Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-hzqq2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-17T21:04:16.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Defining functional groups and their vulnerability to the edge effect in a peri-urban forest in Mexico City

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2018

GABRIELA SANTIBÁÑEZ-ANDRADE ,
CARLOS GRANADOS-PELÁEZ  and
ARTURO GARCÍA-ROMERO
GABRIELA SANTIBÁÑEZ-ANDRADE*
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Natural Resources, Faculty of Science, National Autonomous University of Mexico, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico
CARLOS GRANADOS-PELÁEZ
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Geography, Institute of Geography, National Autonomous University of Mexico, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico
ARTURO GARCÍA-ROMERO
Affiliation:
Department of Physical Geography, Institute of Geography, National Autonomous University of Mexico, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico
*
*Correspondence: Dr Gabriela Santibáñez-Andrade email: gabysant@ciencias.unam.mx
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The expansion of human settlements and primary-sector activities (agriculture and forestry) has resulted in the fragmentation of forests, but the impacts of this are still poorly understood. We examined the effect of patch size on the presence of plant functional groups along an edge–interior gradient. Plant species were classified based on a two-way indicator species analysis in order to determine their establishment thresholds and vulnerability along the gradient, while detrended correspondence analyses and canonical correspondence analyses were performed to identify environmental gradients related to vegetation distribution. Two groups of plant species were recognized in all patch sizes: one commonly found towards the edge and the other in the interior zone. The incidence of these groups was correlated with environmental factors associated with the edge–interior gradient, mainly with humidity, soil moisture and light (canopy opening and global site factor) in the edge zone and with litter cover, depth of litter, slope and soil and air temperature in the interior zone. Identifying the species’ threshold responses to fragmentation is key, as they provide tools to prevent the potential local extinction of species.

Keywords

edge responsespatch sizeforest edgefunctional groupslandscape and fragmentation

Information

Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 45 , Issue 4 , December 2018 , pp. 342 - 351
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Supplementary material can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892917000595

References

REFERENCES

Arzac, A., Chacón-Moreno, E., Llambí, L. D. & Dulhoste, R. (2011) Distribución de formas de vida de plantas en el límite superior del ecotono bosque paramo en los andes tropicales. Ecotrópicos 24 (1): 26–46.Google Scholar
Asbjornsen, H., Ashton, M. S., Vogt, D. J. & Palacios, S. (2004) Effects of habitat fragmentation on the buffering capacity of edge environments in a seasonally dry tropical oak forest ecosystem in Oaxaca, Mexico. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 103 (3): 481–495.Google Scholar
Bolger, D. T., Alberts, C. A. & Soule, M. E. (1991) Occurrence patterns of bird species in habitat fragments: Sampling, extinction and nested species subset. The American Naturalist 137 (2): 155–166.Google Scholar
Cadenasso, M. L. & Pickett, S. (2000) Linking forest edge structure to edge function: Mediation of herbivore damage. Journal of Ecology 88: 31–44.Google Scholar
Casanoves, F., Pla, L. & Di Rienzo, J. (eds.) (2011) Valoración y análisis de la diversidad funcional y su relación con los servicios ecosistémicos [www document]. URL http://www.nucleodiversus.org/uploads/file/Casanoves%20et%20al%202011%20Serie%20Tecnica%20CATIE.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cayuela, L. (2006) Deforestación y fragmentación de bosques tropicales montanos en los Altos de Chiapas, México. Efectos sobre la diversidad de árboles. Ecosistemas 15 (3): 192–198.Google Scholar
Ceccon, E. (2013) Restauracion en Bosques Tropicales: Fundamentos Ecológicos, Prácticos y Sociales. México D. F., Mexico: Ediciones Díaz de Santos.Google Scholar
Fahrig, L. (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34 (1): 487–515.Google Scholar
Farina, A. (2007) Principles and Methods in Landscape Ecology. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Fisher, J. & Lindenmayer, D. B. (2007) Landscape modification and habitat fragmentation: A synthesis. Global Ecology & Biogeography 16: 265–280.Google Scholar
Fletcher, R. J. (2005) Multiple edge effects and their implications in fragmented landscapes. Journal of Animal Ecology 74 (2): 342–352.Google Scholar
Fu, B. J., Liu, S. L., Ma, K. M. & Zhu, Y. G. (2004) Relationships between soil characteristics, topography and plant diversity in a heterogeneous deciduous broad-leaved forest near Beijing, China. Plant and Soil 261 (1): 47–54.Google Scholar
Galicia, L., García-Romero, A., Gómez-Mendoza, L. & Ramirez, M. I. (2007) Cambio de uso de suelo y degradación ambiental. CIENCIA Academia Mexicana de Ciencias 58: 50–59.Google Scholar
Geiger, R. (1965) The Climate Near the Ground. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Godefroid, S. & Koedam, N. (2003) Distribution pattern of the flora in a peri-urban forest: An effect of the city–forest ecotone. Landscape and Urban Planning 65 (4): 169–185.Google Scholar
Gomez-Mendoza, L., Galicia, L. & Aguilar-Santelises, R. (2008) Sensibilidad de grupos funcionales al cambio climático en la Sierra Norte de Oaxaca. Investigaciones Geográficas, Boletín del Instituto de Geografía, UNAM 67: 76–100.Google Scholar
Goosem, M. (2007) Fragmentation impacts caused by roads through rainforests. Current Science 93 (11): 1587–1595.Google Scholar
Granados, C., Serrano, D. & García-Romero, A. (2014) Efecto de borde en la composición y en la estructura de los bosques templados en la Sierra de Monte Alto, Centro de México. Caldasia 36 (2): 269–287.Google Scholar
Hill, M. O. (1994) DECORANA and TWINSPAN for Ordination and Classification of Multivariate Species Data: A New Edition, Together with Supporting Programs, in FORTRAN 77. Huntingdon, UK: Institute of Terrestrial Ecology.Google Scholar
Hooper, D. U., Solan, M., Symstad, A., Díaz, S. & Gessner, M. O. (2002) Species diversity, functional diversity, and ecosystem functioning. In: Biodiversity and Ecosystem Functioning – Synthesis and Perspectives, eds. Loreau, M., Naeem, S. & Inchausti, P., pp. 195–208. New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kerr, J. T. & Deguise, I. (2004) Habitat loss and the limits to endangered species recovery. Ecology Letters 7: 1163–1169.Google Scholar
LaPaix, R. & Freedman, B. (2010) Vegetation structure and composition within urban parks of Halifax Regional Municipality, Nova Scotia, Canada. Landscape and Urban Planning 98 (2): 124–135.Google Scholar
Lavorel, S. & Garnier, E. (2002) Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Functional Ecology 16: 545–556.Google Scholar
Lavorela, S., McIntyreb, S., Landsbergc, J. & Forbesd, T. D. A. (1997) Plant functional classifications: From general groups to specific groups based on response to disturbance. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 12 (12): 474–478.Google Scholar
Lindenmayer, D. B., Fischer, J. & Cunningham, R. B. (2005) Native vegetation cover thresholds associated with species responses. Biological Conservation 124 (3): 311–316.Google Scholar
Lindenmayer, D. B. & Franklin, J. F. (2002) Conserving Forest Biodiversity: A Comprehensive Multiscaled Approach. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Liu, S., Dong, Y., Deng, L., Liu, Q., Zhao, H. & Dong, S. (2014) Forest fragmentation and landscape connectivity change associated with road network extension and city expansion: A case study in the Lancang River Valley. Ecological Indicators 36: 160–168.Google Scholar
López-Barrera, F., Armesto, J. J., Williams-Linera, G., Smith-Ramírez, C. & Manson, R. H. (2007) Fragmentation and edge effects on plant-animal interactions, ecological processes and biodiversity. In: Biodiversity Loss and Conservation in Fragmented Forest Landscapes: The Forests of Montane Mexico and Temperate South America, ed. Newton, A. C., pp. 69–101. Dorset, UK: CAB International.Google Scholar
Luck, G. W., Ricketts, T. H., Daily, G. C. & Imhoff, M. (2004) Alleviating spatial conflict between people and biodiversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 101 (1): 182–186.Google Scholar
Matteucci, S. D. & Colma, A. (1982) Metodología para el Estudio de la Vegetación. Washington, DC, USA: Secretaría General de la Organización de los Estados Americanos.Google Scholar
McCune, B. & Mefford, M. J. (2006) PC-ORD – Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data, Version 5.10. Depoe Bay, OR, USA: MjM Software.Google Scholar
Mitchell, M. G., Bennett, E. M. & Gonzalez, A. (2014) Forest fragments modulate the provision of multiple ecosystem services. Journal of Applied Ecology 51: 909–918.Google Scholar
Montenegro, A. L. & Vargas, O. (2008) Caracterización de bordes de bosque altoandino e implicaciones para la restauración ecológica en la Reserva Forestal de Cogua (Colombia). International Journal of Tropical Biology 56: 1543–1556.Google Scholar
Murcia, C. (1995) Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 58–62.Google Scholar
Patterson, B. D. & Atmar, W. (1986) Nested subsets and the structure of insular mammalian faunas and archipelagos. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 28 (1–2): 65–82.Google Scholar
Pincheira-Ulbrich, J., Rau, J. R. & Peña-Cortés, F. (2009) Tamaño y forma de fragmentos de bosque y su relacion con la riqueza de especies de árboles y arbustos. Phyton, International Journal of Experimental Botany 78: 121–128.Google Scholar
Porensky, L. M. & Young, T. P. (2016) Development of edge effects around experimental ecosystem hotspots is affected by hotspot density and matrix type. Landscape Ecology 31: 1663–1680.Google Scholar
Primack, R. (1993) Essentials of Conservation Biology. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
Ries, L., Fletcher, R. J., Battin, J. & Sisk, T. D. (2004) Ecological responses to habitat edges: Mechanisms, models, and variability explained. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35 (1): 491–522.Google Scholar
Ries, L. & Sisk, T. D. (2010) What is an edge species? The implications of sensitivity to habitat edges. Oikos 119 (10): 1636–1642.Google Scholar
Romero-Torres, M. & Varela-Ramírez, A. (2011) Efecto de borde sobre el proceso de descomposición de hojarasca en bosque nublado. Acta Biológica Colombiana 16 (2): 155–174.Google Scholar
Rozzi, R., Primack, R., Feinsinger, P., Dirzo, R. & Massardo, F. (2001) What is conservation biology? In: Fundamentals of Conservation Biology, Latin American Perspectives, eds. Primack, R., Ruiz, R., Feinsinger, P., Dirzo, R. & Massardo, F., pp. 35–43. Mexico City, Mexico: Economic Culture Fund.Google Scholar
Sánchez, O., Vega, E., Peters, E. & Monroy-Vilchis, O. (2003) Conservación de Ecosistemas Templados de Montaña en México. Mexico City, Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Ecologia.Google Scholar
Santos, T. & Tellería, J. L. (2006) Pérdida y fragmentación del hábitat: Efecto sobre la conservación de las especies. Ecosistemas 15 (2): 3–12.Google Scholar
Saunders, D. A., Hobbs, R. J. & Margules, C. R. (1991) Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: A review. Conservation Biology 5 (1): 18–32.Google Scholar
Stenhouse, R. N. (2004) Fragmentation and internal disturbance of native vegetation reserves in the Perth metropolitan area, Western Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning 68 (4): 389–401.Google Scholar
Tilman, D., May, R. M., Lehman, C. L. & Nowak, M. A. (1994) Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371: 65–66.Google Scholar
Westoby, M. & Leishman, M. (1997) Categorizing plant species into functional types. In: Plant Functional Types, eds. Smith, T. M., Shugart, H. H. & Woodward, F. I., pp. 104–121. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. B. (1999) Guilds, functional types and ecological groups. Oikos 86 (3): 507–522.Google Scholar
Williams, M. (2003) Deforesting the Earth. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, F. I. (1993) How many species are required for functional ecosystem? In: Biodiversity and Ecosystem Function, eds. Ernst-Detlef, S. & Mooney, H. A., pp. 215–228. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Santibáñez-Andrade et al. supplementary material

Appendix S1

Download Santibáñez-Andrade et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 4.3 MB
Supplementary material: File

Santibáñez-Andrade et al. supplementary material

Appendix S2

Download Santibáñez-Andrade et al. supplementary material(File)
File 14.3 KB
Supplementary material: Image

Santibáñez-Andrade et al. supplementary material

Appendix S3

Download Santibáñez-Andrade et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 4.2 MB