Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-8wtlm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-27T00:16:10.484Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantitative analysis of tympanic membrane perforation: a simple and reliable method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 October 2008

T S Ibekwe ,
A A Adeosun  and
O G Nwaorgu
T S Ibekwe*
Affiliation:
Division of ENT, Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital, the Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Ambrose Alli University, Ekpoma, Nigeria
A A Adeosun
Affiliation:
Department of ORL, University College Hospital Ibadan, Nigeria Department of ORL, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
O G Nwaorgu
Affiliation:
Department of ORL, University College Hospital Ibadan, Nigeria Department of ORL, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
*
Address for correspondence: Dr Titus S Ibekwe, Division of ENT, Irrua Specialist Teaching Hospital, PMB 08, Irrua, Nigeria. E-mail: ibekwets@yahoo.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

Accurate assessment of the features of tympanic membrane perforation, especially size, site, duration and aetiology, is important, as it enables optimum management.

Aim and objectives:

To describe a simple, cheap and effective method of quantitatively analysing tympanic membrane perforations.

Materials and methods:

The system described comprises a video-otoscope (capable of generating still and video images of the tympanic membrane), adapted via a universal serial bus box to a computer screen, with images analysed using the Image J geometrical analysis software package. The reproducibility of results and their correlation with conventional otoscopic methods of estimation were tested statistically with the paired t-test and correlational tests, using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 11 software.

Results:

The following equation was generated: P/T × 100 per cent = percentage perforation, where P is the area (in pixels2) of the tympanic membrane perforation and T is the total area (in pixels2) for the entire tympanic membrane (including the perforation). Illustrations are shown. Comparison of blinded data on tympanic membrane perforation area obtained independently from assessments by two trained otologists, of comparative years of experience, using the video-otoscopy system described, showed similar findings, with strong correlations devoid of inter-observer error (p = 0.000, r = 1). Comparison with conventional otoscopic assessment also indicated significant correlation, comparing results for two trained otologists, but some inter-observer variation was present (p = 0.000, r = 0.896). Correlation between the two methods for each of the otologists was also highly significant (p = 0.000).

Conclusion:

A computer-adapted video-otoscope, with images analysed by Image J software, represents a cheap, reliable, technology-driven, clinical method of quantitative analysis of tympanic membrane perforations and injuries.

Keywords

Tympanic MembranePhotographyEndoscopy

Information

Type
Online Only Main Article
Information
The Journal of Laryngology & Otology , Volume 123 , Issue 1 , January 2009 , e2
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 Ibekwe, TS, Ijaduola, GT, Nwaorgu, OG. Tympanic membrane perforation among adults in West Africa. Otol Neurotol 2007;28:348–52Google Scholar
2 Lilly-Tariah, OB, Somefun, AO. Traumatic perforation of the tympanic membrane in University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Nigeria. Niger Postgrad Med J 2007;14:121–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Mehta, RP, Rosowski, JJ, Voss, SE, O'Neil, E, Merchant, SN. Determinants of hearing loss in perforations of tympanic membrane. Otol Neurotol 2006;27:136–43CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 Angeli, SI, Kulak, JL, Guzman, J. Lateral tympanoplasty for total or near total perforation: prognostic factors. Laryngoscope 2006;116:1594–9Google Scholar
5 Fadl, FA. Outcome of type 1 tympanoplasty. Saudi Med J 2003;24:58–61Google ScholarPubMed
6 Schraff, S, Dash, N, Strasnick, B. ‘Window shade’ tympanoplasty for anterior marginal perforations. Laryngoscope 2005;115:1655–9Google Scholar
7 Hsu, CY, Chen, YS, Hwang, JH, Liu, TC. A computer program to calculate the size of tympanic membrane perforations. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2004;29:340–2Google Scholar
8 Voss, SE, Rosowski, JJ, Merchant, SN, Peake, WT. How do tympanic-membrane perforations affect human middle-ear sound transmission? Acta Otolaryngol 2001;121:169–73Google ScholarPubMed
9 Sullivan, RF. Video otoscopy in audiological practice. J Am Acad Audiol 1997;8:447–67Google Scholar
10 Image J (Image Processing and analysis in Java). http://www.rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/ 18 May 2005Google Scholar
11 Cool drives Sata USB and fire wire drives. http://www.cooldrives.com/cute-tv-usb-tv-tuner-adapter-for-windows.html 18 May 2005Google Scholar
12 Patricoski, C, Kokesh, J, Ferguson, AS, Koller, K, Zwack, G, Provost, E et al. Comparison of in-person examination and video otoscope imaging for tympanostomy tube follow-up. Telemed J E Health 2003;9:331–44Google Scholar
13 Hampal, S, Padgham, N, Bunt, S, Wright, A. Errors in the assessment of tympanic membrane perforations. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1993;18:58–62Google Scholar
14 Wright, A. Anatomy and ultra structure of the human ear. In: Mackay, IS, Bull, TR, eds. Scott-Brown's Otolaryngology, 6th edn. London: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1997;1/1/11–15Google Scholar
15 Fasunla, JA, Ibekwe, TS, Onakoya, PA. Otomycosis in Western Nigeria. Mycoses 2008;51:67–70Google Scholar