Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-8wtlm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-13T23:07:23.136Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ticket‐splitting and strategic voting under mixed electoral rules: Evidence from Germany

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2026

Thomas Gschwend
Thomas Gschwend*
Affiliation:
Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung, Mannheim, Germany
*
Address for correspondence: Thomas Gschwend, Mannheimer Zentrum für Europäische Sozialforschung, L7, 1 Mannheim 68161, Germany. E‐mail: Thomas.Gschwend@mzes.uni‐mannheim.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is more to strategic voting than simply avoiding wasting one's vote if one is liberated from the corset of studying voting behavior in plurality systems. Mixed electoral systems provide different voters with diverse incentives to cast a strategic vote. They not only determine the degree of strategic voting, but also the kind of strategies voters employ. Strategic voters employ either a wasted‐vote or a coalition insurance strategy, but do not automatically cast their vote for large parties as the current literature suggest. This has important implications for the consolidation of party systems. Moreover, even when facing the same institutional incentives, voters vary in their proclivity to vote strategically.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
European Journal of Political Research , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , January 2007 , pp. 1 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © 2006 The Author(s). Journal compilation © 2006 (European Consortium for Political Research)

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Austen‐Smith, D. & Banks, J. (1988). Elections, coalitions and legislative outcomes. American Political Science Review 82 (June): 405–422. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, P.A., Baum, L., Clausen, A.R. & Smith, C.E. Jr. (1992). Patterns and sources of ticket splitting in subpresidential voting. American Political Science Review 86 (December): 916–928. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J.H. (1978). The multicandidate calculus of voting: Application to Canadian federal elections. American Journal of Political Science 22 (August): 609–638. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Black, J.H. (1980). The probability‐choice perspective in voter decision making models. Public Choice 35(5): 565–574. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, A. & Massicotte, L. (1996). Electoral systems. In LeDuc, L., Niemi, R.G. & Norris, P. (eds), Comparing democracies: Elections and voting in global perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Google Scholar
Brambor, T., Clark, W.R. & Golder, G. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analysis. Political Analysis 14 (Winter): 63–82. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braumoeller, B.F. (2004). Hypothesis testing and multiplicative interaction terms. International Organization 58 (Fall): 807–820. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burden, B.C. & Kimball, D.C. (1998). A new approach to the study of ticket splitting. American Political Science Review 92 (September): 533–544. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, B. (1978). Strategic voting in Britain. American Journal of Political Science 22 (August): 639–655. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, B., Ferejohn, J. & Fiorina, M. (1987). The personal vote: Constituency service and electoral independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. & Miller, W.E. (1957). The motivational basis of straight and split ticket voting. American Political Science Review 51 (June): 293–312. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, G.W. (1997). Making votes count: Strategic coordination in the world's electoral systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, G.W. & Shugart, M.S. (1996). Strategic voting under proportional representation. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 12 (October): 299–324. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, K.E. & Schoppa, L.J. (2002). Interaction effects and mixed member electoral systems: Theory and evidence from Germany, Japan and Italy. Comparative Political Studies 35: 1027–1053. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duch, R.M. & Palmer, H.D. (2002). Strategic voting in post‐communist democracy? British Journal of Political Science 32: 63–91. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duverger, M. (1954). Political parties. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
Ferrara, F. & Herron, E.S. (2005). Going it alone? Strategic entry under mixed electoral rules. American Journal of Political Science 41(1): 16–31. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fey, M. (1997). Stability and coordination in Duverger's Law: A formal model of pre‐election polls and strategic voting. American Political Science Review 91 (March): 135–147. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, M.P. (1992). Divided government. New York: Macmillian. Google Scholar
Fiske, S.T. & Taylor, S.E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw‐Hill. Google Scholar
Forsythe, R., Myerson, R.B., Rietz, T.A. & Weber, R.J. (1993). An experiment on coordination in multi‐candidate elections: The importance of polls and election histories. Social Choice and Welfare 10: 223–247. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gschwend, T. (2004). Strategic voting in mixed electoral systems. Amsterdam:SFG‐Elsevier. Google Scholar
Gschwend, T., Johnston, R. & Pattie, C. (2003). Split‐ticket patterns in mixed‐member proportional election systems: Estimates and analyses of their spatial variation at the German federal election, 1998. British Journal of Political Science 33(1): 109–127. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gschwend, T. & Van der Kolk, H. (2006). Split ticket voting in mixed member proportional systems: The hypothetical case of The Netherlands Acta Politica 41(2): 163–179. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herron, E.S. & Nishikawa, M. (2001). Contamination effects and the number of parties in mixed‐superposition electoral systems. Electoral Studies 20 (March): 63–86. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karp, J.A., Vowles, J., Banducci, S., Donovan, T. (2002). Strategic voting, party activity and candidate effects: Testing explanations for split voting in New Zealand's new mixed system. Electoral Studies 12: 1–22. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, M. & Schofield, N. (1990). Multiparty government: The politics of coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Moser, R.G. & Scheiner, E. (2005). Strategic ticket splitting and the personal vote in mixed‐member electoral systems. Legislative Studies Quarterly 30(2): 259–276. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nie, N.H., Verba, S. & Petrocik, J.R. (1976). The changing American voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
Pappi, F.U. & Eckstein, G. (1998). Voters' party preferences in multiparty systems and their coalitional and spatial implications: Germany after unification. Public Choice 97 (December): 229–255. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pappi, F.U. & Thurner, P.W. (2002). Electoral behavior in a two‐vote system: Incentives for ticket splitting in German Bundestag elections. European Journal of Political Research 41(2): 207–232. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, G.B. (2000). Elections as instruments of democracy: Majoritarian and proportional visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar
Riker, W.H. (1962). The theory of political coalitions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Google Scholar
Roberts, G.K. (1988). The ‘second‐vote’ campaign strategy of the West German Free Democratic Party. European Journal of Political Research 16: 317–337. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shively, W.P. (1970). The elusive psychological factor: A test for the impact of electoral systems on voters' behavior. Comparative Politics 3 (October): 115–125. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, M.S. & Wattenberg, M.P. (2001). Mixed member electoral systems: The best of both worlds? Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
Zaller, J.R. (1992). The nature and origins of mass opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar