Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-nqrmd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T18:29:42.983Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Investigating the IGF axis as a pathway for intergenerational effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 September 2024

Haley B. Ragsdale*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
Aaron A. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
Thomas W. McDade
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
Nanette R. Lee
Affiliation:
USC-Office of Population Studies Foundation, Inc., University of San Carlos, Cebu, Philippines
Isabelita N. Bas
Affiliation:
USC-Office of Population Studies Foundation, Inc., University of San Carlos, Cebu, Philippines
Christopher W. Kuzawa
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA Institute for Policy Research, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA
*
Corresponding author: Haley B. Ragsdale; Email: haleyragsdale2023@u.northwestern.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Early nutritional and growth experiences can impact development, metabolic function, and reproductive outcomes in adulthood, influencing health trajectories in the next generation. The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) axis regulates growth, metabolism, and energetic investment, but whether it plays a role in the pathway linking maternal experience with offspring prenatal development is unclear. To test this, we investigated patterns of maternal developmental weight gain (a proxy of early nutrition), young adult energy stores, age, and parity as predictors of biomarkers of the pregnancy IGF axis (n = 36) using data from the Cebu Longitudinal Health and Nutrition Survey in Metro Cebu, Philippines. We analyzed maternal conditional weight measures at 2, 8, and 22 years of age and leptin at age 22 (a marker of body fat/energy stores) in relation to free IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 in mid/late pregnancy (mean age = 27). Maternal IGF axis measures were also assessed as predictors of offspring fetal growth. Maternal age, parity, and age 22 leptin were associated with pregnancy free IGF-1, offspring birth weight, and offspring skinfold thickness. We find that free IGF-1 levels in pregnancy are more closely related to nutritional status in early adulthood than to preadult developmental nutrition and demonstrate significant effects of young adult leptin on offspring fetal fat mass deposition. We suggest that the previously documented finding that maternal developmental nutrition predicts offspring birth size likely operates through pathways other than the maternal IGF axis, which reflects more recent energy status.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with The International Society for Developmental Origins of Health and Disease (DOHaD)
Figure 0

Table 1. Descriptive statistics for participants (n = 35) and their offspring (n = 36)

Figure 1

Table 2. Results from a series of multiple regression analyses predicting maternal pregnancy free IGF-1, IGFBP-3, and the molar ratio of free IGF-1/IGFBP-3. Model 1 predictors: age in pregnancy, parity, and nonpregnant leptin. Model 2 predictors: gestational age-adjusted birth weight, conditional weight at 2 years, conditional weight at 8 years, and conditional weight at 22 years. Model 3 includes all predictor variables from Models 1 and 2. **p < 0.01 *p < 0.05 ∼p < 0.1

Figure 2

Table 3. Results from separate multiple regression models predicting neonatal anthropometrics. Birth outcome variables are residuals after adjusting for days after birth of measurement. **p < 0.01 *p < 0.05 ∼p < 0.1