Abeysekera, L., and Dawson, P. (2015). Motivation and cognitive load in the flipped classroom: Definition, rationale and a call for research. Higher Education Research and Development, 34(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2014.934336CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abrahamsson, N., and Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(4), 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310808073XCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alegria de la Colina, A., and del Pilar García Mayo, M. (2009). Oral interaction in task-based EFL learning: The use of the L1 as a cognitive tool. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47(3–4), 325–345. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.2009.014Google Scholar

Alexander, B., Adams Becker, S., and Cummins, M. (2016). Digital literacy: An NMC Horizon Project strategic brief. Horizon Project, 3(3). Austin, TX: New Media Consortium.Google Scholar

Al-Homoud, F., and Schmitt, N. (2009). Extensive reading in a challenging environment: A comparison of extensive and intensive reading approaches in Saudi Arabia. Language Teaching Research, 33(4), 383–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Allen, J. P., Swain, M., Harley, B., and Cummins, J. (1990). Aspects of classroom treatment: Towards a more comprehensive view of second language education. In Harley, B., Allen, J. P., Cummins, J., and Swain, M., eds., The Development of Second Language Proficiency (pp. 57–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aston, G. (1993). Notes on the interlanguage of comity. In Kasper, G. and Blum-Kulka, S., eds., Interlanguage Pragmatics (pp. 224–250). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auerbach, E. R. (1993). Reexamining English only in the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 27(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586949CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baars, B. J. (1997). In the theatre of consciousness: Global workspace theory, a rigorous scientific theory of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 4(4), 292–309.Google Scholar

Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36(3), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(03)00019–4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Batstone, R., and Philp, J. (2013). Classroom interaction and learning across time and space. In McDonough, K. and Mackey, A., eds., Second Language Interaction in Diverse Educational Contexts (pp. 109–128). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bekar, M., and Christiansen, M. S. (2018). Computer‐mediated communication (CMC). In Liontas, J. I. and DelliCarpini, M., eds., The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0816Google Scholar

Berman, R. (2007). Language knowledge and use across adolescence. In Hoff, E. and Shatz, M., eds., Blackwell Handbook of Language Development (pp. 347–367). Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R., eds. (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, School. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–1770.1996.tb01246.xGoogle Scholar

Breen, M., ed. (2001). Learner Contributions to Language Learning: New Directions in Research . Harlow: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

Brown, H. D., and Abeywickrama, P. (2010). Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices, 2nd ed. New York: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar

Bygate, M., and Samuda, V. (2009). Creating pressure in task pedagogy: The joint roles of field, purpose and engagement within the interaction approach. In Mackey, A. and Polio, C., eds., Multiple Perspectives on Interaction: Second Language Research in Honor of Susan M. Gass (pp. 90–116). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Carlson, R. A. (2003). Skill learning. In Nadel, L., ed., Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science (Vol. IV, pp. 36–42). London: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Chik, A. (2012). Digital gameplay for autonomous foreign language learning: Gamers’ and language teachers’ perspectives. In Reinders, H., ed., Digital Games in Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 95–114). London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137005267_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chung, K. K. H., and Lam, C. B. (2020). Cognitive linguistic skills underlying word reading and spelling difficulties in Chinese adolescents with dyslexia. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(1), 48–59.Google Scholar

Cobb, T. (2018). Technology for teaching reading. In Liontas, J. I. and DelliCarpini, M. eds., The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0444Google Scholar

Collins, L., and Muñoz, C. (2016). The foreign language classroom: Current perspectives and future considerations. The Modern Language Journal, 100 (S1), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12305CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cook, T. D., Deng, Y., and Morgano, E. (2007). Friendship influences during early adolescence: The special role of friends’ grade point average. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 17(2), 325–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532–7795.2007.00525.xGoogle Scholar

Cook, V. (2001). Using the first language in the classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(3), 402–423. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.57.3.402Google Scholar

Cornillie, F., Clarebout, G., and Desmet, P. (2012). Between learning and playing? Exploring learners’ perceptions of corrective feedback in an immersive game for English pragmatics. ReCALL, 24(3), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344012000146CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craik, F. I. M., and Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80001-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crone, E. (2011). Das pubertierende Gehirn. Wie Kinder erwachsen werden. Munich: Droemer.Google Scholar

Crookes, G., and Schmidt, R. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language Learning, 41(4), 469–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–1770.1991.tb00690.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cummins, J. (2015). Inclusion and language learning: Pedagogical principles for integrating students from marginalized groups in the mainstream classroom. In Bongartz, C. and Rohde, A., eds., Inklusion im Englischunterricht (pp. 95–116). Frankfurt: Peter Lang Edition.Google Scholar

Dawes, L. (2004). Research report: Talk and learning in classroom science. International Journal of Science Education, 26(6), 677–695. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000097424CrossRefGoogle Scholar

De Bot, K. (1996). The psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis. Language Learning, 46(3), 529–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–1770.1996.tb01246.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deci, E., and Ryan, R. (1985). Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behaviour. New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In Doughty, C. and Williams, J., eds., Focus on Form in Classroom Second Language Acquisition (pp. 42–63). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical periods in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 493–533. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100004022Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. (2007). Situating the concept of practice. In DeKeyser, R., ed., Practice in a Second Language: Perspectives from Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology (pp. 1–18). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deterding, S., Khaled, R., Nacke, L., and Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification: Toward a definition. CHI 2011 Gamification Workshop Proceedings (pp. 12–15). Vancouver, BC, Canada.Google Scholar

Dewaele, J., Witney, J., Saito, K., and Dewaele, L. (2018). Foreign language enjoyment and anxiety: The effect of teacher and learner variables. Language Teaching Research, 22(6), 676–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in second language learning. Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 273–284. doi:10.2307/330107CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and Researching Motivation. London: Longman Pearson.Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The Psychology of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z., and Maldarez, A. (1997). Group dynamics and foreign language learning. System, 25(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(96)00061–9Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z., and Ryan, S. (2015). The Psychology of the Language Learner Revisited. New York/London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dörnyei, Z., and Ushoida, E., eds. (2009). Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dotterer, A. M., McHale, S. M., and Crouter, A. C. (2009). The development and correlates of academic interests from childhood through adolescence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 509–519. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013987CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Doughty, C., and Williams, J., eds. (1998). Focus-on-Form in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Duchesne, S., and McMaugh, A. (2016). Educational Psychology for Learning and Teaching, 5th ed. Melbourne, Australia: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar

East, M. (2012). Task-Based Language Teaching from the Teachers’ Perspective. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Edstrom, A. (2006). L1 use in the L2 classroom: One teacher’s self-evaluation. Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(2), 275–292. doi:10.1353/cml.2007.0002Google Scholar

Elder, C., Erlam, R., and Philp, J. (2007). Explicit language knowledge and focus on form: Options and obstacles for TESOL teacher trainees. In Fotos, S. and Nassaji, H., eds., Form-Focused Instruction and Teacher Education: Studies in Honour of Rod Ellis (pp. 225–240). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Elkind, D. (1967). Egocentrism in adolescence. Child Development, 38(4), 1025–1034.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Elley, W. B., and Mangubhai, E. (1981). The Impact of a Book Flood in Fiji Primary Schools. Wellington, New Zealand: NZCER.Google Scholar

Ellis, N. C. (1996). Sequencing in SLA: Phonological memory, chunking and points of order. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(1), 91–126. doi:10.1017/S0272263100014698CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, N. C. (2005). At the interface: Dynamic interactions of explicit and implicit language knowledge. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(2), 305–352. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310505014XCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, N. C., and Wulff, S. (2015). Usage-based approaches in second language acquisition. In VanPatten, B. and Williams, J., eds., Theories in Second Language Acquisition, pp. 75–93. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2005). Instructed Second Language Acquisition: A Literature Review. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2006). Current issues in the teaching of grammar: An SLA perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 83–108.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2008). The Study of Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ellis, R. (2012). Language Teaching Research and Language Pedagogy. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ellis, R., and Shintani, N. (2014). Exploring Language Pedagogy through Second Language Acquisition Research. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Erlam, R. (2005). Language aptitude and its relationship to instructional effectiveness in second language acquisition. Language Teaching Research, 9(2), 147–171. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr161oaGoogle Scholar

Erlam, R. (2008). What do you researchers know about language teaching? Bridging the gap between SLA research and language pedagogy. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 2(3), 253–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501220802158958CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erlam, R. (2013). Listing and comparing tasks in the language classroom: Examples of Willis and Willis’s (2007) taxonomy in practice. The New Zealand Language Teacher, 39, 7–14.Google Scholar

Erlam, R. (2017). Is it ok to use Kahoot for assessment in the language classroom? Language Assessment Matters, 8, 3–5. Retrieved from www.altaanz.org/uploads/5/9/0/8/5908292/altaanz_newsletter_issue_8_october_2017.pdfGoogle Scholar

Erlam, R., and Ellis, R. (2018). Task-based language teaching for beginner-level learners of L2 French: An exploratory study. Canadian Modern Language Review, 71(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Erlam, R., and Pimentel-Hellier, M. (2017). Opportunities to attend to language form in the adolescent near-beginner foreign language classroom. Language Awareness, 26(2), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2017.1314487Google Scholar

Feser, J. (2015). The disruptive nature of mobile learning. In Udell, C. and Woodill, G., eds., Mastering Mobile Learning: Tips and Techniques for Success (pp. 21–30). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar

Firth, A., and Wagner, J. (1997). On discourse, communication, and (some) fundamental concepts in SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 81(3), 285–300. doi:10.2307/329302CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Firth, A., and Wagner, J. (2007). Second/foreign language learning as a social accomplishment: elaborations on a reconceptualized SLA. The Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 800–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540–4781.2007.00670.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Franceschi, V. (2017). Exploring Plurilingualism in Fan Fiction: ELF Users as Creative Writers. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar

Fredericks, J., Blumenfeld, P., and Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Frederikson, N., and Cline, T. (2002). Special Educational Needs, Inclusion and Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gardner, M., and Steinberg, L. (2005). Peer influence on risk taking, risk preference and risky decision making in adolescence and adulthood: An experimental study. Developmental Psychology, 41(4), 625–635. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.4.625CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, Interaction and the Second Language Learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Gass, S.M., and Mackey, A. (2006). Input, interaction and output: An overview. AILA Review, 19, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.19.03gasCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gass, S.M., and Selinker, L. (2001). Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course, 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Gee, J. P. 2012. Foreword. In Reinders, H., ed., Digital Games in Language Learning and Teaching (pp. xii–xiv). London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Gibbons, P. (2007). Mediating academic language learning through classroom discourse. In Cummins, J., and Davison, C., eds., International Handbook of English Language Teaching (pp. 701–718). Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar

Goetz, T., Ludtke, O., Nett, U. E., Keller, M. M., and Lipnevich, A. A. (2013). Characteristics of teaching and students’ emotions in the classroom: Investigating differences across domains. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gray, S. (2012). Inclusive academic language teaching in New Zealand: History and responses. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 32(3), 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Green, A. (2014). Exploring Language Assessment and Testing: Language in Action. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hadfield, J., and Dörnyei, Z. (2013). Motivating Learning. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Hallahan, D. P., Kauffman, J. M., and Pullen, P. C. (2009). Exceptional Learners: An Introduction to Special Education, 11th ed. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.Google Scholar

Harley, B., and Swain, M. (1978). An analysis of the verb system used by young learners of French. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 3, 35–79.Google Scholar

Harmer, J. (2012). Essential Teacher Knowledge: Core Concepts in English Language Teaching. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar

Harmer, J. (2015). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Harlow: Pearson.Google Scholar

Hartup, W. W. (1989). Social relationships and their developmental significance. American Psychologist, 44(2), 120–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.2.120Google Scholar

Hartup, W. W. (2009). Critical issues and theoretical viewpoints. In Rubin, K. H., Bukowski, W. M. and Laursen, B., eds., Handbook of Peer Interactions, Relationships and Groups (pp. 3–19). New York, NY: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Hattie, J. (2012). Visible Learning for Teachers: Maximizing Impact on Learning. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hockly, N., and Dudeney, G. (2017). Digital learning in 2020. In Carrier, M., Damerow, R. M., and Bailey, K. M., eds., Digital Language Learning and Teaching: Research, Theory, and Practice (pp. 235–246). New York/London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hornberger, N. H., and Link, H. (2012). Translanguaging and transnational literacies in multilingual classrooms: A biliteracy lens. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 15(3), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2012.658016CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kaliampos, J., and Schmidt, T. (2014). Web 2.0 tasks in action: EFL learning in the U.S. Embassy School election project 2012. American Studies Journal, 58. Online: www.asjournal.org/58–2014/efl-learning-in-the-u-s-embassy-school-election-project–2012/Google Scholar

Kang, S.-J. (2005). Dynamic emergence of situational willingness to communicate in a second language. System, 33(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.10.004Google Scholar

Keenan, J. M., and MacWhinney, B. (1987). Understanding the relationship between comprehension and production. In Dechert, H. W. and Raupach, M., eds., Psycholinguistic Models of Production (pp. 150–155). Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing Corporation.Google Scholar

Kormos, J., Kiddle, T., and Csizér, K. (2011). Systems of goals, attitudes and self-related beliefs in second language-learning motivation. Applied Linguistics, 32(5), 495–516. doi:10.1093/applin/amr019Google Scholar

Kormos, J., and Smith, A. M. (2012). Teaching Languages to Students with Specific Learning Differences. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Krashen, S. (1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2020). Mobile assisted language learning. In Chapelle, C. A., ed., The Concise Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0768.pub2Google Scholar

Kurth-Buchholz, E. (2011). Schülermitbestimmung aus Sicht von Schülern und Lehrern: Eine vergleichende Untersuchung an Gymnasien in Brandenberg und Nordrheim-Westfalen . Munster: Waxmann.Google Scholar

Lambert, C., Philp, J., and Nakamura, S. (2017). Learner-generated content and engagement in second language task performance. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 665–680.Google Scholar

Landrum, T. J., and McDuffie, K. A. (2010). Learning styles in the age of differentiated instruction. Exceptionality, 18(1), 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362830903462441Google Scholar

Lantolf, J. P., and Beckett, T. G. (2009). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition. Language Teaching, 42(4), 459–475. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444809990048Google Scholar

Larsen-Freeman, D., and Anderson, M. (2011). Techniques and Principles in Language Teaching, 3rd ed. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Laufer, B., and Hulstijn, J. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Laursen, B. (2010). Capturing the peer context: The paradox of progress. Journal of Adolescence, 33(6), 897–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.08.008Google Scholar

Laursen, B. and Hartup, W. W. (2002). The origins of reciprocity and social exchange in friendships. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 95, 27–40. doi:10.1002/cd.35CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lee, Y.-A. (2006). Respecifying display questions: Interactional resources for language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 40(4), 691–713. doi:10.2307/40264304Google Scholar

Legutke, M. (2012). Teaching teenagers. In Burns, A. and Richards, J., eds., The Cambridge Guide to Pedagogy and Practice in Second Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Lemke, J. L. (2002). Language development and identity: Multiple timescales in the social ecology of learning. In Kramsch, C., ed., Language and Language Socialization Acquisition (pp. 68–87). London: Continuum.Google Scholar

Lerner, R., and Steinberg, L., eds. (2009). Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, 2nd ed., Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, vi–vii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Leung, C. (2016). English as an additional language: A genealogy of language-in-education policies and reflections on research trajectories. Language and Education, 30(2), 158–174.Google Scholar

Li, J. (2020). Development and validation of second language online reading strategies inventory. Computers and Education, 145, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103733Google Scholar

Lightbown, P. M. (2014). Making the minutes count in L2 teaching. Language Awareness, 23(1–2), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2013.863903CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lightbown, P., and Halter, R. (1989). Evaluation of ESL Learning Regular and Experimental Programs in Four New Brunswick School Districts: 1987–88 (Vol. 2). Research report prepared for the Ministry of Education of New Brunswick.Google Scholar

Lightbown, P. M., Halter, R. H., White, J., and Horst, M. (2002). Comprehension-based learning: The limits of ‘do it yourself’. Canadian Modern Language Review, 58(3), 427–64. doi:10.3138/cmlr.58.3.427Google Scholar

Lightbown, P. M., and Spada, N. (2006). How Languages Are Learned, 3rd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Fisher, L., Forbes, K., and Evans, M. (2017). The knowledge base of teaching in linguistically diverse contexts: Ten grounded principles of multilingual classroom pedagogy for EAL. Language and Intercultural Communication, 17(4), 378–395.Google Scholar

Loewen, S. (2005). Incidental focus on form and second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27(3), 361–386. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263105050163CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Loewen, S., and Reinders, H. (2011). Key Concepts in Second Language Acquisition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Long, M. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In de Bot, K., Ginsberg, R., and Kramsch, C., eds., Foreign Language Research in Cross-cultural Perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, W. C. and Bhatia, T. K., eds., Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (pp. 413–468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Lyster, R., and Saito, K. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 265–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990520Google Scholar

Mackey, A., and Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In Mackey, A., ed., Conversational Interaction in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 407–452). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Martin-Beltrán, M., Chen, P.-J., Guzman, N., and Merrills, K. A. (2016). How adolescents use social discourse to open space for language learning. In Sato, M. and Ballinger, S., eds., Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning: Pedagogical Potential and Research Agenda (pp. 319–348). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45.13marGoogle Scholar

Martínez-Alvarez, P. (2017). Language multiplicity and dynamism: Emergent bilinguals. Taking ownership of language use in a hybrid curricular space. International Multilingual Research Journal, 11(4), 255–276. doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-5982-7.ch010CrossRefGoogle Scholar

McColl, H. 2005. Foreign language learning and inclusion: Who? Why? What?– and How? Support for Learning 20(3), 103–108.Google Scholar

McDevitt, T. M., and Ormond, J. E. (2013). Child Development and Education, 5th ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar

McDonough, K. (2004). Learner–learner interaction during pair and small group activities in a Thai EFL context. System, 32(2), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Meyer, B., and Sørensen, B. H. (2009). Designing serious games for computer assisted language learning – A framework for development and analysis. In Kankaanranta, M. and Neittaanmäki, P., eds., Design and Use of Serious Games. Intelligent Systems, Control, and Automation: Science and Engineering (pp. 69–82). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978–1-4020–9496-5_5Google Scholar

Ministry of Education, New Zealand (2007). The New Zealand Curriculum. Wellington, New Zealand: Learning Media.Google Scholar

Miyake, A., and Friedman, D. (1998). Individual differences in second language proficiency: Working memory as language aptitude. In Healy, A. F. and Bourne, L. E., eds., Foreign Language Learning: Psycholinguistic Studies on Training and Retention (pp. 339–364). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

MPFS: Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest, eds. (2018). JIM-Studie 2018: Jugend, Information, Medien. Accessed from www.mpfs.de/fileadmin/files/Studien/JIM/2018/Studie/JIM2018_Gesamt.pdfGoogle Scholar

MPFS: Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest, eds. (2019). JIM-Studie 2019: Jugend, Information, Medien. Accessed from www.mpfs.de/fileadmin/files/Studien/JIM/2019/JIM_2019.pdfGoogle Scholar

Muñoz, C. (2006). The effects of age on foreign language learning: The BAF project. In Muñoz, C., ed., Age and the Rate of Foreign Language Learning (pp. 1–40). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

Nakahama, Y., Tyler, A., and Van Lier, L. (2001). Negotiation of meaning in conversational and information gap activities: A comparative discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 35(3), 377–405. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588028Google Scholar

Nation, I. S. P. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59–82. doi:10.1353/cml.2006.0049CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nation, I. S. P. (2007). The four strands. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.2167/illt039.0Google Scholar

Nation, I. S. P. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL Reading and Writing. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Nation, I. S. P. (2011). My ideal vocabulary teaching course. In Macalister, J. and Nation, I. S. P., eds., Case Studies in Language Curriculum Design (pp. 51–62). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Nation, I. S. P., and Macalister, J. (2010). Language Curriculum Design. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar

Noels, K. (2001). New orientations in language learning motivation: Towards a model of intrinsic extrinsic and integrative orientations and motivations. In Dörnyei, Z. and Robinson, P., eds., Motivation and Second Language Acquisition (pp. 43–68). Honolulu, HI: The University of Hawaii: Second Language and Curriculum Centre.Google Scholar

Noels, K., Pelletier, L. G., Clement, R., and Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self-determination theory. Language Learning, 50(1), 57–85. doi:10.1111/0023-8333.00111Google Scholar

O’Donnell, A. M. (2006). The role of peers and group learning. In Alexander, P. A. and Winnie, P. H., eds., Handbook of Educational Psychology, 2nd ed. (pp. 781–802). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar

Ortega, L. (2007). Meaningful L2 practice in foreign language classrooms: A cognitive-interactionist SLA perspective. In DeKeyser, R., ed., Practice in a Second Language: Perspectives from Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology (pp. 180–207). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paulston, C. B., and Bruder, M. N. (1976). Teaching English as a Second Language: Techniques and Procedures. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop.Google Scholar

Pegrum, M. (2014). Mobile Learning: Languages, Literacies and Cultures. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pegrum, M. (2019). Mobile Lenses on Learning: Languages and Literacies on the Move. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pegrum, M., Dudeney, G., and Hockly, N. (2018). Digital literacies revisited. European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 7(2), 3–24.Google Scholar

Philp, J. (2016). Epilogue. In Sato, M. and Ballinger, S., eds., Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning: Pedagogical Potential and Research Agenda (pp. 319–348). Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45Google Scholar

Philp, J., Adams, R., and Iwashita, N. (2013). Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning. New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Philp, J., and Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50–72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000094CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Philp, J., Walter, S., and Basturkmen, H. (2010). Peer interaction in the foreign language classroom: What factors foster a focus on form? Language Awareness, 19(4), 261–279.Google Scholar

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816Google Scholar

Puentedura, R. (2006). Transformation, technology, and education [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://hippasus.com/resources/tte/Google Scholar

Randler, C., and Wicke, R. (2014). Von Eulen und Lerchen – Zum Sclafverhalten von Jugendlichen. Fremdsprache Deutsch, 51, 15–17. https://doi.org/10.37307/j.2194–1823.2014.51.05Google Scholar

Redecker, C., and Punie, Y. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigcompEdu (No. JRC107466). Publications Office of the European Union. http://dx.doi.org/10.2760/159770Google Scholar

Reinders, H., ed. (2012). Digital Games in Language Learning and Teaching. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Reinders, H., and Stockwell, G. (2017). Computer-assisted SLA. In Loewen, S. and Sato, M., eds., The Routledge Handbook of Instructed Second Language Acquisition (pp. 361–375). New York/London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Reinhardt, J. (2019). Social media in second and foreign language teaching and learning: Blogs, wikis, and social networking. Language Teaching, 52(1), 1–39. https://doi:10.1017/S0261444818000356CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Riemer, C. (2010). Motivierung. In Krumm, H.-J., Fandrych, C., Hufeisen, B., and Riemer, C., eds., Deutsch als Fremd- und Zweitsprache: Ein internationales Handbuch (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft [HSK] 2) (pp. 1152–1157). Berlin/New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Robins, R. W., Trzesniewski, K. H., Tracy, J. L., Gosling, S. D., and Potter, J. (2002). Global self-esteem across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 17(3), 423–434. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882–7974.17.3.423Google Scholar

Roffwarg, H. P., Muzio, J. N., and Dement, W. C. (1966). Ontogenetic development of the human sleep dream cycle. Science, 152(3722), 604–618. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.152.3722.604Google Scholar

Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., and Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 223–246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033–2909.134.2.223Google Scholar

Rubie-Davies, C. M. (2007). Classroom interactions: Exploring the practices of high- and low-expectation teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(2), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709906X101601CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rubie-Davies, C. M. (2015). Becoming a High Expectation Teacher: Raising the Bar. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar

Rubie-Davies, C. M., Peterson, E. R., Sibley, C. G., and Rosenthal, R. (2015). A teacher expectation intervention: Modelling the practices of high expectation teachers. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 40, 72–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.03.003Google Scholar

Russell, J., and Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the learning of L2 grammar. In Norris, J. and Ortega, L., eds., Synthesizing Research on Language Learning and Teaching (pp. 309–365). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Saito, K., and Hanzawa, K. (2016). Developing second language oral ability in foreign language classrooms: The role of the length and focus of instruction and individual differences. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 813–840. Doi:10.1017/S0142716415000259CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Salomo, D. (2014). Deutschland, Deutschlernen und Deutschunterricht: Aus der Sicht von Jugendlichen und Lehrkräften in verschiedenen Ländern weltweit, eine empirische Studie. Retrieved from www.goethe.de/resources/files/pdf31/deutschlernen_18_12_2014_web.pdfGoogle Scholar

Sato, M., and Ballinger, S. (2012). Raising language awareness in peer interaction: A cross-context, cross-methodology examination. Language Awareness, 21(1–2), 157–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2011.639884CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sauro, S. (2012). Computer‐mediated communication and second language development. In Chapelle, C. A., ed., The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0180Google Scholar

Saville-Troike, M. (1988). ‘Private speech’: Evidence for second language learning strategies during the ‘silent period’. Journal of Child Language, 15(3), 567–590. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900012575Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In Schmidt, R. (ed.), Attention and Awareness in Foreign Language Learning (pp. 1–65). Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar

Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In Robinson, P., ed., Cognition and Second Language Instruction (pp. 3–32). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Scrivener, J. (2005). Learning Teaching: A Guidebook for English Language Teachers. Oxford: Macmillan Education.Google Scholar

Shernoff, D. J. (2013). Optimal Learning Environments to Promote Student Engagement. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar

Shernoff, D. J., Ruzek, E. A., and Sinha, S. (2017). The influence of the high school classroom environment on learning as mediated by student engagement. Psychology International, 38(2), 201–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034316666413CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Simard, D., and Jean, G. (2011). An exploration of L2 teachers’ use of pedagogical interventions devised to draw L2 learners’ attention to form. Language Learning, 61(3), 759–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467–9922.2011.00656.xGoogle Scholar

Skehan, P. (1998). A Cognitive Approach to Language Learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Spada, N. (2007). Communicative language teaching: Current status and future prospects. In Cummins, J. and Davison, C., eds., International Handbook of English Language Teaching (pp. 271–288). New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Spada, N., and Lightbown, P. (2008). Form-focused instruction: Isolated or integrated? TESOL Quarterly, 42(2), 181–207. doi:10.2307/40264447Google Scholar

