Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-mgxrv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-18T15:45:00.748Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Assessing the effects of temperature on the population of Aedes aegypti, the vector of dengue

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 February 2009

H. M. YANG*
Affiliation:
UNICAMP – IMECC, Departamento de Matemática Aplicada, Campinas, SP, Brazil
M. L. G. MACORIS
Affiliation:
SUCEN, Avenida Santo Antonio, Bairro Somenzari, Marìlia, SP, Brazil
K. C. GALVANI
Affiliation:
SUCEN, Avenida Santo Antonio, Bairro Somenzari, Marìlia, SP, Brazil
M. T. M. ANDRIGHETTI
Affiliation:
SUCEN, Avenida Santo Antonio, Bairro Somenzari, Marìlia, SP, Brazil
D. M. V. WANDERLEY
Affiliation:
SUCEN, Avenida Santo Antonio, Bairro Somenzari, Marìlia, SP, Brazil
*
*Author for correspondence: Prof. H. M. Yang, UNICAMP – IMECC, Departamento de Matemática Aplicada, Caixa Postal 6065, CEP 13083-859, Campinas, SP, Brazil. (Email: hyunyang@ime.unicamp.br)
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Dengue is a vector-borne disease transmitted by the mosquito Aedes aegypti. The incidence of dengue disease shows a clear dependence on seasonal variation. How does the temperature affect the incidence? We addressed this question indirectly by estimating the size of the A. aegypti population for different temperatures applying population dynamics theory. In order to achieve this objective we designed temperature-controlled experiments to assess the entomological parameters regarding the mosquito's life-cycle at different temperatures. By obtaining the mortality, transition and oviposition rates for different stages of the life-cycle of the mosquito we were able to calculate the basic offspring number Q0, which is the capacity of vector reproduction and ultimately gives the size of the vector population.

Information

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Weighted average temperatures (mean) programmed in the germination chamber for the periods of time (in hours) that the light is turned on (‘day’) and off (‘night’)

Figure 1

Fig. 1. The probability of maintaining the original state as a function of observation time is shown for 4 heterogeneity degrees (days−1): (1) β→0, (2) β=0·5, (3) β=3·0 and (4) β→∞. The common half time is τ=10 days.

Figure 2

Fig. 2. The fitting of the female mosquito mortality rate as a function of temperature. The estimated coefficients bi with errors in parentheses [days−1×(°C)i] are: b0=8·692×10−1 (1·291×10−1), b1=−1·590×10−1 (2·698×10−2), b2=1·116×10−2 (2·004×10−3), b3=−3·408×10−4 (6·297×10−5) and b4=3·809×10−6 (7·114×10−7) (–––). Fittings for the third- (- - -) and fifth- (–––) degree polynomials and the observed values (◆) are also shown.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. The fitting of the oviposition rate as a function of temperature. The estimated coefficients bi with errors in parentheses [days−1×(°C)i] are: b0=−5·400 (2·969×101), b1=1·800 (7·866), b2=−2·124×10−1 (7·382×10−1), b3=1·015×10−2 (2·869×10−2) and b4=−1·515×10−4 (3·886×10−4) (–––). Fittings for the third- (- - -) and fifth- (–––) degree polynomials and the observed values (◆) are also shown.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. The fitting of the aquatic phase mortality rate as a function of temperature. The estimated coefficients bi with errors in parentheses [days−1×(°C)i] are: b0=2·130 (5·260×10−2), b1=−3·797×10−1 (1·043×10−2), b2=2·457×10−2 (7·437×10−4), b3=−6·778×10−4 (2·234×10−5) and b4=6·794×10−6 (2·373×10−7) (–––). Fittings for the third- (- - -) and fifth- (–––) degree polynomials and the observed values (◆) are also shown.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. The fitting of the aquatic phase transition rate as a function of temperature. The estimated coefficients bi with errors in parentheses [days−1×(°C)i] are: b0=1·310×10−1 (3·750×10−2), b1=−5·723×10−2 (1·385×10−2), b2=1·164×10−2 (2·073×10−3), b3=−1·341×10−3 (1·628×10−4), b4=8·723×10−5 (7·250×10−6), b5=−3·017×10−6 (1·839×10−7), b6=5·153×10−8 (2·471×10−9) and b7=−3·420×10−10 and (1·365×10−11) (–––). Fittings for the sixth- (- - -) and eighth- (–––) degree polynomials and the observed values (◆) are also shown.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. The basic offspring number Q0 as a function of temperature is shown, with k=0·5 and f=0·5. The model assumes one compartment comprising larval and pupal stages, and we have Q0>1 for 13·60⩽T⩽36·55°C.

Figure 7

Table 2. Estimated values of the half age τ (and variance στ2) and heterogeneity β (and variance σβ2) for male mosquitoes

Figure 8

Table 3. Estimated values of the half age τ (and variance στ2) and heterogeneity β (and variance σβ2) for female mosquitoes

Figure 9

Table 4. Calculation of the average survival time η (and error ση) and the mortality rate μ (and error σμ) for female mosquitoes

Figure 10

Table 5. Calculated values of the average number of oviposition rate φ and the first day (FD in days) of oviposition

Figure 11

Table 6. Number of the followed-up individuals (NF), the maximum or last time (LT in days) of observation, the numbers of dead larvae before reaching pupal stage (NDL) and dead pupae before emerging as mosquitoes (NDP)

Figure 12

Table 7. Estimated values of the half age τ (and variance στ2) and heterogeneity β (and variance σβ2) for the survival of the whole aquatic phase

Figure 13

Table 8. Calculated values of the average survival time η (and error ση) and the mortality rate μ (and error σμ) for the whole aquatic phase

Figure 14

Table 9. Estimated values of the half age τ (and variance στ2) and heterogeneity β (and variance σβ2) for the transition of the whole aquatic phase

Figure 15

Table 10. Calculated values of the average transition time ξ (and error σξ) and the transition rate π (and error σπ) for the whole aquatic phase