Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-lfk5g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-21T02:46:09.579Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Informed Decision Making and Abortion: Crisis Pregnancy Centers, Informed Consent, and the First Amendment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Aziza Ahmed
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Shifting laws and regulations increasingly displace the centrality of women’s needs in the provision of abortion services. Lawmakers and judges contribute to this environment in two ways: by protecting the right of “Crisis Pregnancy Centers” (CPCs) to give false and misleading information about abortion and by supporting legislation mandating that abortion providers give misleading and unnecessary information for the purposes of informed consent. Litigation on informed consent is further complicated through the mobilization of facts — such as the gestational age or sonogram of the fetus — delivered with the intent to dissuade women from accessing abortion. In other words, factual information utilized for ideological purpose.

First Amendment litigation has done little to help prioritize women’s access to appropriate information about abortion that is calibrated to their needs.

Information

Type
Symposium
Information
Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , Spring 2015 , pp. 51 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

National Abortion Federation: Crisis Pregnancy Centers, available at <http://www.prochoice.org/about_abortion/facts/cpc.html> (last visited February 4, 2015)+(last+visited+February+4,+2015)>Google Scholar
American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Pregnancy Resource Centers, available at <http://www.aaplog.org/pregnancy-resource-centers/> (last visited February 4, 2015) (“Pregnancy Resource Centers (Crisis Pregnancy Centers) have been called the kind, calm, nonjudgmental face of the pro-life movement… They provide life-saving help in a truly life-changing way by assisting women who are at risk for abortion with the life-affirming, practical support they need to choose life, then prepare them to parent or to place for adoption.”).+(last+visited+February+4,+2015)+(“Pregnancy+Resource+Centers+(Crisis+Pregnancy+Centers)+have+been+called+the+kind,+calm,+nonjudgmental+face+of+the+pro-life+movement…+They+provide+life-saving+help+in+a+truly+life-changing+way+by+assisting+women+who+are+at+risk+for+abortion+with+the+life-affirming,+practical+support+they+need+to+choose+life,+then+prepare+them+to+parent+or+to+place+for+adoption.”).>Google Scholar
Lin, V. Dailard, C., “The Guttmacher Report on Public Policy, Crisis Pregnancy Centers Seek to Increase Political Clout, Secure Government Subsidy,” available at <http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/tgr/05/2/gr050204.html> (last visited February 4, 2015).+(last+visited+February+4,+2015).>Google Scholar
Jones, R. Kooistra, K., “Abortion Incidence and Access to Services in the United States, 2008,” Perspective in Sexual and Reproductive Health 43, no1 (2011): 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Abortion Rights Action League, “Just Because You're Pregnant: Lies, Half-Truths, and Manipulation at Crisis Pregnancy Centers in Massachusetts,” NARAL (2011), available at <http://www.prochoicemass.org/assets/bin/NARAL%20PCM%20CPC%20Report%202011.pdf> (last visited March 4, 2015). (last visited March 4, 2015).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=National+Abortion+Rights+Action+League,+“Just+Because+You're+Pregnant:+Lies,+Half-Truths,+and+Manipulation+at+Crisis+Pregnancy+Centers+in+Massachusetts,”+NARAL+(2011),+available+at++(last+visited+March+4,+2015).>Google Scholar
See Lin and Dailard, supra note 3.Google Scholar
U.S. House of Representatives, False and Misleading Health Information Provided by Federally Funded Pregnancy Resource Centers, July 2006, at i.Google Scholar
Choose Life America, Inc., available at <http://www.choose-life.org/> (Last visited August 17, 2014)+(Last+visited+August+17,+2014)>Google Scholar
Guttmacher Institute, State Policies in Brief, available at <http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_CLLP.pdf> (last visited February 5, 2015).+(last+visited+February+5,+2015).>Google Scholar
Choose Life Georgia, Inc., “License to Live,” available at <http://www.chooselifega.org/faq-about-choose-life/> (last visited February 5, 2015).+(last+visited+February+5,+2015).>Google Scholar
The Children First Foundation, “New Jersey,” available at <http://www.njchoose-life.org/new_jersey0.aspx> (last visited February 4, 2015).+(last+visited+February+4,+2015).>Google Scholar
The Children First Foundation, Connecticut, available at <http://www.njchoose-life.org/connecticut0.aspx> (last visited February 4, 2015).+(last+visited+February+4,+2015).>Google Scholar
U.S. House of Representatives, “False and Misleading Health Information Provided by Federally Funded Pregnancy Resource Centers,” 2006, available at <http://www.chsourcebook.com/articles/waxman2.pdf> (last visited March 4, 2015).+(last+visited+March+4,+2015).>Google Scholar
Id., at i.Google Scholar
Id., at 7.Google Scholar
NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota Foundation, “State-Funded Deception: Minnesota's Crisis Pregnancy Centers,” 2012, at 20, available at <http://www.prochoiceminnesota.org/assets/bin/2012NARAL_MNCPCReport_.pdf> (last visited March 4, 2015. (last visited March 4, 2015.' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=NARAL+Pro-Choice+Minnesota+Foundation,+“State-Funded+Deception:+Minnesota's+Crisis+Pregnancy+Centers,”+2012,+at+20,+available+at++(last+visited+March+4,+2015.>Google Scholar
American Public Health Association, Regulating Disclosure of Services and Sponsorship of Crisis Pregnancy Centers, available at <http://www.apha.org/advocacy/policy/policysearch/default.htm?id=1433> (last visited February 4, 2015).+(last+visited+February+4,+2015).>Google Scholar
Jones, R. Kooistra, K., “Abortion Incidence and Access to Services in the United States, 2008,” Perspectives on Sexual Reproductive Health 43, no1 (2011): 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Depres, E., “The Vanishing Abortion Clinic,” available at <http://www.businessweek.com/articles/2013-11-27/abortion-clinics-face-shutdown-spiral-as-republicans-push-restrictions> (last visited February 4, 2015).+(last+visited+February+4,+2015).>Google Scholar
National Pro-Life Alliance, “Ultrasound Informed Consent Act,” available at <http://www.prolifealliance.com/womens_right_to_know.html> (last visited February 4, 2015).+(last+visited+February+4,+2015).>Google Scholar
The Guttmacher Institute, >“State Policies in Brief,” available at <http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_MWPA.pdf> (last visited February 4, 2015).“State+Policies+in+Brief,”+available+at++(last+visited+February+4,+2015).>Google Scholar
Planned Parenthood Minnesota, N. Dakota, S. Dakota v.Rounds, 686 F.3d 889 (8th Cir. 2012).Google Scholar
The Guttmacher Institute, “State Policies in Brief,” available at <http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_MWPA.pdf> (last visited February 4, 2015).+(last+visited+February+4,+2015).>Google Scholar
Schenker, Y. Meisel, A., “Informed Consent in Clinical Care: Practical Considerations in the Effort to Achieve Ethical Goals,” JAMA 305, no11 (2011): 1130–1131.Google Scholar
American Medical Association, “Opinion 8.08 – Informed Consent,” available at <http://www.ama-assn.org//ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/opinion808.page> (last visited February 4, 2015).+(last+visited+February+4,+2015).>Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Schenker and Meisel, supra note 22.Google Scholar
U.S. House of Representatives, supra note 11.Google Scholar
American Public Health Association, “Regulating Disclosure of Services and Sponsorship of Crisis Pregnancy Centers,” available at <http://www.apha.org/advocacy/policy/policysearch/default.htm?id=1433> (last visited February 4, 2015).+(last+visited+February+4,+2015).>Google Scholar
Evergreen Ass'n, Inc. v. City of New York, 740 F.3d 233 (2014).Google Scholar
Keighley, J., “Can You Handle the Truth? Compelled Commercial Speech and the First Amendment,” Journal of Constitutional Law 15, no2 (2012): 539–617, at 588.Google Scholar
683 F.3d 539 n Rehearing en Banc Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, 4th Cir.(Md.), July 3, 2013.Google Scholar
O'Brien v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 768 F. Supp. 2d 804, 813 (D. Md. 2011) aff'd sub nom.Google Scholar
Greater Baltimore Ctr. for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 683 F.3d 539 (4th Cir. 2012) on reh'g en banc, 721 F.3d 264 (4th Cir. 2013) and aff'd in part, vacated in part, remanded sub nom.Google Scholar
Greater Baltimore Ctr. for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 721 F.3d 264 (4th Cir. 2013).Google Scholar
Rehearing en Banc Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, 4th Cir. (Md.), July 3, 2013.Google Scholar
Rehearing en Banc Greater Baltimore Center for Pregnancy Concerns, Inc. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, 4th Cir. (Md.), July 3, 2013.Google Scholar
Ordinance 10–9, City Council of the City of Austin (2010).Google Scholar
Ordinance 10–10, City Council of the City of Austin (2012).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Montgomery County Resolution Number 16–252 (2010).Google Scholar
Tepeyac v. Montgomery Cnty., 779 F. Supp. 2d 456, 468 (D. Md. 2011)Google Scholar
aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 683 F.3d 591 (4th Cir. 2012) on reh'g en banc sub nom.Google Scholar
Centro Tepeyac v. Montgomery Cnty., 722 F.3d 184 (4th Cir. 2013) and aff'd sub nom.Google Scholar
Centro Tepeyac v. Montgomery Cnty., 722 F.3d 184 (4th Cir. 2013).Google Scholar
Centro Tepeyac v. Montgomery Cnty., 722 F.3d 184, 189 (4th Cir. 2013).Google Scholar
Local Law 17 § 2 (2011).Google Scholar
Evergreen Ass'n, Inc. v. City of New York, 740 F.3d 233 (2d Cir. 2014).Google Scholar
Evergreen Ass'n, Inc. v. City of New York, 801 F. Supp. 2d 197, 205 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)Google Scholar
aff'd in part, vacated in part, 740 F.3d 233 (2d Cir. 2014).Google Scholar
Evergreen Ass'n, Inc. v. City of New York, 740 F.3d 233 (2014).Google Scholar
American Center for Law and Justice, “Brief Filed in New York City Pro-Life Crisis Pregnancy Center Case,”> available at <http://aclj.org/pro-life/brief-filed-in-new-york-city-pro-life-crisis-pregnancy-center-case> (last visited February 4, 2015).+available+at++(last+visited+February+4,+2015).>Google Scholar
Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833, 872 (1992).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Carhart v. Gonzales, 550 U.S. (2007).Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Brief of Sandra Cano, the Former “Mary Doe” of Doe v. Bolton, et al. Carhart v. Gonzales, 550 U.S. (2007).Google Scholar
Borgmann, C., “Abortion, the Undue Burden Standard, and the Evisceration of Women's Privacy,” William & Mary Journal of Women and Law 16, no2 (2009): 291–325, at 291;.Google Scholar
Center for Reproductive Rights, “Targeted Regulation of Abortion Providers,” available at <http://reproductiverights.org/en/project/targeted-regulation-of-abortion-providers-trap> (last visited February 4, 2015).+(last+visited+February+4,+2015).>Google Scholar
Ahmed, A., “Medical Evidence and Expertise in Abortion Jurisprudence,” American Journal of Law and Medicine (forthcoming 2015).Google Scholar
Planned Parenthood Minnesota, North Dakota, South Dakota v. Rounds, United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit. July 24, 2012686 F.3d 889.Google Scholar
Texas Medical Providers Performing Abortion Services v. Lakey, 667 F.3d 570, 578 (2012).Google Scholar
Siegal, R., “Dignity and the Politics of Protection: Abortion Restrictions Under Casey/Carhart,” Yale Law Journal 117 (2008): 1695–1800 at 1698.Google Scholar
N.C. Gen. Stat. §§ 90–21.80 through 90–21.92 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gretchen v. Huff, No. 1:11CV804, (D.N.C. filed Dec. 19, 2011).Google Scholar
Texas Medical Providers Performing Abortion Services v. Lakey, 667 F.3d 570, 578 (2012).Google Scholar
Texas Medical Providers Performing Abortion Services v. Lakey, 667 F.3d 570, 578 (2012);Google Scholar
See, also, Post, R., “Informed Consent to Abortion: A First Amendment Analysis of Compelled Physician Speech,” University of Illinois Law Review 2007, no3 (2007): 939–990, at 944.Google Scholar
National Abortion Action Rights Action League, “‘Just Because You're Pregnant’: Lies, Half Truths, Manipulation at Crisis Pregnancy Centers in Massachusetts,” (2011) available at <http://www.prochoicemass.org/assets/bin/NARAL%20PCM%20CPC%20Report%202011.pdf> (last visited March 4, 2015) (last visited March 4, 2015)' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=National+Abortion+Action+Rights+Action+League,+“‘Just+Because+You're+Pregnant’:+Lies,+Half+Truths,+Manipulation+at+Crisis+Pregnancy+Centers+in+Massachusetts,”+(2011)+available+at++(last+visited+March+4,+2015)>Google Scholar
National Abortion Federation, Crisis Pregnancy Centers, available at <http://www.prochoice.org/about_abortion/facts/cpc.html> (last visited February 4, 2015)+(last+visited+February+4,+2015)>Google Scholar
NARAL Pro-Choice Minnesota Foundation, State-Funded Deception: Minnesota's Crisis Pregnancy Centers, 2012, available at <http://www.prochoiceminnesota.org/assets/bin/2012NARAL_MNCPCReport_.pdf> (last visited March 4, 2015). (last visited March 4, 2015).' href=https://scholar.google.com/scholar?q=NARAL+Pro-Choice+Minnesota+Foundation,+State-Funded+Deception:+Minnesota's+Crisis+Pregnancy+Centers,+2012,+available+at++(last+visited+March+4,+2015).>Google Scholar
A search in Westlaw for law reviews reveals a much larger swath of articles with approximately 119 at mentioning CPCs.Google Scholar
Rosen, J. D., “The Public Health Risks of Crisis Pregnancy Centers,” Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 44, no3 (2012): 201–205, at 202.Google Scholar
Joyce, T. Henshaw, S. Dennis, A.et al, “The Impact of State Mandatory Counseling and Waiting Period Laws on Abortion: A Literature Review,” The Guttmacher Institute, 2009, available at <http://www.guttmacher.org/pubs/MandatoryCounseling.pdf> (last visited March 4, 2015).+(last+visited+March+4,+2015).>Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar
Id.Google Scholar