No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Characteristics and progress of patients who receive inpatient rehabilitation services
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 June 2014
Abstract
Objectives:
To describe the characteristics and progress of the first 50 patients with severe and enduring mental illness who accessed inpatient rehabilitation services in Dublin North East Mental Health Service between 2001 and 2006.
Method:
Retrospective collection of data on the first 50 inpatients from case notes and staff interviews. Data included demographics, psychiatric history, results of rehabilitation interventions and assessment tools. The results were compiled and analysed using descriptive statistics.
Results:
Fifty patients were identified. The majority were male (68%) with a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia (60%). The levels of co-morbid alcohol and drug misuse were 40% and 30% respectively. Histories of verbal/physical aggression were found in 92% and impulsive behaviour in 70%. The majority of patients had a past history of being detained under the Mental Treatment Act (1945). High levels of co-morbid physical health problems were identified. New long-stay (NLS) patients showed a trend towards requiring the shortest admissions prior to being ready for discharge to lower levels of support.
Conclusion:
One third of patients moved on to reside at lower support levels and accessed vocational training programmes following active inpatient rehabilitation interventions. However, there remained a cohort of patients who required prolonged inpatient admissions due to their high levels of disability. This study further highlights the need to ensure that a range of rehabilitation services from inpatient to supported community placement are provided to meet the needs of patients with severe and enduring mental illness with complex needs.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Original Papers
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009
References
2.Department of Health (1984). Planning for the Future “Report of a Study Group on the Development of the Psychiatric Service”.Google Scholar
4.Planning for the Future, “Report of a Study Group on the Development of the Psychiatric Service”. Dublin; Department of Health, 1984.Google Scholar
5.A Vision for Change. Report of the Expert Group on Mental Health Policy. Dublin, 2006.Google Scholar
6.Daly, A, Walsh, D. Irish Psychiatric Units and Hospitals Census 2006. Dublin: Health Research Board, 2006.Google Scholar
7.Daly, A, Walsh, D, Moran, R. Activities of Irish Psychatric Units and Hospitals 2006. Dublin: Health Research Board, 2006.Google Scholar
8.Readmission to Irish Psychiatric Units and Hospitals 2001-2005. Mental Health Research Unit. Dublin: Health Research BoardGoogle Scholar
9.Szmukler, G, Holloway, F. In: Thornicroft, G, Szmukler, G, Eds. Textbook of Commmunity Psychiatry. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001: 321–337.Google Scholar
10.Mental Health Commission Annual Report 2004, including the report of the Inspector of Mental Health Services.Google Scholar
11.Lelliot, P, Wing, J, Clifford, P. A national audit of new long-stay psychiatric patients. Br J Psychiatry 1994: 165: 160–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Holloway, F, Wykes, T, Petch, E, Lewis-Cole, K. The new long stay in an inner city service: A tale of two cohorts. Int J Soc Psychiatry 1999; 45 (2): 93–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Mental Health Commission. Annual Report 2006 Including the Report of the Inspector of Mental Health Services. Mental Health Commission: Dublin, 2006.Google Scholar
14.Cavan Monaghan Mental Health Service: A Model for a New Community Health Service – The Cavan-Monaghan Project. North-Eastern Health Board, 2001.Google Scholar
16. Report of the Inspector of Mental Hospitals for the year ending 31 st December 2002.Google Scholar
17.Daly, A, Walsh D, . Irish Psychiatric Hospitals and Units Census 2001. Dublin: Health Research Board, 2002.Google Scholar
18. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, 10th RevisionGoogle Scholar
21. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences: Version 13.0Google Scholar
23.Kavanagh, A, Lavelle, E. The impact of a rehabilitation and recovery service on patient groups residing in high support community residences. Ir JPsych Med 2008; 25 (1): 5–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24.Dayson, D, Gooch, C, Thornicroft, G. The TAPS project. 16: Difficult to place, long term psychiatric patients: risk factors for failure to resettle long-stay patients in community facilities. BMJ 1992 Oct 24; 305(6860): 993–995.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
25.Mental Health Commission. Annual Report 2004 Including the Report of the Inspector of Mental Health Services. Mental Health Commission: Dublin, 2005b.Google Scholar
26.O'Brien, S, Devitt, E, Ahmed, M, McDonald, C. High Prevalence of risk factors for physical illness in a long-stay psychiatric unit. Ir J Psych Med 2007; 24: 55–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar