Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-6mz5d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-18T21:17:57.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Differentiating the democratic performance of the West

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Joe Foweraker  and
Roman Krznaric
Roman Krznaric
Affiliation:
Department of Government, University of Essex, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is a commonplace of comparative politics that the democratic performance of the established democracies of the West is both uniform and superior to that of other democracies across the globe. This commonplace both reflects and reinforces the mainstream measures of democracy, like those of Freedom House or Polity III, that fail to differentiate the democratic performance of the West. This article examines this commonplace by deploying the measures of democratic performance contained in the newly constructed Database of Liberal Democratic Performance, and uses descriptive statistics (means and variance) to compare the performance of individual Western democracies, as well as the West overall with the ‘rest’. The Database is designed to capture a wider normative range of performance than the mainstream measures, and shows that the performance of the West is neither uniform nor superior in every respect, especially with regard to civil and minority rights. These findings are explored and confirmed by comparative case studies of minorities in the criminal justice systems of those Western democracies that tend to perform worst in this respect. In conclusion, it is suggested that the findings may begin to change the way we view the relationships between economic growth and democracy, political culture and democracy, and even constitutional design and democracy.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
European Journal of Political Research , Volume 42 , Issue 3 , May 2003 , pp. 313 - 340
Copyright
Copyright © European Consortium for Political Research 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Abu-Jamal, M. (1997). Death blossoms: Reflections from a prisoner of conscience. Farmington, PA: Plough Publishing.Google Scholar
Almond, G. & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amnesty International (1997a). Australia, deaths in custody: How many more? (June 1997). Available online at: http://www.amnesty.org/ailib/aipub/1997/ASA/31200497.htm.Google Scholar
Amnesty International (1997b). Australia, police brutality against Queensland Aborigines. (April 1997). Available online at: http://www.amnesty.org/ailib/aipub/1997/ASA/31200397.htm.Google Scholar
Amnesty International (1998). Australia, silence on human rights: Government responds to ‘Stolen Children Inquiry’. (March 1998). Available online at: http://www.amnesty.org/ailib/aipub/1998/ASA/31200298.htm.Google Scholar
Amnesty International (1999). Death by discrimination: Skin colour influences who lives and dies in the US judicial system. (18 May 1999). Available online at: http://www.amnesty.org/news/1999/25107599.htm.Google Scholar
Banks, A.S. (1998). Cross-polity time-series data. Binghamton, NY: State University of New York.Google Scholar
Bolton, G. (1996). The Oxford history of Australia, Vol. 5: The Middle Way 1942–1995. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burger, J. (1988). Aborigines today: Land and justice. London: Anti-Slavery Society.Google Scholar
Chesterman, J. & Galligan, B. (1997). Citizens without rights: Aborigines and Australian citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cingranelli, D.L. & Richards, D.L. (1999). Measuring the level, pattern and sequence of government respect for physical integrity rights. International Studies Quarterly 43: 407–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crick, B. (1959). The American science of politics: Its origins and conditions. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cunneen, C. (1992). Policing and Aboriginal communities: Is the concept of over-policing useful. in C. Cunneen(ed.), Aboriginal perspectives on criminal justice (Institute of Criminology Monograph Series No.1). Sydney: Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (1956). A preface to democratic theory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven, CT/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Deininger, K. & Squire, L. (1996). A new data set for measuring income inequality. The World Bank Economic Review 10: 565–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, L. (1997). The end of the third wave and the global future of democracy (Reihe Polikwissenschaft/Political Science Series No.45, July). Vienna: Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Diamond, L. (1999). Developing democracy: Toward consolidation. Baltimore, MD/London: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, L., Linz, J.J. & Lipset, S.M. (eds.) (19881989). Democracy in developing countries. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner/London: Adamantine Press.Google Scholar
Ewing, K.D. & Gearty, C.A. (1990). Freedom under Thatcher: Civil liberties in modern Britain. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Foweraker, J. & Krznaric, R. (1999). Database of Liberal Democratic Performance (computer file and codebook). National Data Archive, University of Essex. Available online at: www.data-archive.ac.uk, Study No. 4046.Google Scholar
Foweraker, J. & Krznaric, R. (2000). Measuring liberal democratic performance: An empirical and conceptual critique. Political Studies 48: 759–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foweraker, J. & Krznaric, R. (2001). How to construct a database of liberal democratic performance. Democratization 8(3): 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foweraker, J. & Krznaric, R. (2002). The uneven performance of the democracies of the 3rd Wave: Electoral politics and the imperfect rule of law in Latin America. Latin American Politics and Society 44(3): 29–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedom House (1999). Comparative survey of freedom. New York: Freedom House.Google Scholar
Genders, E. & Player, E. (1989). Race relations in prison. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, P. et, Al. (1996). Creating a nation 1788–1990. Ringwood: Penguin.Google Scholar
Haxton, M. & Gurr, T.R. (1997). Minorities at risk dataset. College Park, MD: University of Maryland. Available online at: http://www.bsos.umd.edu/cidcm/mar/cbwebpg.htm.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch (1993). The Human Rights Watch global report on prisons. New York/Washington, DC/Los Angeles, CA/London: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
Human Rights Watch (1998). Losing the vote: The impact of felony disenfranchisement laws in the United States. Available online at: http://www.hrw.org/pubweb.Google Scholar
Hunter, W. (1995). Politicians against soldiers: Contesting the military in post-authoritarian Brazil. Comparative Politics 27: 425–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntington, S.P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of the world order. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, R. & Carballo, M. (1997). Does Latin America exist? (And is there a Confucian culture?): A global analysis of cross-cultural differences. PS: Political Science and Politics 30: 34–46.Google Scholar
International IDEA (1997). Voter turnout from 1945 to 1997: A global report. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.Google Scholar
International Monetary Fund (various years). Government finance statistics yearbook. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
Inter-Parliamentary Union (1995). Women in parliaments 1945–1995: A world statistical survey. Geneva: Inter-Parliamentary Union.Google Scholar
Jaggers, K. & Gurr, T.R. (1995). Tracking democracy's third wave with the Polity III data. Journal of Peace Research 32: 469–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, B., Holmes, K.R. & Kirkpatrick, M. (1998). Index of economic freedom 1998. Washington, DC/New York: Heritage Foundation and Wall Street Journal.Google Scholar
Klug, F., Starmer, K. & Weir, S. (1996). The three pillars of liberty: Political rights and freedoms in the United Kingdom. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Knack, S. & Keefer, P. (1995). Institutions and economic performance: Cross-country tests using alternative institutional measures. Economics and Politics 7: 207–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landman, T. (1999). Economic development and democracy: The view from Latin America. Political Studies 47: 607–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1984). Democracies: Patterns of majoritarian and consensus government in twenty-one countries. New Haven, CT/London: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1993). Constitutional choices for new democracies. in L. Diamond & M. Plattner(ed.), The global resurgence of democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1994). Democracies: Forms, performance and constitutional engineering. European Journal of Political Research 25: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven, CT/London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, S.M. (1963). Political man. London: Mercury Books.Google Scholar
Locke, J. (1924). Of civil government: Two treatises. (Undated, with an introduction by W.S. Carpenter, Everyman Library No. 751). London: J.M. Dent.Google Scholar
Marcuse, H. (1986[1964]) One-dimensional man. London: Ark.Google Scholar
Mauer, M. (1992). America behind bars: One year later. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.Google Scholar
Mauer, M. (1994). America behind bars: The international use of incarceration, 1992–1993. Washington: The Sentencing Project.Google Scholar
Mauer, M. (1997). America behind bars: US and international use of incarceration, 1995. Washington: The Sentencing Project.Google Scholar
McDonald, D. (1994). Public imprisonment by private means: The re-emergence of private prisons and jails in the United States, the United Kingdom and Australia. British Journal of Criminology 34(Special issue): 29–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Donnell, G. (1997). Illusions about consolidation. in L. Diamond et al.(ed.), Consolidating the third wave democracies: Themes and perspectives. Baltimore, MD/London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, G. & Schmitter, P. (1986). Transitions from authoritarian rule: Tentative conclusions: Tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Pease, K. (1994). Cross-national imprisonment rates: Limitations of method and possible conclusions. British Journal of Criminology 34(Special issue): 116–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pilger, J. (1998). Hidden agendas. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
Poe, S. & Tate, C.N. (1994). Repression of human rights to personal integrity in the 1980s: A global analysis. American Political Science Review 88: 853–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poe, S. Tate, C.N. & Camp Keith, L. (1999). Repression of human rights to personal integrity revisited: A global cross-national study covering the years 1976–1993. International Studies Quarterly 43: 291–313.Google Scholar
Poulter, S. (1998). Ethnicity, law and human rights: The English experience. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, G.B. Jr. (1982). Contemporary democracies: Participation, stability and violence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Przeworski, A. et, Al. (1996). What makes democracies endure? Journal of Democracy 7(1): 38–51.Google Scholar
Putnam, R.D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civil traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, H. (1982). The other side of the frontier: Aboriginal resistance to the European invasion of Australia. Ringwood: Penguin.Google Scholar
Robertson, G. (1993). Freedom, the individual and the law. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, D., Stephens, E.H. & Stephens, J.D. (1992). Capitalist development and democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, M. & Sim, J. (1995). The penal system in England and Wales: Round up the usual suspects. in V. Ruggiero, M. Ryan & J. Sim(ed.), Western European penal systems: A critical anatomy. London/Thousand Oaks, CA/New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1987). The theory of democracy revisited. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. (1943). Capitalism, socialism, democracy. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Skinnner, Q. (1973). The empirical theorists of democracy and their critics: A plague on both their houses. Political Theory 1: 287–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Q. (1998). Liberty before liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stepan, A. & Skach, C. (1993). Constitutional frameworks and democratic consolidation: Parliamentarism versus presidentialism. World Politics 46: 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, V. (1998). A sin against the future: Imprisonment in the world. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Sykes, R. (1989). Black majority. Hawthorn: Hudson.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, M. (1995). Imprisoned Ireland. in V. Ruggiero, M. Ryan & J. Sim(ed.), Western European penal systems: A critical anatomy. London/Thousand Oaks, CA/New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
Tonry, M. (1994). Racial disproportions in US prisons. British Journal of Criminology 34(Special issue): 97–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhanen, T. (1997). Prospects for democracy: A study of 172 countries. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Walmsley, R. (1996). Prison systems in Central and Eastern Europe. Helsinki: Heuni, European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1968). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, eds.). New York: Bedminster Press.Google Scholar
Welch, S. (1993). The concept of political culture. Basingstoke/London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zelaznik, J. (1999) Electoral disproportionality dataset. Department of Government, University of Essex.Google Scholar