Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-j4x9h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T14:09:18.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Approach to red blood cell transfusions in post-operative congenital heart disease surgery patients: when to stop?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 October 2023

Murat Tanyildiz*
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
Asiye Gungormus
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
Selin Ece Erden
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
Omer Ozden
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Intensive Care, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
Mehmet Bicer
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
Atif Akcevin
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
Ender Odemis
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Cardiology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
*
Corresponding author: M. Tanyildiz; Email: murattanyildiz@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

The best transfusion approach for CHD surgery is controversial. Studies suggest two strategies: liberal (haemoglobin ≤ 9.5 g/dL) and restrictive (waiting for transfusion until haemoglobin ≤ 7.0 g/dL if the patient is stable). Here we compare liberal and restrictive transfusion in post-operative CHD patients in a cardiac intensive care unit.

Methods:

Retrospective analysis was conducted on CHD patients who received liberal transfusion (2019–2021, n=53) and restrictive transfusion (2021–2022, n=43).

Results:

The two groups were similar in terms of age, gender, Paediatric Risk of Mortality-3 score, Paediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 score, Risk Adjustment for Congenital Heart Surgery-1 score, cardiopulmonary bypass time, vasoactive inotropic score, total fluid balance, mechanical ventilation duration, length of cardiac intensive care unit stay, and mortality. The liberal transfusion group had a higher pre-operative haemoglobin level than the restrictive group (p < 0.05), with no differences in pre-operative anaemia. Regarding the minimum and maximum post-operative haemoglobin levels during a cardiac intensive care unit stay, the liberal group had higher haemoglobin levels in both cases (p<0.01 and p=0.019, respectively). The number of red blood cell transfusions received by the liberal group was higher than that of the restrictive group (p < 0.001). There were no differences between the two groups regarding lactate levels at the time of and after red blood cell transfusion. The incidence of bleeding, re-operation, acute kidney injury, dialysis, sepsis, and systemic inflammatory response syndrome was similar.

Conclusions:

Restrictive transfusion may be preferable over liberal transfusion. Achieving similar outcomes with restrictive transfusions may provide promising evidence for future studies.

Information

Type
Original Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Table 1. Characteristic features of the patients in the study group.

Figure 1

Table 2. Pre-operative and post-operative haemoglobin levels and laboratory parameters of the patients in the study group.

Figure 2

Table 3. Number of transfusion of blood products.

Figure 3

Table 4. Haemoglobin and lactate levels at the time of and after RBC transfusion of the patients in the study group.

Figure 4

Table 5. Clinical features of the patients in the study group.