Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-rbxfs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T09:46:51.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evidence of active shortening along the eastern border of the San Rafael basement block: characterization of the seismic source of the Villa Atuel earthquake (1929), Mendoza province, Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 June 2016

M. BRANELLEC*
Affiliation:
Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour, Laboratoires des Fluides Complexes et Leurs Réservoirs, Equipes Geosciences, CNRS UMR 5150, Avenue de L'université, Pau, France
B. NIVIÈRE
Affiliation:
Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour, Laboratoires des Fluides Complexes et Leurs Réservoirs, Equipes Geosciences, CNRS UMR 5150, Avenue de L'université, Pau, France
J.-P. CALLOT
Affiliation:
Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour, Laboratoires des Fluides Complexes et Leurs Réservoirs, Equipes Geosciences, CNRS UMR 5150, Avenue de L'université, Pau, France
V. REGARD
Affiliation:
Université Paul Sabatier, Laboratoire Géosciences Environnement Toulouse (GET) 31400, France
J.-C. RINGENBACH
Affiliation:
Total SA, Centre Scientifique et Technique Jean Féger, Avenue Larribau, Pau 64000, France
*
Author for correspondence: matthieu.branellec@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

On the 30 May 1929, a massive earthquake occurred in the San Rafael area (southern Mendoza province) leading to the destruction of the Villa Atuel and Las Malvinas towns. The region affected by the ground shaking covers a large part of southern South America. Although no surface breaks have been detected on the surface, several authors have pointed out active faults that could be related to the event of 1929. Using satellite imagery and field observations, we investigated two active faults situated on the eastern border of the San Rafael Block (SRB) close to or within the epicentral area. The most prominent faults are the c. 40 km long Las Malvinas and c. 30 km long Cerro Negro reverse faults which are located near the epicentral area. Geological and morphological observations allow us to describe late Pleistocene activity and estimate the long-term slip rates of these faults. Possible ruptures that match our observations and which are compatible with the cartographic length of these faults would account for a seismic moment magnitude of M 0 = 2.8×1019 N m and a moment magnitude of M W = 6.9. The morphological signatures of these fault segments and the occurrence of the San Rafael earthquake suggests that the southern Mendoza Province is still currently submitted to shortening.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) Geodynamic setting of the Neuquén Basin showing the several morpho-structural units between 32°S and 40°S. (b) Seismotectonic framework of the region hit by the 1929 earthquake. The plotted crustal seismicity (<60 km) has been taken from the USGS database and topography is derived from an ASTER GDEM (30 m). (c) Schematic cross-section running from the Malargue Fold–Thrust Belt to the San Rafael Block showing the global structural style characterized by the involvement of the pre-Jurassic basement (white: basement rocks; grey: Mesozoic and Cenozoic cover). Red stars refer to historical seismicity (unknown location of macroseismic epicentres).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Geological map of the San Rafael Block, modified from Sepúlveda et al. (2000).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Upper: 3D view of the northern part of the Las Malvinas fault. Located on Figure 2. Lower: topographic profile along the eastern border of the SRB showing a 100–150 m high topographic ridge above the cartographic trace of the fault.

Figure 3

Figure 4. 3D view of the southern segment of the Las Malvinas fault. Located on Figure 2. Right: field pictures exhibiting the folding of Chapua Group volcanic (Pleistocene) rocks above the fault trace. Lower: topographic profiles highlighting the uplift of the alluvial terrace as well as the Chapua Group volcanic rocks. Left: field picture showing the location of the terrace-related sampled pebbles for cosmogenic dating.

Figure 4

Figure 5. 3D view of the southern segment of the Cerro Negro Fault. Below, topographic profile showing the topographic ridge situated at the foot of the Cerro Negro Volcano and related to the Cerro Negro Fault initially described by Folguera et al. (2009). This zone characterizes the transition between the Las Malvinas and the Cerro Negro faults.

Figure 5

Figure 6. 3D geological view of the northern segment of the Cerro Negro Fault. The Plio-Pleistocene topographic ridge is associated with the growth of an anticline that triggers reorganization of the drainage network we can observe to the left part of the figure. Lower: topographic profile and field picture showing the anticline hinge in the Plio-pleistocene alluviums. The AR-2013-4 has been sampled on the top of the topographic ridge for cosmogenic dating.

Figure 6

Table 1. AMS ASTER 10Be concentration measurements.

Figure 7

Table 2. Exposure age evaluations depending on erosion rates. Calculations have been processed with Cronus web calculator with four different values for local erosion rates: 0; 10−6; 5×10−6 and 10−5m a–1. The average sample thickness is 12.5 cm. Since the various models proposed by Cronus yield different evaluations, we propose an ‘average’ value (last two columns).

Figure 8

Figure 7. Topographic profile showing the excess area resulting from the terrace uplift related to the activation of the Las Malvinas southern fault segment. Simple model showing the relationships between the shortening, the uplifted surface and the depth to the décollement level.

Figure 9

Table 3. Calculation of the uplift and slip rates associated with the La Malvinas and Cerro Negro faults, based on cosmogenic analysis. The denudation rate is 0 m Ma–1.

Figure 10

Table 4. Calculation of the uplift and slip rates associated with the La Malvinas and Cerro Negro faults, based on cosmogenic analysis. The denudation rate is 5 m Ma–1.

Figure 11

Table 5. Seismic parameters for the various fault segments. MFL: morphologic fault length; RLD: rupture length at depth; M: moment magnitude of the maximum possible earthquake.