Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-45ctf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-16T15:28:17.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Consequences of reported β-lactam allergy on perioperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of surgical site infection risk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 September 2025

Yuki Hanai*
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toho University, Funabashi, Chiba, Japan
Jun Hirai
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Infectious Diseases, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Aichi, Japan
Kazuhiro Matsuo
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toho University, Funabashi, Chiba, Japan
Keita Kouzu
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, National Defense Medical College, Saitama, Japan
Hiroji Shinkawa
Affiliation:
Department of Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka Metropolitan University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
Seiichi Shinji
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
Motomu Kobayashi
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, Hokushinkai Megumino Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan
Yuichi Kitagawa
Affiliation:
Department of Infection Control, National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Aichi, Japan
Chizuru Yamashita
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan
Yasuhiko Mohri
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Mie Prefectural General Medical Center, Mie, Japan
Hiroshi Nobuhara
Affiliation:
Merry Hospital, Medical Corporation Yachiyokai, Hiroshima, Japan
Katsunori Suzuki
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Disease Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Fukuoka, Japan
Junzo Shimizu
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan
Motoi Uchino
Affiliation:
Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Division of Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Hyogo Medical University, Hyogo, Japan
Seiji Haji
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Soseikai General Hospital, Kyoto, Japan
Masahiro Yoshida
Affiliation:
Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, International University of Health and Welfare, School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
Toru Mizuguchi
Affiliation:
Department of Nursing, Division of Surgical Science, Sapporo Medical University, Hokkaido, Japan
Toshihiko Mayumi
Affiliation:
Department of Intensive Care Unit, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Chukyo Hospital, Aichi, Japan
Yuko Kitagawa
Affiliation:
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Hiroki Ohge
Affiliation:
Department of Infectious Diseases, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
*
Corresponding author: Yuki Hanai; Email: yuki.hanai@phar.toho-u.ac.jp

Abstract

Objective:

To evaluate the impact of reported β-lactam allergy on the risk of surgical site infections (SSIs), given that most reported cases are unverified and may lead to suboptimal antibiotic prophylaxis.

Design:

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods:

Four databases were systematically searched for studies reporting SSI rates in patients with and without β-lactam allergy. The primary outcome was SSI incidence; secondary outcomes included mortality, length of hospital stay (LOS) and adverse events. Subgroup analyses were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using a random-effects model. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool.

Results:

Twenty-five retrospective observational studies comprising 460,284 patients were included. Reported β-lactam allergy was associated with a significantly increased risk of SSI (RR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.24–1.94). This association remained consistent across sensitivity and subgroup analyses, particularly in studies relying on self-reported allergies. Patients receiving β-lactam antibiotics had a significantly lower SSI risk than that of patients receiving non-β-lactam alternatives (RR = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.42–0.94). No significant differences were found in LOS or hypersensitivity reaction rates. Mortality was not reported in any of the included studies.

Conclusions:

Reported β-lactam allergy is associated with an increased risk of SSI, highlighting the importance of accurate allergy assessment. Selective administration of β-lactam agents, such as cefazolin, may offer a safe and effective option for preoperative prophylaxis in patients without a history of severe hypersensitivity.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bratzler, DW, Dellinger, EP, Olsen, KM, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2013;70:195283. https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp120568 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and Japan Society for Surgical Infection. Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery 2016 [in Japanese]. http://www.gekakansen.jp/file/antimicrobial-guideline.pdf. Published 2016. Accessed May 2, 2025.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. Global guidelines for the prevention of surgical site infection. 2nd ed. 2018. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550475. Published 2018. Accessed May 2, 2025.Google Scholar
Arroliga, ME, Radojicic, C, Gordon, SM, et al. A prospective observational study of the effect of penicillin skin testing on antibiotic use in the intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2003;24:347350. https://doi.org/10.1086/502212 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sagar, PS, Katelaris, CH. Utility of penicillin allergy testing in patients presenting with a history of penicillin allergy. Asia Pac Allergy 2013;3:115119. https://doi.org/10.5415/apallergy.2013.3.2.115 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macy, E, Contreras, R. Health care use and serious infection prevalence associated with penicillin “allergy” in hospitalized patients: a cohort study. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014;133:790796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2013.09.021 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLaughlin, EJ, Saseen, JJ, Malone, DC. Costs of beta-lactam allergies: Selection and costs of antibiotics for patients with a reported beta-lactam allergy. Arch Fam Med 2000;9:722726. https://doi.org/10.1001/archfami.9.8.722 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blumenthal, KG, Ryan, EE, Li, Y, Lee, H, Kuhlen, JL, Shenoy, ES. The impact of a reported penicillin allergy on surgical site infection risk. Clin Infect Dis 2018;66:329336. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix794 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lam, PW, Tarighi, P, Elligsen, M, et al. Self-reported beta-lactam allergy and the risk of surgical site infection: a retrospective cohort study. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2020;41:438443. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2019.374 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deierhoi, RJ, Dawes, LG, Vick, C, Itani, KM, Hawn, MT. Choice of intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis for colorectal surgery does matter. J Am Coll Surg 2013;217:763769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.003 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zastrow, RK, Huang, HH, Galatz, LM, Saunders-Hao, P, Poeran, J, Moucha, CS. characteristics of antibiotic prophylaxis and risk of surgical site infections in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2020;35:25812589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2020.04.025 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Page, MJ, McKenzie, JE, Bossuyt, PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mangram, AJ, Horan, TC, Pearson, ML, Silver, LC, Jarvis, WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) hospital infection control practices advisory committee. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:97132; quiz 133-4; discussion 96. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-6553(99)70088-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cumpston, M, Li, T, Page, MJ, et al. Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: A new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;10:ED000142. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.ED000142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sterne, JA, Hernán, MA, Reeves, BC, et al. ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 2016;355:i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beltran, RJ, Kako, H, Chovanec, T, Ramesh, A, Bissonnette, B, Tobias, JD. Penicillin allergy and surgical prophylaxis: Cephalosporin cross-reactivity risk in a pediatric tertiary care center. J Pediatr Surg 2015;50:856859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.10.048 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, TL, Springer, BD, Ruder, JA, Ruffolo, MR, Chen, AF. Is vancomycin-only prophylaxis for patients with penicillin allergy associated with increased risk of infection after arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2016;474:16011606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-015-4672-4 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nguyen, AV, Coggins, WS, Jain, RR, et al. Cefazolin versus vancomycin for neurosurgical operative prophylaxis—A single institution retrospective cohort study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2019;182:152157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.05.017 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, AH, Kelmer, G, MacDonald, JH, Clance, MR, King, PJ. The impact of patient-reported penicillin allergy on risk for surgical site infection in total joint arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2019;27:854860. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-18-00709 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Motoa, G, Carrillo-Martin, I, Chamorro-Pareja, N, et al. Impact of beta-lactam allergy label in liver transplant recipients. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2020;8:24342436.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2020.03.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plager, JH, Mancini, CM, Fu, X, et al. Preoperative penicillin allergy testing in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2020;124:583588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2020.03.013 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yian, EH, Chan, PH, Burfeind, W, Navarro, RA, Singh, A, Dillon, MT. Perioperative clindamycin use in penicillin allergic patients is associated with a higher risk of infection after shoulder arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2020;28:e270e276. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00168 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Basma, HS, Misch, CM. Extraction socket grafting and ridge augmentation failures associated with clindamycin antibiotic therapy: A retrospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2021;36:122125. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.8461 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fosnot, S, Currier, K, Pendell, J, Jeffres, MN. Comparison of immediate hypersensitivity reactions to preoperative antibiotics in patients labeled as penicillin allergic. Surgery 2021;170:777782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2021.02.063 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nguyen, CT, Petrucci, K, Daily, E, Brown, AM, Pettit, NN, Pisano, J. Investigating the impact of a β-lactam allergy label on preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis administration. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021;42:710714. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2020.1271 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertin, E, Meyer, C, Chatelain, B, Barrabé, A, Weber, E, Louvrier, A. Does penicillin allergy increase the risk of surgical site infection after orthognathic surgery? A multivariate analysis. J Clin Med 2022;11:5556. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195556 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnston, C, Godecker, A, Shirley, D, Antony, KM. Documented β-lactam allergy and risk for cesarean surgical site infection. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 2022;2022:5313948. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5313948 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khan, A, Wolford, DD, Ogola, GO, et al. Impact of patient-reported penicillin allergy on antibiotic prophylaxis and surgical site infection among patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2022;65:13971404. https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000002190 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mowrer, C, Lyden, E, Matthews, S, et al. Beta-lactam allergies, surgical site infections, and prophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients at a single center: a retrospective cohort study. Transpl Infect Dis 2022;24:e13907. https://doi.org/10.1111/tid.13907 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roebke, AJ, Malik, AT, Khan, SN, Yu, E. Does a reported penicillin allergy affect outcomes following elective posterior lumbar fusions? Int J Spine Surg 2022;16:10231028. https://doi.org/10.14444/8326 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roistacher, DM, Heller, JA, Ferraro, NF, August, M. Is penicillin allergy a risk factor for surgical site infection after oral and maxillofacial surgery?. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2022;80:93100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2021.08.147 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seidelman, JL, Moehring, RW, Weber, DJ, Anderson, DJ, Lewis, SS. The impact of patient-reported penicillin or cephalosporin allergy on surgical site infections. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2022;43:829833. https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2021.232 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilhelm, NB, Bonsall, TJ, Miller, CL. The effect of beta-lactam allergy status on the rate of surgical site infections: A retrospective cohort study. Ann Surg 2022;275:208212. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003949 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niu, T, Bao, X, Wei, J, Shi, Y, Ma, W, Wang, R. Impact of penicillin allergy-based alternative antibiotics on the risk of postoperative central nervous system infection: a retrospective cohort study. World Neurosurg 2023;171:e745e751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2022.12.102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niu, T, Zhang, Y, Li, Z, Bian, Y, Zhang, J, Wang, Y. The association between penicillin allergy and surgical site infection after orthopedic surgeries: a retrospective cohort study. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 2023;13:1182778. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2023 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scaggs Huang, F, Mangeot, C, Sucharew, H, et al. Beta-lactam allergy association with surgical site infections in pediatric procedures: A matched cohort study. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc 2023;12:123127. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpids/piac138 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bukowski, BR, Torres-Ramirez, RJ, Devine, D, et al. Perioperative cefazolin for total joint arthroplasty patients who have a penicillin allergy: Is it safe? J Arthroplasty 2024;39:S110S116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.058 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Narayanan, R, Carter, M, Toci, G, et al. Outcomes of cefazolin administration in a propensity matched cohort of penicillin allergic patients compared to non-penicillin allergic patients. Global Spine J 2025. https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251344907 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, M, Markus, P, Matesic, D, Li, JT. Safety and effectiveness of a preoperative allergy clinic in decreasing vancomycin use in patients with a history of penicillin allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2006;97:681687. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61100-3 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blanca, M, Torres, MJ, García, JJ, et al. Natural evolution of skin test sensitivity in patients allergic to beta-lactam antibiotics. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1999;103:918924. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0091-6749(99)70439-2 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trubiano, JA, Vogrin, S, Chua, KYL, et al. Development and validation of a penicillin allergy clinical decision rule. JAMA Intern Med 2020;180:745752. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0403 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crum, H, Gagnon, B, Thumann, A, Sidebottom, A, Vacquier, M, Gens, K. Impact of a pharmacist-driven penicillin allergy de-labeling pilot program in preoperative cardiothoracic and spine surgery patients at a quaternary hospital. Allergies 2024;4:3041. https://doi.org/10.3390/allergies4020003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blumenthal, KG, Peter, JG, Trubiano, JA, Phillips, EJ. Antibiotic allergy. Lancet 2019;393:183198. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32218-9 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Hanai et al. supplementary material 1

Hanai et al. supplementary material
Download Hanai et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 34.8 MB
Supplementary material: File

Hanai et al. supplementary material 2

Hanai et al. supplementary material
Download Hanai et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 34.8 MB
Supplementary material: File

Hanai et al. supplementary material 3

Hanai et al. supplementary material
Download Hanai et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 34.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Hanai et al. supplementary material 4

Hanai et al. supplementary material
Download Hanai et al. supplementary material 4(File)
File 39.4 KB