Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-fx4k7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-14T12:57:57.273Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inventory and recent changes of small glaciers on the northeast margin of the Southern Patagonia Icefield, Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2017

M.H. Masiokas*
Affiliation:
Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales (IANIGLA), CCT–CONICET Mendoza, Mendoza, Argentina
S. Delgado
Affiliation:
Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales (IANIGLA), CCT–CONICET Mendoza, Mendoza, Argentina
P. Pitte
Affiliation:
Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales (IANIGLA), CCT–CONICET Mendoza, Mendoza, Argentina
E. Berthier
Affiliation:
LEGOS, CNRS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
R. Villalba
Affiliation:
Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales (IANIGLA), CCT–CONICET Mendoza, Mendoza, Argentina
P. Skvarca
Affiliation:
Glaciarium, Museo del Hielo Patagónico, El Calafate, Santa Cruz, Argentina
L. Ruiz
Affiliation:
Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales (IANIGLA), CCT–CONICET Mendoza, Mendoza, Argentina
J. Ukita
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Science, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
T. Yamanokuchi
Affiliation:
Remote Sensing Technology Center of Japan (RESTEC), Tokyo, Japan
T. Tadono
Affiliation:
Earth Observation Research Center (EORC), Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA), Ibaraki, Japan
S. Marinsek
Affiliation:
Instituto Antártico Argentino, Buenos Aires, Argentina
F. Couvreux
Affiliation:
Météo-France, CNRM/GMME/MOANA, Toulouse, France
L. Zalazar
Affiliation:
Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales (IANIGLA), CCT–CONICET Mendoza, Mendoza, Argentina
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Most glaciological studies in Argentina have focused on the large outlet glaciers of the Southern Patagonia Icefield (SPI); the numerous smaller neighboring glaciers have received significantly less attention. We present an inventory of 248 medium- to small-size glaciers (0.01–25 km2) adjacent to the northeast margin of the SPI, describe their change over the period 1979–2005 and assess local and regional climatic variations in an attempt to explain the observed glacier changes. Based on an ASTER mosaic from 20 February 2005 and the ASTER Global Digital Elevation Model, we identified a total glacier area of 187.2 ± 7.4 km2 between 600 and 2870 m a.s.l. Glaciers are largely debris-free and are concentrated in the western, more humid sector adjacent to the SPI. Using a 20 March 1979 US military intelligence Hexagon KH-9 satellite photograph, we measured a total areal reduction of ∼33.7 km2 (15.2%) between 1979 and 2005. Ablation season temperatures from the study area have followed a regional warming trend that could partly explain the observed glacier shrinkage. Annual precipitation estimates show a gradual decrease between 1979 and 2002 that may also have contributed to the ice mass loss.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2015
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Mosaic (false-color composite of bands 4-3-2) of two Landsat Thematic Mapper scenes acquired on 19 February 2005 showing the location of the study area (green) on the northeastern margin of the Southern Patagonia Icefield (SPI). The limits of the upper Santa Cruz river basin (orange) and the lakes San Martín/O’Higgins (LSM), Viedma (LVI) and Argentino (LAR) are also shown. Collectively, this portion of the Andes contains the largest glaciated area in Argentina. (b) Closer view of the study area as observed on a mosaic (false-color composite of bands 3-2-1) of two Terra ASTER scenes acquired on 20 February 2005. The glaciers Chico and Viedma are shown to illustrate the differences between these large SPI outlet glaciers and the significantly smaller ice masses analyzed in this study. The town El Chaltén and the location of the Torre temperature data logger (TOR) and the Estancia Los Huemules precipitation station (HUE) are also indicated.

Figure 1

Table 1. Satellite images used in the development of the glacier inventory of the VT basins

Figure 2

Table 2. Surface temperature and precipitation records used in this study. Data sources: GHCN: Global Historical Climatology Network; DMC: Dirección Meteorológica de Chile; IANIGLA: Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales; DGA: Dirección General de Aguas, Chile; SSRH: Subsecretaría de Recursos Hídricos, Argentina; SMN: Servicio Meteorológico Nacional, Argentina

Figure 3

Fig. 2. (a) Map showing the glacier inventory of the VT hydrological basins based on an ASTER mosaic from 20 February 2005 (map projection UTM 18S, datum WGS84). The town of El Chaltén is located at ∼49°19′44″ S, 72°55′48″ W (450 m a.s.l.). (b) Distribution of glaciated area vs longitude in the study area. Note the concentration of glaciers towards the western, most humid sectors adjacent to the SPI.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. (a) Percentage of total inventoried area of the different types of geoforms identified in this study. (b) Number of units and surface area covered by these units, grouped by size. Note that the smallest units are the most numerous but cover a relatively small surface area, whereas the largest glaciers are only a few but occupy the bulk of the area. (c) Hypsometry of the different surface types inventoried in the study area. Note the predominance of clean ice, mostly concentrated between 1300 and 2000 m, and the existence of debris-covered ice only at low elevations. (d) Orientation of the units inventoried in the VT basins.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. (a) Oblique view of a portion of study area showing the glacier margins in 1979 and 2005 (blue and red, respectively). The 3-D effect was created by overlaying the KH-9 image on the GDEM. Some of the best-studied glaciers are indicated: Torre (GTo), Túnel (GTu), de los Tres (G3) and Piedras Blancas (GPB). (b) Changes of glaciated area vs elevation between 1979 and 2005 (blue and red bars, respectively).

Figure 6

Fig. 5. (a) Changes in area of the glaciers inventoried in the VT basins between 1979 and 2005. The changes are indicated as a percent reduction using the 1979 areas as a reference. (b) Same as (a), but for the length of 97 mountain and valley glaciers identified in the study area. Note that the smaller units show a larger variability in both areal and frontal changes. (c) Same as (a), but showing the relative areal changes of glaciers based on the longitude. The complete disintegration (100% reduction) of ice masses only occurred in the eastern half of the study area.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. (a) Field correlations between gridded ERA-Interim mean monthly surface temperature data and the records collected at the Glaciar Torre data logger (TOR) between 2002 and 2012. Only statistically significant correlations (p < 0.05) are shown. Prior to computing the correlations, the series were converted to temperature anomalies by subtracting their seasonal cycle. The extent covered by Figure 1a is shown by a rectangle, and the location of other temperature stations in southern Patagonia is also indicated (see Table 2). (b) Scatter plot showing the strong positive correlation between mean monthly surface temperature anomalies at the ERA-Interim gridcell centered at 49° S, 73° W and those observed at TOR. (c) Mean monthly temperature variations recorded and predicted at TOR (light and dark blue, respectively). TOR monthly temperature anomalies over the 1979–2014 period were first estimated through simple linear regression using the 49° S, 73° W ERA-Interim gridcell values as predictors, and then converted back to mean monthly values using the seasonal cycle observed at TOR between 2002 and 2012.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. (a) October–March mean temperature variations as recorded and predicted for TOR (light and dark blue, respectively). A regionally averaged October–March mean temperature series derived from the seven longest station records available in southern Patagonia (light green; Table 2) is also included for comparison. Prior to computing this regional composite series, monthly records from these stations were averaged into October–March seasonal values and expressed as anomalies from the mean of the 1970–2000 period common to all series. The series starts in 1931 when at least three station records are available to compute the regional series. Missing values were excluded from the computation of this regional average. Five-year moving averages plotted at the latest year of each moving window are shown to emphasize the low-frequency patterns in this record. (b) April–March precipitation totals observed and predicted for HUE (brown and orange, respectively; see Fig. 9). The 5 year moving averages of the predicted HUE series are shown in red. The April–March precipitation totals for Estancia Entre Ríos (EER, black) are also shown for comparison. This record starts in 1980, but prior to 1992 it contains a large percentage of missing data that precluded the calculation of annual precipitation totals.

Figure 9

Fig. 8. Field correlations between gridded ERA-Interim monthly surface precipitation data and selected station records (see Table 2). Only statistically significant correlations (p < 0.05) are shown. Prior to computing the correlations, all gridded and station series were converted to precipitation anomalies by subtracting their seasonal cycles. Missing values were not considered in the correlations. In each panel the extent covered by Figure 1a is shown by a rectangle together with the location of the station and its period of overlap with the reanalysis data.

Figure 10

Fig. 9. (a) Field correlations between monthly precipitation anomalies between gridded ERA-Interim data and the precipitation recorded at Estancia Los Huemules (HUE) between 2006 and 2014. Only statistically significant correlations (p < 0.05) are shown. (b) Scatter plot showing the positive correlation between the precipitation anomalies of the HUE series and those of the ERA-Interim gridcell centered at 49° S, 73° W. (c) Monthly total variations recorded and predicted for HUE (dark red and orange, respectively). HUE monthly precipitation anomalies back to 1979 were first estimated through simple linear regression using the 49° S, 73° W ERA-Interim gridcell values as predictors, and then converted back to monthly total values by adding the seasonal cycle observed at HUE.