Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 The Multifaceted Nature of International Law
- 2 International Institutions
- 3 Who Shall Enforce the Peace?
- 4 The Law of Armed Conflict
- 5 Arms Control, Disarmament, Nonproliferation, and Safeguards
- 6 Human Rights
- 7 International Environmental Issues
- 8 Causes of the Present Malaise, Concluding Observations, and a Prognosis
- Index
- References
3 - Who Shall Enforce the Peace?
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 The Multifaceted Nature of International Law
- 2 International Institutions
- 3 Who Shall Enforce the Peace?
- 4 The Law of Armed Conflict
- 5 Arms Control, Disarmament, Nonproliferation, and Safeguards
- 6 Human Rights
- 7 International Environmental Issues
- 8 Causes of the Present Malaise, Concluding Observations, and a Prognosis
- Index
- References
Summary
As is well known, the primary motivation of the founders of the United Nations was to create an international institution that would be more effective than the League of Nations was in maintaining international peace and security. Under the U.N. Charter the Security Council is given the “primary responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security,” and it was the vision of the founders of the United Nations that the permanent members of the Security Council, especially the United States and the Soviet Union, would continue the cooperation that characterized their actions during World War II and be the backbone for the efforts of the new institution to prevent and, if necessary, to suppress by armed force aggression and other threats to and breaches of the peace.
With rare exceptions the vision of the founders has not been realized. To be sure, the record is not one of consistent failure. From time to time various permanent members have played key roles in efforts to meet aggression or threats to the peace. But the record on the whole is scandalously bad. Surprisingly, with the exception of the Gulf War in 1991, the record has been especially poor since the end of the Cold War.
In a speech to the United Nations General Assembly in September 2003, Kofi Annan, then Secretary-General of the United Nations, suggested that “a decisive moment” had arrived for the United Nations and “in particular for the aspiration set out in the [U.N.] Charter to provide collective security for all.”
Information
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Evolving Dimensions of International LawHard Choices for the World Community, pp. 103 - 160Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2010
References
, Humanitarian Intervention. A Reply to Ian Brownlie and a Plea for Constructive Alternatives, inLAWS and CIVIL WAR in the MODERN WORLD229 ( ed., 1974)Google Scholar
, Humanitarian Intervention to Protect the Ibos, inHUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION App. A ( ed., 1973)Google Scholar
, Palestinian Self-Determination: Possible Future for the Unallocated Territories of the Palestine Mandate, 5 YALE STUD. WORLD PUBLIC ORDER147–72 (1979)Google Scholar
, Appraisals of the ICJ's Decision: Nicaragua v. United States, 81 AM. J. INT'L L.77 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The United States and the United Nations in the Persian Gulf War: New Order or Disorder?, 25 CORNELL INT'L L.J.1 (1992)Google Scholar
, Security Council Resolution 678 and Persian Gulf Decision Making: Precarious Legitimacy, 85 AM. J. INT'L L.516 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, From Unity to Polarization: International Law and the Use of Force Against Iraq, 13 EUR. J. INT'L L.1, 11–12 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Averting Catastrophe: Why the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty is Losing Its Deterrence Capacity and How to Restore it, 28 MICH. J. INT'L L.337 (2007)Google Scholar
, Embolded by Impunity: The History and Consequences of Failure to Enforce Iranian Violations of International Law, 57 SYRACUSE L. REV.519 (2007)Google Scholar
, Principles of U.N.-OAS Relationship in the Dominican Republic, 52 DEP'T STATE BULL.975, 976–77 (1965)Google Scholar
, Grenada and the International Double Standard, 78 AM. J. INT'L L.145, 154–59 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Reflections on the Lawfulness of Invasion, 78 AM. J. INT'L L.131, 135–37, 142 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
& , The New African Union and Its Constitutive Act, 96 AM. J. INT'L L.365, 372–73 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this chapter is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.