Stern, H. H. (1985). The time factor and compact course development. TESL Canada Journal, 3(1), 13–29. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v3i1.471CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52(1), 119–158. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467–9922.00179Google Scholar

Sumter, S., Bokhorst, C., and Westemberg, P. M. (2009). Social fears during adolescence: Is there an increase in distress and avoidance? Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 23(7), 897–903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.05.004Google Scholar

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass, S. and Madden, C., eds., Input in Second Language Acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar

Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In Cook, G. and Seidhofer, B., eds., Principles and Practice in the Study of Language: Studies in Honour of H. G. Widdowson (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In Lantolf, J. P., ed., Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Swain, M. (2005). The output hypothesis: Theory and research. In Hinkel, E., ed., Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 471–483). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Tapscott, D. (2008). Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation Is Changing Your World. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Tognini, R. (2008). Interaction in languages other than English classes in Western Australian primary and secondary schools: Theory, practice and perceptions. https://ro.ecu.edu.au/theses/26Google Scholar

Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The Differentiated Classroom: Responding to the Needs of All Learners, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar

Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., Conover, L. A., and Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2–3), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/016235320302700203Google Scholar

Toth, P. D. (2006). Processing instruction and a role for output in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 56(2), 319–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023–8333.2006.00349.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar

UNESCO (2009). Policy guidelines on inclusion in education. Retrieved from www.scribd.com/doc/37626440/UNESCO-Education-Inclusion-Policy-GuidelinesGoogle Scholar

Ushoida, E. (2009). A person-in-context relational view of emergent motivation, self and identity. In Dörnyei, Z. and Ushoida, E., eds., Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self (pp. 215–228). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar

van de Pol, J., Volman, M., and Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22, 271–296. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10648-010–9127–6Google Scholar

van Lier, L. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In Lantolf, J. P., ed., Sociocultural Theory and Second Language Learning, pp. 245–260. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

van Lier, L. (2004). The Ecology and Semiotics of Languages Learning: A Sociocultural Perspective. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar

VanPatten, B., Williams, J., Rott, S., and Overstreet, M. (2004). Form–Meaning Connections in Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Vatansever, A. (2018). A comparison of the influence of teacher-generated and learner-generated content on learner engagement in oral tasks: A Turkish EFL high school context. Unpublished Master’s dissertation, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK.Google Scholar

Vötter, S. and Treter, C. (2009). Die deutsche Sprache in China und die PASCH-Initiative. Fremdsprache Deutsch Sonderheft 1: Schulen: Partner der Zukunft [Special issue: Schools: Partners of the future], 33–36.Google Scholar

Wei, L. (2018). Investigating the influence of age and language aptitude on the implicit and explicit knowledge of ESL learners. Unpublished PhD thesis, The University of Auckland.Google Scholar

Wentzel, K. R., Barry, C. M., and Caldwell, K. A. (2004). Friendships in middle school: Influences on motivation and school adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–0663.96.2.195Google Scholar

Wilden, E. (2013). Handcrafting video clips to foster audio-visual literacy in the EFL classroom. WorldCALL Glasgow 10–13 July 2013 Papers, 369–372.Google Scholar

Williams, J. (1999). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 49(4), 583–625. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023–8333.00103Google Scholar

Willis, D., and Willis, J. (2007). Doing Task-Based Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wu, P.-H. N., and Marek, M. W. (2018). Developing intercultural competence via social media engagement in a language learning framework. Journal of Intercultural Communication, 46.Google Scholar

Zheng, B., Yim, S., and Warschauer, M. (2018). Social media in the writing classroom and beyond. In Liontas, J. I. and DelliCarpini, M., eds., The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0555Google Scholar