Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-88psn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T05:53:26.448Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ice-flow-induced scattering zone within the Antarctic ice sheet revealed by high-frequency airborne radar

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

Kenichi Matsuoka
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Box 351310, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195-1310, U.S.A. E-mail: matsuoka@ess.washington.edu
Seiho Uratsuka
Affiliation:
National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Nukui-kita 4-2-1, Koganei, Tokyo 184-8795, Japan
Shuji Fujita
Affiliation:
National Institute of Polar Research, Kaga, Itabashi ku, Tokyo 173-8515, Japan
Fumihiko Nishio
Affiliation:
Center for Environmental Remote Sensing, Chiba University, 1-33, Yayoi cho, Inage ku, Chiba 263-8522, Japan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

To better understand how internal radar echoes depend on ice-flow conditions and radar polarization, we surveyed two basins in East Antarctica using 179 MHz airborne radar. We compared radar echoes from three ice-flow conditions: parallel sheet flow in the main stream of a basin, convergent flow towards an ice stream, and longitudinal compression by nunataks. We detected a distinct zone of high radar scattering several hundred meters thick at middle depths in the latter two regions. This high-scattering zone was detected only when the radar polarization plane was parallel to the compression axis in ice. Such a high-scattering zone was not found in the parallel-flow region, regardless of the polarization. Using a recently developed theory of radar scattering in ice, we interpret the high-scattering zone as being caused by crystal-orientation-fabric alternations among adjacent ice layers due to difference in horizontal strain components. We argue that the spatial variation of the high-scattering zone is crucial for understanding past and present flow features.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2004
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Ragnhild Glacier basin (RGB) and Shirase Glacier basin (SGB) in eastern Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica (Liu and others, 1999). The shaded rectangle in the inset map shows the area covered by the larger map. RGB has a chain of inland nunataks about 200 km from the coast that include the Yamato Mountains near R1, the Belgica Mountains near R2, and the Sor Rondane Mountains (SRM). This chain of nunataks and wide ice shelves characterize the Dronning Maud Land coast from 20° W to 35° E. Contour intervals are 100 m, and elevations of1000, 2000 and 3000 m are labeled. Black dashed lines highlight topographic divides. Flight-lines are shown as thick black lines. Thin solid lines in SGB show three previous ground-based measurement lines (Matsuoka and others, 2003) including the Mizuho ice-coring site marked with an X. (b) The flight path and the locations of the continuous high-Pr zone. The locations of the flight turning points are marked with letters and listed in Table 1. We denote the distances counterclockwise along these lines in RGB and SGB as xr and xg, respectively. Solid black lines mark the locations of the high-Pr zone, the white-filled lines show locations where this zone was not detected, and the hatched-line segments mark regions with less distinct high-Pr zones. The polarization was parallel to the flight path. We could not distinguish internal scattering and off-nadir bed scattering around R1 and R2. Line A is the lowest line in our previous study (Matsuoka and others, 2003). Spatial variations of the high-Pr zone due to Pcof-based anisotropic reflection zones along line A are marked in the same way.

Figure 1

Table 1. Locations of theflight turning points

Figure 2

Table 2. Specifications of the 179 MHz radar system. See Uratsuka and others (1996) for more details

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Radar echo along the survey line in RGB. (a) Radargram. Locations of R1-R3 correspond to the sites shown in Figure 1b. R1 is at xr = 0 and 480 km. The gray scale on the right is for Pr. The continuous, jagged white line in the right panel highlights the bed topography where scattering from the bed is not obvious. A white arrow marks the high-Przone, a zone of relatively high internal Pr. (b) Depth profiles of Prat xr = 100,140, 220, 240 and 260 km from left to right. The dotted line connects the bed depth at the different positions. Black horizontal arrows at xr = 220,240 and260 mark the high-Pr zone. Detection limit ranges from —98 to —108 dBm, depending on the pulse width (Table 2).

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Radar echo along the survey line in SGB. (a) Radargram. Locations of S1-S4 correspond to the sites shown in Figure 1b. The white arrow marks the distinct high-Przone. The gray scale on the right represents Pr. (b) Depth profiles of Prat xS = 50, 80, 110, 140 and 170 kmfrom left to right. The dotted line connects the bed depth at the different positions. Black horizontal arrows at xS = 110, 140 and 170 km mark the high-Pr zone. Detection limit is at -103 dBm (Table 2).

Figure 5

Fig. 4. COF patterns inferred from the observed radar echoes. All diagrams are projected onto the horizontal plane. (a) Strong vertical single pole. (b) Elongated single pole. (c) Vertical girdle. For (b) and (c), the cluster plane of c axes is along the compression axis and perpendicular to the extension axis. Large scattering occurs only along the horizontal compression axis when COF patterns alter among (a-c), or if elongations of (b) change.