Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-mzsfj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-21T16:52:51.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Parasitic infections in relation to practices and knowledge in a rural village in Northern Thailand with emphasis on fish-borne trematode infection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2018

K. Chaisiri
Affiliation:
Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Department of Helminthology, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
C. Jollivet
Affiliation:
CIRAD ASTRE, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand
P. Della Rossa
Affiliation:
CIRAD ASTRE, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand CIRAD, UPR HortSys, F-97285 Le Lamentin, Martinique, France
S. Sanguankiat
Affiliation:
Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Department of Helminthology, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
D. Wattanakulpanich
Affiliation:
Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Department of Helminthology, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
C. Lajaunie
Affiliation:
INSERM, Ceric-DICE CNRS, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
A. Binot
Affiliation:
CIRAD ASTRE, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand ASTRE, INRA, CIRAD, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
M. Tanita
Affiliation:
Saen Thong Health Promoting Hospital, Tha Wang Pha, Nan, Thailand
S. Rattanapikul
Affiliation:
Saen Thong Health Promoting Hospital, Tha Wang Pha, Nan, Thailand
D. Sutdan
Affiliation:
Tha Wang Pha Hospital, Tha Wang Pha, Nan, Thailand
S. Morand
Affiliation:
CNRS ISEM – CIRAD ASTRE, Faculty of Veterinary Technology, Kasetsart University, Bangkok, Thailand
A. Ribas*
Affiliation:
Section of Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, Department of Biology, Healthcare and the Environment, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
*
Author for correspondence: A. Ribas, E-mail: aribas@ub.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present study integrates several aspects of a parasitological survey in a rural community village combining community knowledge of parasites, their potential transmission routes and health risk factors. A rural community located in Northern Thailand was surveyed for intestinal parasites, and an overall prevalence of 45.2% for helminths and 4.8% for protozoan infections was identified. Socio-demographic characteristics, customs and perceptions were compiled using individual questionnaires and interviews for participants surveyed for parasitic screening. The results allowed us to determine the knowledge and perception of local people concerning helminthic infection and transmission. Despite the fact that the participants in this community were aware of parasitic transmission routes, their widespread custom of eating raw fish and meat render the reduction of helminthiasis difficult. A detailed study on the infection of fish-borne parasitic trematodes, the most prevalent helminth, allowed us to determine that the distance from a given household to the river is a determinant of infection intensity. Health education activities organised in the local community resulted in a change in perception of risks associated with parasite transmission.

Information

Type
Original Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018
Figure 0

Table 1. Demographic and social characteristics of participants to questionnaires and parasitological survey in Huay Muang village

Figure 1

Table 2. Food habits of participants to questionnaires of Huay Muang village

Figure 2

Table 3. Local knowledge of different types of parasites and their transmission ways

Figure 3

Fig. 1. Results of the participatory mapping (see ‘Materials and methods’ section) showing the flooding areas and the unhealthy places according to risk perception of water-borne diseases.

Figure 4

Table 4. Prevalence and intensity of helminths and protists in faecal samples obtained from Huay Muang village

Figure 5

Fig. 2. (a) Principal component analysis of parasites and their distribution among the inhabitants of Huay Muang, with the two first axes of the PCA explaining 31.3% of the variance. (b) Principal component analysis of the socio-demography and perceptions distribution among the inhabitants of Huay Muang, with the two first axes of the PCA explaining 45.9% of the variance. (c) Biplot graph of canonical correspondence analysis showing the association between intestinal parasites in relation to socio-demography (represented by PCA in (a)) and perceptions (represented by PCA in (b)) of Huay Muang villagers, with (d) the distribution of the inhabitants of Huay Muang. Rbm, raw bushmeat; Rmeat, raw meat (pork and beef); Rcrab, raw crab; Rfish, raw fish; water, water filtrated; boots, use of boots; market, food is mainly obtained from the market; ts, food is mainly obtained by the household; bm, consumption of bushmeat; pork, consumption of pork meat; buff, consumption of buffalo meat; beef, consumption of beef meet; nfood, consumption of natural food; toilet, presence of toilets; educ, level of education (from none to technical college); age, age; Strongyl, Strongyloides sp.; Parag, Paragonimus sp.; MIF, fish-borne trematodes.

Figure 6

Fig. 3. (a) Huay Muang map of fish-borne trematodes infection level (EPG) at household level with a size of green circles corresponding to the level of EPG infection for each household (white rectangle corresponds to the kriging area of (b); river in blue); (b) interpolation of fish-borne trematodes infection by kriging in a grid based on geographical coordinates of households with a scale of EPG infection from low infection in yellow to high infection in green.

Figure 7

Table 5. Identification of risk factors influencing infection of fish-borne trematodes in Huay Muang village

Figure 8

Table 6. Comparison of interviewing information from helminth-infected patients before and after receiving health educational activities (extracted from the report of the Primary Care Unit to the Subdistrict Administrative Organization)