Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-jnbmb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-01T16:27:27.664Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Coagulation studies in patients admitted with epistaxis – current practice in Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 June 2007

S. Holland
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.
M. A. Thaha
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.
E. L. K. Nilssen*
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.
P. S. White
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, UK.
*
Address for correspondence: Mr E. Nilssen, Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee DD1 9SY.

Abstract

Abstract Epistaxis remains the most common ENT emergency. The use of coagulation studies in Scotland to manage these patients was investigated to determine current practice. The study took the form of a postal questionnaire sent to all practising ENT consultants and a telephone survey of ENT senior house officers working in Scotland. Of the 60 questionnaires circulated amongst consultants, 55 responses were received (92 per cent). Thirty-eight consultants (70 per cent) indicated that they did not routinely request a coagulation screen for their patients, however, 30 per cent (16) did. Forty-three of the 45 junior staff were available for interview, 22 (51 per cent) of whom routinely requested coagulation studies. While the majority of consultants did not request routine coagulation studies, there did not appear to be any consensus among the junior staff. Although there is a paucity of scientific information with regard to this aspect of epistaxis patient management, there is support in the literature for targeted rather than blanket testing. There is perhaps a need to address this issue within individual departments, to achieve uniformity of practice, and to improve communication between junior and senior staff.

Information

Type
Main Articles
Copyright
Copyright © JLO (1984) Limited 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable