholar
16Ries, PW. Prevalence and characteristics of persons with hearing trouble: United States, 1990–1991. Vital Health Stat 1994;188:1–75Google Scholar
17Moscicki, EK, Baum, HM, McNamara, PM. Hearing loss in the elderly: an epidemiologic study of the Framingham Heart Study Cohort. Ear Hear 1985;6:184–90CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
18Johansson, M, Arlinger, S. Hearing threshold levels for an otologically unscreened, non-occupationally noise-exposed population in Sweden. Int J Audiol 2002;41:180–94CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Lee, FS, Matthews, LJ, Dubno, JR, Mills, JH. Longitudinal study of pure-tone thresholds in older persons. Ear Hear 2005;26:1–11CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Rosenhall, R. The influence of ageing on noise-induced hearing loss. Noise Health 2003;5:47–53Google ScholarPubMed
21Rosler, G. Progression of hearing loss caused by occupational noise. Scand Audiol 1994;23:13–37CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Miller, JM, Dolan, DF, Raphael, Y, Altschuler, RA. Interactive effects of aging with noise induced hearing loss. Scand Audiol 1998;27:53–61Google Scholar
23Tambs, K, Hoffman, HJ, Borchgrevink, HM, Holmen, J, Engdahl, B. Hearing loss induced by occupational and impulse noise: results on threshold shifts by frequencies, age and gender from the Nord-Trondelag Hearing Loss Study. Int J Audiol 2006;45:309–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed