Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-jnbmb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-02T23:42:24.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Persistent mass loss of Triangular Glacier, James Ross Island, north-eastern Antarctic Peninsula

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2022

Zbyněk Engel*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science, Department of Physical Geography and Geoecology, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic
Kamil Láska
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science, Department of Geography, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
Jan Kavan
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science, Department of Geography, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
Jana Smolíková
Affiliation:
Faculty of Science, Department of Physical Geography and Geoecology, Charles University, Praha, Czech Republic
*
Author for correspondence: Zbyněk Engel, E-mail: engel@natur.cuni.cz
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The retreat rates of Triangular Glacier since 1979 and its mass changes during the period 2014/15–2019/20 indicate the sensitive response of small ice masses on the eastern side of the Antarctic Peninsula to air temperature evolution. This cirque glacier in the northern part of James Ross Island receded rapidly during the period of regional warming in the late 20th century, losing 30.8% of its surface area between 1979 and 2006 (−1.7% a−1). The retreat rate then dropped to −0.3% a−1 following the regional cooling trend, but started to accelerate again (−0.8 to −2.3% a−1) with increasing air temperature since the summer 2014/15. Since the glaciological year 2015/16, Triangular Glacier has experienced enhanced snow melt, wind scour and permanent mass loss with annual mass balance ranging from −0.08 ± 0.35 to −0.56 ± 0.25 m w.e. The largest mass loss was observed in the glaciological year 2019/20, which included the warmest summer of the observation period. The cumulative mass balance of −1.66 ± 0.83 m w.e. over the years 2014/15–2019/20 is consistent with the termination of the positive mass-balance period that occurred in the north-eastern Antarctic Peninsula from 2009/10 to 2014/15.

Information

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Location of James Ross Island and Esperanza Station (black triangle) in the north-eastern part of the Antarctic Peninsula with the study area marked in red. (b) Topography of the northern part of the Ulu Peninsula with the location of automatic weather stations at Triangular Glacier and Mendel Base (black triangles). Ice-free area on the Antarctic Peninsula after Burton-Johnson and others (2016).

Figure 1

Table 1. Remote-sensing data used for delineation of Triangular Glacier

Figure 2

Table 2. Geometric changes of Triangular Glacier since 1979

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Location of ground penetrating radar profiles (black lines), automatic weather station (black triangle), accumulation and ablation stakes (black dots) on Triangular Glacier. Blue lines indicate evolution of the glacier since 1979. Aerial image (BAS/RN/06/0945, the British Antarctic Survey) shows a distinct snowline in the upper part of the glacier and an ice-marginal lake (light blue hatches) in front of its terminus in February 2006.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. (a) Surface area of Triangular Glacier over the period 1979–2021 (extent in 2016 and 2020 without labels). (b) Areal retreat rates of selected glaciers on the Ulu Peninsula. Extent of glaciers in 1988 after Davies and others (2012). Data for Davies Dome, Whisky Glacier and Lachman Crags adopted from Engel and others (2012, 2019).

Figure 5

Fig. 4. (a) Ice-thickness uncertainty, (b) glacier thickness and (c) glacier surface elevation (blue contours) and terrain and glacier bed elevation (brown contours).

Figure 6

Table 3. Spatial characteristics of Triangular Glacier (IJR-39) in 2021

Figure 7

Table 4. Annual surface mass balance, equilibrium-line altitude (ELA) and accumulation-area ratio (AAR) of Triangular Glacier during the period 2014/15–2019/20

Figure 8

Fig. 5. Annual mass balance (in m w.e.) of Triangular Glacier during the period 2014/15–2019/20.

Figure 9

Fig. 6. Cumulative mass balance (in m w.e.) of Triangular Glacier over the period 2014/15–2019/20.

Figure 10

Fig. 7. (a) Variation of monthly mean air temperature recorded at Triangular Glacier from February 2014 to February 2020. (b) Mean summer (DJF) and annual (AT) air temperature and annual positive degree-day (PDD) sum during the period 2014/15–2019/20.

Figure 11

Fig. 8. (a) Snow height changes and (b) daily rate of snow height increase and decrease at Triangular Glacier from February 2017 to January 2020.

Figure 12

Fig. 9. Cumulative snow height changes at Triangular Glacier over the period 2017/18–2019/20.

Figure 13

Fig. 10. Comparison of annual (bar chart) and cumulative (line chart) mass-balance values for Triangular Glacier with mass-balance records in the northern Antarctic Peninsula region. Data for Bahía del Diablo, Hurd and Johnsons Glaciers from the WGMS (2021b).

Figure 14

Fig. 11. Variation of mean annual air temperature at Esperanza station in the period 1980–2019. The broken line indicates the linear trend for the annual temperature over the entire period. The temperature data were obtained from the Reference Antarctic Data for Environmental Research (READER) database (Turner and others, 2004).

Figure 15

Fig. 12. Relationship between cumulative sum of positive degree-day (PDD) and (a) surface mass balance (SMB), (b) accumulation area ratio (AAR) and (c) equilibrium-line altitude (ELA) for Triangular Glacier over the period 2014–2020. The value for the glaciological year 2016/17 represented by an open circle is not considered in the regression analysis.