Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-g98kq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-14T10:36:08.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Prehospital Aspirin Delivery: Emergency Medical Dispatcher-Directed versus Emergency Medical Services Field Provider-Directed Aspirin Administration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2025

Greg Scott ,
Christopher Olola Open the ORCID record for Christopher Olola [Opens in a new window] ,
Jan Althoff ,
Jean M. Early ,
Whitney Burr ,
Lindy Curtis ,
Nikki Anderson ,
Matthew Miko  and
Jeff Clawson
Greg Scott*
Affiliation:
International Academies of Emergency Dispatch, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Christopher Olola
Affiliation:
International Academies of Emergency Dispatch, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Jan Althoff
Affiliation:
North Memorial Health, Robbinsdale, Minnesota, USA
Jean M. Early
Affiliation:
Northwell Health Center for Emergency Medical Services, Syosset, New York, USA
Whitney Burr
Affiliation:
MedStar Mobile Healthcare, Fort Worth, Texas, USA
Lindy Curtis
Affiliation:
MedStar Mobile Healthcare, Fort Worth, Texas, USA
Nikki Anderson
Affiliation:
North Memorial Health, Robbinsdale, Minnesota, USA
Matthew Miko
Affiliation:
International Academies of Emergency Dispatch, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Jeff Clawson
Affiliation:
International Academies of Emergency Dispatch, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
*
Correspondence: Greg Scott International Academies of Emergency Dispatch 110 Regent Street Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 USA E-mail. greg.scott@emergencydispatch.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

For suspected acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and unstable angina patients, prehospital aspirin (ASA) administration has been the standard of care by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) field providers. Recently, Emergency Medical Dispatchers (EMDs), using Medical Priority Dispatch System (MPDS), provide telephone instructions to qualifying suspected AMI patients to take ASA, prior to EMS field provider arrival. No formal studies exist that measure time saved from earlier Dispatcher-Directed Aspirin Administration (DDAA).

Objectives:

The primary objectives of the study were: (1) to determine the amount of time saved, if any, using DDAA; and (2) to describe the frequency of DDAA and Field Provider-Directed Aspirin Administration (FPAA).

Methods:

The retrospective study analyzed EMD and EMS data collected during a six-month period at three dispatch services and three EMS agencies in the United States. The frequency and mean (plus 95% confidence interval [CI]) time of DDAA and FPAA were calculated. Reasons why patients who qualified to take ASA per dispatch protocol but did not take it were also assessed.

Results:

A total of 108,459 EMS cases were analyzed; EMD/EMS delivered ASA to 4.0% (n = 4,113) of these patients. The most frequent primary impressions were: cardiac chest pain (angina), cardiovascular (CV)-chest pain (presumed cardiac), ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and CV-chest pain – acute coronary syndrome (ACS; 50.0%). Overall, DDAA saved 13 minutes mean time (95% CI, 11.4-14.6; P < .001) (median: 12.3 minutes) from the case creation time.

Conclusions:

It was found that DDAA provides measurable time savings in ASA delivery to patients. Further studies will need to assess if the reduction of ASA delivery time by EMDs has the potential to improve overall care and survival for patients. The study identified beneficial new knowledge for possible future enhancements to medical dispatch protocols and for EMS providers.

Keywords

aspirin administrationaspirin deliveryaspirin treatmentEmergency Medical DispatchEmergency Medical Services

Information

Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 40 , Issue 5 , October 2025 , pp. 251 - 258
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Barbash, IM, Freimark, D, Gottlieb, S, et al. Outcome of myocardial infarction in patients treated with aspirin is enhanced by pre-hospital administration. Cardiology. 2002;98(3):141–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freimark, D, Matetzky, S, Leor, J, et al. Timing of aspirin administration as a determinant of survival of patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis. Am J Cardiol. 2002;89(4):381–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horne, R, James, D, Petrie, K, Weinman, J, Vincent, R. Patients’ interpretation of symptoms as a cause of delay in reaching hospital during acute myocardial infarction. Heart. 2000;83(4):388–393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohn, PF. Silent myocardial ischemia: recent developments. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2005;7(2):155–163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hochman, JS, Tamis, JE, Thompson, TD, et al. Sex, clinical presentation, and outcome in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Global use of strategies to open occluded coronary arteries in acute coronary syndromes IIb investigators. N Engl J Med. 1999;34(4):226–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, KA, Vaccarino, V, Arnold, AL, Funk, M, Goldberg, RJ. Gender and age differences in chief complaints of acute myocardial infarction (Worcester heart attack study). Am J Cardiol. 2004;93(5):606–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russo, RG, Wikler, D, Rahimi, K, Danaei, G. Self-administration of aspirin after chest pain for the prevention of premature cardiovascular mortality in the United States: a population-based analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2024;13(11):e032778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McVaney, KE, Marlow, M, Colwell, C, Pons, PT. Treatment of suspected cardiac ischemia with aspirin by paramedics in an urban emergency medical services system. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005;9(3):282–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, G, Clawson, J, Gardett, I, et al. 9-1-1 triage of non-traumatic chest pain: association with hospital diagnosis. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2017;21(4):525–534.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Academies of Emergency Dispatch (IAED). EMD Medical Priority Dispatch Protocol System (MPDS) version 13.3, 2020 release. Salt Lake City, Utah USA: Priority Dispatch Corp. https://prioritydispatch.widen.net/s/swjnpjrnsf/mpds-marketing-brochure_english-low-res. Accessed November 8, 2023.Google Scholar
Barron, T, Clawson, J, Scott, G, et al. Aspirin administration by emergency medical dispatchers using a protocol-driven aspirin diagnostic and instruction tool. Emerg Med J. 2013;30(7):572–578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knockaert, DC, Buntinx, F, Stoens, N, Bruyninckx, R, Delooz, H. Chest pain in the emergency department: the broad spectrum of causes. Eur J Emerg Med. 2002;9(1):25–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frieling, T, Bergdoldt, G, Allescher, HD, Riemann, JF. Chest pain—not always the heart! Clinical impact of gastrointestinal diseases in non-cardiac chest pain. Z Gastroenterol. 2015;53(2):120–124.Google ScholarPubMed
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Acute Coronary Syndromes: Guidance, 2020. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng185. Accessed November 3, 2023.Google Scholar
Verheugt, FW, van der Laarse, A, Funke-Küpper, AJ, Sterkman, LG, Galema, TW, Roos, JP. Effects of early intervention with low-dose aspirin (100 mg) on infarct size, reinfarction and mortality in anterior wall acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1990;66(3):267–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, MJ, Topal, EJ. Prehospital administration of aspirin in patients with unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction. Arch Intern Med. 1996;156(14):1506–1510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, HD Jr, Davis, JW, Archibald, DG, et al. Protective effects of aspirin against acute myocardial infarction and death in men with unstable angina. Results of a veteran’s administration cooperative study. N Engl J Med. 1983;309(7):396–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Scott et al. supplementary material 1

Scott et al. supplementary material
Download Scott et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 455 KB
Supplementary material: File

Scott et al. supplementary material 2

Scott et al. supplementary material
Download Scott et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 1.3 MB
Supplementary material: File

Scott et al. supplementary material 3

Scott et al. supplementary material
Download Scott et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 34.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Scott et al. supplementary material 4

Scott et al. supplementary material
Download Scott et al. supplementary material 4(File)
File 28.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Scott et al. supplementary material 5

Scott et al. supplementary material
Download Scott et al. supplementary material 5(File)
File 27.9 KB