Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-zlvph Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-18T00:38:26.689Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of the ELA as a practical method of monitoring glacier response to climate in New Zealand’s Southern Alps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2017

Trevor J. Chinn
Affiliation:
20 Muir Road, Lake Hawea, RD2 Wanaka 9192, New Zealand E-mail: t.chinn@niwa.co.nz
Clive Heydenrych
Affiliation:
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd, PO Box 109695, Auckland, New Zealand
M. Jim Salinger
Affiliation:
National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd, PO Box 109695, Auckland, New Zealand
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In lieu of direct glacier surface mass-balance measurements, equilibrium-line altitudes (ELAs) have been measured over a 28 year period at 50 selected glaciers distributed along the glacierized length of New Zealand’s Southern Alps. Analysis of the data shows that ELAs are a useful measurement of glacier response to annual climate fluctuations, although there is much variability in the degree of response between glaciers in any given year. Comparisons of individual glacier annual ELA with the mean for all annual ELAs of the Southern Alps show a large variation of individual glacier response, with coefficients of variation (r 2) ranging from 0.53 to 0.90. The ELA data show detailed, but qualitative, annual mass-balance variations on both regional and individual glacier scales. The ELA record closely predicts glacier termini responses that follow after appropriate response time delays. The recorded variability in climate response for the Southern Alps suggests no single glacier is truly representative for detailed studies of glacier-climate relationships, and that a large number of ELA measurements may be as good an indicator of climate as a few mass-balance measurements. Given the appropriate mass-balance gradient, mass-balance values may be calculated for any of the monitored glaciers.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 2005
Figure 0

Fig. 1. The South Island, New Zealand, showing the distribution of the ELA index glaciers.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Ivory Glacier in April 1969, early in the period of balance measurements.

Figure 2

Table 1. Mass-balance measurement data from Ivory Glacier: AAR (accumulation-area ratio) estimated from measured accumulation area; ELA derived from AAR; Bw winter balance; Bs summer balance; Bn net (area-averaged) balance; BnG net balance gradient. Values in m w.e. (after Anderton and Chinn, 1973)

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Mass-balance gradients for Ivory Glacier.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. The upper Tasman Glacier névé and snowline, March 1996. Numbers indicate stake sites for mass-balance measurements, 1966_75.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Mass-balance gradients for Tasman Glacier.

Figure 6

Table 2. Specific (point) annual mass-balance measurement data from Tasman Glacier. Values in m w.e. (from Anderton, 1975)

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Comparison of annual mass-balance measurements between Ivory and Tasman Glaciers.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Comparison of ELAs between Ivory and Tasman Glaciers.

Figure 9

Fig. 8. The individual ELA departures of the New Zealand index glaciers for 2000 showing the ELA departure variability. Zero values are missing data.

Figure 10

Fig. 9. Mean annual ELA departures of the New Zealand index glaciers. Positive values (high snowlines) indicate negative mass balances and negative values indicate positive mass balances.

Figure 11

Table 3. Mean annual values for ELA departures from ELA0, for the New Zealand index glaciers, with annual means and standard deviations (see Fig. 13)

Figure 12

Table 4. The index glaciers arranged in descending order of values of coefficients of determination (r2) of ELA departures, where each glacier is compared with the mean of the remaining glaciers of the Alps. The table effectively presents the degree of representativity of each index glacier

Figure 13

Fig. 10. Annual ELA departures at Siege Glacier correlated with the mean for the remainder of the ‘Alps’ index glaciers.

Figure 14

Fig. 11. Annual ELA departures at Glenmary Glacier correlated with the mean for the remainder of the ‘Alps’ index glaciers.

Figure 15

Fig. 12. Correlation between the regression gradient, α, of the ELA departures of each glacier with the ‘Alps’ mean, and their respective ELA departure ranges.

Figure 16

Fig. 13. Plot of annual standard deviations of each survey against respective mean annual departures. The fitted polynomial curve demonstrates increasing variability away from zero, i.e. the ELA0.

Figure 17

Fig. 14. Correlation of ELA departures between the adjacent Vertebrae Col glaciers. Annual departures of No. 25 with annual departures of No. 12 show an r2 value of 0.906.

Figure 18

Fig. 15. Comparisons of cumulative mean negative ELA departures for the Southern Alps index glacier record with the longer ELA record of Tasman Glacier. Both are compared with the terminus fluctuations of Franz Josef Glacier and percentage of a sample of 64 advancing glaciers (from Chinn, 1999). To separate the plots, Tasman data have been adjusted by +1000, the Franz Josef Glacier data adjusted to zero at 1959, and percentage glaciers advancing adjusted to _1000 at 1976.