No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Human capital of the US deaf population from 1850 to 1910
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 April 2025
Abstract
We conduct the first modern econometric analysis of the historical deaf population in the United States by incorporating deafness into a model of human capital. We find that the deaf population invested less in observable educational and physical human capital. Lower literacy, employment, and occupational scores also suggest that unobserved human capital investments were not substantial enough to improve productivity to the level of the hearing population. States that subsidized schools for the deaf provided deaf people with improved social capital and access to intangible goods that they pursued at the cost of higher economic achievement. Finally, we argue that substantial lifecycle differences between the hearing and deaf populations have implications for unbiased school attendance and employment rate estimation.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Social Science History Association
References
Abramitzky, Ran, Boustan, Leah Platt, and Eriksson, Katherine (2014) “A nation of immigrants: Assimilation and economic outcomes in the age of mass migration.” Journal of Political Economy 122 (3): 467–506. https://doi.org/10.1086/675805.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baynton, Douglas C. (1996) Forbidden Signs: American Culture and the Campaign against Sign Language. The University of Chicago Press. https://hdl.handle.net/2027/heb02822.0001.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Sascha O., and Woessmann, Ludger (2008) “Luther and the girls: Religious denomination and the female education gap in nineteenth-century Prussia.” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 110 (4): 777–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9442.2008.00561.x
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, Sascha O., and Woessmann, Ludger (2009) “Was Weber wrong? A human capital theory of protestant economic history.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (2): 531–96. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.531
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, Alexander (1906) “1900 Census Special Reports: The Blind and the Deaf.” US Census. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/1906/dec/blind-deaf.html.Google Scholar
Bergeron, François, Berland, Aurore, Demers, Dominique, and Gobeil, Suzie (2020) “Contemporary speech and oral language care for deaf and hard-of-hearing children using hearing devices.” Journal of Clinical Medicine 9 (2): 378. https://doi-org.mutex.gmu.edu/10.3390/jcm9020378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Best, Harry (1914) The Deaf – Their Position in Society and the Provision for Their Education in the United States. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company Publishers. https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/23320/pg23320-images.html.Google Scholar
Billings, John (1894) Report on the Insane, Feeble-Minded, Deaf and Dumb, and Blind in the United States at the Eleventh Census: 1890. Department of the Interior Census Office.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Robert (1999) Illusions of Equality. 1st Edition. Washington, D.C.: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Bureau of Education (1891) Report of the Commissioner of Education for the Year 1888-89 Volume I. Washington: Government Printing Office. https://ttu-ir.tdl.org/handle/2346/63958.Google Scholar
Callaway, Brantly, and Santa Anna, Pedro H. C. (2021) “Difference-in-Differences with Multiple Time Periods.” Journal of Econometrics, Themed Issue: Treatment Effect 1, 225 (2): 200–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.12.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Veirman, Sofie. 2015. “Deaf and Disabled? (Un)Employment of Deaf People in Belgium: A Comparison of Eighteenth-Century and Nineteenth-Century Cohorts.” Disability & Society 30 (3): 460–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2015.1014087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, R. A. R. (2012) Words Made Flesh: Nineteenth-Century Deaf Education and the Growth of Deaf Culture. The History of Disability. New York: UnivPress.Google Scholar
Estimates of Worker Trait Requirements for 4,000 Jobs as Defined in the Dictionary of Occupational Titles: An Alphabetical Index (1956) Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Employment Security. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Estimates_of_Worker_Trait_Requirements_f/JrERkAEACAAJ?hl=en.Google Scholar
Fay, Edward Allen (1893) Histories of American Schools for the Deaf, 1817-1893. Vol. 1. Washington, D.C.: The Volta Bureau.Google Scholar
Fay, Edward Allen (1900) “The Secondary and Higher Education of the Deaf in America.” 43. Annual Report. Washington D.C.: the Columbia Institution for the Deaf and Dumb. Gallaudet University Archive. http://archive.org/details/ANNUALREPORT-Gallaudet-1864.Google Scholar
Fay, Edward Allen, ed. (1905) “Miscellaneous.” American Annals of the Deaf 50 (2): 260–64.Google Scholar
Fay, Edward Allen, ed. (1915) “Miscellaneous.” American Annals of the Deaf 60 (4): 348–57.Google Scholar
Feigenbaum, James Joseph (2015) “Essays on Intergenerational Mobility and Inequality in Economic History.” Ph.D., United States – Massachusetts: Harvard University. https://www.proquest.com/docview/1931470680/abstract/C63DABC79FB844F9PQ/1.Google Scholar
Franz, Sarah (2016) “Deaf studies: Disability studies perspective and controversy,” in The SAGE Deaf Studies Encyclopedia. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc., 278–79. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483346489.Google Scholar
Friedner, Michele (2010) “Focus on which (deaf) space?,” in Burch, Susan and Kafer, Alison (ed.) Vol. Deaf and Disability Studies: Interdisciplinary Perspectives. Washington, D. C.: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
Gallaudet, Edward (1864) Annual Report, vol. 7. Washington D.C.: Columbia Institution for the Deaf and Dumb. Gallaudet University Archive. http://archive.org/details/ANNUALREPORT-Gallaudet-1900.Google Scholar
Gallaudet, Edward (1865) Annual Report, vol. 8. Washington D.C.: Columbia Institution for the Deaf and Dumb. Gallaudet University Archive. http://archive.org/details/ANNUALREPORT-Gallaudet-1865.Google Scholar
Gallaudet, Edward (1900) Annual Report, vol. 43. Washington D.C.: Columbia Institution for the Deaf and Dumb. Gallaudet University Archive. http://archive.org/details/ANNUALREPORT-Gallaudet-1900.Google Scholar
Gannon, Jack R. (2012) Deaf Heritage: A Narrative History of Deaf America. Gallaudet University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2rh28df.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gray, Rowena (2013) “Taking technology to task: The skill content of technological change in early twentieth century United States.” Explorations in Economic History 50 (3): 351–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2013.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groce, Nora (1985) Everyone Here Spoke Sign Language: Hereditary Deafness on Martha’s Vineyard. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, Robert M., and Warren, John Robert (1997) “Socioeconomic Indexes for Occupations: A Review, Update, and Critique.” Sociological Methodology 27: 177–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9531.271028
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Joseph A., and Brown, Reginald L., eds. (1918) Deaf-Mutes in the United States: Analysis of the Census of 1910 with Summary of State Laws Relative to the Deaf as of January 1, 1918. Washington: GPO.Google Scholar
“History & Cogswell Heritage House American School for the Deaf.” (n.d.) https://www.asd-1817.org/about/history--cogswell-heritage-house (accessed July 9, 2021).Google Scholar
Inwood, Kris, Minns, Chris, and Summerfield, Fraser (2019) “Occupational Income Scores and Immigrant Assimilation. Evidence from the Canadian Census.” Explorations in Economic History 72 (April): 114–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2019.02.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, John W. 1918. “One hundred years of history in the education of the deaf in America and its present status.” American Annals of the Deaf 63 (1): 1–47. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44462669
Google Scholar
King, Miriam L., and Magnuson, Diana L. (1995) “Perspectives on Historical U.S. Census Undercounts.” Social Science History 19 (4): 455–66. https://doi.org/10.2307/1171475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kushalnagar, Poorna, Claire Ryan, Raylene Paludneviciene, Spellun, Arielle, and Gulati, Sanjay 2020. “Adverse childhood communication experiences associated with an increased risk of chronic diseases in adults who are deaf.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 59 (4): 548–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2020.04.016.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lahlou, Ghizlene, Daoudi, Hannah, Ferrary, Evelyne, Jia, Huan, De Bergh, Marion, Nguyen, Yann, Sterkers, Olivier, and Mosnier, Isabelle (2022) “Candidacy for cochlear implantation in prelingual profoundly deaf adult patients.” Journal of Clinical Medicine 11 (7): 1874. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11071874.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Landes, William M., and Solmon, Lewis C. (1972) “Compulsory Schooling Legislation: An Economic Analysis of Law and Social Change in the Nineteenth Century.” The Journal of Economic History 32 (1): 54–91. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700075392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennon, Conor (2016) “Slave Escape, Prices, and the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850.” The Journal of Law and Economics 59 (3): 669–95. https://doi.org/10.1086/689619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebler, Carolyn A., Wise, Jacob, and Todd, Richard M. (2018) “Occupational dissimilarity between the American Indian/Alaska native and the white workforce in the contemporary United States.” American Indian Culture and Research Journal 42 (1): 41–70. https://doi.org/10.17953/aicrj.42.1.liebler.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lockheed, Marlaine E., Jamison, T., and Lau, Lawrence J. (1980) “Farmer education and farm efficiency: A survey.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 29 (1): 37–76. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1153584
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Ross E., Young, Travas A., Bachelda, Bellamie, and Karchmer, Michael A. (2006) “How many people use ASL in the United States?: Why estimates need updating.” Sign Language Studies 6 (3): 306–35. https://doi.org/10.1353/sls.2006.0019
CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Ninth Annual Report of Civil Service Commission.” (1893) Civil Service Commission. https://congressional-proquest-com.mutex.gmu.edu/congressional/result/congressional/congdocumentview?accountid=14541&groupid=96011&parmId=17A01FD9805#100.Google Scholar
Papagno, Costanza, Cecchetto, Carlo, Pisoni, Alberto, and Bolognini, Nadia (2016) “Deaf, Blind or Deaf-Blind: Is Touch Enhanced?” Experimental Brain Research 234 (2): 627–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4488-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pimperton, Hannah, Ralph-Lewis, Amelia, and MacSweeney, Mairéad (2017) “Speechreading in Deaf Adults with Cochlear Implants: Evidence for Perceptual Compensation.” Frontiers in Psychology 8: 1–10. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pitt, Mark M., Rosenzweig, Mark R., and Hassan, Mohammad Nazmul (2012) “Human capital investment and the gender division of labor in a brawn-based economy.” The American Economic Review 102 (7): 3531–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Warren, Pach, Alex, and Axling, Phil L. (1904) “The industrial status of the deaf.” American Annals of the Deaf 49 (5): 460–64.Google Scholar
Rodríguez, Jhon James Mora, and Muro, Juan (2015) “On the size of sheepskin effects: A meta-analysis.” Economics 9 (37): 1–18A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romer, Paul (1990) “Human capital and growth: Theory and evidence.” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 32 (March): 251–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2231(90)90028-J.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggles, Steven, Flood, Sarah, Foster, Sophia, Goeken, Ronald, Pacas, Jose, Schouweiler, Megan, and Sobek, Matthew (2021) IPUMS. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS. https://doi.org/10.18128/D010.V11.0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggles, Steven, Flood, Sarah, Sobek, Mathew, Backman, Daniel, Chen, Annie, Cooper, Grace, Richards, Stephanie, Rogers, Renae, and Schouweiler, Megan (2024) IPUMS. Minneapolis, MN: 2022 American Community Survey. https://doi.org/10.18128/D010.V11.0.Google Scholar
Saavedra, Martin, and Twinam, Tate (2020) “A machine learning approach to improving occupational income scores.” Explorations in Economic History 75 (January): 101304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eeh.2019.101304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
“Tabular Statement of American Schools for the Deaf, 1889.” (1890) American Annals of the Deaf 35 (1): 56–65.Google Scholar
The Silent Worker (1888) “Beer and Tobacco.” The Silent Worker, December 20, 1888, Vol. 2 No. 9 edition.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau (1853) 1850 Census: The Seventh Census of the United States. Washington, D.C.: US Census Bureau. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/1853/dec/1850a.html.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau (1864) 1860 Census: Population of the United States. Washington, D.C. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/1864/dec/1860a.html.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau. 1872. 1870 Census: Population of the United States. Washington, D.C. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/1872/dec/1870b.html.Google Scholar
U.S. Census Bureau (1882) Compendium of the Tenth Census. Washington, D.C. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/1872/dec/1870b.html.Google Scholar
Van Cleve, John V. (1989) A Place of Their Own: Creating the Deaf Community in America. Washington, D.C: Gallaudet University Press.Google Scholar
van de Werfhorst, H. G., and Andersen, R. (2005) “Social Background, Credential Inflation and Educational Strategies.” Acta Sociologica 48 (4): 321–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699305059945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartsch and Henderson supplementary material 1
Bartsch and Henderson supplementary material
File
21 KB
Bartsch and Henderson supplementary material 2
Bartsch and Henderson supplementary material
File
16.4 KB