Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-r6c6k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T13:19:45.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The influence of phosphorus application and varying soil pH on soil and herbage properties across a range of grassland soils with impeded drainage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2022

D. Corbett*
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Cork, Ireland School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Ireland
D. P. Wall
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Crops, Environmental and Land-use Programme, Johnstown Castle, Wexford, Ireland
M. B. Lynch
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Crops, Environmental and Land-use Programme, Johnstown Castle, Wexford, Ireland
P. Tuohy
Affiliation:
Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Fermoy, Cork, Ireland
*
Author for correspondence: D. Corbett, E-mail: david.corbett@teagasc.ie
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

On soils dominated by high proportions of clay and organic matter, soil acidity and poor nutrient use efficiency have a major impact on output potential. Due to the inherent chemical properties of these soils, reducing soil acidity and the prevalence of undesirable metallic cations poses challenges. As a result, these soils have a large capacity for phosphorus (P) fixation, therefore reducing plant P availability. Limestone (CaCO3 or MgCO3) is applied to agricultural soils to counteract soil acidity and reduce P fixation. The current study investigates the effects of four contrasting annual P application rates (0, 50, 100, 150 kg P/ha); split (50:50) between spring and summer, across soils with a range of soil pH values from a previous liming trial. The effect of soil pH ranges and P treatment rates on seasonal herbage growth and herbage P concentration was investigated over three years. Soil nutrient status was also investigated. Soil pH had a significant impact on the rate of mineralization and soil P concentration across each site. A soil pH of 6.2 caused a 1.8 mg/l increase in soil test P. An annual P application was necessary to maintain sufficient herbage P concentration for animal dietary requirements (0.35% DM), however there was no effect of P application or liming rate on herbage productivity across the three sites as all sites possessed sufficient soil P reserves. The current experiment has shown that despite optimal soil fertility status, ensuring sufficient plant available P is a problem on these particular soils.

Information

Type
Crops and Soils Research Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Initial soil properties (chemical and physical) across all three sites

Figure 1

Table 2. Sampling dates and rotation length (days) across each year within each farm

Figure 2

Fig. 1. (a) Daily herbage growth between individual sites across grazing dates; (b) daily herbage growth between individual sites across seasons.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Average herbage P concentration over the trial period across P treatment rates within each season – average across all sites (line on figure represents herbage critical P threshold for animal dietary requirements – 0.35%).

Figure 4

Table 3. Seasonal herbage phosphorus concentration (%) across P treatment rates and sites

Figure 5

Fig. 3. Average change in Morgan's STP concentration across all sites over the trial period as a result of P and lime treatment rates (results presented are the change in addition to control) – STP refers to Morgan's P soil test.

Figure 6

Table 4. Change in soil test phosphorus across sites, sampling dates and phosphorus treatment rates

Figure 7

Fig. 4. Average change in soil pH across sites and sampling dates over the trial period.

Figure 8

Table 5. Change in soil pH across sampling dates and liming rates within each individual site