Hostname: page-component-75d7c8f48-f9ccc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-14T03:20:29.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Candida auris screening practices at healthcare facilities in the United States: An Emerging Infections Network survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 March 2024

Ian P. Hennessee Open the ORCID record for Ian P. Hennessee [Opens in a new window] ,
Kaitlin Forsberg Open the ORCID record for Kaitlin Forsberg [Opens in a new window] ,
Susan E. Beekmann Open the ORCID record for Susan E. Beekmann [Opens in a new window] ,
Philip M. Polgreen Open the ORCID record for Philip M. Polgreen [Opens in a new window] ,
Jeremy A.W. Gold Open the ORCID record for Jeremy A.W. Gold [Opens in a new window]  and
Meghan Lyman Open the ORCID record for Meghan Lyman [Opens in a new window]
Ian P. Hennessee*
Affiliation:
Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Kaitlin Forsberg
Affiliation:
Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Susan E. Beekmann
Affiliation:
University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
Philip M. Polgreen
Affiliation:
University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa
Jeremy A.W. Gold
Affiliation:
Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
Meghan Lyman
Affiliation:
Mycotic Diseases Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
*
Corresponding author: Ian Hennessee; Email: xye0@cdc.gov
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We surveyed members of the Emerging Infections Network about Candida auris screening practices at US healthcare facilities. Only 37% of respondents reported conducting screening; among these, 75% reported detection of at least 1 C. auris case in the last year. Increased screening could improve C. auris detection and prevent spread.

Information

Type
Concise Communication
Information
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology , Volume 45 , Issue 6 , June 2024 , pp. 766 - 769
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Rossow, J, Ostrowsky, B, Adams, E, et al. Factors associated with Candida auris colonization and transmission in skilled nursing facilities with ventilator units, New York, 2016–2018. Clin Infect Dis 2021;72:e753–e760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sexton, DJ, Bentz, ML, Welsh, RM, et al. Positive correlation between Candida auris skin-colonization burden and environmental contamination at a ventilator-capable skilled nursing facility in Chicago. Clin Infect Dis 2021;73:1142–1148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). List P includes EPA-approved products with claims against C. auris (https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/list-p-antimicrobial-products-registered-epa-claims-against-candida-auris).Google Scholar
Rhodes, J, Fisher, MC. Global epidemiology of emerging Candida auris . Curr Opin Microbiol 2019;52:84–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pillai, SK, Beekmann, SE, Santibanez, S, Polgreen, PM. The Infectious Diseases Society of America Emerging Infections Network: Bridging the gap between clinical infectious diseases and public health. Clin Infect Dis 2014;58:991–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, E, Quinn, M, Tsay, S, et al. Candida auris in healthcare facilities, New York, USA, 2013–2017. Emerg Infect Dis 2018;24:1816–1824.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsay, S, Welsh, RM, Adams, EH, et al. Notes from the field: ongoing transmission of Candida auris in healthcare facilities—United States, June 2016–May 2017. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017;66:514–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennis, EK, Chaturvedi, S, Chaturvedi, V. So many diagnostic tests, so little time: review and preview of Candida auris testing in clinical and public health laboratories. Front Microbiol 2021;12:757835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, D, Martin, EK, Madad, S, Dhagat, P, Nuzzo, JB. Preparedness and response to an emerging health threat—lessons learned from Candida auris outbreaks in the United States. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2021;42:1301–1306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowlands, J, Dufort, E, Chaturvedi, S, et al. Candida auris admission screening pilot in select units of New York City healthcare facilities, 2017–2019. Am J Infect Control 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2023.01.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parti, U, Walton, S, Finn, L, et al. The importance of information technology and surveillance to prevent the spread of Candida auris . Am J Infect Control 2021;49:S8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar