Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-f6s65 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-08T13:26:25.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What Does Graptolite Origination and Extinction Reveal about the Cause of the Late Ordovician Mass Extinction?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 December 2025

Charles E. Mitchell
Affiliation:
University at Buffalo
H. David Sheets
Affiliation:
Merrimack College
Michael J. Melchin
Affiliation:
St. Francis Xavier University
Chris Holmden
Affiliation:
University of Saskatchewan

Summary

Assesses the macroevolutionary turnover of paleotropical planktic graptolites during the Late Ordovician Mass Extinction (LOME) via automated sequencing and capture-mark-recapture modeling. Graptolites exhibited a succession of turnover pulses (sensu Elizabeth Vrba) that were coincident with the main phases of the Hirnantian glaciation and during which the Diplograptina experienced declining metapopulation size, elevated extinction, zero species originations, and ultimately, complete extermination. Concurrently, the Neograptina (latest Katian temperate zone immigrants) exhibit pulses of both extinction and adaptive radiation. Thus, the LOME involved intense species selection and the wholesale alteration of the clade diversity structure of a major element of the zooplankton. The LOME is unlikely to have been a direct effect of ocean anoxia or sampling bias but rather resulted from Hirnantian climate change, which altered nutrient supplies and plankton community compositions along with ecological displacement and loss of habitat that together drove the succession of turnover pulses. This title is also available as open access on Cambridge Core.

Information

Figure 0

Figure 1 Observed trajectories in graptolite species diversity and turnover in clade composition relative to lithostratigraphy and the Hirnantian carbon isotopic excursion (HICE) at five intensively studied sections from across the paleotropics (see Fig. 2 for site locations). Sections exhibit distinctly different patterns of graptolite faunal turnover relative to lithological change and the trajectory of the C-isotopic excursion, as described later in the Element. Sections shown, from left to right: Wangjiawan (25) and Honghuayuan/Nanbazi (12) in South China; Vinini Creek (24) and Dob’s Linn (6) on opposite sides of Laurentia; and Mirny Creek (19) in Kolyma. Full names of graptolite biozones (in descending order, including abbreviations): Cystograptus vesiculosus Biozone, Parakidograptus acuminatus Biozone, Akidograptus ascensus Biozone, Metabolograptus persculptus Biozone, Metabolograptus extraordinarius Biozone, Paraorthograptus pacificus Biozone, Diceratograptus mirus Subzone, Tangyagraptus typicus Subzone (ty); lower unnamed subzone of P. pacificus Biozone (lo), Dicellograptus complexus Biozone. Other abbreviations: A,B,C,D,E, Anceps Bands A–E; EB, Extraordinarius Band; KYQ, Kuanyinqiao Beds; MHIG, mid-Hirnantian interglacial episode. Placement of the MHIG is based on a combination of geochemical and faunal data; see Appendix A for additional information about the occurrence of Metabolograptus persculptus in the EB at Dob’s Linn and Appendix B for data sources.

Figure 1

Figure 2 Location map of 27 Late Ordovician to early Silurian graptolite-bearing sections studied here. Paleoplates from which data were used in the present study are labeled with the following abbreviations: Bal, Baltica; CT, Chu Ili-Tien Shan terrane; EA, East Avalon terrane; Iap, Iapetus Ocean; KO, Kolyma-Omolon terrane, Lau, Laurentia; NC, North China; SC, South China; WA, West Avalon terrane. Sites numbered as in Melchin et al. (2017); see Appendix 2 for data sources and sample-by-sample species occurrence data from these sites.

Figure 2

Figure 3 A Histogram of the number of stratigraphically informative species per sample (ordinate). Thirty-five samples contain only species that are not shared with samples from other sections (i.e., species that are unique to single localities) and thus have zero informative species. The position in the ordinal composite of such samples is constrained only by samples above or below them that do contain stratigraphically informative species. The ordinal position of 67 percent of samples is constrained by the joint occurrence in those samples of three or more species and that of slightly less than half is constrained by five or more. B, Histogram of the sighting frequency (i.e., the number of recorded occurrences) for each species through its full range within the dataset, together with tabulated median, median/myr, and maximum sighting frequencies within individual biozone intervals and the study interval as a whole; for example, Appendispinograptus supernus (which is the most widely reported species in the set) is reported in 200 samples within the full dataset and in 145 samples within the P. pacificus Biozone.Figure 3 long description.

Figure 3

Figure 4 Timescale employed for the analysis of graptolite species diversity and turnover during the late Katian and Hirnantian ages (Late Ordovician Epoch) to early Rhuddanian Age (Llandovery Epoch, Silurian Period). Geochronological ages (in Ma) and chronozone durations employed herein based on the GTS2020 timescale (Goldman et al.2020) and data from the literature (see Table 1 and text for discussion). Uncertainty error bars (±2σ) shown for the geochronological age of the beginning of the Silurian, duration of the Hirnantian (based on calculations herein), the first appearance datum (FAD) of Metabolograptus extraordinarius and the Hirnantian GSSP in the timescale, along with the location of the rising limb, peak, and falling limb of the widespread Hirnantian d13C isotopic excursion (HICE), all based on the ordinal position of global events, including the FADs and LADs of the rising and falling limbs of the HICE, in the Melchin et al. (2017; see also Appendix B) composite. Also shown is the temporal alignment of the three sets of 24 analytical bins (B1-B3) employed for the diversity analysis. All bins in B1 and B2 are 210 Kyr in duration but encompass different numbers of horizons (N from 10–52); those of B3 are variable in duration (80–420 Kyr) but each includes 24 horizons. Hirnantian bins are shaded and the beginning of the first Hirnantian-aged bin in the B1 set (B1-14) is aligned with the beginning of M. extraordinarius Chron, whereas the beginning of the first bin in B2 and B3 is aligned with the beginning of the D. complexus Chron. Based on the placement of samples marking the LAD of the rising limb and FAD of the falling limb of the HICE (see Melchin et al., 2017 for discussion of the coding of the segments of the HICE) the late HICE peak displayed at Wangjiawan (site 25) and Dob’s Linn (site 6) and shown in Fig. 1, occupies an interval from about 443.73 ± 0.19 Ma, coeval with the start of the Persculptus Chron, to about 443.62 ± 0.10 Ma at the beginning of the falling limb of the HICE in mid Persculptus Chron time. At other sites, such as Vinini Creek (site 24) and Blackstone River (site 4), the broader HICE peak commences near the beginning of the Hirnantian

(LaPorte et al., 2009; see also Fig. 1 in this Element).
Figure 4

Table 1 Biozones in the late Katian to early Rhuddanian (Rhud.) stages of the Late Ordovician and early Silurian systems and biozone durations employed for timescaling the Horizon Annealing composite. Modeled ages are based on median zone durations and the GTS2020 age estimate for the beginning of the Silurian Period.Table 1 long description.

Figure 5

Figure 5 Observed diversity dynamics of planktic graptolite species through late Katian to early Rhuddanian chronozones and relative to the span of the HICE (as in Fig. 4). A, Estimated mean standing diversity in binning schemes B1–B3 for all graptolite species present through the study interval taken together, alongside those of the three constituent subclades within the Diplograptina: the Dicranograptoidea (Dc), Diplograptoidea (Dp) and Climacograptoidea (Cl), and two subgroups within the Neograptina: stem-group Neograptina (sN) and Retiolitoidea (Re). Note that variation among results from B1–B3 is small relative to the large changes in species diversity and to the differences in those changes in diplograptine versus neograptine subclades. B, Stacked plot of the number of species extinctions within B1 bins by subclade. C, as in B but for species originations. High numbers of diplograptine species extinctions preceded the beginning of the HICE and the invasion of the paleotropics by neograptine species, which subsequently diversified while diplograptines went extinct over the course of the Hirnantian and earliest Rhuddanian. D, Time series of approximate per species sighting probabilities (proportion of observed, extant species recovered in bin) for each binning scheme; values are somewhat variable but are similar among binning schemes. Values show no long-term trend and those in the mass extinction interval (Mirus + Hirnantian bins) are not significantly different from nonextinction interval values; overall the sighting probabilities average 0.88 ± 0.22 (95 percent CI). Cl: Climacograptoidea; Dc: Dicranograptoidea; Di: Diplograptoidea; sN: stem neograptines; Re: Retiolitoidea.Figure 5 long description.

Figure 6

Figure 6 Time series of per capita and Capture-Mark-Recapture (CMR) model-based estimates of graptolite species turnover dynamics. Species of the clades Diplograptina and Neograptina analyzed separately based on the B1–B3 occurrence records for the per capita rates and the B1 and B2 records for CMR. Timing of neograptine invasion and diplograptine subclade final extinctions shown by arrows along the timeline below A (abbreviations as in Fig. 5). A, Per capita extinction rate () from B1–B3 data treatments. B, Per capita origination rate () from B1–B3 data treatments. C, CMR modeled species sighting probabilities (±95 percent bootstrapped CI); sighting rates and CI fixed for both of the highest ranked models of the Diplograptina record and variable for both Neograptina models. D, Extinction rates (±95 percent CI) derived from the highest ranked CMR models; rates time-variant for the Diplograptina in both models and only slightly variable or fixed for the Neograptina. E, Origination rates (±95 percent CI) derived from the highest ranked CMR models; rates fixed or minimally time-variant for the Diplograptina and highly variable for the Neograptina in both models. F, Number of species extinctions in the two clades inferred from the highest ranked B1 and B2 CMR models.Figure 6 long description.

Figure 7

Table 2 Capture-mark-recapture model rankings. Results shown for five combinations of bin sets (B1 and B2) and clade-based data subsets: all species, Diplograptina only and Neograptina only. GOF p: p values for goodness-of-fit between the data and model expectations. Six alternative CMR models are shown for each of these datasets, with models ranging from fully time-variable (bottom row) through five combinations of fixed versions for model parameters p, ϕ, and γ (see text for parameter descriptions), with the subscript (t) indicating parameters that are variable among temporal bins and (.) those that are fixed over all bins. Model parameters shown are AICc, delta AICc (departure of AICc value for a particular model from the lowest AICc model in each set) and relative AICc weight (wt). The preferred models (italics) are those with lowest AICc score (and thus, zero delta AICc) and the highest relative AICc wt. See the text for further explanation.Table 2 long description.

Figure 8

Table 3 Cohort survivorship tables for diplograptine and neograptine species documenting highly significant extinction selectivity between clades in the two maximally different bin sets (B1 in A,B; B3 in C,D). A, C LOME-1 extinction selectivity; starting species cohort is the set of species present in the interval just before and during the LOME-1 extinction peak in the early Hirnantian and survivors are those still extant during some part of the interval up to and including the LOME-2 extinction peak in the mid Hirnantian. B, D LOME-1+2 extinction selectivity; starting species cohort is the set of species present in the interval from just before the early Hirnantian LOME-1 extinction peak up to and including the LOME-2 extinction peak, and survivors are those still extant during some part of the postpeak interval in the late Persculptus Chron and younger. Only one of the 31 diplograptine species in these cohorts survives both episodes in contrast to 16 of 18 Neograptine species.

Figure 9

Figure 7 A, Time series of median species prevalence (the fraction of horizons within a bin that include a given species, assessed separately for each species) in the Diplograptina and the Neograptina derived from the contrasting B1 and B3 binning schemes. (B) Time series of the number of horizons per bin for B1 and B3, which have, respectively, intervals with a fixed 210 Kyr duration (B1, equally spaced midpoints) but variable sample sizes versus bins of variable duration (B3, unequally spaced midpoints) but with fixed sample size (24 horizons per interval). (C) Comparison of average species prevalence in diplograptine species during the Katian (ordinate) versus the average species prevalence of the same species during the Hirnantian; Explanation of symbols: (Δ), species with increased prevalence in the Hirnantian; (+), little change in prevalence (less than ±20 percent of Katian average); (•), decreased prevalence. (D) histogram of change in average species prevalence of diplograptine species based on values plotted in C. Values included in red bars (left of the mode) correspond to data plotted in C as (•), modal blue bar as (+) and right-most yellow bar as (Δ).Figure 7 long description.

Figure 10

Figure 8 Correspondence (least squares regression, dashed red line) between the median prevalence of diplograptine species during the Katian and the age of their last appearance datum (bin midpoint) in the B3 dataset (B1 data yield the same result). The plotted species set is the cohort of 46 diplograptine species extant early in the Typicus Subchron (bin 5 of the B3 set), when the Diplograptina reached its peak diversity. The variance explained by the regression (R2) is 0.278 and p, the probability of obtaining this relationship by chance, is 0.0002. Thirty-two species with low species prevalence in this cohort went extinct during LOME 1 (late Katian to earliest Hirnantian) but only seven such cohort members survived into LOME 2 (late Persculptus Chron) whereas all seven species in the cohort that had a species prevalence value in the upper half of the range (>0.32) survived into the later phases of LOME2. Accordingly, it appears that species’ prevalence during the Katian significantly predicts their probability of survival during the LOME.

Figure 11

Figure 9(A) species recovered in 16 bulk samples through the Vinini Creek section (mid Complexus to early Persculptus chrons) at Vinini Creek (Sheets et al.2016) versus their coeval species prevalence values in temporal bins B3–2 to B3–16.Figure 9(A) long description.

Figure 12

Figure 9(B) , as for A but for bulk samples from Blackstone River (early Pacificus to early Extraordinarius chrons). The prevalence of species is significantly correlated with contemporaneous specimen abundance at each site, suggesting that global prevalence is a function, in part, of specimen density in local populations. Also note that in samples from the Hirnantian strata at Vinini Creek, the carry-over diplograptines generally have lower specimen counts and species prevalence than the diplograptine species did at that site during the Katian and are generally lower in both specimen abundance and species prevalence than the contemporaneous neograptines from that site.Figure 9(B) long description.

Figure 13

Figure 10 Time series of the percentage of faunas within individual Late Ordovician graptolite collections that are comprised by diplograptine species and diplograptine specimens versus the biozonal assignment of those collections. Data from Vinini Creek (site 24), Blackstone River (4), Wangjiawan North (25), Fenxiang (10), Honghuayuan (12), Mirny Creek (19) and Dob’s Linn (6); binned by part of biozone: D. mirus Subzone, and lower, middle, and upper parts of the M. extraordinarius and M. persculptus biozones (see text for references). Late Katian assemblages were dominantly or entirely composed of Diplograptina but as a proportion of graptolite assemblages, the percent of recovered specimens that were diplograptine fell even more precipitously than did the proportion of diplograptine species in those assemblages (gap between average values indicated by stippled area).

Figure 14

Figure 11 Interval-by-Interval (or bin-by bin) frequency distributions of individual species prevalence values for species present in each analytical interval (bin) beginning during the Typicus Subchron of the Pacificus Chron, when graptolite species diversity reached its Katian peak (bin B3–4) through the latest Hirnantian Persculptus Chron (B3–19); intervals labeled by chron and bin number. Prevalence values for diplograptines indicated by dark (green) columns and those of neograptines by pale (yellow) columns. Scope of the LOME-1 is indicated by the flattening and leftward shift (toward lower species prevalence, i.e., toward greater rarity) of the frequency distributions, which in the B3 set is exhibited by data from B3–6, late Typicus Chron through B3–12, early in the Extraordinarius Chron. Similar changes occurred during LOME-2 mass extinction phases in the late Persculptus Chron B3–15 and B3–16 intervals. nD and nN indicate the total number of diplograptine and neograptine species in each interval, respectively; NiN: indicates the interval (B3–10 Mirus Chron) during which the Neograptina invaded the paleotropics.Figure 11 long description.

Figure 15

Figure 12 Comparison of time series of several measures of graptolite faunal turnover, including the three phases of the LOME described in the text (shaded horizontal bands), to those of estimated sea surface temperature, δ13C, and to the Brenchley et al. (2001) model of graptolite generic turnover through the LOME. (A) δ13C trajectories from Anticosti Island (narrow black curve “A”; from Mauviel & Desrochers (2016), Blackstone River (dashed curve “B”; from LaPorte et al., (2009) and Monitor Range (thick blue grey line “M”; from LaPorte et al., (2009) illustrating a range of different trajectories through the Hirnantian carbon isotopic excursion (HICE). (B) Sea surface temperature (SST) with 2σ uncertainty in SST (horizontal error bars) and estimated uncertainty in sample age (vertical error bars); SST data from Finnegan et al. (2011), but sample ages revised to reflect placement of the beginning of the Hirnantian Stage near the base of the Ellis Bay Formation at Anticosti Island (Achab et al.,2011; Achab et al.2013, Mauviel et al.,2020; Zimmt & Jin, 2023; Zimmt et al.,2024) and their correlation to samples in the Cincinnatian succession (Brett et al.,2020; Sinnesael et al.,2021). (C) Graptolite species diversity from Fig. 5. (D) Estimated mean standing diversity of graptolite genera (B1 bin set) in the Diplograptina and Neograptina. (E) Capture-Mark-Recapture estimates of species origination and extinction intensity for the Diplograptina and Neograptina, as in Fig. 6D,E. (F) The Brenchley et al. (2001) interpretation of graptolite generic diversity change through the LOME as presented in Harper (2023, Fig. 4), fit to the timing of the HICE.

Figure 16

Table 4 Model parameters demonstrating 1.5‰ origin of the Hirnantian CIE by increased carbonate weathering during the glacio-eustatically controlled sea level lowstand. Initial C-cycle parameters are those of Kump et al. (1999). All parameter changes represent steady-state conditions. Subscripts sw, riv, w-carb, and org represent seawater, rivers, carbonate weathering, and organic matter, respectively. The following simplifying assumptions apply: δ13CSW is equivalent to sedimentary δ13Ccarb; εP is the global average value of the photosynthetic fractionation factor, which is equivalent to Δ13C (= δ13Ccarb – δ13Corg); δ13Criv is the value of the continental weathering flux of carbon to the oceans, which is comprised of two sources: carbonate weathering (0‰) and kerogen weathering (–25‰), with fw-carb being the fraction of carbonate-derived carbon in riverine C-flux. The modeled scenario is for the maximum change in fw-carb based on geological maps depicting the area of exposed carbonates during the sea-level lowstand (Kump et al., 1999). A reduction in the fraction of organic carbon burial is required to keep the Hirnantian CIE from climbing above 1.5‰. Altered forcings are highlighted in underlining and responses in italics. See the text for discussion.Table 4 long description.

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

What Does Graptolite Origination and Extinction Reveal about the Cause of the Late Ordovician Mass Extinction?
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

What Does Graptolite Origination and Extinction Reveal about the Cause of the Late Ordovician Mass Extinction?
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

What Does Graptolite Origination and Extinction Reveal about the Cause of the Late Ordovician Mass Extinction?
Available formats
×