Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-v2srd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-18T20:46:30.193Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Above- and below-ground competition in high and low irradiance: tree seedling responses to a competing liana Byttneria grandifolia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2008

Ya-Jun Chen ,
Frans Bongers ,
Kun-Fang Cao  and
Zhi-quan Cai
Ya-Jun Chen
Affiliation:
Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla 666303, PR China
Frans Bongers
Affiliation:
Forest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Centre for Ecosystem Studies, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
Kun-Fang Cao
Affiliation:
Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla 666303, PR China
Zhi-quan Cai*
Affiliation:
Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla 666303, PR China Forest Ecology and Forest Management Group, Centre for Ecosystem Studies, Wageningen University, P.O. Box 47, 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
*
1Corresponding author. Present postal address: Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Mengla 666303, China. Email: czq@xtbg.org.cn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

In tropical forests, trees compete not only with other trees, but also with lianas, which may limit tree growth and regeneration. Liana effects may depend on the availability of above- and below-ground resources and differ between tree species. We conducted a shade house experiment to test the effect of light (4% and 35% full sun, using neutral-density screen) on the competitive interactions between seedlings of one liana (Byttneria grandifolia) and three tree species (two shade-tolerant trees, Litsea dilleniifolia and Pometia tomentosa, and one light-demanding tree, Bauhinia variegata) and to evaluate the contribution of both above- and below-ground competition. Trees were grown in four competition treatments with the liana: no competition, root competition, shoot competition and root and shoot competition. Light strongly affected leaf photosynthetic capacity (light-saturated photosynthetic rate, Pn), growth and most morphological traits of the tree species. Liana-induced competition resulted in reduced Pn, total leaf areas and relative growth rates (RGR) of the three tree species. The relative importance of above- and below-ground competition differed between the two light levels. In low light, RGR of the three tree species was reduced more strongly by shoot competition (23.1–28.7% reduction) than by root competition (5.3–26.4%). In high light, in contrast, root competition rather than shoot competition greatly reduced RGR. Liana competition affected most morphological traits (except for specific leaf area and leaf area ratio of Litsea and Pometia), and differentially altered patterns of biomass allocation in the tree seedlings. These findings suggest that competition from liana seedlings can greatly suppress growth in tree seedlings of both light-demanding and shade-tolerant species and those effects differ with competition type (below- and above-ground) and with irradiance.

Keywords

competitionlianamorphological traitsphotosynthesisrelative growth rate

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Tropical Ecology , Volume 24 , Issue 5 , September 2008 , pp. 517 - 524
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

LITERATURE CITED

BARBERIS, I. M. & TANNER, E. V. J. 2005. Gaps and root trenching increase tree seedling growth in Panamanian semi-evergreen forest. Ecology 86:667–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BONGERS, F. & STERCK, F. J. 1998. Architecture and development of rainforest trees: responses to light variation. Pp. 125–162 in Newbery, D. M., Prins, H. H. T. & Brown, N. (eds.). Dynamics of tropical communities. British Ecological Society Symposium, Blackwell Science, Oxford.Google Scholar
BONGERS, F., PARREN, M. P. E. & TRAORE, D. 2005. Forest climbing plants of West Africa: diversity, ecology and management. CAB International, Wallingford. 273 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BURTON, P. J. & BAZZAZ, F. A. 1995. Ecophysiological responses of tree seedlings invading different patches of old-field vegetation. Journal of Ecology 83:99–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CAHILL, J. F. 2002. Interactions between root and shoot competition vary among species. Oikos 99:101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CAHILL, J. F. 2003. Lack of relationship between below-ground competition and allocation to roots in 10 grassland species. Journal of Ecology 91:532–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CAI, Z. Q., POORTER, L., CAO, K. F. & BONGERS, F. 2007a. Seedling growth strategies in Bauhinia species: comparing lianas and trees. Annals of Botany 100:831–838.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
CAI, Z. Q., CHEN, Y. J. & BONGERS, F. 2007b. Seasonal changes in photosynthesis and growth of Zizyphus attopensis seedlings in three contrasting microhabitats in a tropical seasonal rain forest. Tree Physiology 27:827–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CANHAM, C. D., DENSLOW, J. S., PLAN, W. J., RUNKLE, J. R., SPIES, T. A. & WHITE, P. S. 1990. Light regimes beneath closed canopies and tree-fall gaps in temperate and tropical forests. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 20:620–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CHEN, Y. J., CAO, K. F. & CAI, Z. Q. 2008. Above- and below-ground competition between seedlings of lianas and trees under two light irradiances. Journal of Plant Ecology 32:639–647.Google Scholar
CLARK, D. B. & CLARK, D. A. 1990. Distribution and effects on tree growth of lianas and woody hemiepiphytes in a Costa Rican tropical wet forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 6:321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COOMES, D. A. & GRUBB, P. J. 1998. Responses of juvenile trees to above- and belowground competition in nutrient-starved Amazonian rain forest. Ecology 79:768–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COOMES, D. A. & GRUBB, P. J. 2000. Impacts of root competition in forests and woodlands: a theoretical framework and review of experiments. Ecological Monographs 70:171–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DARWIN, C. 1867. On the movements and habits of climbing plants. Journal of the Linnean Society 9:1–118.Google Scholar
DENSLOW, J. S., ELLISON, A. M. & SANFORD, R. E. 1998. Treefall gap size effects on above- and below-ground process in a tropical wet forest. Journal of Ecology 86:597–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DILLENBURG, L. R., WHIGHAM, D. F., TERAMURA, A. H. & FORSETH, I. N. 1993. Effects of below- and aboveground competition from vines Lonicera japonica and Parthenocissus quinquefolia on the growth of the tree host Liquidambar styraciflua. Oecologia 93:48–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DILLENBURG, L. R., TERAMURA, A. H., FORSETH, I. N. & WHIGHAM, D. F. 1995. Photosynthetic and biomass allocation responses of Liquidambar styraciflua (Hamamelidaceae) to vine competition. American Journal of Botany 82:454–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GENTRY, A. H. 1991. The distribution and evolution of climbing plants. Pp. 3–49 in Putz, F. E. & Mooney, H. A. (eds.). The biology of vines. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
LEWIS, S. L. & TANNER, E. V. J. 2000. Effects of above- and belowground competition on growth and survival of rain forest tree seedlings. Ecology 81:2525–2538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MCPHEE, C. S. & AARSSEN, L. W. 2001. The separation of above- and below-ground competition in plants: a review and critique of methodology. Plant Ecology 152:119–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OSTERTAG, R. 1998. Belowground effects of canopy gaps in a tropical wet forest. Ecology 79:1294–1304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PÉREZ-SALICRUP, D. R. & BARKER, M. G. 2000. Effect of liana cutting on water potential and growth of Senna multijuga (Caesalpiniodeae) trees in a Bolivian tropical forest. Oecologia 124:369–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PHILLIPS, O. L., MARTINEZ, R. V., ARROYO, L., BAKER, T. R., KILEEN, T., LEWIS, S. L., MALHI, Y., MENDOZA, A. M., NEILL, D., VARGAS, P. N., ALEXIADES, M., CERON, C., FIORE, A. D., ERWIN, T., JARDIM, A., PALACIOS, W., SALDIAS, M. & VINCETI, B. 2002. Increasing dominance of large lianas in Amazonian forests. Nature 418:770–774.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
POORTER, L. 2001. Light-dependent changes in biomass allocation and their importance for growth of rain forest tree species. Functional Ecology 15:113–123.Google Scholar
POORTER, L. 2005. Resource capture and use by tropical forest tree seedlings and their consequences for competition. Pp. 35–64 in Burslem, D. F. R. P., Pinard, M. A. & Hartley, S. E. (eds.). Biotic interactions in the tropics: their role in the maintenance of species diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
POORTER, L., BONGERS, F., STERCK, F. J. & WOLL, H. 2003. Architecture of 53 rain forest tree species differing in adult stature and shade tolerance. Ecology 84:602–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
POORTER, L., BONGERS, L. & BONGERS, F. 2006. Architecture of 54 rain forest tree species: traits, trade-offs, and functional groups. Ecology 87:1289–1301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
PUTZ, F. E. 1983. Liana biomass and leaf area of a “Tierra Firme” forest in the Rio Negro Basin, Venezuela. Biotropica 15:185–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PUTZ, F. E. 1984. The natural history of lianas on Barro Colorado Island, Panama. Ecology 65:1713–1724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
REYNOLDS, H. & ANTONIO, C. 1996. The ecological significance of plasticity in root weight ratio in response to nitrogen: opinion. Plant and Soil 185:75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROYO, A. & CARSON, W. P. 2006. On the formation of dense understorey layers in forests worldwide: consequences and implications for forest dynamics, biodiversity, and succession. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 36:1345–1362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHNITZER, S. A. & BONGERS, F. 2002. The ecology of lianas and their role in forests. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 17:223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHNITZER, S. A., DALLING, J. W. & CARSON, W. P. 2000. The impact of lianas on tree regeneration in tropical forest canopy gaps: evidence for an alternative pathway of gap-phase regeneration. Journal of Ecology 88:655–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHNITZER, S. A., PARREN, M. P. E. & BONGERS, F. 2004. Recruitment of lianas into logging gaps and the effects of pre-harvesting climber cutting. Forest Ecology and Management 190;87–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCHNITZER, S. A., KUZEE, M. E. & BONGERS, F. 2005. Disentangling above- and below-ground competition between lianas and trees in a tropical forest. Journal of Ecology 93:1115–1125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SHIPLEY, B. & MEZIANE, D. 2002. The balanced growth hypothesis and the allometry of leaf and root biomass allocation. Functional Ecology 16:326–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STEVENS, G. C. 1987. Lianas as structural parasites. Ecology 68:77–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SVENNING, J. C., FABBRO, T. & WRIGHT, S. J. 2008. Seedling interactions in a tropical forest in Panama. Oecologia 155:143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TILMAN, D. 1982. Resource competition and community structure. Princeton University Press, Princeton. 296 pp.Google ScholarPubMed
TOLEDO-ACEVES, T. & SWAINE, M. 2007. Effect of three species of climber on the performance of Ceiba pentandra seedlings in gaps in a tropical forest in Ghana. Journal of Tropical Ecology 23:45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TOLEDO-ACEVES, T. & SWAINE, M. 2008a. Above- and below-ground competition between the liana Acacia kamerunensis and tree seedlings in contrasting light environments. Plant Ecology 196:233–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TOLEDO-ACEVES, T. & SWAINE, M. 2008b. Effect of lianas on tree regeneration in gaps and forest understorey in a tropical forest in Ghana. Journal of Vegetation Science 19:717–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TWOLAN-STRUTT, L. & KEDDY, P. A. 1996. Above- and belowground competition intensity in two contrasting wetland plant communities. Ecology 77:259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VLEUT, I. & PÉREZ-SALICRUP, D. R. 2005. Lianas and their supporting plants in the understorey at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Journal of Tropical Ecology 21:577–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WEINIG, C., & DELPH, L. F. 2001. Phenotypic plasticity early in life constrains developmental responses later. Evolution 55:930–936.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
WILSON, S. D. & TILMAN, D. 1993. Plant competition and resource avalability in response to disturbance and fertilization. Ecology 74:599–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ZOBEL, M. & ZOBEL, K. 2002. Study plant competition: from root competition to general aims. Journal of Ecology 90:578–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar