2.a. Geological context of the Wachi La succession

Between its western and eastern syntaxes two of the three northern Himalaya lithotectonic zones contain sedimentary rocks, namely the Lesser Himalaya and Tethyan Himalaya (Myrow et al. Reference Myrow, Hughes, Paulsen, Williams, Parcha, Thompson, Bowring, Peng and Ahluwalia2003). An intervening zone of high-grade metamorphic rock of igneous and sedimentary protolith, the Greater Himalaya, separates these zones (Fig. 1). The boundaries between these lithotectonic zones are important tectonic structures, such as the Main Central Thrust, which separates the Greater Himalaya and the Lesser Himalaya, and the South Tibetan Fault System, a top-to-the-north normal fault that separates the Greater Himalaya and Tethyan Himalaya.

Figure 1.

(a) Simplified geological map of Himalayan orogenic system and lithotectonic divisions (modified from Yin, Reference Yin2006). (b) Geological map of Bhutan: TCK – Tang Chu klippe, BMO – Black Mountain outlier, UK – Ura klippe, SK – Sakteng klippe (modified from Grujic, Hollister & Parrish, Reference Grujic, Hollister and Parrish2002).

Cambrian sedimentary rocks occur in both the Lesser Himalaya and the Tethyan Himalaya in the central and western sectors of the Himalaya, and as sedimentary protolith in the Greater Himalaya (Myrow et al. Reference Myrow, Hughes, Searle, Fanning, Peng and Parcha2009). This distribution and the stratigraphic characteristics of these rocks suggest a passive margin during Cambrian deposition that progressively deepened to the north (Brookfield, Reference Brookfield1993; Searle, Reference Searle, Yin and Harrison1996; Myrow et al. Reference Myrow, Hughes, Paulsen, Williams, Parcha, Thompson, Bowring, Peng and Ahluwalia2003; Hughes et al. Reference Hughes, Peng, Bhargava, Ahulwalia, Walia, Myrow and Parcha2005). In the western and central Himalaya, no Cambrian sedimentary rock younger than about 501 Ma is known (Peng et al. Reference Gupta and Bandyopadhyay2009).

The succession in Bhutan differs in several ways. Although continuous lithotectonic belts of both Tethyan Himalayan and Lesser Himalayan strata are present in the northern and southern parts of the country, respectively, Bhutan also contains a series of outliers bearing sedimentary rocks that are situated within the Greater Himalayan lithotectonic belt (Gansser, Reference Gansser1983; Bhargava, Reference Bhargava and Bhargava1995; Grujic, Hollister & Parrish, Reference Grujic, Hollister and Parrish2002) (Fig. 1a), although the number and boundaries of the outliers recognized differ among authors. The Pele La Group, which contains the material described herein, belongs to a region containing Palaeozoic rocks that has been termed the Tang Chu or Pele La klippe (Fig. 1b) (Gansser, Reference Gansser1983; Grujic et al. Reference Grujic, Coutand, Bookhagen, Bonnet, Blythe and Duncan2006). Several Bhutanese outliers, including the Tang Chu, are reportedly underlain by thrust faults and are thus klippen (Grujic et al. Reference Grujic, Coutand, Bookhagen, Bonnet, Blythe and Duncan2006; Kellett, Grujic & Erdman, Reference Kellett, Grujic and Erdman2009, but also see Long & McQuarrie, Reference Long and McQuarrie2010). Details of the relationship between the rocks in the Bhutanese outliers and other parts of the Himalaya have not been investigated to date.

We show herein that the age of the dated Cambrian part of the Pele La Group sedimentary succession is younger than any Cambrian strata known in the western and central Tethyan Himalaya, or in the Lesser Himalaya. The succession is also important in that it is the only Himalayan Cambrian rock bearing body fossils yet known east of the Gori Valley of the Kumaon region of India, over 1000 km to the WNW (Fig. 1). The absence of intervening fossil-bearing Cambrian rocks in the Tethyan Himalaya of Nepal and Tibet is likely to be due to metamorphism, as rocks of this depositional age are present in these regions (Brookfield, Reference Brookfield1993; Myrow et al. Reference Myrow, Hughes, Searle, Fanning, Peng and Parcha2009).

2.b. The Chekha Formation and its stratigraphic relationship to low-grade sedimentary rocks in the Bhutanese outliers

In NW Bhutan, where Chekha (N27.667°, E089.217°) is located (Fig. 1b), a sequence of metasedimentary siliciclastic rocks with minor carbonates mapped as the Chekha Series was noted to be in fault contact with the high-grade gneisses of the Thimphu Series (Nautiyal et al. Reference Nautiyal, Jangpangi, Singh, Sarkar, Bhate, Raghabvan and Sahai1964). In the NW margin of this region Chekha Series rocks are mapped as in contact with Tethyan Himalayan rocks, and the Chekha Series is interpreted as the hanging wall of the South Tibetan Fault System (Chakungal et al. Reference Chakungal, Dostal, Grujic, Duchêne and Ghalley2010, fig. 1a; Long & McQuarrie, Reference Long and McQuarrie2010, fig. 1). According to this view, the Chekha Series is a Tethyan Himalayan stratigraphic unit. The high-grade Thimphu Series is considered part of the Greater Himalaya (Gansser, Reference Gansser1983; Golani, Reference Golani and Bhargava1995). Both series were subsequently re-designated as the Thimphu-Chekha Group and divided into the Thimphu Formation and the Chekha Formation (Jangpangi, Reference Jangpangi and Saklani1978) (Fig. 2a).

Figure 2.

(a) General summary of nomenclature applied to lower Tethyan strata of the Bhutanese outliers. (b) Summary of nomenclature and chronostratigraphy of the Pele La Group, Wachi La section. Spellings are as given in the original references.

The Tethyan Himalayan succession of Bhutan has not been studied in detail, and so the relationship between the Chekha Formation at its type section and the sedimentary rocks exposed within the outliers remains unclear. Nevertheless, the map of Nautiyal et al. (Reference Nautiyal, Jangpangi, Singh, Sarkar, Bhate, Raghabvan and Sahai1964, fig. 1) shows the Chekha Series to be exposed in what has since been recognized as the area containing both the Tang Chu klippe and the Black Mountain outlier. This view has since been extended to include outcrops of the Chekha Formation in all the Bhutanese outliers and in the Tethyan Himalaya (Grujic, Hollister & Parrish, Reference Grujic, Hollister and Parrish2002; McQuarrie et al. Reference McQuarrie, Robinson, Long, Tobgay, Grujic, Gehrels and Ducea2008; Chakungal et al. Reference Chakungal, Dostal, Grujic, Duchêne and Ghalley2010; Long & McQuarrie, Reference Long and McQuarrie2010). In effect, the term ‘Chekha Formation’ has become the default stratigraphic name for all sedimentary rocks within the outliers unless they are distinguished by the presence of age-diagnostic fossils. The depositional age of the Chekha Formation in these various regions has yet to be constrained.

Nautiyal et al. (Reference Nautiyal, Jangpangi, Singh, Sarkar, Bhate, Raghabvan and Sahai1964) noted that in the Tang Chu klippe, the Chekha Series was unconformably overlain by bryozoan-bearing limestones of the Tongchu Series. These fossiliferous rocks were referred to the Tethyan sequence by Gansser (Reference Gansser1983). It has been suggested that the oldest fossiliferous rocks in any of the outliers are Devonian in age (Termier & Gansser, Reference Termier and Gansser1974), and found only in the Tang Chu klippe (Fig. 2a) (e.g. Grujic, Hollister & Parrish, Reference Grujic, Hollister and Parrish2002, p. 180).

Others have reported fossils from, and alternative stratigraphic nomenclatures for, older rocks in the Tang Chu klippe (Chaturvedi, Mishra & Mulay, Reference Chaturvedi, Mishra and Mulay1983a, Reference Chaturvedi, Mishra and Mulayb; Bhargava, Reference Bhargava and Bhargava1995; Tangri & Pande, Reference Tangri, Pande and Bhargava1995) (Fig. 2a, b). These schemes have included a stratigraphically restricted Chekha Formation that lies at the base of the sequence (Tangri & Pande, Reference Tangri, Pande and Bhargava1995). The stratigraphy of the Cambrian rocks that overlie the Chekha Formation (sensu Tangri & Pande, Reference Tangri, Pande and Bhargava1995) is discussed in the next section.

2.c. Cambrian stratigraphy of the Wachi La succession

This paper focuses on collections from the Pele La Group in the Wachi La region of the Tang Chu klippe which overlie rocks of the Chekha Formation (sensu Tangri & Pande, Reference Tangri, Pande and Bhargava1995) (Fig. 1b). Initial attempts at chronostratigraphy of these rocks were conducted by Chaturvedi, Mishra & Mulay (Reference Chaturvedi, Mishra and Mulay1983a, Reference Chaturvedi, Mishra and Mulayb) and revised by Bhargava (Reference Bhargava and Bhargava1995) and Tangri & Pande (Reference Tangri, Pande and Bhargava1995) (Fig. 2b). We accept Bhargava's (Reference Bhargava and Bhargava1995) argument that Chaturvedi, Mishra & Mulay's (Reference Chaturvedi, Mishra and Mulay1983a, Reference Chaturvedi, Mishra and Mulayb) stratigraphic units were too poorly defined to be acceptable without extensive revision, and we therefore employ the revised scheme of Tangri & Pande (Reference Tangri, Pande and Bhargava1995), which is based on described type sections (Fig. 2). The basal unit of the Pele La Group is reportedly the Singhi Formation, which consists of rhyolitic/dactic volcanic flows. This is overlain by the quartz sandstone of the Deshichiling Formation, followed by dark shales of the Maneting Formation. The latter is succeeded by the fossiliferous fine-grained siliciclastic Quartzite Formation, which also bears minor beds of white recrystallized limestone. The overlying Wachi La Formation marks the base of the subsequent Tang Chu Group (Tangri & Pande, Reference Tangri, Pande and Bhargava1995). The interval from the upper part of the Deshichiling Formation to above the recrystallized carbonate at the base of the Wachi La Formation is exposed in the Wachi La section and is the subject of this report. Stratigraphic heights mentioned below are in metres above the base of the Maneting Formation.

3.a. Description

The Deshichiling Formation consists primarily of white vitreous and grey carbonate-cemented quartz-rich fine sandstone (Fig. 3). Beds are 5–30 cm thick and make up bed sets up to 70 cm thick that are separated by thin shale drapes. There are a few widely spaced, highly cleaved shale beds up to 40 cm thick, but most shale consists of millimetre-thick laminae. Simple bedding-parallel burrows are abundant and exist on most bedding planes. Most of the quartzite is massive, although some weathering surfaces show trough cross-bed sets up to 95 cm thick. Additional sedimentary structures include sporadic shale intraclasts, polygonal desiccation cracks, and small symmetrical ripple marks, which confirm that the section is right-way-up.

Figure 3.

Stratigraphic section for the Maneting and Quartzite formations measured along the Wachi La ridge. Fossiliferous horizons are indicated by T (trilobites) and B (brachiopods). Representatives of both phyla were found in each horizon, but taxon abundance varied with the dominant form in each bed indicated by T or B. The solid star indicates the stratigraphic position of the detrital zircon sample analysed from the Quartzite Formation. The Deshichiling Formation sample was collected below the base of this section.

The Maneting Formation is poorly exposed along the ridge leading to the Wachi La pass. The lower, poorly exposed part of the formation is approximately 60 m thick and consists of dark shale mostly exposed in float. The remainder of the formation was measured from the first exposures of interbedded shale and sandstone. The lower part consists of dark grey shale with tan weathering, very fine and fine sandstone beds (Fig. 4a). The sandstone beds average 3 cm in thickness and a small percentage of beds are greater than 10 cm thick. These beds have slightly irregular bases and contain abundant parallel lamination and small-scale hummocky cross-stratification. A single bed in float consists of 43 cm of trough cross-bedded fine sandstone.

Figure 4.

(a) Interbedded graded sandstone and shale from 50 m level in the Maneting Formation, tip of pencil 2 cm long. (b) Well-developed hummocky cross-stratification at ~275 m level in the Quartzite Formation. Note thin trilobite hash bed at base of pencil which is 14 cm long (see d). (c) Thick (96 cm) white weathering recrystallized limestone bed at 273.44 m, and overlying amalgamated hummocky cross-stratified sandstone; hammer about 34 cm long. (d) Two centimetre thick trilobite hash layer within amalgamated hummocky cross-stratified sandstone at 275.2 m; tip of pencil 2 cm long. (e) Thin bed of flat-pebble conglomerate at 274.4 m that rests directly on the white limestone bed in (c); pencil 14 cm long. (f) Bed of blue-grey weathering limestone, 87 cm thick, at 356.2 m; pencil 14 cm long. (g) White limestone above top of Quartzite Formation; pencil 14 cm long. (h) Coral-bearing surface at the top of a limestone bed above the Quartzite Formation, in the Wachi La Formation; tip of pencil 2 cm long; Indian five rupee coin 2.3 cm in diameter.

The Quartzite Formation begins at 147.95 m, at the base of a 68 cm thick unit with three amalgamated hummocky cross-stratified beds. The lower part of the member, from 147.95 m to 201.3 m, consists primarily of variably exposed thin to medium beds (5–15 cm thick) of grey, fine sandstone and minor (<20% of thickness) shale. Sandstone beds are massive, parallel laminated and hummocky cross-stratified. From 201.3 m to 263.7 m the member consists of very poorly exposed, amalgamated, fine sandstone with large-scale hummocky cross-stratification throughout.

The interval from 263.7 m to 273.44 m in the formation consists of stacked, very thin- to thin-bedded (1–7 cm thick), grey, fine sandstone with abundant red-weathering siderite spots (weathered carbonate cement). This is interbedded with minor amounts (<10%) of green-grey bioturbated shale with thin laminae of very fine sandstone. The laminated sandstone contains abundant rhynchonelliform brachiopods and some trilobite fossils. Nearly all bedding planes exhibit abundant trace fossils.

A prominent 96 cm thick bed of white-weathering limestone exists at 273.44 m (Fig. 4c). This bed consists of extremely pure, homogeneous, recrystallized limestone with abundant stylolites spaced 1–5 cm apart. Directly above this limestone bed are thick amalgamated beds showing large-scale hummocky cross-stratification (Fig. 4b). The lower two metres of these strata contain very thin (1–4 cm thick) brachiopod and trilobite coquinites (Fig. 4b, d). A 5 cm thick intraclast conglomerate with abundant trilobite fossils sits within a shallow scour directly on top of the limestone bed (Fig. 4e). The thick amalgamated hummocky cross-stratified deposits are interbedded with units up to 60 cm thick of 1–3 cm thick, burrowed, fine sandstone beds similar in character to those below the prominent limestone bed at 273.44 m. This facies becomes more abundant up-section to 349.05 m.

A second limestone bed exists at 349.05 m and consists of 2.55 m of tan to grey weathering, massive, mottled limestone. Up to 18 cm of brown weathering hummocky cross-stratified fine sandstone and white limestone are interbedded on a cm scale directly above the thick limestone bed. The white limestone beds are up to 3 cm thick. This is overlain by brown, siderite-mottled, very thin- to thin-bedded (1–7 cm), burrowed fine sandstone, the lower 1.7 m of which contains varying minor amounts of carbonate. At 356.2 m is a 3.27 m thick white, blue-grey weathering limestone bed (Fig. 4f). The lower 87 cm has biohermal mounds with what may be an encrusting stromatoporoid. The rest of the section, up to 366.57 m consists of burrowed, thin-bedded fine sandstone.

The top of the section is defined by a prominent fault that is followed by a series of deformed shale and minor limestone beds and then a covered zone (Fig. 5). Beyond this covered zone are hundreds of metres of reefal limestone (Fig. 4g) deposits with well-preserved corals (Fig. 4h). Time limitations did not allow for a careful study of the younger limestone deposits. The nature of these deposits (colour, texture) is very similar to the thick limestone units at the top of the Quartzite Formation described above.

Figure 5.

Sketch of the inferred geology of the upper part of the Wachi La section (above about 340 m; see Fig. 3) showing the top of the measured section, a fault with associated fault breccia, and overlying apparently Ordovician carbonate strata with different strike and dip. The fault itself is poorly exposed. The sketch is approximately orientated east–west, with east on the right.

Phylum ARTHROPODA
Class TRILOBITA
Order CORYNEXOCHIDA Kobayashi, Reference Kobayashi1935
Suborder LEIOSTEGIINA Fortey, Reference Fortey and Whittington1997
Superfamily leiostegioidea Bradley, Reference Bradley1925
Family kaolishanidae Kobayashi, Reference Kobayashi1935

This family of leiostegiinid trilobites bears a single pair of prominent pygidial spines associated with the posterior band of the anteriormost pleural segment of the holaspid pygidium (Kobayashi, Reference Kobayashi1956, p. 12).

Genus Kaolishania Sun, Reference Sun1924

Type species. Kaolishania pustulosa Sun, Reference Sun1924 (p. 52, pl. 3, fig. 8a–h); from the Kaolishania Zone, Changshan Formation, Haolishan, Taian, Shandong province, China.

Species assigned. Kaolishania granulosa Kobayashi, Reference Kobayashi1933 (p. 104, pl. 11, figs 15, 16) from Kaolishania Zone, Paichiashan, Liaoning Province, China; Kaolishania yunnanensis Sun & Xiang, Reference Sun and Xiang1979 (p. 7, pl. 1, figs 1, 2) from the upper Cambrian Liushui Formation, Lijiasi, Baoshan, Yunnan; Parakaolishania brevica Sun & Xiang, Reference Sun and Xiang1979, (p. 8, pl. 1, figs 4–9) from the upper Cambrian Liushui Formation, Huajiaosi, Pupiao, Baoshan, Yunnan. Other species currently assigned to the genus are discussed below.

Diagnosis. Trapezoidal cranidium of high relief with pustulose ornament. Glabella trapezoidal with four pairs of lateral furrows, terminating in firmly incised anterior border furrow behind long (sag.), upturned anterior border. Fixigenae broad (tr.). Librigena with long (exsag.) genal spines diverging abaxially toward posterior. Librigenal lateral border furrow not confluent with posterior border furrow. Pygidium semi-elliptical with five or more axial rings with prominent relief, firmly incised pleural furrows, and a pair of large macropleural spines associated with the posterior band of the anteriormost pleurae.

Kaolishania granulosa Kobayashi, Reference Kobayashi1933
Figures 6a–j, 7a–h, 12a

1. 1933 Kaolishania? granulosa Kobayashi, pp. 103–5, pl. 11, figs 19, 20.

2. 1935 Kaolishania granulata Kobayashi, pp. 175–7, pl. 8, figs 9–11; pl. 9, figs 14, 15 (nomen dubium).

3. 1935 Kaolishania obsolata Kobayashi, pp. 177–8, pl. 9, fig. 16.

4. 1937 Paramansuyella granulosa Endo in Endo & Resser, p. 359, pl. 70, figs 1–9.

5. 1956 Kaolishania granulosa Kobayashi; Kobayashi, p. 13.

6. 1960 Kaolishania granulosa Kobayashi; Kobayashi, pp. 355–6; pl. 20, figs 8–12, pl. 21, fig. 14.

7. 1960 Kaolishania? latiura Kobayashi, p. 356, pl. 21, fig. 19.

8. 1965 Kaolishania granulosa Kobayashi; Lu et al., p. 422, pl. 81, figs 5, 6.

9. 1980 Kaolishania granulosa Kobayashi; Nan, p. 506, pl. 207, figs 2–5.

10. 1983a ?Prosopiscus sp. or ?Annamitella sp.; Chaturvedi, Misra & Mulay, p. 236, pl. 2, figs 1, 3, non fig. 2.

11. 1983b ?Prosopiscus; Chaturvedi, Misra & Mulay, p. 236, pl. 2, figs 1, 3, non fig. 2.

12. 1994 Kaolishania granulosa Kobayashi; Qian, p. 119.

13. 1995 Trilobite remains; Tangri & Pande, p. 134, figs 3.10.37–40.

14. 1995 Kaolishaniids/pagodiids; Bhargava, p. 187, figs 5.2.9, 5.2.11.

15. 2002 Prochuangia; Hughes, Peng & Luo, p. 714 (discusses figured material of Bhargava, and Tangri & Pande).

16. 2005 Kaolishania granulosa Kobayashi; Duan et al., p. 27.

Figure 6.

Cephalic sclerites of Kaolishania granulosa Kobayashi from the Quartzite Formation, Wachi La section, Bhutan. All specimens are coated with ammonium chloride sublimate prior to digital photography, specimens are internal surfaces of moulds unless otherwise stated. White scale bar is 5 mm long. (a) GSB12, partial cranidium. (b) GSB13, partial cranidium. (c) GSB14, partial cranidium. (d) GSB15, partial cranidium. (e, f) GSB16, partial cranidium; (e) dorsal view; (f) oblique view. (g) GSB17, partial cranidium. (h) GSB18, partial cranidium. (i) GSB19, librigena. (j) GSB20, librigena.

Figure 7.

Pygidia of Kaolishania granulosa Kobayashi from the Quartzite Formation, Wachi La section, Bhutan. All specimens coated with ammonium chloride sublimate prior to digital photography, specimens are internal surfaces of moulds unless otherwise stated. White scale bar is 5 mm long. (a, b) GSB21; (a) dorsal view, (b) lateral-oblique view. (c) GSB22. (d, e) GSB23; (d) dorsal view, (e) posterior view. (f) GSB24. (g) GSB25, latex cast. (h) GSB26.

Type material. Holotype fragmentary cranidium, Kobayashi (Reference Kobayashi1933, pl. 11, figs 19, 20), Kaolishania Zone, Paichiashan, Liaoning Province, China.

Bhutanese material. Twelve cranidia from WL-2 (GSB46, GSB47), WL-3 (GSB45) and WL-8 (GSB12, GSB13, GSB14, GSB15, GSB16, GSB17, GSB18, GSB48, GSB49); four librigenae from WL-2 (GSB19, GSB51), WL-3 (GSB20) and WL-8 (GSB50); and fourteen pygidia from WL-2 (GSB23, GSB52, GSB53, GSB54, GSB58, GSB59), WL-3 (GSB21) and WL-8 (GSB22, GSB24, GSB25, GSB26, GSB55, GSB56, GSB57) from the Quartzite Formation, Wachi La section, Black Mountains, Bhutan.

Diagnosis. Kaolishania with pygidium semi-elliptical bearing five well-defined axial rings and terminal piece, pleural furrows firmly impressed with four pleural ribs and a pair of long (exsag.), posteriorly divergent marginal spines.

Description. Pustulose cranidium with length (sag.) approximately 50% of width (tr.) at posterior border. Glabellar length (sag., including occipital ring) about 80% of total cranidial length (sag.), tapering gently anteriorly, with rounded anterolateral corners and transverse anterior margin. Axial furrow firmly incised, shallowing slightly anteriorly, confluent with four pairs of lateral glabellar furrows. SO long (sag.), transverse, deeply incised abaxially, shallower medially, confluent with axial furrow. S1 deeply incised abaxially, obsolete in medial glabellar third, oblique rearward at approximately 45° angle to sagittal axis, bifurcate in adaxial most portion in some specimens; S2 transverse or oblique posteriorly at low angle (tr.), shorter (exsag.) than S1, crossing one third of glabellar width; S3 faint, transverse, crossing one quarter of glabellar width. L1 subtriangular abaxially. LO width (tr.) of similar width to posterior of L1 (tr.), bearing tiny medial node. Anterior margin of LO bowed slightly forward medially. Preglabellar furrow long (sag.). Anterior border about 15% of cranidial length (sag.), convex dorsally, with steep posterior margin, lengthening (sag.) medially. Ocular ridge oriented oblique rearward and outwards at about 20° angle to transverse axis, originating approximately opposite anterior of S3. Palpebral lobe small, about 20% of glabellar length, elevated, with anterior opposite S2 and posterior opposite S1. Palpebral fixigenal width (tr.) 50% of glabellar width at palpebral area midlength. Preocular fixigenae widest opposite L3, truncated sharply by anterior border furrow. Posterior lateral border furrow firmly incised, lengthening (exsag.) abaxially. Preocular dorsal suture diverges slightly (exsag.) immediately anterior of palpebral lobe, then converges gently forward; postocular suture defines triangular posterior border.

Librigenal field slopes down into firmly incised lateral border furrow that is isolated from posterior border furrow by convex, ridge-like extension of librigenal field that extends from anterior portion of genal spine base. Lateral border inflated, rim-like. Posterior border short (exsag.), with firmly incised posterior border furrow that tapers into posterior of genal spine base. Genal spine broad (tr.) and straight sided, divergent from sagittal axis posteriorly, slightly less than length of the remainder of the librigena (exsag.).

Pygidium semi-elliptical with length (sag.) about 50% of maximum width (tr.), excluding spines. Axis tapers gently posteriorly with anterior width (tr.) about 30% of maximum pygidial width (tr.) and five firmly incised axial rings plus a bulbous terminal piece with possible additional ring furrow evident in some specimens. Articulating half ring short (sag.). Terminal piece longer (sag.) than anteriormost ring, with round posterior margin. Anterior band of anteriormost pleural segment short (exsag.), lengthening abaxially beyond distinct fulcrum. Anteriormost pleural furrow wide (tr.) and long (exsag.) with steep margins, long (exsag.) almost reaching pygidial margin. Posterior band of first pleural segment inflated abaxially, extending into long, posteriorly and abaxially directed, straight sided, marginal spines. In smaller specimens spine length (exsag.) roughly equal to pygidial width (tr.), and in larger specimens spine length is roughly equal to one half of pygidial width (tr.). Pleural field of subsequent segments crosses about half of pleural width, and traversed by four obliquely directed pleural furrows. Pleural field terminates at sharp, steep, break of slope separating pleural platform from flat border. Edge of pleural platform intersects terminal piece margin. Pygidial margin with slight emargination postaxially.

Discussion. Specimens from Wachi La have been subject to tectonic deformation, with specimens whose sagittal axis was at low angles to the principal extension direction becoming relatively elongated (Figs 6a, 7g), while those with sagittal axes at high angles to the principal extension direction have become tectonically shortened (Figs 6d, 7h). This deformation notwithstanding, species-specific characteristics are evident from this material. The reconstruction of the species (Fig. 12a) is based on a consideration of type and other non-Bhutanese material assigned to the species, in addition to our new specimens.

Several specimens previously illustrated from the Wachi La belong to this species. One cranidium and one partial thoracopygon from the Wachi La section may belong to this species, but they are poorly illustrated and their assignment is uncertain (Chaturvedi, Mishra & Mulay, Reference Chaturvedi, Mishra and Mulay1983a, Reference Chaturvedi, Mishra and Mulayb, pl. 2, figs 1, 3). Better-illustrated material that certainly belongs to this taxon has also been figured (Bhargava, Reference Bhargava and Bhargava1995; Tangri & Pande, Reference Tangri, Pande and Bhargava1995).

Kaolishania granulosa can be assigned to the genus with confidence, but other assignments are less secure. This is because either the material differs markedly from the forms of K. pustulosa and K. granulosa, or because the material is poorly preserved. The type material of Kaolishania granulosa is distinguished from Kaolishania pustulosa by its possession of larger pustules (Kobayashi, Reference Kobayashi1933, p. 104). While the holotype is poorly preserved, subsequent work by Kobayashi (Reference Kobayashi1935, Reference Kobayashi1956, Reference Kobayashi1960) expanded documentation of the species and added further illustrations, and our assignment of the Bhutanese material to K. granulosa is based on comparison with Kobayashi's additional material from North China and Korea.

The difference in pustule size of K. pustulosa and K. granulosa, while apparent in well-preserved material, is not a reliable character for species identification in all cases. The relatively coarse grain size of the Bhutanese specimens prohibits preservation of surficial ornament. Secondly, variation in pustule size or presence can be ontogenetic in some trilobites (e.g. Hughes, Reference Hughes1994). Other characters more useful for differentiating K. granulosa from K. pustulosa are the more semicircular pygidium of K. pustulosa with more firmly incised pleural furrows, which show five pleural ribs and six or seven axial rings in well-preserved specimens with a terminal piece, whereas K. granulosa exhibits only four pleural ribs and five axial rings with an undivided terminal piece. The pygidial spines in K. pustulosa run sub-parallel to the axis, whereas the pygidial spines in K. granulosa are more strongly abaxially divergent posteriorly. Abaxial expansion of the posterior border furrow is more pronounced in K. granulosa than in K. pustulosa.

Kobayashi (Reference Kobayashi1933, pl. 11, figs 15, 16) erected Kaolishania obsolata based on a fragmented cranidium and pygidium. Neither of these sclerites possesses characters diagnostic of Kaolishania, as both cranidium and pygidium are effaced, the cranidium has a narrow fixed cheek, and the pygidium bears only three axial rings. Kobayashi (Reference Kobayashi1935, pl. 9, figs 16–18) illustrated three additional fragmentary cranidia that he assigned to K. obsolata, but it is difficult to identify character states from the poor quality of the illustrations. The specimen figured as Kobayashi's (Reference Kobayashi1935, pl. 9, fig. 16) is pustulated with a trapezoidal glabella with three furrows and an anterior border comparable to K. granulosa, whereas specimens in his plate 9, figures 17 and 18 have weakly impressed furrows or lack them entirely, narrow fixigenae, and longer, more pointed anterior borders that differ from the condition in Kaolishania.

Kaolishania latiura (Kobayashi, Reference Kobayashi1960) was defined by a single pygidium that we consider similar to that of K. granulosa, and we treat K. latiura as a junior synonym of K. granulosa. Kobayashi (Reference Kobayashi1960) assigned Teinistion sp. indet. Walcott (Reference Walcott and 1913, pl. 9, fig. 4) to K. granulosa. Subsequently, Zhang & Jell (Reference Zhang and Jell1987) reassigned that specimen to Mansuyia without discussion of Kobayashi's (Reference Kobayashi1960) reassignment. We concur that this specimen does not belong within Kaolishania due to the elliptical shape of the pygidium.

Resser (Reference Resser1942) distinguished the new species Kaolishania hopeiensis from a suite of specimens that Sun (Reference Sun1935, pl. 2, figs 25–29) had assigned to K. pustulosa. The two cranidia that Sun (Reference Sun1935) figured do not show differences of likely taxonomic import, and the single pygidium illustrated shows as many as seven axial rings, five pleural ribs and rather weakly divergent pygidial spines, all of which suggest K. pustulosa. In our opinion the slight variation in cranidial length and pygidial width noted by Resser (Reference Resser1942) does not warrant recognition of a new species, especially when the small sample size is considered. Thus we concur with the opinion of Lu et al. (Reference Lu, Chang, Chu, Chien and Hsiang1965, p. 422) that Kaolishania hopeiensis is a synonym of K. pustulosa.

Zhang & Wang (Reference Zhang and Wang1985) established three new species, K. yanshanensis, K. pingquanensis and K. dongyushanensis, all from fragmentary material. Kaolishania pingquanensis was based on a single poorly preserved pygidium that might belong to one of several kaolishaniid genera. Kaolishania dongyushanensis was based on deformed material with a single cranidium weakly resembling Kaolishania. However, the pygidia figured contain eight axial rings plus a terminal piece, six pleural furrows and no preserved pygidial spines, all features that differ from other species of Kaolishania. Without clear evidence of pygidial spines we consider assignment to Kaolishania to be unconfirmed.

The pygidium of K. yanshanensis is nearly identical to that of K. pustulosa, whereas the figured cranidium (Zhang & Wang, Reference Zhang and Wang1985, pl. 140, fig. 5) is similar to that in Kaolishania cylindrica, a species previously established by Guo & Duan (Reference Guo and Duan1978). Duan et al. (Reference Duan, An, Liu, Peng and Zhang2005) erected a new species also called Kaolishania yanshanensis that is broadly similar to K. yanshanensis Zhang & Wang Reference Zhang and Wang1985, although the Duan et al. (Reference Duan, An, Liu, Peng and Zhang2005) species is largely effaced with weakly incised glabellar furrows and large pustules. Kaolishania yanshanensis Duan is a junior homonym of K. yanshanensis Zhang & Wang, but it is unclear whether it is also its junior synonym. All three of these species, K. cylindrica Guo & Duan, K. yanshanensis Zhang & Wang, K. yanshanensis Duan, have highly convex cranidia with short anterior borders and parallel-sided glabellae, and these features differ from the condition in typical Kaolishania. Both K. cylindrica and K. yanshanensis Duan also possess larger palpebral lobes than those of other Kaolishania species, and K. cylindrica contains particularly deeply incised bifurcate S1 glabellar furrows. All these features resemble Eokaolishania (Wittke, Reference Wittke1984; Zhu & Wittke, Reference Zhu and Wittke1989). Duan et al. (Reference Duan, An, Liu, Peng and Zhang2005, p. 34) listed another new species, Kaolishania funingensis, in a stratigraphic column but provided no description or illustrations of this species, which is thus nomen nudum.

Kaolishania laevigata was erected based on a single quite poorly preserved pygidium that is kaolishaniid (Qian, Reference Qian1994). It has only four axial rings, but we do not think that this single specimen warrants the recognition of a new species. Rather we restrict this name to this specimen pending the recovery of more material.

The species Kaolishania megaspina has been recognized from South China (Zhou et al. Reference Zhou, Lui, Meng and Sun1977) and was based on a single thoracopygon. This specimen differs from species of Kaolishania by having extremely long pygidial spines. Although the form of the pygidium is kaolishaniid, the lack of an associated cranidium precludes confident assignment of this species to Kaolishania.

Two other species have been described from western Yunnan by Sun & Xiang (Reference Sun and Xiang1979), and these are Kaolishania yunnanensis and Parakaolishania brevica, which was reassigned to Kaolishania by Shergold, Laurie & Shergold (Reference Shergold, Laurie and Shergold2007). Effacement of the glabellar furrows in K. yunnanensis and K. brevica distinguish these species from K. pustulosa and K. granulosa, and in this respect they resemble the cranidia of Peichishania species, but both species are poorly known.

Shergold (Reference Shergold1972) erected Kaolishania australis from the Gola Beds of western Queensland. Cranidia of this species differ from those of Kaolishania granulosa and K. pustulosa by possessing two pairs of isolated glabellar furrows and in having a very short anterior border. Shergold (Reference Shergold1972, p. 51) acknowledged that the pygidia assigned to this species may not be correctly associated with the cranidia, and while the ‘meraspid’ pygidia figured (Shergold, Reference Shergold1972, pl. 21, figs 1, 3, 4) are generally similar to those of kaolishaniids except in the smaller number of axial rings, the single illustrated holaspid pygidium (Shergold, Reference Shergold1972, pl. 21, fig. 2) apparently has spines with a wider base than typical of other Kaolishania species. The cranidia of Kaolishania clarkensis Shergold, Laurie & Shergold, Reference Shergold, Laurie and Shergold2007 from the Clark Sandstone of the Bonaparte Basin in NW Australia differ from the generic concept of Kaolishania by having a conical glabella with a rounded anterior end, a largely effaced cranidium with only faint S1, and a short, narrow anterior border. If it belongs within Kaolishania, it is quite different from the typical species K. pustulosa and K. granulosa.

In summary, two species K. pustulosa and K. granulosa can be assigned with confidence to the genus. Other putative members of the genus for which reasonably well-preserved material is available, such as K. clarkensis, K. australis and K. cylindrica, are distinctly different. Most other putative species are either likely synonyms of either K. pustulosa and K. granulosa or are too poorly know to be further evaluated.

Family tsinaniidae Kobayashi, Reference Kobayashi1935

Taipaikia has consistently been placed within this family of large, effaced trilobites (Kobayashi, Reference Kobayashi1960; Jell & Adrain, Reference Jell and Adrain2003; Zhu, Reference Zhu, Zhou and Zhen2008). Although recent discussions have varied greatly in their assessment of tsinaniid affinities, we now consider the group to comprise large, effaced leiostegiinid trilobites with an extended preglabellar field (Zhu, Hughes & Peng, Reference Zhu, Hughes and Peng2010). Fortey (Reference Fortey and Whittington1997) placed Tsinaniidae in Illaenina based on the presence of the lunettes, and this may be appropriate if the tsinaniid bacculae are indeed homologous with lunettes. Zhu, Hughes & Peng (Reference Zhu, Hughes and Peng2007) noted that Taipaikia differed from other tsinaniids in the more abaxial position at which the facial suture intersects the anterior margin. In other respects Taipaikia closely resemble other tsinaniids.

Genus Taipaikia Kobayashi, Reference Kobayashi1960

1. 1960 Taipaikia Kobayashi, p. 398.

2. 1965 Taipaikia Kobayashi; Lu et al., p. 344.

3. 1980 Taipaikia Kobayashi; Nan, p. 501.

4. 2003 Taipaikia Kobayashi; Jell & Adrain, p. 450.

5. 2005 Taipaikia Kobayashi; Duan et al., p. 171.

6. 2007 Taipaikia Kobayashi; Zhu, Hughes & Peng, p. 248.

7. 2008 Taipaikia Kobayashi; Zhu, pp. 140, 160, table 6.1.

Type species. Paramansuyella glabra Endo in Endo & Resser, Reference Endo and Resser1937, Changshan Formation, China.

Diagnosis. Effaced cranidium with long (sag.), concave frontal area with anterior branch of facial suture running abaxially anterior of the palpebral lobe, then sweeping adaxially in open curve to intersect anterior margin in front of fixigena. Glabellar conical with weakly incised anterior margin. Posterior border furrow and SO firmly incised. Posterior lateral margin of LO pit-like. Isopygous with convex, semicircular pygidium with distinct pleural facet, axis tapering posteriorly, border broad, flattened with broad doublure.

Taipaikia glabra (Endo in Endo & Resser, Reference Endo and Resser1937)
Figures 8a–h, 9a–g, 10a–d, 12b

1. 1937 Paramansuyella glabra Endo in Endo & Resser, p. 358, pl. 69, fig. 21, non 22 (= ?Kaolishania).

2. 1952 Mansuyia? glabra (Endo); Kobayashi, p. 148, pl. 20, fig. 18.

3. 1960 Taipaikia glabra (Endo); Kobayashi, p. 398, pl. 20, fig. 18, pl. 21, figs 20, 21.

4. 1965 Taipaikia glabra (Endo); Lu et al., p. 344, pl. 64, fig. 14.

5. 1980 Taipaikia glabra (Endo); Nan, p. 501, pl. 25, figs 5–8, 25.

6. ?1995 Trilobite remains Tangri & Pande, p. 134, fig. 3.10.6.

7. 2005 Shergoldia yanshanensis Duan in Duan et al., p. 170, pl. 34, figs 12, 13.

8. 2005 Taipaikia glabra (Endo); Duan et al., p. 171, pl. 34, figs 4–8, pl. 53, fig. 9.

9. 2008 Taipaikia glabra (Endo); Zhu, p. 160.

Figure 8.

Cephalic sclerites of Taipaikia glabra (Endo) from the Quartzite Formation, Wachi La section, Bhutan. All specimens are coated with ammonium chloride sublimate prior to digital photography, specimens are internal surfaces of moulds unless otherwise stated. White scale bar is 5 mm long, black scale bar is 10 mm long. (a, b) GSB27, partial cranidium; (a) dorsal view; (b) oblique view. (c, d) GSB28, partial cranidium; (c) dorsal view; (d) lateral view. (e, f) GSB29, ventral doublure of librigena; (e) external mould; (f) latex cast. (g) GSB30, ventral doublure, latex cast. (h) GSB31, librigena.

Figure 9.

Pygidia of Taipaikia glabra (Endo) from the Quartzite Formation, Wachi La section, Bhutan. All specimens are coated with ammonium chloride sublimate prior to digital photography, specimens are internal surfaces of moulds unless otherwise stated. White scale bar is 5 mm long, black scale bar is 10 mm long. (a) GSB32. (b) GSB33. (c) GSB34, latex cast. (d) GSB35, (e) GSB36, latex cast. (f, g) GSB37; (f) lateral view; (g) dorsal view.

Figure 10.

Comparison of retrodeformed Bhutanese specimen of Taipaikia glabra with Korean T. glabra. Black scale bar is 10 mm long. (a–c) GSB28 partial cranidium from the Quartzite Formation; (a) cranidium as recovered; (b) retrodeformation of (a) with strain ellipse (10% pure shear); (c) composite image of single retrodeformed partial cranidium, reflected and digitally merged illustrating our concept of the form of the complete cranidium; (d) partial cranidium of T. glabra collected about 3 km northeast of the summit Mt Taebaek, Kaolishania zone, Taebaeksan Basin, Korea (counterpart of Kobayashi, Reference Kobayashi1960, p. 248, pl. 21, fig. 20) with pixels digitally inverted to create an image with positive relief, PA2481, University Museum, University of Tokyo.

Type material. Holotype cranidium Endo in Endo & Resser, Reference Endo and Resser1937, pl. 69, fig. 21, Changshan Formation, Kaolishania Zone, Paichiashan, Liaoning Province, China.

Bhutanese material. Five cranidia from WL-2 (GSB27, GSB28, GSB60, GSB62), WL-8 (GSB61); four librigena from WL-2 (GSB29, GSB31), WL-3 (GSB63), WL-8 (GSB30); and six pygidia from WL-2 (GSB33, GSB36) and WL-8 (GSB32, GSB34, GSB35, GSB37) from the Quartzite Formation, Wachi La section, Black Mountains, Bhutan.

Diagnosis. As for genus, monotypic.

Description. Effaced cranidium of moderate relief, length (sag.) about 75% of width (tr.) at posterior border. Glabella conical, low relief, tapering slightly and evenly anteriorly, about 75% of cranidial length (sag.). SO entire, firmly incised, shallowing abaxially but confluent with axial furrow and of even length (sag.), preoccipital glabellar furrows absent. Axial furrow moderately incised posteriorly, shallow anteriorly, preglabellar furrow absent, with anterior end of glabella sloping into concave frontal area. Posterior border furrow moderately well incised. Posterior of LO meets axial furrow in depressed, pit-like node. Ocular ridge straight, short (exsag.), extending from glabellar anterior lateral margin to the anterior of palpebral lobe at an angle of about 45° to transverse axis. Palpebral lobe approximately 20% of cranidial length (sag.), oriented at about 30° to sagittal axis with rearward divergence, posteriorly positioned with anterior opposite glabellar midpoint. Palpebral furrow weakly incised. Interocular fixigenal width (tr.) equal to glabellar width (tr.) at palpebral area midlength. Prepalpebral fixigena about 80% of glabellar length at widest. Facial suture weakly divergent anterior to palpebral lobe, then curving gently and evenly toward anterior margin, which it intersects in front of fixigena. Posterior branch runs posteriorly for short distance behind palpebral lobe, then curves abruptly abaxially to define long, spatulate posterior border that obliquely truncates posterior border furrow. Posterior margin subtransverse adaxially, flexed posteriorly beyond weak fulcrum.

Librigenal border furrow effaced. Doublure wide, strongly convex ventrally, almost half of fixigenal width with prominent straight-crested terrace ridges on ventral surface at density of about 2 ridges/mm. Genal spine short (exsag.) and narrow (tr.), posteriorly directed. Librigenal length approximately twice width, suggesting cephalic width to length ratio of about 2:1.

Pygidium semicircular, of moderately high relief, sloping evenly and gently to posterior margin. Axis weakly inflated, straight-sided, decreasing in width (tr.) posteriorly, with up to 7 poorly defined axial rings in large specimens. Axis occupies about 75% of pygidial length (sag.). Articulating facet distinctly defined on abaxial portion of anterior border. Convex pleural platform slopes evenly into concave border, with slope inflection approximately coincident with weakly incised paradoublural line. Anteriormost pleural furrow evenly long (exsag.) and firmly incised, other pleural and interpleural furrows weakly incised near axis, effaced abaxially. Pygidial border broad, flat to slightly concave, extending across about one third of anterior pygidial width in small specimens and about one quarter of anterior pygidial width (tr.) in large specimens. Doublure with straight crested terrace lines approximately 3 ridges/mm, convex ventrally extending across about one third of pygidial width.

Discussion. The Bhutanese specimens assigned to this species have been tectonically deformed, and we have been able to retrodeform a cranidium that experienced simple oblique shear (see below). The pygidia show little oblique shear (Fig. 9), but it is notable that smaller specimens are relatively long and narrow (Fig. 9a, b) and larger pygidia relatively wide and short (Fig. 9c–g). These differences may result from deformation, in which the sagittal axes of the smaller specimens paralleled the principal extension direction, and those of the larger specimens were orthogonal to it. Further collecting will be needed to confirm whether this explanation or others, such as size-related shape change, are preferable.

Taipaikia glabra (Endo in Endo & Resser, Reference Endo and Resser1937) is known from various outcrops of the Changshan Formation in North China (Duan et al. Reference Duan, An, Liu, Peng and Zhang2005), and from a single locality in the Taebaeksan basin of South Korea (Kobayashi, Reference Kobayashi1960). Subtle differences exist between the Bhutanese and east Asian specimens of T. glabra. The Bhutanese specimens lack a well-defined medial ridge on a glabella that is slightly wider than in the type material, has a more spatulate posterior border of the cranidium, and bear one less distinctive ring on the pygidial axis. As these characteristics may reflect preservational differences between the tectonically deformed fine- to medium-grained siliciclastic material of Bhutan and the carbonate east Asian material, or minor intraspecific variation, we do not consider them to be of taxonomic significance.

The Bhutanese cranidia are fragmentary and tectonically deformed. As individual slabs preserve no more than a single cranidium or single pygidium of T. glabra, retrodeformation and reconstruction of a complete cranidium has been attempted (Fig. 10) by attempting to restore original approximate bilateral symmetry. The retrodeformation was achieved by compression of the digital image along the inferred principal extension direction and matching extension along axis orthogonal to principal extension (Hughes, Reference Hughes and Harper1999). The restoration of symmetry was judged using the outline of the anterior border. The portion of the specimen missing on the right hand side was copied, reflected and combined with the original image such that the anterior border was entire, thus creating an artificial image of a complete retrodeformed cranidium. This cranidium can be compared with the counterpart of an undeformed Korean specimen of this species preserved in limestone and figured by Kobayashi (Reference Kobayashi1960, pl. 21, fig. 20). Digital inversion of the image of the unfigured original counterpart better illustrates features not preserved in the figured cast. The Korean specimen is similar to the retrodeformed Bhutanese specimen, notably in the shape of the anterior border, the location of the palpebral lobe, and proportion of the glabellar width and length relative to cranidial length and width. There is a slight difference in the depth and width of SO. The glabella in the Korean specimen is slightly more conical, although subtle variation is seen in this feature among other figured material preserved in limestone from a single locality (Duan et al. Reference Duan, An, Liu, Peng and Zhang2005, pl. 34, figs 4, 5). Accordingly, we do not consider that the Bhutanese material warrants a new species.

Pygidia of T. glabra are similar to those of Shergoldia, but cranidia of Taipaikia are distinguished by small, more posteriorly situated palpebral lobes, and a more evenly rounded profile of the frontal area. In Shergoldia the facial suture cuts the anterior border in front of the glabella, defining a more pointed or ‘spade’-shaped frontal area (e.g. Zhu, Hughes & Peng, Reference Zhu, Hughes and Peng2007, fig. 2F). Taipaikia also lacks the glabellar furrows seen in Shergoldia. Furthermore, no pygidia of Taipaikia have been found bearing the spines seen in pre-mature pygidia of Shergoldia (Zhu, Hughes & Peng, Reference Zhu, Hughes and Peng2007). Duan et al. (Reference Duan, An, Liu, Peng and Zhang2005) erected the species Shergoldia yanshanensis based on material from a single locality from the Changshan Formation in Liaoning, North China, where the species co-occurs with Kaolishania granulosa and Lingyuanaspis lingyuanensis. The figures of the two pygidia of Shergoldia yanshanensis, one of which is holotype (Duan et al. Reference Duan, An, Liu, Peng and Zhang2005, pl. 34, figs 12, 13), are nearly identical to the pygidia of Taipaikia. Taipaikia appears to have been restricted the Kaolishania Zone which is stratigraphically below the base of the Ptychaspis–Tsinania Zone, in which other species of Shergoldia have been recovered.

Order PTYCHOPARIIDA Swinnerton, Reference Swinnerton1915
Family solenopleuridae Angelin, 1854

Members of this ‘ptychoparioid’ family are grouped according to the possession of an inflated, sub-triangular glabella, and relatively narrow fixigena (Kobayashi, Reference Kobayashi1935). Lingyuanaspis was assigned to Solenopleuridae by Guo & Duan (Reference Guo and Duan1978), an opinion maintained by Jell & Adrain (Reference Jell and Adrain2003) and Zhu (Reference Zhu, Zhou and Zhen2008). We note that that Lingyuanaspis and Phylacterus are characterized by a similar sagittal preglabellar furrow that could denote shared ancestry, but until more is known we maintain Lingyuanaspis within Solenopleuridae.

Genus Lingyuanaspis Guo & Duan, Reference Guo and Duan1978

1. 1978 Lingyuanaspis Guo & Duan, p. 450.

2. 2003 Lingyuanaspis Guo & Duan; Jell & Adrain, p. 398.

3. 2005 Lingyuanaspis Guo & Duan; Duan et al., pp. 27, 39.

4. 2008 Lingyuanaspis Guo & Duan; Zhu, pp. 140, 160, table 6.1

Type species. Lingyuanaspis lingyuanensis Guo & Duan, Reference Guo and Duan1978 (p. 450, pl. 2, figs 24–27) from the Changshan Formation, Laozhuanghu section, Lingyuan County, Liaoning Province, China.

Species assigned. In addition to the type species, Lingyuanaspis sangae sp. nov. is described herein.

Diagnosis. Cranidium of moderate to high relief, roughly triangular in outline, axial furrow deeply incised, inflated fixigena curve steeply into preglabellar field, meeting in depressed, anteriorly expanding (tr.) sagittal preglabellar furrow. Posterior margin of anterior border expanded posteriorly along sagittal axis. Pygidium trapezoidal, with deeply incised axial furrow and well-defined axial rings, and two short, posteriorly directed spines originating from pygidial margin just abaxial to axial furrow.

Discussion. This genus bears some resemblance to the middle Cambrian solenopleuriid genera Changqingia Lu & Zhu in Qiu et al. Reference Qiu, Lu, Zhu, Bi, Lin, Zhou, Zhang, Qian, Ju, Han and Wiei1983 and Eilura Resser & Endo in Kobayashi Reference Kobayashi1935. We accept Austrosinia Zhang & Jell, Reference Zhang and Jell1987 to be a junior synonym of Changqingia Lu & Zhu in Qiu et al. Reference Qiu, Lu, Zhu, Bi, Lin, Zhou, Zhang, Qian, Ju, Han and Wiei1983, as suggested by several authors (see Peng et al. Reference Peng, Hughes, Heim, Sell, Zhu, Myrow and Parcha2009, p. 79). Zhang & Jell (Reference Zhang and Jell1987) acknowledged the similarity between Changqingia and Eilura, but noted differences in their pygidial outline and concavity. The cranidium of Lingyuanaspis is comparable to that of Changqingia in glabellar shape and the presence of a shallow sagittal preglabellar furrow, but the pygidium of Lingyuanaspis is more similar in outline to that of Eilura. Lingyuanaspis is distinguished from both these taxa by the presence of short posterior pygidial spines, a feature lacking in both Eilura and Changqingia.

Another comparable form is Phylacterus vermontanus (Raymond, Reference Raymond1937), which is known from Laurentian cranidia that are stratigraphically slightly above the level bearing Lingyuanaspis. The Laurentian species bore a comparable sagittal preglabellar furrow, but has wider fixigenae, a distinct ocular ridge (Ludvigsen, Reference Ludvigsen1982, fig. 53A–D), and lacks marked posterior sagittal inflection of the anterior border. Phylacterus vermontanus also appears to be more strongly inflated than any Lingyuanaspis. Although the pygidium of P. vermontanus is unknown, the generic type species P. saylesi Raymond, Reference Raymond1924 has a triangular pygidium that contains multiple segments and is broadly comparable to that of Lingyuanaspis but differs in having more axial rings, an axis that extends almost of the posterior margin, and in lacking marginal spines (see Ludvigsen, Westrop & Kindle, Reference Ludvigsen, Westrop and Kindle1989, pl. 43).

Lingyuanaspis sangae sp. nov.
Figures 11a–p, 12c

Name. In honour of Her Royal Highness Ashi Sangay Choden Wangchuck, Queen of Bhutan, in recognition of her interest in the natural and human heritage of her country, and for her efforts in its conservation.

Figure 11.

Lingyuanaspis sangae sp. nov. from the Quartzite Formation, Wachi La section, Bhutan. All specimens coated with ammonium chloride sublimate prior to digital photography, specimens are internal surfaces of moulds unless otherwise stated. White scale bar is 5 mm long in all figures. (a) GSB1, latex cast of partial cranidium. (b) GSB2, partial cranidium. (c) GSB3, partial cranidium. (d) GSB4, partial cranidium. (e, f) GSB5, cranidium, holotype; (e) dorsal view; (f) anterior view. (g, h) GSB38, partial cranidium; (g) oblique view; (h) dorsal view. (i) GSB6, partial pygidium. (j) GSB7, partial pygidium. (k) GSB8, pygidium. (l) GSB9, partial pygidium. (m) GSB10, partial pygidium. (n–p) GSB11, partial pygidium; (n) lateral view; (o) posterior view; (p) dorsal view.

Figure 12.

Schematic reconstructions of the Wachi La trilobite species. (a) Kaolishania granulosa; (b) Taipaikia glabra; (c) Lingyuanaspis sangae.

Holotype. Cranidium (Fig. 11e, f), GSB5 from the WL-8 collection, Wachi La section, Quartzite Formation in the Black Mountain region, Bhutan.

Other material. Nine cranidia from WL-3 (GSB1, GSB2, GSB3, GSB4, GSB6, GSB7, GSB38), WL-5 (GSB39, GSB40); 10 pygidia from WL-2 (GSB11) WL-3 (GSB6, GSB7, GSB8, GSB9, GSB41, GSB42) and WL-5 (GSB10, GSB43, GSB44), Quartzite Formation, Wachi La section, Black Mountains, Bhutan.

Diagnosis. Lingyuanaspis with glabellar furrows absent or weakly incised. Pygidial pleural furrows absent or weakly incised.

Description. Cranidium of moderate relief with length (sag.) approximately 50% of width (tr.) at posterior border. Glabella conical, gently tapering and rounded anteriorly with preoccipital glabellar furrows absent or weakly incised, S1 pit-like, isolated where present. Occipital ring slightly narrower than glabellar width at posterior of L1, with firmly incised SO. Axial furrows deeply incised, preglabellar furrow slightly shallower. Preglabellar field short, about 15% of cranidial length (sag.) with prominent preglabellar furrow expanding anteriorly into broad (tr.) anterior border furrow. Anterior border narrow (tr.) with posterior margin slightly elongated sagittally. Anterior border about 15% of cranidial length. Palpebral lobe small, forward, inclined at 25° angle to sagittal axis with anterior end adaxial, about 20% of cranidial length (sag.), interocular palpebral width 50% of glabellar width (tr.) at palpebral fixigenal midlength. Anterior branch of facial suture runs forwards and inwards. Posterior branch curves gently abaxially posterior to eye, then sweeps posteriorly. Posterior border slopes steeply into posterior border furrow in abaxial portion. Posterior border furrow long (exsag.), firmly incised.

Pygidium convex, length (sag.) about 60% of maximum width (tr.), trapezoidal in outline, width between abaxial pygidial spine base (tr.) 60% of maximum width (tr.). Posterior marginal spine pair straight sided, diverge abaxially at slight angle to sagittal axis. Spine base approximately 40% of anteriormost axial ring width (tr.). Spine up to approximately 40% of pygidial length. Posterior border between spines transverse or slightly emarginated sagittally. Axis occupies about 75% of pygidial length (sag.), strongly inflated, axial rings evenly decrease in width (tr.) posteriorly. Six or more axial rings plus terminal piece with bulbous, rounded end. Axial furrow firmly incised, axial ring furrows short (sag.), evenly incised, shallower posteriorly. Pleural field highly convex, sloping convexly downward from inflated pleural platform, effaced with one or rarely two furrows apparent anteriorly in some specimens.

Discussion. All specimens of L. sangae have experienced mild to moderate tectonic deformation. Those forms orthogonal to the axis of principal extension have become markedly shortened (Fig. 11d), while those parallel to that axis have been elongated (Fig. 11h). Accordingly, we have attempted a reconstruction (Fig. 12c) that approximates our view of the undeformed morphology.

The type species Lingyuanaspis lingyuanensis (Guo & Duan, Reference Guo and Duan1978) is only known from the Changshan Formation in the Laozhuanghu section in Lingyuan County and from the Yuanshishan section in Jinxi County of the Liaoning Province, North China (Duan et al. Reference Duan, An, Liu, Peng and Zhang2005). The presence of firmly incised lateral glabellar furrows distinguishes L. lingyuanensis from L. sangae. There is also a difference in glabellar shape, with the glabella of L. lingyuanensis tapering anteriorly to yield a more triangular form than that of L. sangae, which has a more gently tapered, conical glabella. The pygidia also differ with L. lingyuanensis displaying multiple well-defined pleural furrows, whereas the pleurae of L. sangae are effaced with no more than two faint furrows.

Phylum BRACHIOPODA
Class RHYNCHONELLIFORMA
Order BILLINGSELLIDA Schuchert, Reference Schuchert1893
Suborder BILLINGSELLIDINA Schuchert, Reference Schuchert1893
Superfamily billingselloidea Schuchert, Reference Schuchert1893
Family billingsellidae Schuchert, Reference Schuchert1893

The billingsellids are a distinctive group of strophomenate brachiopods that have many features in common with the orthide brachiopods where until recently they were placed. Nevertheless, the presence of a pseudodeltidium and a chilidium together with transverse flat-lying socket plates and in particular a secondary shell layer consisting of cross-bladed laminae, has required a reassignment of the group to the Strophomenida (Williams & Harper, Reference Williams, Harper, Williams, Brunton and Carlson2000). The family ranges from the middle Cambrian to the Lower Ordovician (Floian) and currently includes some six genera.

Genus Billingsella Hall & Clarke, Reference Hall and Clarke1892

Type species. Orthis pepina Hall, Reference Hall1863, p. 134, pl. 6, figs 23–27.

Billingsella is generally ventribiconvex with variable cardinal extremities, a strong pseudodeltidium and convex chilidium together with an apical foramen. The dental plates are widely divergent and the ventral muscle scars are commonly impressed on a long, tongue-like callus; a subperipheral rim is occasional developed. The other members of the family conform to the Billingsella model but have minor differences, mainly in overall shape and features of the ventral interior. Billingsella ranges from the middle Cambrian to the Lower Ordovician (Tremadocian) and has a cosmopolitan distribution. The majority of its some 20 reported species are known from the Furongian.

Billingsella cf. tonkiniana Mansuy, Reference Mansuy1915
Figure 13a–k

1. cf. 1915 Billingsella tonkiniana Mansuy, p. 7, pl. I, fig. 2a–q.

2. cf. 1916 Billingsella tonkiniana Mansuy; Mansuy, p. 13, pl. I, fig. 12a–g.

3. 1983a Rafinesquina sp. Chaturvedi, Mishra & Mulay, pl. 1, figs 1–4, 6.

4. 1983a Orthis sp. ? Chaturvedi, Mishra & Mulay, pl. 1, figs 5, 7.

5. 1983a Chaturvedi, Mishra & Mulay, pl. 1, figs 8, 9.

6. 1983a Strophomenidae sp. Chaturvedi, Mishra & Mulay, pl. 1, fig. 11.

7. ?1983a ?Sowerbyites sp. Chaturvedi, Mishra & Mulay, pl. 1, fig. 14.

8. 1983b Rafinesquina cratera Salter; Chaturvedi, Mishra & Mulay, pl. 1, figs 1–4, 6.

9. 1983b Orthis cf. dalmenella Chaturvedi, Mishra & Mulay, pl. 1, figs 5–7, 9.

10. 1983b ?Strophomena sp. indet. Chaturvedi, Mishra & Mulay, pl. 1, fig. 11.

11. ?1983b ?Sowerbyites sp. indet. Chaturvedi, Mishra & Mulay, pl. 1, fig. 14.

12. 1995 Brachiopod impression Tangri & Pande, p. 134, fig. 3.10.41.

Figure 13

Billingsella cf. tonkiniana Mansuy, Reference Mansuy1915, from the Quartzite Formation, Wachi La section, Black Mountain outlier, Bhutan. (a) GSB64, latex replica of conjoined valves showing dorsal exterior and the ventral interarea. (b) GSB65, latex replica of ventral exterior; (c) GSB66, latex replica of dorsal exterior. (d, e) GSB67, internal mould of ventral valve and latex replica. (f, g) GSB68, internal mould of dorsal valve and latex replica. (h, i) GSB69, external mould and latex replica of conjoined pair showing dorsal exterior and ventral interarea. (j, k) GSB70, dorsal interior and latex replica of dorsal valve. Scale bar 5 mm.

Material. Two dorsal conjoined exteriors and ventral interareas from WL-5 (GSB64, GSB69); one ventral exterior (GSB65) from WL-5 and one (GSB66) from WL-6; two dorsal interiors (GSB68, GSB70) from WL-5; one ventral interior (GSB67) from WL-5. The species also occurred in the following collections: WL-2, WL-7 and WL-8, Quartzite Formation, Wachi La section, Black Mountains, Bhutan.

Description. Exterior. Unequal, usually dorsibiconvex valves of transverse to subquadrate outline with maximum width commonly at or just anterior to hingeline; cardinal extremities rectangular or slightly obtuse. Anterior commissure slightly to markedly sulcate. Ventral valve feebly convex with low, flat median fold and planar to slightly concave flanks. Ventral interarea high, flat with strongly convex pseudodeltidium, occupying about two-thirds of deltidium and with slight trace of minute, apical pedicle foramen. Dorsal valve convex with transverse outline; marked sulcus with steep sides arising at or near umbo, deepening and widening anteriorly; commonly flanked by two strong ribs and with curved base. Dorsal interarea relatively short, flat; chilidium relatively small, convex occupying the apical part of the notothyrium. Ornament of strong costae and costellae, with sharp profiles and flat interspaces; arising by both branching and intercalation; concentric growth lines variably developed, accentuated at and near anterior commissure; up to ten ribs developed per 5 mm at about 5 mm from dorsal umbo, with commonly five in the sulcus.

Ventral interior. Muscle scars not clearly discernible. Teeth, relatively large and robust, forming knoblike, divergent projections extending outwards from the anterolateral margins of the delthyrium.

Dorsal interior. Well-developed, high notothyrial platform with simple, bladelike cardinal process flanked by pair of suboval depressions, marking the site of the diductor scars; platform extended anteriorly as ridge, that broadens and fades within the posterior third of the valve length. Notothyrial platform flanked by flat-lying socket ridges that extend laterally, subparallel to hingeline, thickening slightly, distally. Posterior pair of adductor scars, oval, faintly impressed lateral to median ridge. Vascular media impressed and diverge anteriorly.

Discussion. This is a large, subquadrate to tranverse, dorsibiconvex Billingsella species with normally coarse costae and costellae, arising by branching and intercalation; the cardinal process is simple, situated on a high notothyrial platform with widely divergent socket ridges, subparallel to the hingeline; the large convex pseusodeltidium is perforated by minute apical foramen.

Several previous figured brachiopod specimens from the Quartzite Formation of the Wachi La section evidently belong to this species. Specimens assigned to Rafinesquina cratera are internal moulds of the ventral valve, whereas external moulds were generally assigned to Orthis cf. dalmenella (Chaturvedi, Mishra & Mulay, Reference Chaturvedi, Mishra and Mulay1983b). Our new material is also preserved as moulds and is variably deformed. The material exhibits a wide degree of morphological variation due partly to tectonic strain but in common with many other late Cambrian taxa, there is probably also a significant degree of biologically related morphological variation. Nevertheless, the biconvex, costellate shells with long interareas, and a large, convex pseudodeltidium perforated by an apical foramen and flat-lying socket ridges subparallel to the hingeline confirm an assignment to Billingsella. Approximately 20 species have been placed within Billingsella and many of those that have not already been reassigned to other genera, such as Oligomys and Wimanella, are in need of revision. Many species of Billingsella show wide variation in shell shape and ornament (Bell, Reference Bell1941; Freeman & Stitt, Reference Freeman and Stitt1996), and are thus difficult to characterize. The Bhutanese material is most similar to a group of species centred around B. perfecta Ulrich & Cooper, Reference Ulrich and Cooper1938 but which also includes B. coloradoensis (Shumard, Reference Shumard1861) and B. texana Bell & Ellinwood, Reference Bell and Ellinwood1962. This group has transverse dorsal and subquadrate ventral valves, a large pseudodeltidium and relatively coarse radial ornament. The Bhutanese species differs in having a high notothyrial platform, simple socket ridges developed virtually parallel to the hingeline and a lack of ridges in the dorsal interior, together with a raised muscle platform in the ventral valves.

A number of species of Billingsella have been reported from Shandong and Liaoning provinces of North China (Kobayashi, Reference Kobayashi1933; Endo & Resser, Reference Endo and Resser1937). Billingsella pumpellyi Walcott is reported and figured from the Furongian Changshan Formation of Shandong (Endo, Reference Endo and Aoki1939, pl. 1, fig. 9). The key characters of the species are its strongly convex ventral valve, a projecting ventral apex, a faintly-defined median fold and sharp, radiating ribs. Endo (Reference Endo and Aoki1939), however, only figured a dorsal exterior. The Shandong material is apparently broken and poorly preserved, and although having sharp ribs and a sulcate anterior commissure, the Bhutanese material lacks a strongly-projected ventral apex, apparently typical of this form. Three new species were assigned by Endo & Resser (Reference Endo and Resser1937) to Billingsella. Billingsella aojii is similar to B. pumpellyi but possesses less convex and wider valves. Billingsella simplex is characterized by a subcircular ventral valve, which is more convex and with finer ribs than the two latter species. Billingsella willisi, however, is subquadrate, moderately convex with fine ribs. All three are only briefly described and inadequately illustrated for comparison with the Bhutanese material.

Two new species were reported from the Liaoning Province (Kobayashi, Reference Kobayashi1933). Billingsella goettschei is similar to B. pumpellyi but is less convex and displays vascula media that are more narrowly divergent, whereas B. hsishunenesis is characterized by costellae that increase by intercalation and strong concentric growth lines. Both species are based on inadequate sample sizes and thus it is not possible to judge if these, and indeed the other species from China, are indeed recognizable species or merely part of a single, more variable species.

Mansuy (Reference Mansuy1915, Reference Mansuy1916) described and illustrated two named species of Billingsella from Haut-Tonkin, which is part of the South China block. Billingsella loungeoensis Mansuy, Reference Mansuy1916 is based on a transverse, ventral valve with a relatively fine ornament. It apparently lacks the high ventral interarea typical of Billingsella, and significantly Mansuy (Reference Mansuy1916) compared his species with Billingsella exporrecta Linnarsson, a Swedish species now assigned to Oligomys. Billingsella tonkiniana Mansuy, Reference Mansuy1915 is adequately illustrated (Mansuy, Reference Mansuy1915, Reference Mansuy1916) and displays many of the features typical of Billingsella. Mansuy (Reference Mansuy1915) in fact compared his new species with B. coloradoensis (Shumard, Reference Shumard1861), and it is thus similar to both the American species and the new material described here (see above). The Haut-Tonkin material is similar in overall shape, particularly in the development of a dorsal sulcus and apparently has a similar density of ribbing. The Bhutan material has generally a more transverse outline and a higher ventral interarea; detailed comparisons with the interiors of Mansuy's species are not possible. Both species are tectonically deformed, making precise morphological comparisons difficult, but both are clearly similar. On this assumption and to avoid further proliferation of specific names, the Bhutanese material is compared with B. tonkiniana. Pending revision of Mansuy's species, the Bhutanese taxon may be included in that species, or its distinctive characteristics could form the basis for a new species.

The Billingsella Association (Bassett, Popov & Holmer, Reference Bassett, Popov, Holmer, Crame and Owen2002) was a low-diversity assemblage, dominated by the eponymous genus itself or closely related forms such as Cymbithyris. Many of these assemblages were limited in spatial distribution but formed high-density, high-dominance clusters in thin, locally extensive horizons commonly within nearshore facies. These distributional patterns suggest that Billingsella pursued an opportunist life strategy, forming thick near-monospecific shell beds in the middle and upper Cambrian rocks of Iran and the Furongian strata of north-central Kazakhstan (Bassett, Popov & Holmer, Reference Bassett, Popov, Holmer, Crame and Owen2002). In the Wachi La section Billingsella occur throughout the fossiliferous interval and dominate some, but not all, beds in which they occur (Fig. 3).

5.a. New stratigraphic constraints from the fossils described herein

Our collections from the Quartzite Formation spanned about a 40 m stratigraphic interval, although the majority of the material is within 12 m of the base of this interval (Fig. 3). Individual beds contain different relative abundances, with the WL-5 and WL-6 collections dominated by B. cf. tonkiniana, whereas the WL-2, WL-3 and WL-8 collections were trilobite-dominated. As all three trilobite taxa occur throughout the section there is no indication of biozones within the section (Fig. 3).

The trilobite assemblage described here from the Quartzite Formation is unique, with all three of the Bhutanese trilobite genera known to be restricted to a narrow stratigraphic interval in North China (Sino-Korean block). Kaolishania granulosa occurs quite commonly in the Kaolishania pustulosa Zone of North China (the top zone of the Changshanian Stage in the traditional Chinese stage nomenclature), which is correlative to the Eolotagnostus decoratus–Kaolishaniella Zone of South China (Peng, Reference Peng1992; Geyer & Shergold, Reference Geyer and Shergold2000; Choi & Kim, Reference Choi and Kim2006) (that is, within the lower portion of the Taoyuanian Stage in the slope-facies stages of China). It belongs to Stage 9 of the Furongian Epoch, and the age of this zone is estimated to be about 493 Ma (Peng & Babcock, Reference Peng, Babcock, Ogg, Ogg and Gradstein2008). This significantly modifies the middle Cambrian or Ordovician age estimate for the Quartzite Formation of the Pele La Group (Chaturvedi, Mishra & Mulay, Reference Chaturvedi, Mishra and Mulay1983a, Reference Chaturvedi, Mishra and Mulayb; Bhargava, Reference Bhargava and Bhargava1995; Tangri & Pande, Reference Tangri, Pande and Bhargava1995; Hughes, Peng & Luo, Reference Hughes, Peng and Luo2002; Tangri, Bhargava & Pande, Reference Tangri, Bhargava and Pande2003; Long & McQuarrie, Reference Long and McQuarrie2010). On the other hand, billingsellid brachiopod taxa have long stratigraphic ranges with the genus Billingsella extending from the middle Cambrian through the Early Ordovician (Tremadocian). The taxon also shows cosmopolitan distribution (Williams & Harper, Reference Williams, Harper, Williams, Brunton and Carlson2000). This, coupled with the lack of modern descriptions of many billingsellid taxa hinders their further use as biostratigraphic and biogeographic indicators.

The genus Kaolishania is well represented in North China by Kaolishania pustulosa and K. granulosa. Possible congeners also occur on the South China block (Yangtze platform), in Western Yunnan and in Australia, but those forms differ from the typical North Chinese species. The occurrence of K. granulosa in Bhutan thus suggests a specific link between Bhutan and North China. Furthermore, Taipaikia and Lingyuanspis are rare genera and are only known from North China. Taipaikia glabra has been collected from outcrops in the Changshan Formation in Liaoning, Hebei and Shandong provinces of North China (Duan et al. Reference Duan, An, Liu, Peng and Zhang2005) and the Sesong Formation of the Taebaeksan Basin in South Korea (Kobayashi, Reference Kobayashi1960). In both of these locations it co-occurs with Kaolishania granulosa (Endo & Resser, Reference Endo and Resser1937; Kobayashi, Reference Kobayashi1960; Duan et al. Reference Duan, An, Liu, Peng and Zhang2005). The only other species of Lingyuanaspis, L. lingyuanensis, is known only from a stratigraphically thin interval of the Changshan Formation at two localities in the Liaoning Province, North China, where it co-occurs with Taipaikia glabra and Kaolishania granulosa (Duan et al. Reference Duan, An, Liu, Peng and Zhang2005). Thus the co-occurrence of these three species in both Bhutan and North China allows both precise stratigraphic constraints to be placed on the age of the Bhutanese fauna, and a specific faunal association with North China to be advanced. These taxa have not been recovered from other areas bearing rock of similar age despite quite intensive studies of rocks of this age in South China and Australia.

In North China K. granulosa, T. glabra and Lingyuanaspis lingyuanensis occur in shallow water carbonate deposits as part of a mixed siliciclastic–carbonate succession (Duan et al. Reference Duan, An, Liu, Peng and Zhang2005; Kwon et al. Reference Kwon, Chough, Choi and Lee2006), whereas in Bhutan these taxa are found in nearshore, very fine- to medium-grained sandstone facies. Although both settings represent shallow shelfal conditions, the specific lithofacies were different, and occurrence of these taxa evidently was not exclusive to a single lithofacies. Hence there is no indication that this fauna occupied a particularly specialized physical habitat. Thus, proximity between North China and Bhutan, rather than specific environmental similarity, is a more likely explanation for the co-occurrence in both regions.

The Cambrian palaeogeographic position of India is well constrained as an element of core Gondwanaland (e.g. Scotese & McKerrow, Reference Scotese, McKerrow, McKerrow and Scotese1990; Veevers, Reference Veevers2000, Reference Veevers2004) and, assuming that the Cambrian Himalayan margin was continuous along strike and that Bhutan was part of it, as the stratigraphic and detrital zircon analyses suggest, this faunal association described herein would favour placement of the outboard North China block in relatively close proximity. This contrasts with other models in which North China is placed adjacent to eastern Australia or even further around the Gondwanan margin, adjacent to the Ross Sea margin of Antarctica (Huang et al. Reference Huang, Zhu, Otofuji and Yang2000; Li & Powell, Reference Li and Powell2001).

Although the trilobite species allow specific stratigraphic and geographic correlation, the assemblage is of low diversity, as is quite common in Cambrian trilobite assemblages from nearshore sandstone facies. Sclerites of each of the three Bhutanese species have homeomorphs among co-occurrent trilobite species from other settings. For example, the pygidium of K. granulosa is grossly similar to that of species of Crepicephalus, the pygidium of L. sangae is similar to that of Uncaspis discrepans, and the overall size and form of both cranidia and pygidia of T. glabra resemble those of Coosia grandis from the Laurentian Crepicephalus Zone shale/limestone succession of central Montana (Lochman & Duncan, Reference Lochman and Duncan1944). This distantly related Laurentian fauna is significantly older, more diverse and from a different lithofacies than that of the Quartzite Formation. Nevertheless, similarity in aspects of the ecological structure of these disparate faunas is suggested by these resemblances.

5.b. Implications for previous age estimates and correlations of the Pele La Group

The fauna from the Quartzite Formation analysed in this paper suggest stratigraphic equivalence of the formation to members G and H of the Maneting Formation of Chaturvedi, Mishra & Mulay (Reference Chaturvedi, Mishra and Mulay1983a, Reference Chaturvedi, Mishra and Mulayb) (Fig. 2). Those authors collected trilobites from several localities in their Member H of the Maneting Formation at Wachi La, and also in the Kha-Khola/Gongkhola area of the southern Black Mountains. On the basis of those fossils they considered the entire Maneting Formation to be Middle to Upper Ordovician, and the Deshichiling Formation (their Nake-Chu Formation) to be Lower Ordovician. Chaturvedi, Mishra & Mulay's (Reference Chaturvedi, Mishra and Mulay1983a, Reference Chaturvedi, Mishra and Mulayb) figured specimens are difficult to identify from the photographs provided in their papers, and the original specimens have been lost. Several of the forms from the Wachi La section that they illustrate can be assigned to species we describe herein (see synonymies above). Other forms that they illustrated are likely different taxa. For example, their (Chaturvedi, Mishra & Mulay, Reference Chaturvedi, Mishra and Mulay1983a, Reference Chaturvedi, Mishra and Mulayb) plate 2, figures 10 and 11 might be a saukiid trilobite, a clade that we have not recovered in our own collections. Such a trilobite could have been collected from beds a little higher stratigraphically than those we collected. However, nothing illustrated from the Quartzite Formation in the Chaturvedi, Mishra & Mulay (Reference Chaturvedi, Mishra and Mulay1983a, Reference Chaturvedi, Mishra and Mulayb) papers is suggestive of an Ordovician age.

Specimens illustrated by Tangri & Pande (Reference Tangri, Pande and Bhargava1995) and by Bhargava (Reference Bhargava and Bhargava1995) are from the WL-2 locality. Bhargava (Reference Bhargava and Bhargava1995, p. 178) suggested a middle to late Cambrian age for the Quartzite Member based on the specimens that these authors illustrated from WL-2, and based on the suggestion by J. H. Shergold that the trilobites were either kaolishaniids or pagodiids. On the basis of this identification Bhargava (Reference Bhargava and Bhargava1995) proposed a middle Cambrian age for this horizon. This was prompted by the supposedly earliest Cambrian age of the underlying Maneting Formation (Tangri, Bhargava & Pande, Reference Tangri, Bhargava and Pande2003). Bhargava (Reference Bhargava and Bhargava1995) and Tangri, Bhargava & Pande (Reference Tangri, Bhargava and Pande2003) argued that the contrast between strata bearing simple trace fossils such as Planolites in the Deshichiling Formation and lowest parts of the Maneting Formation, and the occurrence of Treptichnus pedum (sensu Jensen, Reference Jensen1997) in the lower part of the Maneting Formation, suggested that this interval spanned the Precambrian–Cambrian boundary. However, none of the trace fossils illustrated by these authors are diagnostic of an early Cambrian age. Treptichnus pedum ranges from the base of the Cambrian into the Ordovician (Geyer & Uchman, Reference Geyer, Uchman, Geyer and Landing1995), and rocks bearing this form are potentially of any age within that interval, although those on the Wachi La must be older than the trilobites described herein. Here we revise the age interpretation based on the new trilobite species identification, and this view is confirmed by the ages of detrital zircon grains from the Deshichiling Formation (see below). Our investigation shows that the leiostegiinid trilobite present is K. granulosa, not Prochuangia (see Hughes, Peng & Luo, Reference Hughes, Peng and Luo2002). This taxonomic revision and the other species identifications suggest that the assemblage is younger than the age suggested previously by Hughes, Peng & Luo (Reference Hughes, Peng and Luo2002).